• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF
  • Like

Rösti
Member
(02-27-2016, 04:59 PM)
Rösti's Avatar


On January 30, 2016, I reported about Ubisoft opposing registration of EA's trademarks for the Ghost studio. New documents dated February 24, 2016, show that Electronic Arts has abandoned at least one of these trademarks. The below is for US Ser. No. 86/568,854, Ghost, under goods and services "Computer game software". The other trademark, US Ser. No. 86/568,852, Ghost, under goods and services "Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game", appears to still be in force, but ought to likely be withdrawn soon as well.



¨



Source: http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?p...&pty=OPP&eno=4

Ghost Games is the EA studio known for Need for Speed Rivals (2013) and Need for Speed (2015). They are currently working on the next Need for Speed game.

Whether the name of the studio will be affected by this development is unknown.
ironcreed
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:02 PM)
ironcreed's Avatar
How fucking stupid. I mean, Ghost is a word. Ubisoft does not own it.
Scum
Junior Member
(02-27-2016, 05:03 PM)
Scum's Avatar
U wot m8?
RoboPlato
I'd be in the dick
(02-27-2016, 05:03 PM)
RoboPlato's Avatar
This is so fucking stupid.
BY2K
Membero Americo
(02-27-2016, 05:03 PM)
BY2K's Avatar
Whaat? C'mon, they could have fought this!
Glass Rebel
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:07 PM)
Glass Rebel's Avatar
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this a good thing? Wasn't EA actually in the wrong here? They tried to register the very non-specific trademark "Ghost", which would have granted them the rights to control who gets to use it for game-related products, and Ubisoft said "nah"?
Setsuna
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:09 PM)

Originally Posted by Glass Rebel

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this a good thing? Wasn't EA actually in the wrong here? They tried to register the very non-specific trademark "Ghost", which would have granted them the rights to control who gets to use it for game-related products, and Ubisoft said "nah"?

You are no't wrong
TheSeks
Blinded by the luminous glory that is David Bowie's physical manifestation.
(02-27-2016, 05:10 PM)
TheSeks's Avatar

Originally Posted by ironcreed

How fucking stupid. I mean, Ghost is a word. Ubisoft does not own it.

Ubisoft does own "Ghost Recon" and the spec op team there is labeled "Ghosts."

There's also Call of Duty that uses "Ghost" as a character for a spec. op. soldier under Activision. The claim (IIRC) was that EA using it as a team/developer name would confuse people.

But that's the nature of trademark lawsuits and the like. They try to protect words and things for the sake of "not confusing people" despite most of the mass-market not really caring about that stuff.
EvB
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:10 PM)
EvB's Avatar

Originally Posted by ironcreed

How fucking stupid. I mean, Ghost is a word. Ubisoft does not own it.

You've got it wrong. Maybe try reading it before calling it "fucking stupid"

EA was trying to claim it as a trademark so only they could use it
Ubisoft said nobody can own it in the world of videogames, don't you dare trademark it

I know this is a confusing situation, who should we hate more, EA or Ubisoft? Ubisoft are the current most hated on GAF, but you should probably cool your jets and watch your language.
Last edited by EvB; 02-27-2016 at 05:13 PM.
Noobcraft
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:11 PM)
Maybe they can change it to Phantom. I'm sure Konami won't care.
Mikasangelos
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:13 PM)
Mikasangelos's Avatar
Wow
Leafhopper
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:14 PM)
Leafhopper's Avatar
EA could have won this BS.

Well maybe not won but at least give a good argument. Then again the way they were going about it was a bit dumb so EA was wrong here.
shinobi602
Daddy Goggles Group™
Member in good standing
(02-27-2016, 05:15 PM)
shinobi602's Avatar
Ahahaha hahahaha
Kyoufu
(02-27-2016, 05:19 PM)
Kyoufu's Avatar

Originally Posted by Glass Rebel

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this a good thing? Wasn't EA actually in the wrong here? They tried to register the very non-specific trademark "Ghost", which would have granted them the rights to control who gets to use it for game-related products, and Ubisoft said "nah"?

It's good in the sense that EA doesn't get to trademark a common word like Ghost, but if a studio can't name themselves that then it wouldn't be a good thing. The question is if this affects the studio's name at all.
RK9039
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:19 PM)
RK9039's Avatar
They shouldn't have Reacted in that way.
ZealousD
Makes world leading predictions like "The sun will rise tomorrow"
(02-27-2016, 05:19 PM)
ZealousD's Avatar

Originally Posted by ironcreed

How fucking stupid. I mean, Ghost is a word. Ubisoft does not own it.

You realize you're arguing in favor of EA, who were making a claim to the word themselves, as if they should own it?
GeeTeeCee
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:19 PM)
GeeTeeCee's Avatar
Ubisoft ain't afraid of no Ghost (trademark battle).
TGO
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:21 PM)
TGO's Avatar
Call of Duty Ghosts next?
rockman zx
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:22 PM)
rockman zx's Avatar
all your ghost are belong to us.
Setsuna
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:22 PM)

Originally Posted by ironcreed

How fucking stupid. I mean, Ghost is a word. Ubisoft does not own it.

"Ubisoft" is also a word. Does that mean someone can trademark a game titled "Ubisoft"? Afterall its just a word
Last edited by Setsuna; 02-27-2016 at 05:32 PM.
Succinct Verbosity
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:23 PM)
Succinct Verbosity's Avatar
Going to war with patent trolls is one thing, but going to court against another massive company with a team of lawyers was probably more effort than it was worth.
SirMossyBloke
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:23 PM)
SirMossyBloke's Avatar

Originally Posted by TheSeks

Ubisoft does own "Ghost Recon" and the spec op team there is labeled "Ghosts."

There's also Call of Duty that uses "Ghost" as a character for a spec. op. soldier under Activision. The claim (IIRC) was that EA using it as a team/developer name would confuse people.

But that's the nature of trademark lawsuits and the like. They try to protect words and things for the sake of "not confusing people" despite most of the mass-market not really caring about that stuff.

Thank you for some common sense in here.

The people getting angry or saying this is stupid are the very same people who have no idea how trademarks work.
Kyoufu
(02-27-2016, 05:24 PM)
Kyoufu's Avatar

Originally Posted by TGO

Call of Duty Ghosts next?

I don't think Activision trademarked "Ghosts" by itself but with the CoD name attached before it instead.
chrominance
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:25 PM)
chrominance's Avatar
I'm sure the thinking here was that it would be more expedient to just change Ghost Games' name, given that they're just a studio and not, say, a franchise with a fanbase, brand recognition, and tons of marketing.

The last time EA had to deal with a trademark that WAS attached to a franchise with a fanbase, brand recognition, and tons of marketing, shit went real bad for the other guy.
Auctopus
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:26 PM)
Auctopus's Avatar
Rename the studio Blackbox and get working on Skate 4.
#sorrynotsorry
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:30 PM)
#sorrynotsorry's Avatar
I think most of the people in this thread are confused about how trademarks work.

This won't affect the name of the studio. There was no conflicting mark here. It just means there's no trademark. Everyone can use Ghost in their name, not no one.
Mentok
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:30 PM)
Mentok's Avatar
People are in favor of EA trademarking a word? Wow, the Ubihate is real.

EDIT:

Originally Posted by #sorrynotsorry

I think most of the people in this thread are confused about how trademarks work.

This won't affect the name of the studio. There was no conflicting mark here. It just means there's no trademark. Everyone can use Ghost in their name, not no one.

Thank you!
pizzacat
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:32 PM)
pizzacat's Avatar
Ubisoft is going to get their shit pushed when they try to do anything with COD Ghosts 2

#skate4
King_Moc
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:34 PM)
King_Moc's Avatar

Originally Posted by #sorrynotsorry

I think most of the people in this thread are confused about how trademarks work.

This won't affect the name of the studio. There was no conflicting mark here. It just means there's no trademark. Everyone can use Ghost in their name, not no one.

Also, I think Ubisoft are pretty much obligated to defend their trademark if they own one for anything with 'ghost' in the name, aren't they?
4Tran
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:36 PM)
EA was in the wrong here, and Ubisoft was right to fight an attempt to trademark an overly generic word. Nobody would have cared if EA had tried to trademark something like "Ghost Games" instead, but they were going for just "Ghost".
SirMossyBloke
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:40 PM)
SirMossyBloke's Avatar

Originally Posted by King_Moc

Also, I think Ubisoft are pretty much obligated to defend their trademark if they own one for anything with 'ghost' in the name, aren't they?

Basically yes.

When EA sends off the application to trademark the USPTO responds by giving them a list of similar names that are already trademarked, the obvious being Ubisofts. Ubisoft are then told about this conflicting application.

EA would then have to file a claim against Ubisofts trademark saying they have more right to it. The usual case is claiming "first use" which means EA would be stating they used the word first in reference to videogames.

Chances are Ubisoft used it first so EA have no basis for a claim, so they dropped it.

The lawyers at EA should have done better research in the beginning before filing a trademark application. Probably why it was dropped so fast.
chrominance
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:44 PM)
chrominance's Avatar

Originally Posted by #sorrynotsorry

I think most of the people in this thread are confused about how trademarks work.

This won't affect the name of the studio. There was no conflicting mark here. It just means there's no trademark. Everyone can use Ghost in their name, not no one.

Okay, so if I understand correctly:

1) Long ago, Ubisoft filed for trademarks on "Ghost Recon" as it pertains to video game-like endeavors and was granted those trademarks;
2) Recently, EA filed for a trademark on the word "Ghost" as it pertains to video game-like endeavors;
3) Ubisoft argued the Ghost trademark is too close to the Ghost Recon trademark and would cause confusion;
4) EA agreed, withdrew their application for "Ghost";
5) end result: "Ghost Recon" is still trademarked, "Ghost" is not, meaning anyone is free to use the word "Ghost" in game-related stuff so long as it's not trademarked, but hands off "Ghost Recon" yo.

?
Xone9
Banned
(02-27-2016, 05:46 PM)
the real ghost...

BouncyFrag
Member
(02-27-2016, 05:51 PM)
BouncyFrag's Avatar
At least Naughty Dog wasn't involved, lol.
Frumix
Suffering From Success
(02-27-2016, 10:49 PM)
Frumix's Avatar
Pokemon to abandon ghost type.

Thread Tools