• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Witcher 3: Is your system ready - Nvidia official system requirements

hermeslyre

Neo Member
Well, that's a different matter as everyone's mileage with overclocking varies. Best is to understand how systems perform at stock. Then it will be up to individuals to figure out how far they can push it. Mixing over clocking with this info muddles the water and sets the wrong expectation.

Certainly from an official standpoint. But I'm not an official.

So I'll put it out there now. If the 980 stock can hit that target, so can almost any 970. OCing is easy as balls nowadays, and the 970 is a unique position where every card on the market has vast OCing potential. None of them are at their limits at stock speeds.
 
11265324_1093351437346036_4480161926829240275_o.jpg


mhhhhhhhh
 

Grassy

Member
Well I should be able to get decent performance at 1440p with my sli 670's, at least until the 980 Ti's arrive...hopefully soon.
 

H4r4kiri

Member
I just hope R9 290 / R9 290X is fine for 1080p@uber (~gtx 970)

please dont be unoptimized for AMD, im too lazy to recofigure and reinstall to GTX 970.. (especially with 2 screens and TV)

Really hoping AMD optimization isnt too bad. If a 960 can pull off High at 40fps+ then Im hoping my 7970 should be able to do a mix of high and ultra at 60fps.

All off this. I hope AMD takes a look how Nvidia handles it and release Charts etc. It is so cool to see that an Nvidia representative is answering question here.
Take a NOTE AMD !

Edit: It was just a too good offer to go from a 760 Nvidia to a AMD 290 for 50€ for me :), but I am really surprised how good the nvidia Support is.
 
Hoping to get decent performance at 1440p with my 7970 crossfire setup.
This game is likely to determine whether I upgrade or not, as I am closely monitoring the 980 Ti
and 390x.
 

viveks86

Member
Missed that, was transfixed by the owl. Yes, chart is everything on, no 'max settings without aa' benchmarking silliness here :)

AWESOME! So I'm going to have enough headroom to tweak ini files even at 4k60 (Titan X SLI OC +200/+400)? I'd probably not even need AA if I can force FXAA through NVCP.
 
Resisting the 970 has been tough.

Wonder if I should make the leap from 8GB ram to 16 ram. I've heard mixed messages on whether it would make any difference.
 

Tworak

Member
https://scontent-fra.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/t31.0-8/s960x960/11265324_1093351437346036_4480161926829240275_o.jpg[IMG]

mhhhhhhhh[/QUOTE]
no doubt which platform is selling best/worst [img]https://github.com/bontscho/dota2-chat-emoticons/raw/master/assets/images/horse.gif
 

Kyaw

Member
How do you think I'm gonna fare with:

AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHz
8GB DDR2 RAM
2GB GTX680

Reaaally need a CPU upgrade.
 

Iceternal

Member
So where does my 780 Ti fit? Under the 970 right? So high-uber 1080p?

Edit: Why is there 3 different settings for the 960? What does that even mean? Which one is it?

Are you kidding ? except for Vram, a 780 Ti is at least as good as a 970 ...

Though I still think my 780 ti is some of the worst money I've ever spent ... Buyer's remorse is strong with this one ...
 

Moff

Member
doesnt look good at all for my system
I have only a 780ti and since I have an asus ROG Swift I need to play it on 1440p if I don't want it to lookg blurry. damn it, I really hoped nvidia would release the 980ti before the witcher 3.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
i5 @ 4.3 with 2x 290x

Curious to see how much my CPU will hold me back/how fucked the support for AMD cards will be.

Hah, you're in a better position than me at least, I'm on an FX6300 and a 280x. Granted I'm gonna buy a better cooler and OC that sucker for W3, but still. Cold do worse than an i5 and two 290Xs :p

Also :lol

Your PC's AMD Radeon R9 200 Series meets the game's minimum specification, but is below the game's recommended specification

The recommended specification to enjoy The Witcher® 3: Wild Hunt is GeForce GTX 770 or higher. Check below to see some upgrade options.

Is this based on actual data or is it just that the tester doesn't have any actual AMD numbers to pull from? I'd be kinda sad if my 280x is below min spec ;p
 

viveks86

Member
Didnt' the .ini mention MSAA samples in adition to temporal AA (TXAA)?

Yes, but changing it won't make a difference.

From postprocess.xml:

<!--<Var id="AllowMSAA" displayName="allow_msaa" displayType="TOGGLE"/>--> <!-- not supported right now -->

Doesn't TXAA depend on MSAA to function? I've always thought TXAA was a combo of MSAA plus post temporal filters.

The underlying technique, yes. But it varies from game to game on how it's implemented. May be the game has not implemented in-game hardware MSAA yet and depends on Nvidia's library for TXAA.

Hardware AA isn't supported. This is post-process. Specifics in the guide ;)

Well there you go
 

Derp

Member
Are you kidding ? except for Vram, a 780 Ti is at least as good as a 970 ...

Though I still think my 780 ti is some of the worst money I've ever spent ... Buyer's remorse is strong with this one ...
970 outperforms the 780 Ti in some games, which is why I asked.

I regret the purchase as well to be honest... I'm skipping the 900 series and waiting for Pascal.
 

Shy

Member
Honest question.
this is my rig
I7 4770k oc'd@4.1.
GTX TITAN. (og ver)
16gb RAM @1866mhz.

i should be able to play on uber with gameworks @1080/60, right. ?
 

viveks86

Member
Sigh so FXAA..... Why don't devs use SMAA?

Not just FXAA. There is a temporal AA setting too. I assumed it was TXAA. Apparently, not. No idea what it is yet.

After reading this this:

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/03/12/crysis_3_video_card_performance_iq_review/9#.VVW7ykCgRAs

It looks like TXAA is by far the worst AA technique to use, as it blurs textures too much.
What to do?

Andy confirmed there is no Hardware AA, so TXAA isn't in either.
 
Top Bottom