• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5 to be full priced release ($60-PS4/ONE,$40-360/PS3)

Xater

Member
I just want to put this out there.

The last WWE game looks WAY better than this. And those games are like the benchmark for terrible looking AAA games. And we don't even know if this is 60 FPS yet or not. Hooo boy.

Yup, good luck with this one Activision.
 
Going to wait for the obvious Christmas sale for this game like others. I can't even say downgrade because the first pictures of this game have been terrible. They can only go up from here.
 
Is it hyperbole to say these are the worst graphics of any $60 current gen release?
Puddy Squad was $40 release so not really.

ps-experience-screenshot-12.jpg


Sixty. Dollars.

Sixty.
I spent $22 which was worth it at that price.
I don't think I would buy this game for $22. Maybe $5 (that is a hard maybe).

The screenshots I have seen, the face models are the only thing that look like crap. Some of you are really harsh.
It looks worse than Tony Hawk Ride. IDK how they did that.
 
Hahahahahahahaha....i just can't stop laughing hahaha.

Oh boy. Tony must have been really desperate. After Tony Hawk Ride they should have known better than to revive something like this.

This looks like a 19.99 downloadable only title for 360.

Like, the Hydro Thunder 360 remake that's digital only looks far better than this

I think the problem isn't with reviving this particular series since people could say the same if a new Skate was announced to be developed by a Dev with a horrible track record. I think the problem is that they picked the worst possible Devs to give it to considering Robomodo fucked up the last 3 Tony Hawk games they made and are responsible for the long time it's been since we've had a title with all the damage they did to the I.P. putting out shovelware games.

This is from the Wikipedia page on Tony Hawk:Shred -
"The initial price for the game was $120 for a bundle including the skateboard controller and approximately $50 for the stand-alone game. During its first week on sale in the United States, the game sold 3,000 copies;[2][3] combined with the negative reception, the Tony Hawk franchise was put on hold"


It seems they haven't learned that you can't charge full price for a game that's not of the same quality as a full price title.


Developers grow with each project. So much negativity,

The problem is they've had 3 chances to grow, and the only thing they've grown is the ire of their community for putting out shit games that ruined the Tony Hawk I.P.

What do you expect when you have a game attempting to harken back to the glory days, as made by the team who completely bungled that exact thing with their previous work?

Tony Hawk's Pro Skater HD proved that Robomodo shouldn't be the developer doing this.

Spot on. If they want to harken to old days, make the gameplay and quality of the game the same as it was in the glory days, with the logical modern improvements we've come to expect like higher resolution and such, not a complete re-work of the core fundamentals of the game like Robomodo has done with all their Tony Hawk games.

Tony Hawk: Ride - Garbage shovelware peripheral gimmick
Tony Hawk: Shred - Garbage shovelware peripheral gimmick #2
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater HD - Great idea thrown in the trash with horrible moon physics that are nothing like the game its supposed to be based on.
 

TM94

Member
Man, Y'all harsh in here. I'm giving this thing the benefit of the doubt before I crucify it.

Agreed, at least wait until we see footage.

I feel bad for the developers, must be awful to see your work ridiculed and dismissed almost instantly.
 

OnPoint

Member
How does this make any sense, whatsoever?

They're selling it for the expected price of a console game in 2015. That's not news, that's a baseline. It means we can expect content equivalent to a disc-based product, rather than a strictly downloadable title.

You've got some screenshots that look sub-par, and a developer with a bad skateboarding game under their belt. I will forgive you for not leaking hype. But being this dismissive seems excessive.

The "shitty price" is representative of where the industry has come since THPS games were considered full price games (note, not THUG or anything after). The THPS redux last gen didn't get bumped out at full price. It's a question of identity. What is this game?

If they want a true current-gen full $60 title they need to outline some pretty awesome features. What sort of innovations can we expect? Online play of some sort is a given, but we've heard nothing about it. So far the only new feature announced is the ability to fire projectiles. Is that worth an extra $40-$45 bucks? Probably not. The reaction to it so far, at least here on GAF, has been fairly negative. THPS4 came out in 2002 and that's the only new thing we've really got to go on. Please, forgive those who aren't in bunches over that.

OK, so new features are out right now. It's clear they're going for a "return to form" anyway. So what then? A ton of levels with lots of objectives and secrets, plus a multitude of unique skaters would suffice. In a product like this, content is king. However, nothing like this was discussed. And then you remember it's Activision. Recent output in other series' points toward it including a small handful of levels at launch and then you have to buy more. It might not be that way, but I'm not holding my breath for them to change their recent strategy for this game.

Aside from a copious amount of levels and skaters, I don't know how you fill a skateboarding game in the THPS style with $60 worth of content these days without revolutionizing the genre. A story-based Campaign would help but even that feels old-hat at this point and doesn't fit the THPS mold. Online features like some sort of MMO-style skate park with competitions and events would be cool. But I'm just making that up now. Nothing -- I repeat -- nothing except the projectile firing move has been revealed as a new feature.

Being OK with $60 is -- and I'm understating this -- asking a lot for what's on the table at this point. Maybe people will get more excited when we get a clearer picture of what's to come.

How's that for a rant
 

Akzel

Junior Member
Why is that surprising? I mean it's a game like any games. I'm not surprised about this price at all.
 
装甲悪鬼村正;163033312 said:
I'm confused, why would I not expect a THPS to be full price? What's going on here?

Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.
 
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.

They made up their mind using past experiences from the people making this game so I'd say thats a good indication. If a dev has made nothing but shit games and gets handed the license to make a game that you love you're gonna know to expect the worse. It'd be different if it were a new Dev that was yet to prove themselves but Robomodo have proved their incompetence 3 times. Unless you have a reason why the game will be great and have some proof behind it then you have less of an idea what you're talking about than those people you're trying to look down on from your high horse.
 

DNAbro

Member
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.

The developers have a shit track record. Game already looks like shit graphically. Not a good indication of quality so far.
 

Nyoro SF

Member
Because several individuals have made up their mind months in advance about a game that hasn't even shown off a proper gameplay video yet.

There's a little something called a track record. I hope you aren't in charge of hiring employees anywhere.

Why is that surprising? I mean it's a game like any games. I'm not surprised about this price at all.

Probably because people are judging on what we have only been given so far, which is graphic quality.

Cross-gen titles costing $20 more because they ticked off a resolution and AA box is...
 
They made up their mind using past experiences from the people making this game so I'd say thats a good indication. If a dev has made nothing but shit games and gets handed the license to make a game that you love you're gonna know to expect the worse. It'd be different if it were a new Dev that was yet to prove themselves but Robomodo have proved their incompetence 3 times. Unless you have a reason why the game will be great and have some proof behind it then you have less of an idea what you're talking about than those people you're trying to look down on from your high horse.

No high horse at all. I'm simply saying that it seems too early to judge a game that we haven't seen in motion yet based upon an admittedly poor screenshot. The game has been marked for release later this year, which gives them ample time to update their visuals.

The biggest reason I bring up a gameplay video is because the biggest complaint to their track record was the physics used in THPS:HD. This is the only entry to the THPS series that Robomodo has developed that didn't involve some wacky skateboarding peripheral included. Tony Hawk's Ride had multiple issues but ultimately, the most cited flaw that I've ever seen is that people didn't want to use the stupid peripheral. Tony Hawk's Shred suffered a similar fate, especially on the back of the legacy of Ride.

I am disagreeing with the jump to assume that Robomodo potentially learned nothing from their previous entry in the series based on an ugly screenshot or that it should be any surprise that a complete game will be discounted as the remaster was. The doom and gloom of the last three threads regarding this feels unwarranted until we see a gameplay video closer to the actual release date.
 

DNAbro

Member
No high horse at all. I'm simply saying that it seems too early to judge a game that we haven't seen in motion yet based upon an admittedly poor screenshot. The game has been marked for release later this year, which gives them ample time to update their visuals.

The biggest reason I bring up a gameplay video is because the biggest complaint to their track record was the physics used in THPS:HD. This is the only entry to the THPS series that Robomodo has developed that didn't involve some wacky skateboarding peripheral included. Tony Hawk's Ride had multiple issues but ultimately, the most cited flaw that I've ever seen is that people didn't want to use the stupid peripheral. Tony Hawk's Shred suffered a similar fate, especially on the back of the legacy of Ride.

I am disagreeing with the jump to assume that Robomodo potentially learned nothing from their previous entry in the series based on an ugly screenshot or that it should be any surprise that a complete game will be discounted as the remaster was.

ugly screenshots. We've seen more than one screen. Graphically this game looks like crap. Game could still be fun but they have a lot to prove.
 
This was the case for the early amazon pages on Watch_Dogs as well (at 90 bucks IIRC) and people lost their shit back then, too. Just thinking this is more of the same.

Maybe this is all just an elaborate prank. Like they're sitting around at Activision thinking of ways to collectively screw with people. "OK, we tell 'em we're developing a new Tony Hawk game, but it's being made by the same people who drove the series into the ground, set it on fire and buried it. Help me whip up some 'screenshots' by cutting and pasting these old magazine clippings over some generic backdrop my kid made as a Quake 3 map. And make some outlandish claim, like firing projectiles or something else that no one could possibly find appealing. Yeah, give it a page on Amazon and tell people it's going to be $60!" It's like performance art.
 
ugly screenshots. We've seen more than one screen. Graphically this game looks like crap. Game could still be fun but they have a lot to prove.

Absolutely. Never said we shouldn't be looking at the game (or any game for that matter) with due skepticism.
 
No high horse at all. I'm simply saying that it seems too early to judge a game that we haven't seen in motion yet based upon an admittedly poor screenshot. The game has been marked for release later this year, which gives them ample time to update their visuals.

The biggest reason I bring up a gameplay video is because the biggest complaint to their track record was the physics used in THPS:HD. This is the only entry to the THPS series that Robomodo has developed that didn't involve some wacky skateboarding peripheral included. Tony Hawk's Ride had multiple issues but ultimately, the most cited flaw that I've ever seen is that people didn't want to use the stupid peripheral. Tony Hawk's Shred suffered a similar fate, especially on the back of the legacy of Ride.

I am disagreeing with the jump to assume that Robomodo potentially learned nothing from their previous entry in the series based on an ugly screenshot or that it should be any surprise that a complete game will be discounted as the remaster was.

I agree that we should give the benefit of the doubt when so little is known about a game. Many times people get a first impression of a game that is very far from the way the game actually turns out and I hate when a game I love is ill-received due to ignorance rather than the game itself being deserving of said bad-rep. The reason I'm so doubtful is that they''ve screwed up 3 times when they were assigned a game thats gameplay first. They could get a pass on the assets if the core gameplay is there, and your point is that we can't judge the gameplay yet since we don't definitively know how it'll turn out. But I truly believe it will be another case of them screwing up by trying to make their mark on the series rather than sticking to the roots like they claim to be. If they really wanted to stick to the roots of the series then they should be focusing on nailing the gameplay and not adding useless features to the game to make it something its not. Their terrible track record is my reasoning for why I have no faith and it's easier to believe something that has failed 3 times will fail again than it is to believe that the person responsible for the 3 previous failures will be capable this time. If you make a big mistake like that you should learn the first time, not the fourth.
 
Why is that surprising? I mean it's a game like any games. I'm not surprised about this price at all.
I think because they confirmed 9 courses only. You can probably beat it in 3 hours.
But yeah, we shouldn't be surprised with 4 hour games getting retail pricing since it happened last gen.
 

KalBalboa

Banned
I don't really know much about THPS5 now other than it's a current gen $60 game. That's not particularly shocking news.

I'm hoping the first gameplay I see is good.
 

Artorias

Banned
I'm kind of surprised at all the tone policing in here for such a shitty looking game. It may be a good game with improved physics for all I know, but there is no denying that it looks like fucking garbage.
 
If it's 1080p60, has local and online MP, and plays better than THPS HD, I'm fine with this. I don't care about next gen graphics in a Tony Hawk game, I want it to play well. It'd be nice if they did a DLC pack of levels from older games and gave THPS HD owners a discount, but knowing Activision, that's unlikely.
 
I'm kind of surprised at all the tone policing in here for such a shitty looking game. It may be a good game with improved physics for all I know, but there is no denying that it looks like fucking garbage.
The main thing is the developer has not proven themselves yet.
It is much like Killer Instinct a while back when we learned the guys who made Green Lantern were working on it.
If they can pull it off, more power to them. The previews seem like they haven't learned yet what makes a TH game fun.

then wy make it at all
Sometimes bad games sell.
I really don't see this reviving the franchise though, much like the new Guitar Hero game.
 
I think because they confirmed 9 courses only. You can probably beat it in 3 hours.
But yeah, we shouldn't be surprised with 4 hour games getting retail pricing since it happened last gen.

I get what you're saying, but I don't think the value of a THPS game has ever really been in how long it takes to beat. It's a series that's always been about high replay value. Playing the same courses over and over again to try to beat your friends score or just to find that perfect line. Of course if high score attacks isn't appealing to you then obviously it's not going to seem like good value, but you can sink a lot of time into it if that's your thing.

With that said, only the first game was short in terms of just completing it. That took four hours according to HowLongtoBeat. The other three games took between 9-11 hours.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
If it's 1080p60, has local and online MP, and plays better than THPS HD, I'm fine with this. I don't care about next gen graphics in a Tony Hawk game, I want it to play well. It'd be nice if they did a DLC pack of levels from older games and gave THPS HD owners a discount, but knowing Activision, that's unlikely.

Same devs as thpshd and tony hawk ride so the gameplay will probably be ass.
 
I get what you're saying, but I don't think the value of a THPS game has ever really been in how long it takes to beat. It's a series that's always been about high replay value. Playing the same courses over and over again to try to beat your friends score or just to find that perfect line. Of course if high score attacks isn't appealing to you then obviously it's not going to seem like good value, but you can sink a lot of time into it if that's your thing.

With that said, only the first game was short in terms of just completing it. That took four hours according to HowLongtoBeat. The other three games took between 9-11 hours.
I can agree with that as well. It is mostly if they can have lots to do in those 9 courses. If it is like the old series, the course challenges are probably 4 hours total. Online score leader boards would be a good option to keep people playing.

It really just depends on what they do with those 9 courses.
From what I seen of this though I don't really have faith in the developer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBe5tAHk7qk
 

Demoskinos

Member
The developers have a shit track record. Game already looks like shit graphically. Not a good indication of quality so far.

I don't see how that looks like "shit" and also we don't know what platform that screenshot is from or how far in development those shots were taken. Assumptions left and right here from people.
 

OnPoint

Member
To anyone who thinks the graphics are getting updated in any meaningful way before release:

- Can you point to a time where a game from a big publisher was revealed 6 months before release
and saw massive graphical improvements when it came out?

-Wouldn't you think they'd want to put their best foot forward this close to release?​
 
I don't see how that looks like "shit" and also we don't know what platform that screenshot is from or how far in development those shots were taken. Assumptions left and right here from people.
Keep in mind that this was the official, hand-picked, specifically-selected promo material. As in what was handed over in an attempt to look as good as possible to try to sell the concept and create maximum hype. And this is the best they could offer.
 
60 bucks for only 9 levels, 2 of them being remakes of older levels? The remaining 7 levels had better be massive then.

I don't care about the graphics quality for this game, number of levels is my issue. 9 seems very low for a full price game.
 
Top Bottom