• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Winter-Spring 2014 Anime |OT3| People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
I personally think that if a twist ruins a text entirely, then the text itself has no value. By definition, it can only be enjoyed once and never again.
Of course, I come from an English Lit background where the whole idea of spoilers is anathema to the idea of criticism. It's why I find movie/game reviews to be so milquetoast in their generalized and broad criticism that refuses to acknowledge the text in any meaningful way. When you can't even talk about the plot, then all you have is "graphics" and "good acting".

...

But yeah, you basically watch the new shows because they're on and then just have to be lucky. It's funny, because some TV critics have lamented the rise of streaming and the death of rerun culture. There's going to be a generation of kids who will never watch MASH or Roseanne or Cheers or any of the iconic American sitcoms because they aren't "forced" to do so by the nature of reruns being on at 4pm. And we value television the least, of all the art forms available, that there really isn't any real gatekeeper to teach people "canon" television. Anime included.
Hmm, that's a good point. I always considered that the main effect of DVRs and streaming is that broadcasts are no longer considered social events but personal experiences, but it also has the effect of reinforcing the idea that everything must be novel. When people lose an appreciation for the merits of revisiting works, then they start to believe that loss of novelty means loss of value.
 

duckroll

Member
Now we can argue the merit of a work of art and I would be absolutely fine with that. For example, you just made the argument for why you prefer Ping Pong's art style. My argument is a little more simple than yours and probably isn't as elegant an argument as you put forth. I am going to try however. It's the fact that I find art styles born from rotoscoping very muddled and messy. Yes we get cool animation and color contrast as a trade off but it isn't a trade off I personally like. I like sharp edges. I like defined lines. I even like the "shiny" look to certain characters in other anime. Now obviously we have to argue if the particular art style helps or hurts the anime itself and if it serves the story and characters better than another art style would have. I don't know. We will have to see more.

For example, I think the type of art style employed in The Tatami Galaxy was for it's benefit as it fit that world and character. Despite the fact that I didn't like the art in of itself. Context is everything. And that's the thing, it has to contextually make sense. I couldn't imagine Chihiyafuru being a rotoscoped anime. Neither Clannad nor FMA. But then again those anime have their unique styles to distinguish themselves. Then again, I couldn't imagine Ping Pong or Flowers of Evil in FMA or Chihiyafuru's art style.

I think there's a colossal misunderstanding about Yuasa's art style if people keep mentioning rotoscoping. Is there rotoscoping used in Ping Pong? Almost certainly, but not in a large degree at all. The ending animation certainly looks rotoscoped, simply because that sort of movement and precision in terms of how things move with relation to the camera looks like it was traced over reference footage. But that has nothing to do with the art style at all. The way characters and the environment look in Ping Pong is entirely down to Yuasa's artistic preference. Kemonozume and Kick-Heart look like this too, and they had no rotoscoping at all. There is rotoscoping used in Nodame, Kids on the Slope, Evangelion 3.0, etc and they look look completely different from each other. Aku no Hana is 100% rotoscoped, and it doesn't look like Ping Pong or any of the other shows I just mentioned either. Rotoscoping is an animation technique, and has little to do with how the art ends up looking.

This doesn't change your point about your preference for things looking clean and defined though, which is fine. The abstract look is not for everyone, even though it has it's merits in terms of application. It's important to clarify that the artistic direction has nothing to do with rotoscoping though, and to emphasis that Ping Pong is mostly -not- rotoscoped, but hand animated. Claiming that the art looks like it does because of rotoscoping would simply be incorrect.
 
I thought the attack on ln adaptations seemed to approach and breach boundaries of civility and disrespected people that enjoyed seeing and watching these anime and/or their anticipation for seeing something they read and enjoyed beforehand adapted.

Admittedly some people did reach the "sorry to say your taste is crap" level. But even if so you should be the bigger person and just continue to enjoy it. Don't stoop to their level.
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
I agree in principle that knowing what will happen shouldn't ruin any good text, because the focus is on why and how it happens, and how well the story is told. Of course, it's still nice and preferable to enjoy all the twists and surprises on your first encounter with the text, and then afterwards dissect everything else about it.

Being unspoiled allows you to appreciate it that one time, and then also appreciate it from a new angle as you revisit the text and see how everything was set up and foreshadowed. I don't really think spoilers increase enjoyment, and I prefer to be unspoiled on everything, but you can still have an enjoyable experience even if you are spoiled.
I will say, I don't purposefully go around spoiling shit just to be an asshole, because I know there are people who want to have virgin experiences with their texts, but there are times when I consider something trivial but someone else considers a massive spoiler and I don't really know what to do in that case.

Personally, I go out of my way to spoiler punchlines to jokes, but it makes it almost impossible to talk about comedies and why you think a show is necessarily funny because at that point, all you can really say is that "it made me laugh" and leave it at that.

I'm in a phase where I pretty much go full spoiler on everything if I can. It's why I like listening to slashfilmcast, because they are one of the only movie review podcasts who understand that the only way to have a genuine discussion about a film is to actually talk about what happens in the film. It helps me make a more informed opinion on whether or not I want to watch a film anyway.

Hmm, that's a good point. I always considered that the main effect of DVRs and streaming is that broadcasts are no longer considered social events but personal experiences, but it also has the effect of reinforcing the idea that everything must be novel. When people lose an appreciation for the merits of revisiting works, then they start to believe that loss of novelty means loss of value.
Well, people are - to use the "E" word - extremely entitled with spoilers now. Because people have been weaned on texts that depend entirely on twists for their excitement. So the whole "Red Wedding" thing was a massive event that people complained about because twitter was reacting en masse to the episode and if you didn't watch it at the same time you were "spoiled".

But yeah, if the whole point of the "Red Wedding" was how shocking it is, then does that episode matter if you go back to it the second time? Presumably so, if you believe that Game of Thrones is a good show, but when you hear people complain about it being ruined because they got spoiled, it makes you wonder sometimes.
 
Dragonar 1:
The concept of the two(?) types of dragon creatures remind me of How to Train your Dragon and this old cartoon Dragon Booster, which sounds interesting enough to me.

Other than that, not much stands out in terms of the characters. I'll give it another chance next episode and see what happens.

No Game No Life 1
This one I like and hope to stick with this season. I mean, two shut-in gamer siblings thrown into a world where virtually everything is decided on games? Something they enjoy or do the most? And not because they're destined heroes...
yet(?)
? Sign me up!

Marvel Disk Wars 1
I'm not sure if I want to drop this just yet. The DISK idea sounds interesting, but I can otherwise see why many/all here recommend otherwise, mainly because of the animation. I'll see where this goes in episode 2.

Nanana 1
Adventure meets potential murder mystery. Sounds sweet as
pudding
. I'm just hoping there isn't too much drama.
 

Jex

Member

This is kind a kind of garbage, "look at all the anime I've watched" post, but it's pretty sweet that that the Captain Earth OP has got a bit of Cobra to it:

ceop31wsmi.jpg
ceop40ishs.jpg


cobraop149sku.jpg
cobraop2q6swb.jpg

I'm sorry /old man
 

Gbraga

Member
Are there other interesting shows that deal with amnesia in the same way Golden Time did (or maybe different, but also serious)? To me, the best thing about the show was definitely that dynamic, usually when a main character has amnesia, it just serves as a plot point later on, but I honestly loved the way they handled it there. I guess it just felt human. Of all the ridiculous melodrama that Banri had over anything, this one was definitely deserved, his struggles with his past life, being scared about it and even
being afraid of and later coming to terms with the fact that the person he calls "me" may suddenly disappear, after all, he's basically another person using someone else's body, and the original owner may wake up at any time.

It was also probably the reason I disliked the ending, after such incredibly moving episodes like 22 and 23, having LOVE CONQUERS ALL with Ghost Banri even getting his ring out of the water (?????????) was kinda stupid. He could have achieved the same result but with a bittersweet ending instead of just saying "you know all those inner conflicts? fuck that, we're happy now. OG Banri can fuck off"
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
Are there other interesting shows that deal with amnesia in the same way Golden Time did (or maybe different, but also serious)? To me, the best thing about the show was definitely that dynamic, usually when a main character has amnesia, it just serves as a plot point later on, but I honestly loved the way they handled it there. I guess it just felt human. Of all the ridiculous melodrama that Banri had over anything, this one was definitely deserved, his struggles with his past life, being scared about it and even
being afraid of and later coming to terms with the fact that the person he calls "me" may suddenly disappear, after all, he's basically another person using someone else's body, and the original owner may wake up at any time.

It was also probably the reason I disliked the ending, after such incredibly moving episodes like 22 and 23, having LOVE CONQUERS ALL with Ghost Banri even getting his ring out of the water (?????????) was kinda stupid. He could have achieved the same result but with a bittersweet ending instead of just saying "you know all those inner conflicts? fuck that, we're happy now. OG Banri can fuck off"

Just watch One Week Friends. Conveniently airing this season.
 

BluWacky

Member
This is kind a kind of garbage, "look at all the anime I've watched" post, but it's pretty sweet that that the Captain Earth OP has got a bit of Cobra to it:

That is seriously impressive, even if it is a "LOOK AT ME!!!! I'VE SEEN SOME STUFF IN MY TIME!!!!" type post :p

I have to admit I was wondering what that scene was doing in there. The gun thing is the ignition for the mechs - why is it also a shooty-shooty-bang-bang type of gun in the OP? Because Cobra references, that's why!
 

jgminto

Member
Mushishi Zoku Shou 2

I think that might have been one of my favourite episodes yet. I thought it was really interesting that while the mushi were there, they weren't really a major part of the story this episode. It was all about the village and the relationships of the people. And all of the mushi taking off at the end of the episode was one of the most beautiful moments in the entire show.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Well, people are - to use the "E" word - extremely entitled with spoilers now. Because people have been weaned on texts that depend entirely on twists for their excitement. So the whole "Red Wedding" thing was a massive event that people complained about because twitter was reacting en masse to the episode and if you didn't watch it at the same time you were "spoiled".

But yeah, if the whole point of the "Red Wedding" was how shocking it is, then does that episode matter if you go back to it the second time? Presumably so, if you believe that Game of Thrones is a good show, but when you hear people complain about it being ruined because they got spoiled, it makes you wonder sometimes.
Many stories have been told in retrospect, providing a general understanding of what occurred at the start, but then going into details for the bulk of the work. Romeo and Juliet is an easy example, and Titanic is another. Some stories even work better this way, as it provides meaning and direction to scenes that would initially appear benign or aimless. I argue as much for School Days, as for many the value is simply the shock at the end, but for me it's the reinforcement of dread as it progresses and that only works when you know how it ends. (To be clear, I've never said School Days was particularly good, just better than a cheap trick.)
 

Midonin

Member
On a day when all my new shows are streamed by Funi, Funi's site goes down the exact hour the new episodes are supposed to go live. Yeesh.

Riddle Story of Devil 02

Now that the rules of the game are established and some of Haru's backstory is out in the open, I'm interested. Tokaku's determination in tearing up all the notices was a good show of "screw your rules", but there's so many characters in the assassination game that I hope I'm able to keep everybody memorized. I'd much rather use character names than descriptors, and so far Nio and Isuke are the only two who I can remember. The various ending themes are good, a nice showing from Kanemoto.

Date a Live II 01

Of the two shows this season that have Mayayan in them, she doesn't appear in either of their first episodes. That's not quite what I was looking for. A decent reintroduction to things. The parallel between Tohka's soap opera and her misunderstanding of things was amusing, but if there's one moment that sticks out the most, it's the moment with Origami and Shido in the girls' bathroom. Getting a little bold there, Origami. I can appreciate bold. The key point of all this is that the twins debut next week, and my favorite Maaya with them.
 
I will say, I don't purposefully go around spoiling shit just to be an asshole, because I know there are people who want to have virgin experiences with their texts, but there are times when I consider something trivial but someone else considers a massive spoiler and I don't really know what to do in that case.

Personally, I go out of my way to spoiler punchlines to jokes, but it makes it almost impossible to talk about comedies and why you think a show is necessarily funny because at that point, all you can really say is that "it made me laugh" and leave it at that.

I'm in a phase where I pretty much go full spoiler on everything if I can. It's why I like listening to slashfilmcast, because they are one of the only movie review podcasts who understand that the only way to have a genuine discussion about a film is to actually talk about what happens in the film. It helps me make a more informed opinion on whether or not I want to watch a film anyway.

Yeah, there is something of a difficult line that varies from person to person. For my own personal take, I generally consider 'spoilers' to be something really major, such as the death of a character or a similarly major event. I'm not generally too bothered about lesser events, and I don't really bother to spoiler tag things unless I think they're really major.

The most effective criticism is certainly going to involve discussing the text as a whole, and I think the idea of spoiler free criticism is kind of silly. The distinction I think falls more on if something is being designed as a review to let people know if they might be interested in something (in which case, light to no spoilers is probably more appropriate, but with the scope of a review in general being a more limited 'this is good/bad' thing) or critical analysis of a work, which will require getting into all the nitty gritty details and involve pulling out quotes, looking at things from multiple angles, etc. The latter is going to be a far more interesting experience for the reader or listener, even if it does feature 'spoilers', and reading a really interesting critical analysis of something might make me more interested in something I had otherwise ignored, even if it told me about some major twist up front.

I'll still take a virgin experience without knowing anything if I have my choice, but knowing where a story is going isn't the end of the world if it is well told. Knowing largely where The Brothers Karamazov is going doesn't make it any less outstanding.

Well, people are - to use the "E" word - extremely entitled with spoilers now. Because people have been weaned on texts that depend entirely on twists for their excitement. So the whole "Red Wedding" thing was a massive event that people complained about because twitter was reacting en masse to the episode and if you didn't watch it at the same time you were "spoiled".

But yeah, if the whole point of the "Red Wedding" was how shocking it is, then does that episode matter if you go back to it the second time? Presumably so, if you believe that Game of Thrones is a good show, but when you hear people complain about it being ruined because they got spoiled, it makes you wonder sometimes.

At least in the case of the Red Wedding, I think it works just as well even when you know what happens (on my re-reads of the book, I actually find it far more effective than I did the first time, because of the buildup to it and all of the wrong things that you can see even if the characters don't). I don't think it's something that relies on being a surprise to be effective storytelling. It is, however, something that is intended in part to be a huge surprise, which is why I think it's the type of thing a lot of people wouldn't want to know about in advance.
 
But it all starts with building a place where people want to have that kind of discourse and where people trust and respect the views of others. A venue for genuinely interesting and insightful discussion about a much-maligned medium. A place that other people want to be apart of and would hope to emulate. I don't think it's idealistic to think that we can achieve that goal. It just takes some work.

Honestly, I think it would be best to split this into two threads. One thread for people with refined, mature taste. And then a second thread for anyone who didn't like the end of OreImo S2.
 

JoeFu

Banned
I hate this bastard so much on the left. Nobody harasses my muu-chan. You better back the fuck out before I knock you the fuck out.


I think you learn to love all the characters in the show. There's only one person I hate with all my anime might in that show. It would have been perfect if she didn't exist......
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
Many stories have been told in retrospect, providing a general understanding of what occurred at the start, but then going into details for the bulk of the work. Romeo and Juliet is an easy example, and Titanic is another. Some stories even work better this way, as it provides meaning and direction to scenes that would initially appear benign or aimless. I argue as much for School Days, as for many the value is simply the shock at the end, but for me it's the reinforcement of dread as it progresses and that only works when you know how it ends. (To be clear, I've never said School Days was particularly good, just better than a cheap trick.)

Well, you had people complaining about being spoiled on Rush. When you need to have spoilers for history, I don't know what you can do at that point.



Yeah, there is something of a difficult line that varies from person to person. For my own personal take, I generally consider 'spoilers' to be something really major, such as the death of a character or a similarly major event. I'm not generally too bothered about lesser events, and I don't really bother to spoiler tag things unless I think they're really major.

The most effective criticism is certainly going to involve discussing the text as a whole, and I think the idea of spoiler free criticism is kind of silly. The distinction I think falls more on if something is being designed as a review to let people know if they might be interested in something (in which case, light to no spoilers is probably more appropriate, but with the scope of a review in general being a more limited 'this is good/bad' thing) or critical analysis of a work, which will require getting into all the nitty gritty details and involve pulling out quotes, looking at things from multiple angles, etc. The latter is going to be a far more interesting experience for the reader or listener.

At least in the case of the Red Wedding, I think it works just as well even when you know what happens (on my re-reads of the book, I actually find it far more effective than I did the first time, because of the buildup to it and all of the wrong things that you can see even if the characters don't). I don't think it's something that relies on being a surprise to be effective storytelling. It is, however, something that is intended in part to be a huge surprise, which is why I think it's the type of thing a lot of people wouldn't want to know about in advance.

I prefer my reviews to skew toward full criticism, because I find that more engaging to read but also because being able to flat out state which of the important components of the film excited the reviewer is also an interesting metric to have. I suppose it depends on what you're looking for in criticism though.

I guess the Red Wedding thing for me wasn't important because I treat GoT as camp. I guess the last twist that I enjoyed was probably the Madoka Magica Rebellion ending, but I liked the film as much the second time that I watched it as much as the first.
 

Grzi

Member
JoJo s2 - 02

Best opening of the season, at least from what I've seen so far.

Episode was great, not much more to be said, since I've read the manga so there's no surprises, and the execution is better than in the first season so I couldn't be happier.
 
Trigun - 17

So everyone is an alien on a new world and Vash is some weird something that isn't quite human... I didn't expect this to go full scifi on me.

Hopefully they continue with the wild west aesthetic in future episodes.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Well, you had people complaining about being spoiled on Rush. When you need to have spoilers for history, I don't know what you can do at that point.
Purposeful refusal of historical information is willful ignorance. While fictional works can achieve cultural significance for one reason or another, history achieves automatic significance on account of actually happening with actual consequences.
 

survivor

Banned
Spice and Wolf 6
It's pretty nice to be able to watch an anime based on a light novel, and not have negative attitude towards the concept or what to expect from it. I can only imagine what this sort of story would have looked like if it was written now trying to appeal to the current popular LN tropes. Lawrence will probably be a high school student who is a genius economist who is trying to save the world. So I'm consistently surprised when I see some smart writing in these past few episodes or see the way the relationship between Holo and Lawrence is developing in a natural progress. I still can't say I care much about the economics concepts explored, but they are doing a fine job in creating conflict and drama.
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
Purposeful refusal of historical information is willful ignorance. While fictional works can achieve cultural significance for one reason or another, history achieves automatic significance on account of actually happening with actual consequences.
People don't seem to understand that now though. :p

I bet if you made a film about JFK now, people would complain about spoilers if you told them what happened in Dallas.
 
Sakura Trick - 10
Salura trick 10 was very good , ..it was full of delicious kissing, delicious finger licking , misunderstandings , denials, evil faces & evil grins and suzu being cute ...
i wonder how does haruka manges when she does soo poorly at sports ..

Rest the obvious question: Out of the 2 , who is the girlfriend ?
Ah sakura trick .... i haven't finished watching you i'm already said i have 2 episode left to watch.
i guess whenever Haruka & yuu are kissing , normal laws of physics are dismissed
..I guess this explain this episode and the first.

Ps: You can Play in the snow , you don't eat in the snow.
 

Dresden

Member
This is kind a kind of garbage, "look at all the anime I've watched" post, but it's pretty sweet that that the Captain Earth OP has got a bit of Cobra to it:

I'm sorry /old man

The fact that the psychogun is now a little girl is pretty reflective of modern anime~

4.Speaking of Star Driver's OPs, I don't think this is as strong as either of them but for different reasons. The 1st OP had a really strong motif in regards to color usage but it also utilized the island itself and sorta worked as a way of showing off the different characters/enemies. The 2nd OP in Star Driver had stronger storyboarding and transitions, not to mention all that action sakuga.

Star Driver's op1 is better, but op2 is... outside of that Shikama cut there isn't much to say about it.

As for modern-bones-robot-anime-openings, CE's op falls behind SD's op1 and Eureka Seven Ao's first opening, but better than the second intros for both. It's almost like there's a trend there.
 
People don't seem to understand that now though. :p

I bet if you made a film about JFK now, people would complain about spoilers if you told them what happened in Dallas.

I do have to agree that 'spoiler culture' is starting to become an annoying thing. Some of the nonsense with the Game of Thrones threads on here just feels annoying to me, and it does lead towards a suppression of any real appreciable discussion being had because everyone is too obsessed with making sure no one gets spoiled on anything, even just through inferences.

And complaining about spoilers for historical events, even if they aren't commonly known ones, is pretty silly. That's the line.
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
I do have to agree that 'spoiler culture' is starting to become an annoying thing. Some of the nonsense with the Game of Thrones threads on here just feels annoying to me, and it does lead towards a suppression of any real appreciable discussion being had because everyone is too obsessed with making sure no one gets spoiled on anything, even just through inferences.

And complaining about spoilers for historical events, even if they aren't commonly known ones, is pretty silly. That's the line.
I think it's been a while since the anime thread read like a redacted CIA document about Area 51... But it's why I'm the crazy person who uses a script that disables the spoiler tag, since it makes some threads more readable.
 
The English dub of DBZ is superior in every way. It's not even debatable. So there are exceptions to the rule.

I don't think you people understand what 'on principal alone' means. Dubs are on a lower tier of quality purely by their definition!!!

Not really serious, but 99% of the time I can't stomach a dub. I'm watching Lodoss in english, though.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
I do have to agree that 'spoiler culture' is starting to become an annoying thing. Some of the nonsense with the Game of Thrones threads on here just feels annoying to me, and it does lead towards a suppression of any real appreciable discussion being had because everyone is too obsessed with making sure no one gets spoiled on anything, even just through inferences.

And complaining about spoilers for historical events, even if they aren't commonly known ones, is pretty silly. That's the line.
This is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
In the Bible,
Angels take on some forms that would scare people shitless. For example there are ones that have many pairs of wings and their entire body, including wings, are covered with eyes. There are really only a small number who look like humans and their role is to interact with humans so people don't freak out.
.
 

Busaiku

Member
I didn't like Ginko's narration at the end there.
It was only a couple of sentences, but the show's usually done better with showing instead of telling.

And I think I'm gonna complain about Funimation not licensing it every week.
 

Link Man

Banned
JoJo 4

Well, I guess this is where the "bizarre" starts coming in. Zepelli has an interesting design, but a lot of the stuff he's spouting right now sounds like nonsense (at this time). And yeah, it's kind of annoying that Speedwagon is reduced to commentating the obvious, seems kind of useless right now.

Visuals are incredible, though.
 

duckroll

Member
I'm curious about how people feel about another aspect of spoilers. If there is a remake or a reimagination of a famous literary work, does it make sense for people to be protected from spoilers if the interest for most people would be on the execution rather than the story beats?

Let's take a few examples: Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Frankenstein, The Count of Monte Cristo. These are all well known works, which I think any reasonable adult should be aware of. Most people would have studied at least one of them at some point, and anyone who is well-read should have exposed themselves to material such as this simply because they're important. They are also extremely influential works, where the themes and/or outcomes are continuously used as references for similar stories if not direct remakes.

In having an intellectual discussion about such a work, what should really be more important? "Protecting" new viewers from some perceived right to have an untarnished experience of not knowing what could happen at all, or encouraging the debate of how well such a work executes the reimaingation of the themes and/or how it adapts the original story into something else?

I think one of the best examples would be something like Gankutsuou. If it were released today, and people are talking about it, if all discussion about the original book is spoiler tagged, I think most pages of discussion for each episode would be just a ton of black bars everywhere. What's the opinion on that?
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Hmm... I think that one function remakes have is to refresh a work's presence in cultural understanding. Recent Hulk and Spiderman movies aside, usually remakes are made because the previous version faded from attention and recognition and a newer generation is presented the opportunity to be reintroduced into it. As such, the expectation for people active in society to be knowledgeable about such things is reduced, but in many cases certain references get absorbed into our cultural language and stick around long after the work itself has faded. For example, most people still know how the original Planet of the Apes ends with the picture of the man kneeling before the ruins of the Statue of Liberty, because the image was iconic. The quote "you can't handle the truth" from the climax of A Few Good Men far exceeded the range of people who actually saw the film. Many other examples exist, and I think overall that while remakes offer a new audience the opportunity to discover something in a way better tailored to them, at some level they have to accept that they're not the first people to discover it and that the first waves of cultural influence had already propagated.
 

Quasar

Member
Nearly every source I turned to before NeoGAF to help find anime to watch was genuinely shitty and none of my friends new anything about the medium. What's worse, the traditional gatekeeper of criticism and recommendation, print, is largely silent on the subject of anime. Someone, somewhere, should try and do a better job. It's not acceptable that there's barely any blogs or podcasts about anime that are worth your time. It's rubbish, especially with the very high volume of titles that get released and how poor most of them are. How is a complete newcomer to the scene supposed to know what to watch this season without help? They'll end up watching three shitty shows and then never coming back to anime because it's "all shit". They need a hand and we can be there to help them along.

Its interesting. I started my anime watching in October 2012. Sure I'd watched anime before when much younger, but it was only really a random thing here and there. Getting netflix streaming changed that. That allowed me to sample a range of things easily at essentially no cost. That in turn led me to Crunchyroll and MAL where using top ten lists from MAL of genres that titles I liked from netflix fell into broadened my exposure. Added to that was starting an anime thread or two on a community I was already well into who had a range of folks into anime and manga.

Probably my first exposure to anime on gaf was the 2012 vote thread. And that again was great in that it pointed me to stuff I would not have tried, mainly tsuritama.

So really I didn't find filtering stuff I'd probably like any harder than western film.

Let's also not forget the fact that the whole Western Anime community also has practically no interest in the history of the medium at all. Why does this matter? Because even though there's only two things airing this season that you'll like I'd imagine that, with knowledge of your preferences, I can recommend you over a dozen truly amazing older titles. This is why it's so important that those with knowledge of older titles share their experiences and views about these works because there's so many of them worth seeing. Most of the biggest one's helped to shape the titles that are airing today and outside of those genre defining classics there's literally hundreds of shows worth watching. Anime did not begin in 1995 and I'm happy to tell you that there's so many good titles to watch that you won't even have time to see them all.

I'm not sure I'd tar the whole community with that brush. Thats probably true with the younger sub group (as its true with western film, tv and other media) but I don't think its completely true. That said as a 'new' anime watcher
i do struggle with anime beyond a certain point (I'd say pre 1990) that I never have with live action film (well silent film is a bit of a struggle). And I think for me, just like videogames, its the visuals. And so unless I have nostalgia for it (like robotech) its hard for me to get into.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
I think one of the best examples would be something like Gankutsuou. If it were released today, and people are talking about it, if all discussion about the original book is spoiler tagged, I think most pages of discussion for each episode would be just a ton of black bars everywhere. What's the opinion on that?

Not my problem if other people are uncultured. I'll readily admit, not spoilering a "remastered" or "readapted" classic is a bit of a dick move but so what? The alternative is just as disgusting if not more so because people are effectively flaunting the fact that they're underachievers when it comes to internationally recognized culture. That mindset should not be acceptable.

Something like JoJo, I can understand, because despite being an manga classic its global exposure is limited and the JoJo fans of GAF are an international community, but something like Count of Monte Cristo, or Frankenstein... No. Not unless it is based on another adaptation (an adaptation of an adaptation if you will) that veers drastically from the source material in some way.

Anyway, if a work of fiction solely relies on "surprise" and being a "pure experience" to be worthwhile, then it probably wasn't a very substantial work in the first place.
 

FelixOrion

Poet Centuriate
I'm curious about how people feel about another aspect of spoilers. If there is a remake or a reimagination of a famous literary work, does it make sense for people to be protected from spoilers if the interest for most people would be on the execution rather than the story beats?

Let's take a few examples: Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Frankenstein, The Count of Monte Cristo. These are all well known works, which I think any reasonable adult should be aware of. Most people would have studied at least one of them at some point, and anyone who is well-read should have exposed themselves to material such as this simply because they're important. They are also extremely influential works, where the themes and/or outcomes are continuously used as references for similar stories if not direct remakes.

In having an intellectual discussion about such a work, what should really be more important? "Protecting" new viewers from some perceived right to have an untarnished experience of not knowing what could happen at all, or encouraging the debate of how well such a work executes the reimaingation of the themes and/or how it adapts the original story into something else?

I think one of the best examples would be something like Gankutsuou. If it were released today, and people are talking about it, if all discussion about the original book is spoiler tagged, I think most pages of discussion for each episode would be just a ton of black bars everywhere. What's the opinion on that?

I like my anime posts like I like my top-secret government documents:
████████

On the real though, I'm not sure, though I don't really care if there are spoilers. Yes, if you're well-read you should probably know these works, but I think many famous works that might be built on by some anime pro might not be as well known by GAF members, especially if they aren't necessarily well-read or maybe come from a place or culture where the work in question isn't perhaps as well know. I'd rather have a page full of redactions and spoiler tags if it meat not spoiling someones enjoyment.

Additionally, if there are original twist or aspects of the remake that don't mix come from he original work (take at lot of what happens in Romeo x Juliet, for example), then, even the base work is well known and largely 'unspoilerable', I still think care should be take to perhaps not spoil at least parts of the remake.
 
Sakura Trick - 11
Sakura%20Trick%20-%2011_03.jpg

About time this happenned. i guess a maiden in love is somewhat dense.
"So tell me , what do you think they were doing ?"

" they were kissing of course "

and then it ended with rose petals.

New student concil president is something else ... i wonder what could have happenned to make a normal girl go this route she even refers to those moments as her "dark past". This need to be adressed ASAP.
Sakura%20Trick%20-%2011_02.jpg

The real question that matters.
The pudding hot demand took all the third years by storm ...i guess this is a case of people because taken in by their desires.
Sakura%20Trick%20-%2011_01.jpg

You cannot resist patting her head.

Anyway the lesson we already knew is that haruka is not a chick magnet , she just struck gold in that familly..i hope that one day we'll get the mother and this effect will work on her too , just for the joke !
 
I'm curious about how people feel about another aspect of spoilers. If there is a remake or a reimagination of a famous literary work, does it make sense for people to be protected from spoilers if the interest for most people would be on the execution rather than the story beats?

Let's take a few examples: Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Frankenstein, The Count of Monte Cristo. These are all well known works, which I think any reasonable adult should be aware of. Most people would have studied at least one of them at some point, and anyone who is well-read should have exposed themselves to material such as this simply because they're important. They are also extremely influential works, where the themes and/or outcomes are continuously used as references for similar stories if not direct remakes.

I thought that happened relatively recently with some people being a bit shocked that the Titanic updated release trailers had been packed with a few scenes spoiling the key event with the ships fate.
 

Quasar

Member
I thought that happened relatively recently with some people being a bit shocked that the Titanic updated release trailers had been packed with a few scenes spoiling the key event with the ships fate.

Yeah. Lots of people upset on places like fb from things like that. Shows how unexposed to older material (be it history or fiction) many, esp the young are.

As for spoilers I don't like them, and really prefer a first viewing being as unspoiled as possible. And so even for remakes I'd err on the side of not spoiling as for so many it could be their first exposure to this story. But really it depends on the audience I'm talking to, or think I'm talking too.

And really Game of Thrones is a pretty perfect example of the whole issue of spoilers. Book 1 came out in 96. So in the communities I hang it had been discussed to death. Then we have the tv show and the spoiler paranoia around that is immense. So i'm always having to be careful to judge who my audience is. I know I'd hate to be spoiled on that.
 

cajunator

Banned
Today's the day

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
*hugs everything

You guys description of bad anime/episode is always more intriguing than the supposed good ones, godammit...

Youve got a good point there. Its more fun really to watch a show that is a basketcase clusterfuck because it surprises you and makes you laugh. A well written and directed show is pleasant and wonderful, but in a completely different way thats more about how it makes you feel than how entertaining it is.

Lol no way! I've only seen the sub but I refuse to believe something that japanese could translate well.

STUDYSTUDYSTUDY just doesn't have the same gravitas as BENKYOBENKYOBENKYO



Dude I couldn't stand a single one of the english cast in that show. *shudder*

I never listen to the subbed version of Goldenboy. It is way inferior.

You could pick a show you like and write a review of the best girl only.

This is a great idea and it works really well.

Where to begin...

Lol. Taking videogames seriously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom