here is the input lag
1080p @ 60Hz : 19.8 ms
1080p With Interpolation : 109.9 ms
1080p @ 60Hz Outside Game Mode : 122.4 ms
1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 : 36.7 ms
4k @ 60Hz : 20.4 ms
4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 : 36.7 ms
4k @ 60Hz + HDR : 20.4 ms
4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 + HDR : 36.7 ms
just want to reiterate I don't know what the use case scenario for 4k @ 60hz HDR 4:4:4 is. HDMI 2.0a doesn't support it. So when gaming at 4k HDR you'll be at 20ms.
What's a better 65" TV for under a G?People are so desperate to get an HDR TV, they literally don't care whether it is or not it seems. So much misinformation being spread by people who don't want to reach into their pockets
If you have a PC hooked up and label it 'PC' you can use the 4:4:4 for cleaner text and detail at the sacrifice of some lag
Don't think it would be HDR though
Its HDR. Some tvs just do HDR better than others.8bit panel
No local dimming/ dual modulation
It can accept and HDR signal , but what you see is not HDR
It can accept and HDR signal , but what you see is not HDR
Its HDR. Some tvs just do HDR better than others.
It is...
Thank youOk, half of GAF will say I'm ruining the image by using dynamic contrast, but this is what looks good TO ME, seven feet back on my couch (KU6290, PS4 Pro):
Welcome to video games.
From what I can see, the 6600 is the Amazon-exclusive version of the 6500 (has a different stand). The 6500 is the curved version of the 6290 and 6300 that everyone in here is talking about. It's not true 10 bit HDR but it looks really good and will beat the pants off of an older, non-HDR TV. It also has low input lag, which is good for gaming obviously.
I agree that it pales in comparison but it would still be considered HDR the same way youtube '1080p' is still 1080p regardless of whether its blu ray quality.Let's not sugar coat this. It's technically HDR because it accepts the signal but what the true HDR experience is, this doesn't even remotely come close. It's like a 720p screen with a native res of 1360 x 768 taking a 1080p signal. It's not really 1080p despite you likely getting a better resolution than 720p. Two years from now, when we look back at what this capability is, it's going to be considered complete utter shit and not in the same league as what the content is supposed to look like. It's super half assed HDR and to keep pushing the line that it's HDR is going to be more confusing for people looking for a proper HDR implementation.
This thread along with all others circulating right now just tells me that nothing is standardized and I should just wait one or two years before purchasing, so that everything can settle.
Just get a B6 OLED... it has no flaws really
Just get the Sony X800D, Hisense H8C or the Samsung KS8000 if you want to play it safe and have something right now.Bumpy as hell but I googled this and came up to this thread. I'm so conflicted on grabbing this TV. It's cheap as hell, but the entire reason I'd be getting a Pro is for the HDR/4k combo. So that's $700 right there and I'm not sure if thats the best investment.
This thread along with all others circulating right now just tells me that nothing is standardized and I should just wait one or two years before purchasing, so that everything can settle.
Just get the Sony X800D, Hisense H8C or the Samsung KS8000 if you want to play it safe and have something right now.
The Hisense H8C is better for size and price with similar performance compared to the Samsung KU6300. Game performance of the H8C is inferior compared to the other TVs, but if it's not a priority and you run on Cinema mode and whatnot anyway, you might not even care. The Sony XBR43X800D is adequate if you want better budget HDR. It doesn't have the the peak brightness of the KS8000 obviously, but it's also not competing in that price range except the XBR49X800D and maybe when the UN49KS8000 goes on sale for a similar price. But there's little reason to own the XBR49X800D when it's an IPS panel and the Samsung KS8000 exists for a few hundred more, but it has hit $650 before last December and it does have Sony image processing if that's a factor. Then there's the KS8000 if you want an even better budget HDR than the XBR43X800D essentially. Funnily, if we're talking about the 2016 LG OLED TVs, there hasn't been an authorized seller that has sold any of them for <$1000 at any point in time so far, so I don't think of them as a budget priced TV. But for a budget HDR TV, it's the minimum I would suggest over the KS8000 if we're talking about a true budget HDR TV and disregarding price. The KS8000 isn't the only choice though. Depends on your priorities, budget and whatever else really. If you can still find the Samsung KU6300 for $300, there are worst things to get like the Sony XBR43X800D for $650 if you're looking for alternatives.Wut? The H8C is largely on par with the 6290/6300, it adds no specs/features over it, and if anything is a hair worse in overall performance (much worse for gaming, with over twice the input lag of the Samsung). The 800D is literally more than twice the price to add expanded gamut, every other performance metric is effectively a wash. If you're paying a premium for "Real HDR", the 800D is the last set you should buy as it's peak light output is shit (even worse than the 6XXX Samsung's in question). The 8000 the only recommendation that makes any sense, but at $1000+, it's a poor buy Vs. the sub-$1500 55" B6/C6 OLED's can be had for. The 6300/6290 is unbeatable at $300, but it's a stop-gap set, not a future proof set. To be fair though, nothing right now is future proof with HDMI 2.1, dynamic metadata, and variable refresh rates on the immediate horizon.
Yeah limme just grab 3,000 from my wallet.
Wut? The H8C is largely on par with the 6290/6300, it adds no specs/features over it, and if anything is a hair worse in overall performance (much worse for gaming, with over twice the input lag of the Samsung). The 800D is literally more than twice the price to add expanded gamut, every other performance metric is effectively a wash. If you're paying a premium for "Real HDR", the 800D is the last set you should buy as it's peak light output is shit (even worse than the 6XXX Samsung's in question). The 8000 the only recommendation that makes any sense, but at $1000+, it's a poor buy Vs. the sub-$1500 55" B6/C6 OLED's can be had for. The 6300/6290 is unbeatable at $300, but it's a stop-gap set, not a future proof set. To be fair though, nothing right now is future proof with HDMI 2.1, dynamic metadata, and variable refresh rates on the immediate horizon.