• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Magic: the Gathering |OT8| Eldritch Moon - It's only a paper (and digital) moon

Status
Not open for further replies.

OnPoint

Member
Oh God.

I hope they leave the romance angle to be Jace + Liliana = awkward bullshit and that's that. Or hook up Gideon and Chandra and be done with it. Please don't make this a soap.
 

Ashodin

Member
Oh God.

I hope they leave the romance angle to be Jace + Liliana = awkward bullshit and that's that. Or hook up Gideon and Chandra and be done with it. Please don't make this a soap.

That's basically what I'm afraid of. I (personally) think that relationship drama has no place in fantasy unless it's the focus (Game of Thrones). All it does is obscure the story trying to be told in my opinion.

Luckily they've kept things to just Jace and Liliana and that will satisfy those who want more of that type of stuff.

It's also a good thing that WOTC is chasing that superhero money instead of shipping money right now because I can stomach the Jacetice League more than I can stomach Teen Wolf: Magic Edition
 

Firemind

Member
I bought the same baby Jace cards. I'm getting together that Izzet Machinegun deck for game day because fuck you Bant I won't play you.
What's your list if I nay ask? I just put together a list and was wondering if I was missing something incredibly obvious.

Too bad Jace is about to rotate.
 
I see what you're doing and I will not take part in it

No seriously Gideon stalked Chandra to Zendikar. They had like 3 moments in their book, which Gideon was even created for by the author of said book.
Gideon is all fire is evil and I have to fight for order and chandra is like people saying shit like that murdered my parents.

Coincidentally Gideon worked for the Order of Heliud, not a typo, which is part of the reason people think Heliod was originally a PW.
 

Daedardus

Member
[QUOTE="God's Beard!";213009915]I thought they were gonna marry each other.[/QUOTE]

See OnPoint, God's Beard is doing shipping right.
 

Crowbear

Member
When did this goddamn Fevered Visions burn deck get so popular? I've been getting back into standard online after a while away playing that BW angels control deck and in the 10 matches I've played in the last 2 days 7 of them were against UR Fevered Visions, including 4 of the 5 I played in a league last night. I lost all of them but 1, most of them 0-2.

It seems like a horrible match up unless I completely change my sideboard specifically to combat this one deck.

I just played one where the guy got 4 Visions down in game 1, Jesus Christ.
 
I'm just glad shipping hasn't taken over. That kind of pandering kills franchises.

Making the actual source media about shipping pairings above all else kills franchises, but making content that inspires shipping is easily the single most effective approach to success for serial entertainment. This is literally the one reason Supernatural is still on the air.

Oh God.

I hope they leave the romance angle to be Jace + Liliana = awkward bullshit and that's that. Or hook up Gideon and Chandra and be done with it. Please don't make this a soap.

Their model is straight-up based on the X-Men so it's gonna be a soap no matter what. Again, the necessary thing is ensuring it's a comic-style soap (i.e. storytelling primarily driven by action/mystery/intrigue/etc. with romance drama happening to the side) and not a full-on TV soap, and given their target audience and the way they tell stories so far the latter does not seem like a risk.
 

Wichu

Member
[QUOTE="God's Beard!";213010452]Speaking of Jace, he's really dipped under $30?

Glad I sold mine at 80 after GP Oakland.[/QUOTE]

I should've sold or traded mine long ago. Oh well, I got 'em for £10 each - I really doubt it will ever go that low again, so I'm not too bothered.
 

Firemind

Member
Could be worse. I bought Ojutai for 20-22 a piece and it's now $6 according to mtggoldfish.

Something is wrong with the game if a 5/4 hexproof dragon that mini Impulses every attack is considered unplayable.
 

OnPoint

Member
Could be worse. I bought Ojutai for 20-22 a piece and it's now $6 according to mtggoldfish.

Something is wrong with the game if a 5/4 hexproof dragon that mini Impulses every attack is considered unplayable.
I still say him plus always watching is a deck.
 
[QUOTE="God's Beard!";213010452]Speaking of Jace, he's really dipped under $30?

Glad I sold mine at 80 after GP Oakland.[/QUOTE]
Feel bad for the people that dropped 400 bones for a play set.
 

Akim

Banned
How low do you think Jace gonna go after rotation? I kinda wanna buy a couple for a U/R spells deck for FNM.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I'm just glad shipping hasn't taken over. That kind of pandering kills franchises.

That's what builds franchises.

Honestly I've never bought the expression "I don't understand shipping" despite how often people on GAF say it. The only way you don't understand shipping is if you have never had any kind of intellectual or emotional engagement with a work of fiction.
 

Ashodin

Member
That's what builds franchises.

Honestly I've never bought the expression "I don't understand shipping" despite how often people on GAF say it. The only way you don't understand shipping is if you have never had any kind of intellectual or emotional engagement with a work of fiction.

I just don't care about relationships in certain kinds of fiction I read. simple as that. I'll read fiction ABOUT relationships if I want that sort of thing.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I just don't care about relationships in certain kinds of fiction I read. simple as that. I'll read fiction ABOUT relationships if I want that sort of thing.

I mean, you can write it out, but I don't believe you.
 

ultron87

Member
I mean, you can write it out, but I don't believe you.

I can understand people saying that it has no appeal to them personally, but people saying that they completely don't understand shipping as a concept are either lying or have led the most sheltered media lives ever and have never engaged with anyone even slightly different than them regarding media.
 

Yeef

Member
I mean, you can write it out, but I don't believe you.
I have to agree with Ahodin on this one. Certain types of fiction just don't lend themselves to shipping culture. One of my favorite short stories I've read in recent memory was Long Tom Lookout about a women who ends up taking care of her husband's 5-year-old son from a previous relationship while he's away on business.

Serial fiction tends to lend itself to that sort of thing (especially if it's got a large, ensemble cast), but to say that it's impossible to be engaged with fiction without shipping is way off base.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
You're consuming horrible (e.g. MTG-quality) fiction if you literally do not care about the interpersonal relationships of the characters involved.
 

Daedardus

Member
You're consuming horrible (e.g. MTG-quality) fiction if you literally do not care about the interpersonal relationships of the characters involved.

I mean, there's a difference in caring about interpersonal relationship or just straight up imagining full stories about it. I deeply care about the relationships of my friends, but I'm not going to make up shit about who should marry each other.
 

Ashodin

Member
You're consuming horrible (e.g. MTG-quality) fiction if you literally do not care about the interpersonal relationships of the characters involved.

It's not a hard concept to get - if Fiction A is about fighting a demonic power that threatens to rule the world, I don't want to read about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of the demons who killed his previous lover. That's not why I'm reading the book.

If Fiction B is about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of something who killed their previous lover (later revealed as demons), then they meet Character B who IS a demon, then I'm reading the book for the relationship, not the demons.
 

aidan

Hugo Award Winning Author and Editor
It's not a hard concept to get - if Fiction A is about fighting a demonic power that threatens to rule the world, I don't want to read about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of the demons who killed his previous lover. That's not why I'm reading the book.

If Fiction B is about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of something who killed their previous lover (later revealed as demons), then they meet Character B who IS a demon, then I'm reading the book for the relationship, not the demons.

Interpersonal relationships allow readers to form an empathetic connection with the characters, which in turn makes them give a shit that the fate of the world is at stake. That relationship must exist between the reader and the characters, otherwise there's no conflict or you're reading a history textbook. You could get around this by structuring the story around a single person's internal conflict—their relationship with themselves/their past/whatever—but you'd best have a good reason to do so.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
It's not a hard concept to get - if Fiction A is about fighting a demonic power that threatens to rule the world, I don't want to read about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of the demons who killed his previous lover. That's not why I'm reading the book.

If Fiction B is about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of something who killed their previous lover (later revealed as demons), then they meet Character B who IS a demon, then I'm reading the book for the relationship, not the demons.

You're basically saying you only want to read low-quality fiction if you specifically in advance don't know or care to know the motivations of the characters involved, even if you try to limit the character trait you don't care about specifically to one particular type of relationship generally shared by every living person.
 
Let's not forget what OT4's OP looked like.

When people say they don't understand shipping, I get the impression that they simply misunderstand what the term means. They think it refers to stuff like this collection of Naruto X Sakura posts from toward the end of Naruto, when Naruto X Hinata was becoming confirmed, where they start raging and crying over things not going their way. In actuality, shipping can cover a wide variety of levels, from that to simply thinking fan art of two characters holding hands and blushing is cute, or thinking it makes more sense for two characters to be together than another pair but otherwise not getting involved in the fan community.
 

Ashodin

Member
You're basically saying you only want to read low-quality fiction if you specifically in advance don't know or care to know the motivations of the characters involved, even if you try to limit the character trait you don't care about specifically to one particular type of relationship generally shared by every living person.

I never said I wouldn't read Fiction B. I'm saying there's a time and a place (for me) for each one.
 

Yeef

Member
I mean, there's a difference in caring about interpersonal relationship or just straight up imagining full stories about it. I deeply care about the relationships of my friends, but I'm not going to make up shit about who should marry each other.
This is where I'm at, too. There's a huge difference between being engaged with how characters manage their relationships with other characters and dreaming up your own, fantasy relationships for them.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I never said I wouldn't read Fiction B. I'm saying there's a time and a place (for me) for each one.

The problem here is that you aren't even arguing against shipping. You're actually arguing against romance existing in a piece of fiction unless its actually written on the tin, which is an absurdly arbitrary restriction on character development.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom