|
(08-13-2007, 06:39 AM)
|
#4
You will not find the unanimity you seek.
|
|
this tag has been removed due to terms of use violation
(08-13-2007, 06:41 AM)
|
#9
I'm playing it right now, for the first time, and it's somewhat disappointing. Even though it's called "new" it sure doesn't feel like it. Canvas Curse shits all over it for sure. The only thing that saves it from failure is that the games it emulates were so great.
|
|
(08-13-2007, 06:43 AM)
|
#10
I think it's a case of 'WE WANT MORE 2D PLATFORMERS'
|
|
(08-13-2007, 06:44 AM)
|
#11
Yeah I love this game but I will confess it is largely because they just don't make 'em like this anymore.
Honestly though, it's a great portable game. Very easy to pick up, play, put down again. |
|
the piano man
(08-13-2007, 06:44 AM)
|
#12
in their pursue of innovation and new IPs, nintendo sometimes forget what people already want and they prefer to try to guess what new stuff will people like next.
New SMB is what people had been asking for in AGES: a 2d decent, new, from the ground-up Mario adventure. in fact, it's not just nintendo that fails at knowing what people want: where is our traditional Megaman? where is our castlevania III: Dracula's curse styled castlevania? where the fuck is our next gen punch-out? soooo much wasted oppotunities, it's not even funny. |
|
Banned
(08-13-2007, 06:46 AM)
|
#14
It was great. Only problems I had with it:
-Hey, let's give out 90 bajillion 1ups -The music, while excellent in some levels, is lacking in both quantity and quality at some points -Very easy bosses, but now that I think about it, all Mario games have easy bosses I totally would want a NSMB2. |
|
Member
(08-13-2007, 06:47 AM)
|
#16
Originally Posted by akachan ningen:
|
|
Banned
(08-13-2007, 06:48 AM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by akachan ningen:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2007, 07:01 AM)
|
#19
I bought it, played it, beat it and haven't really touched it since. It was enjoyable but certainly not groundbreakingly so. If instead of NSMB it were Jumping Jack's Adventure or some shit like that it'd sell a fraction of the copies it has. It's banking entirely on Mario nostalgia.
|
|
Banned
(08-13-2007, 07:33 AM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by BrandNew:
I think the game was too barebones, and some stuff in the game was a little annoying. The overworld looked like a Mario Party game, the touch screen was useless, the powerups completely useless, the levels not as good as the classics. Compare this to the other Game Boy Super Mario Land's - and you have a better comparison of what the game was - it was better than both of those, and as basic. The next game needs to bring back meaningful powerups - they could be new or old, just bring them back - and the level design needs a lot of work. |
|
Self-Confessed Team Killer Scumbag, Want my Gamertag?
(08-13-2007, 07:37 AM)
|
#26
I'm still waiting for a price drop on NSMB.
I'm still waiting for a price drop on Mario 64 DS |
|
.....wat!?
(08-13-2007, 07:43 AM)
|
#29
NSMB is awesome.
Don't care what anyone says, it's a brilliant game which was refreshing and innovative. God knows a good 2D mario platformer hadn't been released since super mario world. Yes it was incredibly easy to beat, then again, both super mario lands on the gameboy were easy. And just beating it isn't all. Getting the coins on all levels gives it replay value. I think it's a brilliant game, great new power-ups, a good diversity in the worlds, and I like the mario vs luigi multiplayer too. my vote: Instant classic. |
|
and have the worst user name EVER
(08-13-2007, 08:14 AM)
|
#33
Originally Posted by Hollywood_mIRC:
I think New Super Mario Bros. was just the result of Nintendo keeping a new traditional Mario game from us for ten years. Not that NSMB wasn't a good game; it definitely was; but it would never have made the splash it did if traditional Mario games had been the status quo over the past while. |
|
(08-13-2007, 08:33 AM)
|
#37
I loved it. The most fun I had with a game since Sunshine.
|
|
Member
(08-13-2007, 08:34 AM)
|
#39
More like "Hmm, 40 million Super Mario Bros sold, 33 million Super Mario Bros 3 sold...HAY THOSE WERE PRETTY GOOD IDEAS, I BET WE COULD DO IT AGAIN"
And they did. Not that it's a bad game, but it's Mario Bros. It had been 15 years since a real, 2d Mario platformer. It(the sales) were bound to happen no matter when it would've been released. |
|
Member
(08-13-2007, 08:40 AM)
|
#40
When I first played NSMB, it is the 3d graphics mario game I always wanted to play.
NSMB is what Mario 64 should of been, and yes I played about a few hours of Mario64 in 2002. Sorry I prefer fast 2d platforming over multi-hour 3d fetch quests. Now, what about a SMB for the Wii? |
|
A little fluff between the ears never did any harm...
(08-13-2007, 08:41 AM)
|
#41
I think the problem with NSMB is that it was trying too hard to emulate both 1 and 3, which are too different of platformers to mix.
If Super Mario Brothers came with a save system it wouldn't be nearly as fun. But for the most part, I agree with Son of Godzilla. |
|
Perfectly able to grasp the inherent value of the fishing game.
(08-13-2007, 08:50 AM)
|
#43
Originally Posted by Iam Canadian:
Anyway, I really, really need to pick me up a copy of NSMB, I honestly haven't had time to play it (Or much on my DS) So I may wait until Christmas to get it for myself :) |
|
Cranky. Very cranky.
Rather sarcastic to boot. (08-13-2007, 08:57 AM)
|
#46
I liked it. I was a bit surprised that I liked it. I wouldn't call it "surprisingly good." The surprise for me was that I had pretty much written it off after I'd beaten it once. Then, for some reason, I tried going after all the coins, which required some platforming skill, and the game jumped from "meh" to "awesome."
|