• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

George Lucas quips he sold 'Star Wars' to "white slavers," criticizes tone of TFA

Status
Not open for further replies.

gioGAF

Member
THANK you. You do not represent the entire fanbase, thank goodness.
Lol, go ahead, carry on with your "edgy" point of view and cling to the shitty prequels. Plenty of good movies came out between 1999 and 2005, they just don't include anything by George Lucas.
 
Well, he's not wrong about the lack of originality. It's been kind of hilarious how the prequels seem to get hated on more with time, but they were each adored on release, then reviled in favor of the next one.

Umm I remember people hating on Jar Jar, and Anakin yipping! on day 1. I actually remember eyerolling Jar Jar stepping into ICKY ICKY GOO! in the theater.
 

JeffZero

Purple Drazi
Well, he's not wrong about the lack of originality. It's been kind of hilarious how the prequels seem to get hated on more with time, but they were each adored on release, then reviled in favor of the next one.

Only Revenge of the Sith was anywhere close to being adored on release, in my experience.
 
I got a crazy idea for a sequel. The starkiller is back and EVEN BIGGER , and they gotta destroy it again! (Return of the Jedi)

People acting like the originals and prequels weren't ridiculous and full of stupid shit need to rewatch. The ewoks defeated the emperors plot with sticks and rocks. Come. The fuck. On.

Star Wars was always a silly ridiculous adventure. If you're gonna be mad about TFA be mad that it was less ridiculous and silly, not more.

why is star wars so popular?
 
Yep, at this point we drop Marcia Lucas into the thread

http://www.thegalaxyexpress.net/2011/09/marcia-lucas-unsung-hero-of-star-wars.html



SW happened in spite of Lucas it seems lol.
Gotta agree. It seems like it was this grand accident that it turned out as well as it did, and things went south when Lucas assumed everything was because of his vision as a filmmaker. A delusion he still has, apparently.
tumblr_inline_nblm6obius9a.jpg

Not a high horse, me and every other fan that has watched and rewatched this film (propelling it to $11 Billion for 2015) are proof.

I'm not speaking for anyone, but it is obvious that many are in agreement. I will just chalk your comment up to you being salty, no worries dude.
"This will begin to make things right" being the first spoken sentence was a great idea. Whoever came up with that should get paid just a little more.
 
What?

Part of the problem with the Prequels was that the aesthetics didn't make any sense. Everything looked so much cleaner and advanced compared to the tech in the OT. TFA did a proper progression of tech and aesthetics for 30 years later.

50s

VS

70s
Plus factor in the angular, mass produced rust buckets the empire would spit out akin to what was on the road back then.

A new one could have had tech more similar to today.
 

Ishida

Banned
Lol, go ahead, carry on with your "edgy" point of view and cling to the shitty prequels. Plenty of good movies came out between 1999 and 2005, they just don't include anything by George Lucas.

Having a different point of view is now edgy. C'mon now.

And I love all the Star Wars movies, thank you very much.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
I see a lot of people echoing "prequels were at least trying new things despite failing"

We're really going with THAT as a positive for prequel? Doing something new and failings doesn't sound like a good thing
 
After the terrible prequels, horrid input for Indy 4, and paint-by-numbers Red Tails I'm ready for him to stop contributing to cinema.

He just doesn't have the energy anymore.
This, and he didn't have it for a long time

Star wars ended in the 70s

He was half assing the prequels

Imagine if the prequels were made in the 70s
 

Fat4all

Banned
Can we stop with the "at least he tried something different with the prequels" excuse?

Yes he tried something different. That would be commendable if they didn't turn out to be complete horseshit in nearly every regard. Cinematography, dialogue, script, everything outsides a few OK uses of the CGI in the later prequels were all ass and contributed next to nothing when it comes to cinema or Star Wars in general.

This, and he didn't have it for a long time

Star wars ended in the 70s

He was half assing the prequels

Imagine if the prequels were made in the 70s

He's have a lot more people around him to say when stuff was dumb so probably a lot better, but that's going into "what if" territory that usually goes nowhere.
 

Dead

well not really...yet
Looks like we are moving on to the "George Lucas had nothing to do with the success of Star Wars, and really should not be taking any credit for any of it, and quite frankly his name should be scrubbed off all the OT and replaced with the mythical Marcia Lucas" delusion
 
I see a lot of people echoing "prequels were at least trying new things despite failing"

We're really going with THAT as a positive for prequel? Doing something new and failings doesn't sound like a good thing

It's also funny because the PT relied so hard on the OT in all plot points and random fanservice that trying new things argument is like a bad meme.
 

antonz

Member
50s


VS

70s

Plus factor in the angular, mass produced rust buckets the empire would spit out akin to what was on the road back then.

A new one could have had tech more similar to today.

People tend to ignore that the Star Wars Galaxy is one that has more or less reached peak scientific discovery. They can travel across the galaxy in days, build planet destroying space stations etc.

The Prequels gave us a look at the wealthier worlds of the galaxy. Tatooine was the asshole of the galaxy. It was never going to look amazing.
 

Ishida

Banned
Can we stop with the "at least he tried something different with the prequels" excuse?

Yes he tried something different. That would be commendable if they didn't turn out to be complete horseshit in nearly every regard. Cinematography, dialogue, script, everything outsides a few OK uses of the CGI in the later prequels were all ass and contributed next to nothing when it comes to cinema or Star Wars in general.

No. Because your opinion is not the end-all.
 
the only scene I actually enjoyed in the prequels was the palpatine opera scene, anakin kept his HURRR URRRR DURRRR lines to a minimum and Ian nailed it.
 

void666

Banned
All the "cool kids" decided to hate on the movies that were released from 99-2005, too. It's not a new phenomenon.

I assumed people hate the prequels because they are awful movies without any redeeming quality.

While TFA is a fun star wars movie. Yeah, it's made to sell toys and other merchandising.
But it's a great adventure. Something lucas failed to deliver in the prequels.
 
Looks like we are moving on to the "George Lucas had nothing to do with the success of Star Wars, and really should not be taking any credit for any of it, and quite frankly his name should be scrubbed off all the OT and replaced with the mythical Marcia Lucas" delusion

Marcia Lucas choreographed the lightsaber fight in ESB and told Han Solo to improve the "I know" line.
 

Ishida

Banned
I assumed people hate the prequels because they are awful movies without any redeeming quality.

A lot of people do.

A lot of people are just blinded by nostalgia.

A lot of people just jumped into the bandwagon of what was popular to do.

In the end, the bolded is just an opinion, though.

I'd love to see people defend the dialogue of the prequels.

Show me them so I may laugh in their faces.

Doubt anyone would do that.

I would laugh in the face of anyone who tried to defend the cheesy dialogue of the originals, though.
 

Nairume

Banned
A lot of people do.

A lot of people are just blinded by nostalgia.

A lot of people just jumped into the bandwagon of what was popular to do.

In the end, the bolded is just an opinion, though.
Finding legitimate faults in the prequels is being blinded by nostalgia or jumping into a bandwagon?
 
I want Disney to release the OT with all the uneeded changes undone, just for extra Lucas grade salt. Also because I dislike the changes.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
I'd love to see people defend the dialogue of the prequels.

Show me them so I may laugh in their faces.

"You're so beautiful
It's only because I'm so in love
No it's because I'm so in love with you
So love has blinded you?"

God it's so much worse typing it out

Anyway, I believe those people who defend the prequels are on theforce.net. I also believe those people think "if it isn't made by Lucas = not canon" so they disregard TFA as a result.
 
Finding legitimate faults in the prequels is being blinded by nostalgia or jumping into a bandwagon?
Yes. Even if you were young enough to have nostalgia for the prequels and not the OT. Then you're just a bandwagoner. If you rerelease Episode I in theaters today it would do just as well as TFA. Maybe add in 3D AND imax?
 

cj_iwakura

Member
Only Revenge of the Sith was anywhere close to being adored on release, in my experience.

Everyone was nuts over Episode 1's Duel of the Fates then 2's Yoda duel, then it was hated when the next came out. It's kind of cyclical.

(Mind you, I like the prequel trilogy.)

People then found things to nitpick over. With 1 it was the midichlorians. Then with 2, the love story, Then with 3, the 'ridiculous' lightsaber fights. Internet and Plinkett, mostly.
 

JeffZero

Purple Drazi
Everyone was nuts over Episode 1's Duel of the Fates then 2's Yoda duel, then it was hated when the next came out. It's kind of cyclical.

(Mind you, I like the prequel trilogy.)

Oh, for those particular elements at least, yeah. That's true. (Duel of the Fates is still pretty well regarded, I think.)
 

Pryce

Member
While George is right that TFA is a re-tread, it's miles better hat the prequels and miles better than anything he would have done going forward.

Salt, Mr. Lucas.
 

Sibylus

Banned
I see a lot of people echoing "prequels were at least trying new things despite failing"

We're really going with THAT as a positive for prequel? Doing something new and failings doesn't sound like a good thing
It's excuse-making, pure and simple. Trying something new doesn't redeem having no heart, nothing at stake, and just poor writing throughout.
 
I feel for him. I think his true talent lies in creating the big picture and major plot points. I feel like thats what made Clone Wars so good. He created the larger broader strokes but he had Filioni there to create the minor details. In fact it's part of the reason why I believe The Clone Wars to be a mandatory view when Judging the PT. They help justify some of the noise that's going on.

I often wonder what the PT would have been like had Kasten and Spielberg come on board for Episode I.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom