So what are the odds that those prices are placeholder, just like the release date?
It's too specific considering they have past-gen prices too.
So what are the odds that those prices are placeholder, just like the release date?
I just want to put this out there.
The last WWE game looks WAY better than this. And those games are like the benchmark for terrible looking AAA games. And we don't even know if this is 60 FPS yet or not. Hooo boy.
Puddy Squad was $40 release so not really.Is it hyperbole to say these are the worst graphics of any $60 current gen release?
I spent $22 which was worth it at that price.
Sixty. Dollars.
Sixty.
It looks worse than Tony Hawk Ride. IDK how they did that.The screenshots I have seen, the face models are the only thing that look like crap. Some of you are really harsh.
I wouldn't read too much into this. for the longest time Deep Down was £55 on amazon and isn't that a F2P title?
Hahahahahahahaha....i just can't stop laughing hahaha.
Oh boy. Tony must have been really desperate. After Tony Hawk Ride they should have known better than to revive something like this.
This looks like a 19.99 downloadable only title for 360.
Like, the Hydro Thunder 360 remake that's digital only looks far better than this
Developers grow with each project. So much negativity,
What do you expect when you have a game attempting to harken back to the glory days, as made by the team who completely bungled that exact thing with their previous work?
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater HD proved that Robomodo shouldn't be the developer doing this.
Man, Y'all harsh in here. I'm giving this thing the benefit of the doubt before I crucify it.
How does this make any sense, whatsoever?
They're selling it for the expected price of a console game in 2015. That's not news, that's a baseline. It means we can expect content equivalent to a disc-based product, rather than a strictly downloadable title.
You've got some screenshots that look sub-par, and a developer with a bad skateboarding game under their belt. I will forgive you for not leaking hype. But being this dismissive seems excessive.
Agreed, at least wait until we see footage.
I feel bad for the developers, must be awful to see your work ridiculed and dismissed almost instantly.
装甲悪鬼村正;163033312 said:I'm confused, why would I not expect a THPS to be full price? What's going on here?
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.
Why is that surprising? I mean it's a game like any games. I'm not surprised about this price at all.
It's too specific considering they have past-gen prices too.
They made up their mind using past experiences from the people making this game so I'd say thats a good indication. If a dev has made nothing but shit games and gets handed the license to make a game that you love you're gonna know to expect the worse. It'd be different if it were a new Dev that was yet to prove themselves but Robomodo have proved their incompetence 3 times. Unless you have a reason why the game will be great and have some proof behind it then you have less of an idea what you're talking about than those people you're trying to look down on from your high horse.
Why the $20 difference between old-gen and current-gen?
No high horse at all. I'm simply saying that it seems too early to judge a game that we haven't seen in motion yet based upon an admittedly poor screenshot. The game has been marked for release later this year, which gives them ample time to update their visuals.
The biggest reason I bring up a gameplay video is because the biggest complaint to their track record was the physics used in THPS:HD. This is the only entry to the THPS series that Robomodo has developed that didn't involve some wacky skateboarding peripheral included. Tony Hawk's Ride had multiple issues but ultimately, the most cited flaw that I've ever seen is that people didn't want to use the stupid peripheral. Tony Hawk's Shred suffered a similar fate, especially on the back of the legacy of Ride.
I am disagreeing with the jump to assume that Robomodo potentially learned nothing from their previous entry in the series based on an ugly screenshot or that it should be any surprise that a complete game will be discounted as the remaster was.
This was the case for the early amazon pages on Watch_Dogs as well (at 90 bucks IIRC) and people lost their shit back then, too. Just thinking this is more of the same.
ugly screenshots. We've seen more than one screen. Graphically this game looks like crap. Game could still be fun but they have a lot to prove.
No high horse at all. I'm simply saying that it seems too early to judge a game that we haven't seen in motion yet based upon an admittedly poor screenshot. The game has been marked for release later this year, which gives them ample time to update their visuals.
The biggest reason I bring up a gameplay video is because the biggest complaint to their track record was the physics used in THPS:HD. This is the only entry to the THPS series that Robomodo has developed that didn't involve some wacky skateboarding peripheral included. Tony Hawk's Ride had multiple issues but ultimately, the most cited flaw that I've ever seen is that people didn't want to use the stupid peripheral. Tony Hawk's Shred suffered a similar fate, especially on the back of the legacy of Ride.
I am disagreeing with the jump to assume that Robomodo potentially learned nothing from their previous entry in the series based on an ugly screenshot or that it should be any surprise that a complete game will be discounted as the remaster was.
Why do I feel like there's going to be tons of DLC even with the full price?
Why do I feel like there's going to be tons of DLC even with the full price?
I think because they confirmed 9 courses only. You can probably beat it in 3 hours.Why is that surprising? I mean it's a game like any games. I'm not surprised about this price at all.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_s...&url=search-alias=aps&linkId=M3MGFR22CXLU4YXC
whelp, it looked like a budget title.
Link was gotten from Wario64
They want this to bomb.
The main thing is the developer has not proven themselves yet.I'm kind of surprised at all the tone policing in here for such a shitty looking game. It may be a good game with improved physics for all I know, but there is no denying that it looks like fucking garbage.
Sometimes bad games sell.then wy make it at all
I think because they confirmed 9 courses only. You can probably beat it in 3 hours.
But yeah, we shouldn't be surprised with 4 hour games getting retail pricing since it happened last gen.
If it's 1080p60, has local and online MP, and plays better than THPS HD, I'm fine with this. I don't care about next gen graphics in a Tony Hawk game, I want it to play well. It'd be nice if they did a DLC pack of levels from older games and gave THPS HD owners a discount, but knowing Activision, that's unlikely.
I can agree with that as well. It is mostly if they can have lots to do in those 9 courses. If it is like the old series, the course challenges are probably 4 hours total. Online score leader boards would be a good option to keep people playing.I get what you're saying, but I don't think the value of a THPS game has ever really been in how long it takes to beat. It's a series that's always been about high replay value. Playing the same courses over and over again to try to beat your friends score or just to find that perfect line. Of course if high score attacks isn't appealing to you then obviously it's not going to seem like good value, but you can sink a lot of time into it if that's your thing.
With that said, only the first game was short in terms of just completing it. That took four hours according to HowLongtoBeat. The other three games took between 9-11 hours.
You posted a screen shot. Come back when you show it to me in motion. Until then you're useless to me.
The developers have a shit track record. Game already looks like shit graphically. Not a good indication of quality so far.
Keep in mind that this was the official, hand-picked, specifically-selected promo material. As in what was handed over in an attempt to look as good as possible to try to sell the concept and create maximum hype. And this is the best they could offer.I don't see how that looks like "shit" and also we don't know what platform that screenshot is from or how far in development those shots were taken. Assumptions left and right here from people.
60 bucks for only 9 levels, 2 of them being remakes of older levels? The remaining 7 levels had better be massive then.