bringer posted:
How about Mithra-cists? It's hard to argue that Jesus existed, or didn't. There's not a lot of actual evidence either way and the Jesus mythos borrow heavily from Mithra, who had a several hundred year head start. It makes sense that a new religion would have a leader but that leads to my next question:
Yes, but this just really isn't true. There just simply isn't any evidence for most of the parallels that have been drawn between Mithras and Jesus - for instance the idea that Mithras had 12 disciples or was born of a virgin. Besides, why would the inheritors of Jewish and / or Hellensitic philosophy (which all the early Christians were) look to an esoteric Persian mystery cult to furnish their mythology? If you want to trace the foundations of Christian belief then there are extremely obvious antecedents in the Jewish and Hellenistic philosophies, that have long been known to scholars and which provide good explanations for the nature and trajectory of Christian theology. These Mithras / Horus connections make absolutely no sense in the social context from which Christianity emerged.