• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

James Bond 23 - SKYFALL (Javier Bardem CONFIRMED as Bond villain!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Solo

Member
Foliorum Viridum said:
I'm not sure how one would top Casino Royale.

Thats not what he said though. What I took from his remark is that its a great script and hes happy to be beyond the "Bond Begins" phase of CR/QoS and into a full on Bond movie with the character hes been developing over two films.
 

Cudder

Member
Goddamn, I love Bond movies. The buildup to their release is just amazing for me, all my childhood memories rush back.
 
Solo said:
Thats not what he said though. What I took from his remark is that its a great script and hes happy to be beyond the "Bond Begins" phase of CR/QoS and into a full on Bond movie with the character hes been developing over two films.
Oh yeah, I didn't mean that's what I took from the quote. I just don't know if a Bond film will ever connect with me the way CR did.

"Classic Bond" isn't an exciting prospect to me since I never really liked a Bond film (bar maybe Goldfinger and Goldeneye) before CR.

Basically, CR is maybe in my top 10 of all-time. It changed my view of the Bond franchise entirely and I want them to follow that up with something that's much better that QoS, but I don't really know how they can with the direction they've taken.
 

Solo

Member
Foliorum Viridum said:
"Classic Bond" isn't an exciting prospect to me since I never really liked a Bond film (bar maybe Goldfinger and Goldeneye) before CR.

I don't think you need to worry about Craig spouting Roger Moore-esque one-liners or driving invisible cars any time soon.

"Classic Bond" may simply mean that there is a very memorable villain or action setpiece lined up.
 
Maybe not, but QoS was definitely more style over substance that previous Bonds were compared to CR which is a pretty intense and dark focus on two characters whom fall in love.

The best scene in QoS was
Matthias dying
and the scene with Vesper's
boyfriend who is getting cosy with the other spy.
. The rest? Looked flash, didn't interest me at all.
 

Solo

Member
I think Mendes will do right by the film. I liked that Craig said Mendes had read all the books in preparation rather than watching all the movies. If he sticks closer to the books tonally then I think you'll get what you're looking for.
 
Its really just a question of whether Mendes can shoot action as I'm sure he's going to nail everything else.

After watching HANNA and seeing Wright handle action, I would love to see him take a stab at the series.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Scullibundo said:
Its really just a question of whether Mendes can shoot action as I'm sure he's going to nail everything else.
Yeah, he's pretty much done a lot of "quiet" (albeit fantastic) movies. I hope they give us an iconic car chase scene this time around, eventhough I liked the QoS intro scene, it can -- no, it should -- be topped.
 

Solo

Member
I actually liked Forster's action - the problem was in the editing moreso than the composition. That opening chase scene was stylish as fuck, but the rapid fire editing was too much. I think Mendes will do fine. If the script is good like Craig says, that will help too. Action is always bumped up several notches when you actually give a fuck about what is going on.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Solo said:
I actually liked Forster's action - the problem was in the editing moreso than the composition. That opening chase scene was stylish as fuck, but the rapid fire editing was too much. I think Mendes will do fine. If the script is good like Craig says, that will help too. Action is always bumped up several notches when you actually give a fuck about what is going on.
The thing with Casino Royale, the parkour chase scene was so damn incredible that any action scene in QoS would fall flat for me. I liked the opening car chase, but I didn't have the same excitement and memorable moment for it like I did with the final car chase in New York in Bourne Ultimatum as far as recent action thrillers go.
 

Solo

Member
Thats because Martin Cambell is, when directing actual people and stunts instead of CG, one of the best action directors around. Dude knows how to expertly stage, shoot and cut action. That construction parkour scene is a thing of beauty, the best and most memorable action sequence of the past decade. And the airport scene isn't far behind.

Forster, while having his own strengths, was not cut from that cloth.
 
What's funny about Casino Royale is that it did the big action movie no-no in peaking its action at the start of the film and winding down toward the end in terms of set-pieces. Yet every action scene was so good and our attachment to the characters at the end so concrete, that by the nailgun scene it didn't matter.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Solo said:
Thats because Martin Cambell is, when directing actual people and stunts instead of CG, one of the best action directors around. Dude knows how to expertly stage, shoot and cut action. That construction parkour scene is a thing of beauty, the best and most memorable action sequence of the past decade. And the airport scene isn't far behind.

Forster, while having his own strengths, was not cut from that cloth.
The other thing that irked me about the car chase in QoS was the fact that there wasn't one in CR, so when the beginning of QoS started off with a car chase, I set my expectations for it to be grandiose and epic. Instead, we had Bond being unable to speed away from some random Alfa Romeos in his government suped-up Aston Martin, albeit on an incredibly beautiful road. Plus, the fading quick cuts made it look like a slow-motion commercial for the first 45 seconds before it actually went into the action.

Scullibundo said:
What's funny about Casino Royale is that it did the big action movie no-no in peaking its action at the start of the film and winding down toward the end in terms of set-pieces. Yet every action scene was so good and our attachment to the characters at the end so concrete, that by the nailgun scene it didn't matter.
The Venice house scene was top-notch though, so it had another huge peak.
 

Solo

Member
What is the closest thing Mendes has done to an action sequence? I'm racking my brain, but all I am seeing is American Beauty right now, lolz. I think I've seen all his films outside of Revolutionary Road.

Interested to see how he fares. It would be really cool if the twist was that there weren't any big action setpieces and it was going to be just a very lean, suspenseful espionage thriller closer to Dr. No.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Solo said:
What is the closest thing Mendes has done to an action sequence? I'm racking my brain, but all I am seeing is American Beauty right now, lolz. I think I've seen all his films outside of Revolutionary Road.

Interested to see how he fares. It would be really cool if the twist was that there weren't any big action setpieces and it was going to be just a very lean, suspenseful espionage thriller closer to Dr. No.
I haven't seen Road to Perdition since it came out, and I cannot remember an action scene from that, either.
 
Solo said:
What is the closest thing Mendes has done to an action sequence? I'm racking my brain, but all I am seeing is American Beauty right now, lolz. I think I've seen all his films outside of Revolutionary Road.

Interested to see how he fares. It would be really cool if the twist was that there weren't any big action setpieces and it was going to be just a very lean, suspenseful espionage thriller closer to Dr. No.

EXACTLY what I was about to say.

I would welcome it whilst most audiences would fucking hate it.

Dr. No is my favourite Bond alongside CR.
 

Solo

Member
Scullibundo said:
EXACTLY what I was about to say.

I would welcome it whilst most audiences would fucking hate it.

Dr. No is my favourite Bond alongside CR.

It would be an AWESOME direction to go in, and I'm sure Craig/Mendes would love to do it, but Broccoli/Wilson will never do that. Explosions, like sex, sells.
 
Solo said:
What is the closest thing Mendes has done to an action sequence? I'm racking my brain, but all I am seeing is American Beauty right now, lolz.

aph_0.jpg


But, not really.
 
Mendes' style lends itself closely to Casino Royale for action scenes.

Anyone who has seen Road to Perdition has seen bits of this; he goes more for characters being exposed to extreme, high tension situations rather than all out gunfests.

He's also a very artistic director. The gunplay in Road to Perdition is mostly concealed but plays out in highly stylised shots.

Plus he's worked with Craig before and that's a good thing.
 
I just really wish they would axe the whole practice of only sticking with native directors.

When Craig was cast after working with Spielberg on the best spy thriller of the decade, there was nothing I wanted more than for them to reunite on Stevie's much dreamed about debut to Bond.
 

Solo

Member
I can't wait to hear the rest of the casting. I mean, if John Logan's script is as good as Craig is hinting, with Mendes directing and ROGER "GOD" DEAKINS shooting it, and we can get a stellar cast around Craig/Dench...fuuuuuuu
 
Solo said:
If nothing else, its already guaranteed to be the best looking Bond film ever.

From a cinematography standpoint, absolutely.

The acting and dramatic scenes will also be of the highest calibre.

My worry; like many others, is that the action scenes will be really boring. Or highly stylized but still, boring.
 

Solo

Member
Yeah, we've basically got another Marc Forster-esque wildcard in Mendes. The obvious benefit Mendes has is that hes coming after QoS and can learn from mistakes Forster made.

EDIT: South Africa and India are confirmed. Great Wall of China rumored. The Bahamas are ALWAYS tought to top.
 
Solo said:
Interested to see how he fares. It would be really cool if the twist was that there weren't any big action setpieces and it was going to be just a very lean, suspenseful espionage thriller closer to Dr. No.
Yes please! I was hopeful this was the direction they were heading in after Casino Royale and why i felt QoS was disappointing and a giant step back in some areas.

I'm with Sculli in wanting Joe Wright to take a jab at Bond 24. I just got back from Hanna and thought he did a fantastic job with the action sequences.
 

overcast

Member
Shit, I am hyped for this. I loved Casino Royale, still haven't gotten around to Quantum. Probably because of the ho-hum reception.

We should be expecting a teaser around December, am I correct? (Yes that was purely a guess).
 

Peru

Member
I don't want another QoS, but I LOVED QoS - I loved it following CR because after the tense relationship climax of CR we got a hardened Bond zipping around the world doing shit, chop-chop pace, no looking back. I'd like it if the series waxes and wanes between style-as-substance movies like that, when they're as elegant as QoS was, and more suspenseful espionage. Of course we've waited way too long for a new movie, but if they come out regularly I don't mind varying things up.

overcast said:
Shit, I am hyped for this. I loved Casino Royale, still haven't gotten around to Quantum. Probably because of the ho-hum reception.


Get to it.
 

dmshaposv

Member
Cold-Steel said:
Mendes' style lends itself closely to Casino Royale for action scenes.

Anyone who has seen Road to Perdition has seen bits of this; he goes more for characters being exposed to extreme, high tension situations rather than all out gunfests.

He's also a very artistic director. The gunplay in Road to Perdition is mostly concealed but plays out in highly stylised shots.

Plus he's worked with Craig before and that's a good thing.

R.I.P. Conrad Hall. Road to Perdition is the second most beautiful looking film last decade, after Assassination of Jesse James.
 

Solo

Member
dmshaposv said:
R.I.P. Conrad Hall. Road to Perdition is the second most beautiful looking film last decade, after Assassination of Jesse James.

Thankfully, we've moved from the dearly departed #2 DP to the #1 based on your own words ;)
 

Solo

Member
After 28 years since "Octopussy", 007 will be heading back to India if pre-production plans for the 23rd James Bond film go through. Although it was rumoured a few of months ago that the next film would shoot in India, Daniel Craig himself has confirmed plans in several interviews this week.

To promote his latest film, "Cowboys & Aliens", Craig spoke to The Telegraph (of India) and also answered some Bond 23 questions about whether the production would shoot in the country. "We are working on the schedule for India and yes, it’s always exciting to play James Bond and this time is no different," Craig confirmed. In another interview covered by NDTV and Mid-Day, Craig was also asked if some scenes from Bond 23 were to be shot in India: "Yes, that's true and I am absolutely thrilled about it."

In a longer interview with The Times of India newspaper, Craig was asked whether he was already gearing up for his third outing as 007 even though shooting was a few months away. "The next Bond will start in October or November. I've kind of already started preparing for Bond. The script is in really, really good shape and I'm sure there will still be changes because that's just the way it is. But if we shot the script we have at the moment, we'd be in a good way." But when pressed about specifics on Indian locations, Craig was cagey: "Too early to talk about it..."

MI6 understands that core members of the production team are planning to be in India from January 2012 for three months. Shooting with principal cast members in the country is expected to last around three weeks. Locations under consideration are the Konkan Railway, the Red Fort, and Mumbai city streets doubled at the sprawling Big ND Studio located in Karjay, near Mumbai.

http://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond_23_report_jul11c.php3?s=bond23&id=02914

3 months? Sounds like the majority of the film will be set in India.
 
I still don't completely understand why they won't let Spielberg do a Bond movie. THE MAN IS A LEGEND AND HE WANTS TO DO YOUR FILM, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
 

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
NotTheGuyYouKill said:
I still don't completely understand why they won't let Spielberg do a Bond movie. THE MAN IS A LEGEND AND HE WANTS TO DO YOUR FILM, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

I was just about to say how much I wouldn't want Spielberg to do a Bond film, then I remembered how fantastic Munich was. And that almost seemed like a side project for him.
 

legacyzero

Banned
Am I alone on this one?

I absolutely HATED Casino and Quantum (thought Casino was the most interesting of the two).

I just miss the ridiculous villains, end of the world type death rays, (and Pierce Brosnan.)

Is is just me, or is the new Bond flicks..............slow..
 

WrikaWrek

Banned
I'm starting to have some faith. Casino Royale was the shit, and Quantum of Solace has been winning me over as time passes, as an action movie at least. But I feel that Bond should go back to being more Bond and less Bourne.

Just make it a bit more spectacular, with a bit less Bourne in it.
 

legacyzero

Banned
NotTheGuyYouKill said:
I still don't completely understand why they won't let Spielberg do a Bond movie. THE MAN IS A LEGEND AND HE WANTS TO DO YOUR FILM, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Just visualizing a Bond film by Spielberg in my minds eye makes me all kinds of warm and fuzzy inside. That would be awesome.

Although I just dont think Daniel Craig would work as Bond under Spielberg's direction.
 
legacyzero said:
Am I alone on this one?

I absolutely HATED Casino and Quantum (thought Casino was the most interesting of the two).

I just miss the ridiculous villains, end of the world type death rays, (and Pierce Brosnan.)

Is is just me, or is the new Bond flicks..............slow..

Well, if nothing else, I hope you're alone on this.

I mean, I loved Brosnan as a visual for Bond, and I still love Goldeneye, but some of the later ones were especially bad. And I don't think every villain has to be over-the-top ridiculous to be memorable.

And I absolutely cannot follow how you could have hated Casino Royale. Especially caps-lock HATED. Just unfathomable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom