• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The death of the Game Console

Game Consoles currently exist for a number of reasons that will not be a factor with mid-performance 2016+ PCs.

Piracy: Piracy required embedded encryption keys and encrypted OS and Memory images. This is why they are called embedded platforms which is a required feature for Playready DRM support. All modern Windows 8.1 OEM platforms and newer require a Trusted boot module and embedded Codec keys as well as protected codec/player and in the near future all IO. This is done in AMD APUs and dGPUs using ARM Trustzone.

Performance envelope allowing a quiet Livingroom console: This is self explanatory and the limiting factor in AMD APUs is memory bandwidth. The PS4 used GDDR5 and the XB1 used a 32meg cache with a soon to be used DX12 that supports tiling allowing the 32meg cache to more efficiently process a video frame.

AMD is counting on HBM to solve their bandwidth problems with dGPUs and APUs. They are moving the Southbridge into the APU, adding more CUs and following their roadmap to bring more ARM Cadence IP (Xtensa DPUs and more) into the SoC. Power efficiency is a big part of this with HBM a major factor. It is easily possible to have a 2016 AMD SoC with performance exceeding a PS4 using much less power.

Game Features not found in a PC: Kinect, Eyetoy...etc. Not yet truly mainstream in game consoles with Microsoft and Sony allowing their hardware to be used on PCs. AMD's Kaveri already includes the same Xtensa DPUs that are in the PS4 and XB1. The XB1 contains more Xtensa processors due to the need to support Kinect and because it's GPU is smaller than the PS4 or a mid range PC should have.

Gaming Ecosystem: This is the only way Microsoft and Sony can stay relevant and they will offer their ecosystem to the PCs of the near future. Windows 10 is rumored to be free with a charge for extra services and there is a Xbox APP that allows access to the Xbox game ecosystem.

To the Metal Perfomance: The APPs for the XB1 Windows 10 are all WebGL with OpenGL support same as the PS4. The major difference for games in the near future, Windows is Direct X and Sony will be supporting a more modern efficient OpenGL with a POSIX OS (FreeBSD or Linux). Both DirectX and OpenGL are being optimized for games. This is possible due to new hardware features like QOS and Trusted boot/embedded with Trustzone. In the past the GPU drivers were used as a choke point for DRM video and driver development was all in house for security. This is now opening up to third parties with OpenGL on Linux now a threat to Microsoft's DirectX which put a fire under them.

Predictions: Wild first, Sony will enable Other OS Linux support on the PS4. The future for Sony games is Linux running on X-86 PCs while the future for Microsoft is Windows. Sony will encourage Linux development and Android, which is a virtual engine running on a OpenGL Linux kernel. The only other choices are to change to Windows Direct X or Microsoft drops Direct X for OpenGL which I doubt will happen.

My belief is that Sony and Microsoft chose X-86 because they see this also. This will also be true for a new Nintendo console. The only other contender for Game Consoles is ARM and there are several being released in the next six months. Some have performance near last generation game consoles and are only viable because of the Vidipath (DLNA CVP2) ecosystem and game streaming (Gaikai like).

PCs are not dead and will move to the living room. The choice will be Windows X86 with the Xbox ecosystem and/or Android running on a X86 Linux kernel with games either ARM or Linux OpenGL which can run future AAA games from Sony with the Playstation ecosystem.

Apps/programs will be Web based with OpenCL.. HSAIL and OpenCL allow native performance to programs as APPS.

There is no longer a need for a future Game Console provided there is no new feature that won't be found in future AMD SoCs. 4K TVs, Vidipath (DLNA CVP2), HTML5 with WebGL and VR make a PC in the living room more valuable. It will offer the same features the XB1 and PS4 will offer to other platforms in the home. In the short term Kaveri, PS4 and XB1 support HEVC as does Windows 10 and they can sideload and transcode to AVCHD (h.264) which is the current Vidipath DLNA standard.

By 2017 every TV will be a smart TV or have a Vidipath STB connected to it. There will be a need for at least one media hub with hard disk (read PC, XB1 or PS4 which are essentially 2016 PCs), the other TVs can use ARM STBs or HDMI sticks.

EDIT: True and pointed out by nurmerus posts in this thread there are other reasons for consoles (marketing, easy to use front end UI, Ecosystem) that I did not address. My point was there will no longer be a hardware need for consoles as 2016+ AMD SoCs have all required features needed for a game console. A 2016+ AMD SoC with the features of a PS4 will have little impact on this generation. The windows 10 Xbox APP, since it's running on a browser desktop can mimic a Xbox Game Console UI screen.

2nd Edit: This post from late 2012 and the Leaked 2010 Xbox 720 powerpoint I found are the basis for all my early speculation. I saw the trends late 2010 but until the above and later the RVU/RUI DLNA CVP2 finds didn't realize it was a world wide convergence. PCs as media hubs I believe creates the demand that allows PCs to move to the Living room...this is only possible with power/performance envelopes allowed (Noise and IPTV power modes) and embedded DRM. This is only starting to happen with PCs and the key is HBM which won't be used with a APU/SoC till 2016+.

**This is a 2010 Sony white paper that was presented to the ATSC committee on what would become Sony Media fusion.** Features in it should become part of Playstation Vue.
 

6.8

Member
SHYPER_375_1.jpg
 
Weren't consoles supposed to be dead already?

They are dead. The PS4's record-breaking sales are a lie perpetuated by Sony and the gaming media.

Also, are there really rumours that Windows 10 will be free?! That would be quite a turn around for MS; I don't really see it happening to be honest.
 

cHaOs667

Member
This is now opening up to third parties with OpenGL on Linux now a threat to Microsoft's DirectX which put a fire under them.
Sorry, i've stopped here as it looks like that you did not realized that DirectX is much more than just an 3D Graphics API...
 

Hanmik

Member
It gets harder and harder to believe these threads every time a new one comes up...

this is a Jeff Rigby thread.. remember he figured that Sony would update their internet browser on the PS3, and they did...

Jeff is a tech head and he knows lots of stuff, but I do not believe that Consoles will die out soon..
 

Creaking

He touched the black heart of a mod
ivxAQdRyTYU08.gif



Oh yeah yeah, if we just factor out the success of the new consoles, and in turn, the reasons that most people actually buy consoles (read just below), then I guess they really will die.
 

Ashler

Member
The convenience of a non-configurable machine (1-stop solution), simplified OS/GUI and plug and play games (install from the disk or download, with no driver updates, incompatibility, etc.) will continue to make the home console market viable.
 

Blakynt

Banned
well, ok good read OP, but you left behind a mayor factor. Fidelity and exclusives. Each company Nintendo Sony MS , they take care of their consoles, i don't see Super Mario Galaxy in PC ( emulation doesn't count) nor do I see a little 7 years old, installing the DSfix to run FF XIII or Dark Souls at a decent frame with the correct drivers, and installing this to support the gamepad that was compatible with his system (and I know about the steam machine, yea...that's just another computer nothing new and the entry price is high).

This apocalyptic future you describe I don't see it happening anytime soon, just as the tablets didn't replace the PC, nor the Iphones replaced the Digital Cameras.
 

Shabad

Member
No they won't.

As long as Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft (aka some of the biggest video game publishers in the industry) will keep developing exclusives. And all the technology you are refering too will be available for those constructors when they make their new dedicated video game box.
 
Game Consoles currently exist for a number of reasons that will not be a factor with mid-performance 2016 PCs.

There is a massive factor that will be the cause of myself having multiple current gen console's over a mid-performance 2016 PC.... I already have the consoles.
 
At least post on your main account, Pachter.
Pachter predicted game consoles would be replaced by tablets and his reasoning is all wrong.

ARM is moving to more performance but in doing so requires more power. big.little is their answer to this. FinFET and stacked memory are going to improve performance/watt but X-86 is doing the same. Since PCs are connected to the mains they can support games better than Tablets and Phones. Optimally a Game Console/PC would stream games to Tablets and Phones which is what the PS4 and XB1 will be doing. This is what future PCs will do. His premise that Tablets would replace Game Consoles is all wrong, Game Consoles will be replaced by Livingroom PCs or the Cloud and game streaming. Short term I believe only PCs are viable as Game Consoles.
 

Clefargle

Member
What is this, 2007? I keep hearing this rhetoric, and it always seems like the people spouting it really want it to happen.
 

Yoda

Member
Game Consoles currently exist for a number of reasons that will not be a factor with mid-performance 2016 PCs.

Piracy: Piracy required embedded encryption keys and encrypted OS and Memory images. This is why they are called embedded platforms which is a required feature for Playready DRM support. All modern Windows 8.1 OEM platforms and newer require a Trusted boot module and embedded Codec keys as well as protected codec/player and in the near future all IO. This is done in AMD APUs and dGPUs using ARM Trustzone.

Performance envelope allowing a quiet Livingroom console: This is self explanatory and the limiting factor in AMD APUs is memory bandwidth. The PS4 used GDDR5 and the XB1 used a 32meg cache with a soon to be used DX12 that supports tiling allowing the 32meg cache to more efficiently process a video frame.

AMD is counting on HBM to solve their bandwidth problems with dGPUs and APUs. They are moving the Southbridge into the APU, adding more CUs and following their roadmap to bring more ARM Cadence IP (Xtensa DPUs and more) into the SoC. Power efficiency is a big part of this with HBM a major factor. It is easily possible to have a 2016 AMD SoC with performance exceeding a PS4 using much less power.

Game Features not found in a PC: Kinect, Eyetoy...etc. Not yet truly mainstream in game consoles with Microsoft and Sony allowing their hardware to be used on PCs. AMD's Kaveri already includes the same Xtensa DPUs that are in the PS4 and XB1. The XB1 contains more Xtensa processors due to the need to support Kinect and because it's GPU is smaller than the PS4 or a mid range PC should have.

Gaming Ecosystem: This is the only way Microsoft and Sony can stay relevant and they will offer their ecosystem to the PCs of the near future. Windows 10 is rumored to be free with a charge for extra services and there is a Xbox APP that allows access to the Xbox game ecosystem.

To the Metal Perfomance: The APPs for the XB1 Windows 10 are all WebGL with OpenGL support same as the PS4. The major difference for games in the near future, Windows is Direct X and Sony will be supporting a more modern efficient OpenGL with a POSIX OS (FreeBSD or Linux). Both DirectX and OpenGL are being optimized for games. This is possible due to new hardware features like QOS and Trusted boot/embedded with Trustzone. In the past the GPU drivers were used as a choke point for DRM video and driver development was all in house for security. This is now opening up to third parties with OpenGL on Linux now a threat to Microsoft's DirectX which put a fire under them.

Predictions: Wild first, Sony will enable Other OS Linux support on the PS4. The future for Sony games is Linux running on X-86 PCs while the future for Microsoft is Windows. Sony will encourage Linux development and Android, which is a virtual engine running on a OpenGL Linux kernel. The only other choices are to change to Windows Direct X or Microsoft drops Direct X for OpenGL which I doubt will happen.

My belief is that Sony and Microsoft chose X-86 because they see this also. This will also be true for a new Nintendo console. The only other contender for Game Consoles is ARM and there are several being released in the next six months. Some have performance near last generation game consoles and are only viable because of the Vidipath (DLNA CVP2) ecosystem and game streaming (Gaikai like).

PCs are not dead and will move to the living room. The choice will be Windows X86 with the Xbox ecosystem and/or Android running on a X86 Linux kernel with games either ARM or Linux OpenGL which can run future AAA games from Sony with the Playstation ecosystem.

Apps/programs will be Web based with OpenCL.. HSAIL and OpenCL allow native performance to programs as APPS.

There is no longer a need for a future Game Console provided there is no new feature that won't be found in future AMD SoCs. 4K TVs, Vidipath (DLNA CVP2), HTML5 with WebGL and VR make a PC in the living room more valuable. It will offer the same features the XB1 and PS4 will offer to other platforms in the home. In the short term Kaveri, PS4 and XB1 support HEVC as does Windows 10 and they can sideload and transcode to AVCHD (h.264) which is the current Vidipath DLNA standard.

By 2017 every TV will be a smart TV or have a Vidipath STB connected to it. There will be a need for at least one media hub with hard disk (read PC), the other TVs can use ARM STBs or HDMI sticks.

You really ought to highlight the low-cost to entry for what the consumer is receiving. Buying a PC that is equivalent to a PS4 is still slightly more expensive (closest is the Alienware kinda steam machine thing). Regardless the fact they are subsidized hardware that isn't garbage like most tablets is the main reason they still work. As hardware gets cheaper better hardware comes out and because the devices are dedicated to gaming above all else they will edge out competition from hybrid platforms like an iPad for AAA gaming. Streaming to a TV from a PC was doable before this gen even launched, the main thing holding it back is it's still more expensive and relative to the cost of the main hardware this gen that won't change significantly enough for people to adopt new tech as opposed to tech they are familiar with that does what its suppose to. New tech has to be worth the "hassle" from the mainstream consumer of switching even if its better on paper and I don't see PC doing that by the end of this gen (I'm primarily a PC gamer not a console gamer).
 
I expect better from you Jeff. Consoles stopped being "relevant" for people who play and love PC gaming already, but only on a performance standpoint. As it turns out, gamers want games before everything else, so even the most dedicated PC gamer will eventually get a console if he/she can afford it.
As long as the numbers make sense for publishers, console gaming is not going to die.
 

lazygecko

Member
This is all assuming that games are going to remain the primary focus of consoles. But I thinik it's been pretty clear that Microsoft and Sony view their machines as long term investments in a war for being the prime middle men of all media consumption in the living room. If everyone watches TV and buys movies and whatnot through their own online services, that's a pretty damn lucrative position to be in getting a cut from all the ad revenue and licenses and whatnot. I don't see how it even makes sense to bleed so much money into their console divisions otherwise.

I am pretty sure this was the reason for Microsoft's initial TV-focused strategy for the Xbox One. They've seen how the core gaming industry has been shrinking and they did not expect this to be enough to drive sales of their console in the long term. It was too premature from a PR standpoint though so they ended up in an awkward position and had to flipflop their image.

Sony just knows to be more quiet about their plans. After all, they're the ones who patented this:

 
Console will always exist. It's just the form factor that will change.

But I think you're right. We're moving in a era of ecosystem. And I think that in the end, we will see Nintendo/Microsoft/Sony selling their own PCs, yet having their stuff accessible on others PC.

Like a DVD player.
 
nottodisushittoagen.gif

I would read more than the first three bullet points if they added more to the discussion than the usual shallow arguments. Yet, they didn't. Hence, I am outta here.

Btw, wrong thread title. It should read something like "why PC is not going to die".
 

nasanu

Banned
And I predict the death of the misinformed poster...

Consoles stopped being "relevant" for people who play and love PC gaming already, but only on a performance standpoint.

My PC was about three times the price of a PS4 and has much more power apparently. Yet Driveclub still blows away any racer I can play on the PC. The PC's performance is always best when on paper. The most talented devs are on consoles and that matters.
 
consoles will die out 50 years from now when fast internet is required for all people to have access to and you can stream a game to your TV at like 2Gb/s.
 
And I predict the death of the misinformed idiot...

Yea don't do that.
My PC was about three times the price of a PS4 and has much more power apparently. Yet Driveclub still blows away any racer I can play on the PC. The PC's performance is always best when on paper. The most talented devs are on consoles and that matters.
A good PC can deliver Driveclub's graphics at 60fps (or more) and 1080p (or more). In fact, Driveclub, as good as it looks, is the symbol the compromises consoles devs have to abide to.
Also, you call someone misinformed and then say the bolded? Really?
 
As long as the platform holders objective is to make a product for the global market there will always be a place for a dedicated games machine. And I'm not talking about as a "niche" product.
I'm not saying that the future you envision won't come to be, it's just that it's definitely not going to happen as soon as you think.
 

gelf

Member
Everything is dead.
Pc gaming is dead since 1985
It can only be a couple of hours until Nintendo is bankrupt
Nobody is buying the Xbox One
And Sony is making loss after loss

We are all like the kid in Sixth Sense.

Exactly. Do we really need to rush and pronounce everything as dead all the time. These statements are proven wrong more then right. I'm enjoying my gaming on a device that was supposed not viable and wouldn't sell in the age of smartphones and a device that has been called dead so many times its lost all meaning. Maybe someday I'll also pick up the device from the company that was supposed to go third party a decade ago.

I like to think there's room for different markets and we shouldn't blindly rush to converge it all.
 

lazygecko

Member
I expect better from you Jeff. Consoles stopped being "relevant" for people who play and love PC gaming already, but only on a performance standpoint. As it turns out, gamers want games before everything else, so even the most dedicated PC gamer will eventually get a console if he/she can afford it.
As long as the numbers make sense for publishers, console gaming is not going to die.

A handful of mostly cinematic-focused exclusives hasn't really been enough to sway me. I stopped buying consoles when the paradigm shift occured in the mid 00's and formerly PC-style games started to dominate the console software market. I've seen no reason to invest in something that mostly just lets me experience watered down (not to mention more expensive) versions of what I used to play on PC.

The only thing I would even remotely consider purchasing if I had a giant surplus of money would be a WiiU, since it at least offers something genuinely different like consoles used to.
 

EGOMON

Member
Jeff is supposed to be a very informed gaffer especially in the hardware side (if am not mistaken) but still i disagree with you
 
this is a Jeff Rigby thread.. remember he figured that Sony would update their internet browser on the PS3, and they did...

Jeff is a tech head and he knows lots of stuff, but I do not believe that Consoles will die out soon..

Even Nintendo update their browser from time to time. The reasons jeff_rigby stated as to why Sony would update theirs never happened. It's time to realise that jeff posts so much scattershot bullshit that some of it might occasionally come true.
 
A handful of mostly cinematic-focused exclusives hasn't really been enough to sway me. I stopped buying consoles when the paradigm shift occured in the mid 00's and formerly PC-style games started to dominate the console software market. I've seen no reason to invest in something that mostly just lets me experience watered down (not to mention more expensive) versions of what I used to play on PC.

The only thing I would even remotely consider purchasing if I had a giant surplus of money would be a WiiU, since it at least offers something genuinely different like consoles used to.

I have a wiiU and a PC, but I would buy a ps4 just for bloodborne. At the end of their respective life cycles,every console ends up having unique exclusives that are worth playing.
 

Flappy

Banned
Isn't the PS4 the fastest selling console of all time? How is that dying?

The only people claiming that they are dying are PC gamers who feel like they are a threat.
 

nasanu

Banned
Yea don't do that.

A good PC can deliver Driveclub's graphics at 60fps (or more) and 1080p (or more). In fact, Driveclub, as good as it looks, is the symbol the compromises consoles devs have to abide to.
Also, you call someone misinformed and then say the bolded? Really?

The talent goes where the money is and with few exceptions that is on console.
 

fertygo

Member
The convenience of a non-configurable machine (1-stop solution), simplified OS/GUI and plug and play games (install from the disk or download, with no driver updates, incompatibility, etc.) will continue to make the home console market viable.
Except that not even true for today routine. Fucking updates and patch is rampant for game console experience.
 
Top Bottom