Zombie James
Banned
You ask that question like they behaved differently before.
That Polygon article about Ferguson, wearable cameras, and making an arbitrary connection to Watch Dogs was kind of dumb.
lol man didnt realize the DC defense for was this prominent
That has nothing to do with my post.
I knew someone was going to bring this one up. I never understood the hate for this review. It obviously affected his experience with the game (and negatively), why wouldn't he bring it up? And it makes sense that he'd want to explain his stance, especially since he apparently didn't even write enough to explain it properly.Sure, let's spend 10 motherfucking paragraphs on a completely non issue before reviewing the game.
Yeah, screw you Polygon.
Edit: Oh, and that Smash review where the dude spends most of the time talking about some weird stuff about his relationship with his dad has to be a close second.
You ask that question like they behaved differently before.
Media Representation is not a "non-issue." When you're reviewing a game, you're sharing your own opinion of the game. If the sexualization in the game bothered him that much, than he absolutely should write about that. If you agree or not is an entirely different conversation than calling it a "non-issue."
There are plenty of better examples of the problems with Polygon... like that Mario Kart article.
Polygon is gonna get a lot of hits out of this thread.
Is he supposed to be a robot with no emotions whenever a new game is announced?
I mean as a news satire website they're not as inspired as The Onion but they can still be pretty funny.
. The daily mail of the gaming worldPolygon: the thread
Yeop, especially since they fixed the online and put in some weather people wont shut up about it. The Gertsmann hate is strong with the DC apologists.
Anyway that Polygon article about how Nintendo could be saved by Disney for $19 billion was a good laugh.
Don't have a link but anyone who said that it would be good for Nintendo to put their stuff into mobile.
always been bad. so nothing.
ITT people remember Polygon primarily writes trolling click-bait and then they go there to read trolling click-bait.
Poly's bayo 2 review and IGN again with their Alien review also come to mind.
Yeop, especially since they fixed the online and put in some weather people wont shut up about it. The Gertsmann hate is strong with the DC apologists.
Anyway that Polygon article about how Nintendo could be saved by Disney for $19 billion was a good laugh.
Ben Kuchera's article saying that Rise of the Tomb Raider being Xbone exclusive was a good thing takes the cake if you ask me.
So they should have gotten someone to review it that would automatically give it a higher score? What's the point of the review then haha.I am saying that he probably was not the right person to review the game. What if someone who did not want x game to be made reviewed x game. I dont really care about his dislike of the game. Most of gaf probably agrees with him.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/15/Review-Dragon-Age-Inquisition
This fucking thing. Most "ethical" review out there /s
I forgot about that one. Thread would be best split into "worst polygon article" and "worst non-polygon article" because they really have it locked up.
Ridiculous that the same writer at Joystiq is saying we need to stop buying broken games after giving MCC at 4.5/5. Fucking hypocrite.
Article
MCC Review
I knew someone was going to bring this one up. I never understood the hate for this review. It obviously affected his experience with the game (and negatively), why wouldn't he bring it up? And it makes sense that he'd want to explain his stance, especially since he apparently didn't even write enough to explain it properly.
WTF at slamming that Bayonetta 2 review? The guy had a problem with the ridiculous and overt sexism.
You don't live in a goddamn vacuum where everyone wants to stare at a woman's crotch constantly. A lot of people have an issue with that, as did the reviewer.
I'd go with this. Anything by Kotaku and Polygon, really.Anything written by Brian Ashcraft?
I was going to suggest Hernandez's "Is killing female players online equivalent to rape?" article, but just remembered that was in 2013. I'd like to nominate that same article as worst of the 2010s, though.
Thing is, Bayonetta is a game conceived as a sexualized extravaganza. It was created like that. He can dislike it, but spending 10 paragraphs rambling about it before even talking about the game is awful. It's like criticizing a FPS for making you shoot stuff.
Think about it as an Iggy Azalea or Nicki Minaj performance. Why is it different? And why does it indulge holier than thou articles over it? You could dislike it, but spending a whole review explaining why you disliked it isn't missing the point?
Polygon: the thread
I was gonna mention this as well. The on-purpose in-your-face sexuality was a factor in the final score?! Why?!