-MD-
Member
You have to be joking.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Frame Rate of Fallout 4 in Interiors is horrible [PS4]
- Thread starter Kenzodielocke
- Start date
- Status
You have to be joking.
Doctor_Thomas
Member
As someone who played Fallout 3 and Skyrim on PS3, you'll have to forgive me for being a little bit sceptical.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
Ha good luck. Maybe iD Tech 6 for Fallout 5 if they feel like it.
Impeccable
Member
... they fixed Skyrim from completely broken and unplayable to a playable state. There's no way to pretend they didn't.
BreezyLimbo
Banned
I looked at the video, and other then one drop half way into the video, it looks completely fine.
Whats the problem again?
Whats the problem again?
Ricerocket
Member
That ain't happening since they have a fanbase that keep making the excuses for them. "It's open world so it's ok, also it's just typical Bethesda jank, it's fine"
wookieofdoom
Member
This thread has bummed my high
dealer-
Member
I doubt it, it will sell loads and they will continue using it unfortunately.
MMaRsu
Banned
And how long did that take? Were the issues ever fully fixed?
I think reviewers mostly played on 360 last gen, this the high scores. If they pull the same nonsense again but on PS4 Bethesda truly is incompetent. Or their engine work at least :/.
With these technical issues and the simplification of gameplay systems Im not sure it will get great reviews. Sure the world atmosphere itself will probably be good but the rest?
We shall see tomorrow
gbpackers25
Member
What confuses me is that I understand the problems with the PS3 versions of Bethesda games. It was a lot more work to run the game on Cell. The PS4 is a lot easier to develop for.
XxRampage07xX
Member
Ugh the frame rate when player looking through the scope is so awful. Also, what's up with those rock textures? They look so flat and ugly for me.
Enter the Dragon Punch
Banned
You got ripped hard on the PC, man. They took advantage of you.
Also, that's still purely anecdotal evidence. Of course when you go to discuss your issues with the game you'll find people with similar issues. That doesn't change the fact that the majority of players didn't have issues. The reception from both critics and users was great for the PC version of Skyrim. Hell, look at the Steam review margin.
Dick Justice
Banned
It's difficult to tell who's joking, and who's being a pathetic, subservient fanboy who has to repeatedly fellate Bethesda because they can't take anyone criticizing their beloved vidyagame.
Norwegian_Imposter
Member
Game feel like a train wreck, watched the video and feels like ps3 skyrim all over again, imagine after a few hours of playing on how the performance will just decrease I kid you not. Also it looks like pants:
Oh come on train wreck that video isn't
perineumlick
Member
That's the thing; when it comes down to frame rate, some people are more sensitive to it than others. In that event, who are you to tell them they're being hyperbolic, when chances are the both of you are having different experiences? The simplest thing to do is to not call out people, and just relate your experience and opinion and keep it moving, but sadly most people get caught up on proving people wrong.
Scientist Supreme!
Banned
I don't like generalization but this is damn good.
Love this.
lol
Mexican Sting
Member
As someone who slogged through a lot of FO3 on PS3, this is dissapponting, but not unexpected.
I had lower standards back then, and when I tried to go back years later after becoming a PC gamer I just couldn't do it. The framerate was one thing, but it would just constantly crash. No bueno, bethesda.
I had lower standards back then, and when I tried to go back years later after becoming a PC gamer I just couldn't do it. The framerate was one thing, but it would just constantly crash. No bueno, bethesda.
-MD-
Member
TheOfficeMut
Unconfirmed Member
Obviously this means it's acceptable since it's a Bethesda game and should be expected!
Garrett Hawke
Member
"mega blurry"Game feel like a train wreck, watched the video and feels like ps3 skyrim all over again, imagine after a few hours of playing on how the performance will just decrease I kid you not. Also it looks like pants:
*screenshot of a YT video*
hm.....
Also "not next gen"? What does that mean?
Coolbgdog12
Member
real gamers don't play Fallout worrying about frame rate. The slow downs help take in the atmosphere.
Lack of distance shadows is really noticeable as well.
I mean, if you havent already bought Tearaway this is a given anyway, even if Fallout 4 launched at a solid 60fps with no drops. Tearaway is incredible.
Hands of Stone
Member
Prebuilt weren't worth at all back then, I mean they're getting better now but building you're own is still the best choice. Cheaper and more bang for your buck.
Or maybe I just don't really see anything that's an issue to me in those videos that will ruin my enjoyment of the game? I'm no fanboy of Bethesda but I enjoy their games and this one seems like it'll be no different.
Your comment is actually pretty harsh and insulting to people excited for the game. So what if they can't see issues in those vids. How does that bother you?
astroturfing
Member
i KNEW Bettesda would betray PS4 fans, just like always. i noticed in some streams very bad antialiaising and framerate when others said its fine, but i knew it.. i just knew Bettesda would betray us. they always do, end of story. do not trust them.
we PS4 fans should support real devs like those who made The Order 1888 and Driveclup, absolutely beautiful games only possible on PS4. Fallout is laughable if you compare any jpg of gif you can find. this game should cost 8 dollars on PSN because thats how cheaply made it looks (to real gamers at least)
like i said i knew it but people wouldnt believe
we PS4 fans should support real devs like those who made The Order 1888 and Driveclup, absolutely beautiful games only possible on PS4. Fallout is laughable if you compare any jpg of gif you can find. this game should cost 8 dollars on PSN because thats how cheaply made it looks (to real gamers at least)
like i said i knew it but people wouldnt believe
BreezyLimbo
Banned
No worse then the folks coming in to create an echo chamber saying "SEE ITS A PIECE OF A SHIT LOL BETHESDA FANBOYS FELLATING".
So sad, so angry those people are. I pity those people.
This basically...
I'm not defending Bethesda... it's seriously getting tiring that they're so myopic when it comes to their tech at this point. But at the same time,my favorite game of all time is OoT on the 64, so I've never been one to complain about framerate when I like the game itself.
Haven't played this though, obviously... so I could end up hating it.
Yup, was expecting better. I doubt it's as bad as Skyrim but if the framerates are effecting aiming? That's not good.
some people on this forum are so vile.
SGRU
Member
If by playable you mean 15 FPS, then yes, they did.
Dick Justice
Banned
Guess you didn't see stuff like "first world problems" and similar posts, eh? I'd say they're worse, because they're actively attempting to shoot down legitimate criticism, in favour of protecting their glorious corporations that care so much about their wellbeing.
joecanada
Member
Ya I mean sure people can defend a games content or say the fps don't bother them but to some people like me this juddering, stuttering bullshit actually makes me dizzy and get headaches from it.
I wish I'd been warned more about the witcher. It's a mess and I couldn't play more than like 30 minutes at a time. All I heard was GOTY. So thanks op
People are acting like the bad framerate is acceptable, well what else is then? We already know that there are at least:
- shadows only showing for couple of meters in front
- pop-up
- clipping, especially in conversations
- long ass load times when entering/exiting buildings
- horrible animations
- companions teleporting / glitching
- player getting stuck in walls
And this is just by watching the Twitch streams today...(mostly PS4 version)
So...acceptable? Should the game pretty much crash on start-up for the issue to be not acceptable?
- shadows only showing for couple of meters in front
- pop-up
- clipping, especially in conversations
- long ass load times when entering/exiting buildings
- horrible animations
- companions teleporting / glitching
- player getting stuck in walls
And this is just by watching the Twitch streams today...(mostly PS4 version)
So...acceptable? Should the game pretty much crash on start-up for the issue to be not acceptable?
EatinOlives
Member
Sub 30 fps on any current-gen console is unacceptable.
MMaRsu
Banned
Riight.. now this here is bait
Dick Justice
Banned
My comment is referring to the fanboys who take offense to any form of criticism. If that offends you, maybe reconsider some things.
cjp
Junior Member
Please can you tell them to fix New Vegas on PS3.
I took another look, wasnt really watching closely the first time + low res.
Holy shit that would be annoying while playing. Those little stutters are far more annoying when you are in control. Def waiting for reviews on this now.
We live in a world where Aliens: Colonial Marines exists...
This is "lesson" is laughable in comparison...
Also the RAM set up, that is not an area to overlook.
But yes, everything should roughly be identical with XB1, so if this nonsense kicks in on PS4 anyway then it's a bunch of shit. Worst that should happen is that it's a highly CPU dependent game and thus shows an occasional issue not on XB1 when a CPU dependent moment crops up.
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
- Status