• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Let's Talk About Sony's Timed Exclusives and Lack of Disclosures

Moneal

Member
The same trick MS used for ROTTR and got a big backslash. Which is fair, because its misleading makrketing in both cases.

Actually MS did talk about RotTR, and they were backed up by Crystal Dymanics(if I remember right). That is why there was a big backlash.
 

Dargor

Member
Considering how many people I've seen that are going for the Ps4 version of NiEr because they have no idea when the PC version released, it seems quite obvious why they would do it.

That doesn't prove anything though. It might just as well be SE worried that PC sales might cannibalise PS4 sales, and for some reason or the other, they think thats a bad thing.
 

Crayon

Member
Timed exclusive can be a fine deal for everyone. Players get to play the game sooner or later. Platform holder gets the boost from the buzz and publisher gets to manipulate perception and sales a little bit. It's easy to get it a little fucked up and then someone's not happy, though. And that someone is usually the consumer.

Look at the Nier on PC situation from yesterday. They probably didn't set out to piss a bunch of people off with rollercoaster ride of bad information but they did it with sloppy handling.
 

jmga

Member
What do the press notes say?

https://www.sie.com/en/corporate/release/2016/160614a.html

SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT UNVEILS
HIDEO KOJIMA'S PS4 CONSOLE EXCLUSIVE TITLE
DEATH STRANDING

Kojima wanted it on PC, Sony agreed. The game has never been said to be PS exclusive.

Nobody has denied it is not coming to PC after Kojima said it.

Sony also published themselves Helldivers and Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on Steam, which are also games owned and produced by them.
 

MUnited83

For you.
That doesn't prove anything though. It might just as well be SE worried that PC sales might cannibalise PS4 sales, and for some reason or the other, they think thats a bad thing.
And they are not worried about that happening with DQ Heroes II... Why exactly?
 

Arkam

Member
- Their "Console Exclusive" or "Only on PlayStation" labels are garbage. They are often incorrect and also vary between regions (???). Nioh is a great example. Published by Sony, labels missing in some regions, not in others.
- UMvC3 is a timed exclusive, though to be fair, the disclosure was immediate
- Crash is a timed exclusive, as many suspected, but we have to rely on a Twitter accounts for the reveal
- FFVII:R is timed, not seeing a lot of complaints of that one.

So you want a hand written note sent to your house letting you know the exact duration? I see nothing wrong with making an announcement that a game is coming to your platform and omitting the exclusive duration. If YOU the consumer want to know if it is coming to another platform later it is up to YOU the consumer to investigate. Expecting one platform holder to come out and let you know the limitations of their deal and when you can get said content on a competetor's platfrom does not make for good business.
 

otakukidd

Member
Yup that's how I read it came about which is why it's only some people that are still upset by it.

Yup Which is why I don't get the people saying Sony is against it since they have had it in multiple games when It was MS that had blocked cross platform play for many years before that and only very recently changed their tune about it.
Pretty sure the director of 14 came out and said that was bullshit. Hell they even said they are thinking about making a switch version. Fuck isnt dqx also coming to ps4 and isn't that cross play with the freaking wiiu and 3ds.
 
They sure seem to care, considering the current situation. Unless you think SE, again, just pulls decisions about games out of a hat.

"How will we deal with NiEr PC version?"
"*Pulls suggestion out of hat, it reads "be extremely secretive about it for several months in a extremely specific manner*"

"How will we deal with DQ Heroes II PC version"
" *Pulls suggestion out of hat, says to be clear about the release date directly months before it releases"

Yeah makes sense.

Yes i do think they pull decisions about games out of a hat .
The made ROTR X1 exclusive for a year .
It's not like the PC version of Nier going to effect Japanese sales .
Where that is only place that Sony would even have a marketing deal for this type of game.
 

Alrus

Member
What would be the benefit for Square to maximize PS4 pre-orders? They earn less money on those.
You guys really need to provide proof of this.

A trailer mentioning a Steam release date went up yesterday, only to be immediately replaced by a trailer with no mention of steam.

The steam trailer was rendered after the PS4-only one, so it can't be some "change of plan regarding the PC version", unless you think somebody at square has short term memory losses.
 

Shabad

Member
Why are we somehow assuming that Sony is responsible for the communication and publication of the PC version of a Square Enix game... ?
 

Skeeter49

Member
Trying to understand the reasons Square does the things they do can drive a man to insanity.

This thread really seems like it's just a problem with Neir, and not a huge problem Sony has in general. Crash was fine, with a minor Twitter hiccup that was addressed. Nothing states Nioh as a timed exclusive.
 
What would be the benefit for Square to maximize PS4 pre-orders? They earn less money on those.


A trailer mentioning a Steam release date went up yesterday, only to be immediately replaced by a trailer with no mention of steam.

The steam trailer was rendered after the PS4-only one, so it can't be some "change of plan regarding the PC version", unless you think somebody at square has short term memory losses.

So this is your proof?
 

jmga

Member
Why are we somehow assuming that Sony is responsible for the communication and publication of the PC version of a Square Enix game... ?

Because Square-Enix marketing decisions around Nier make no sense for their business and only benefits Sony.
 

Kayant

Member
There's a lot more weight in it being a PlayStation exclusive:
In cases like this PR from trailer and such are far less likely to be the best indicators for exclusivity you only have to look at all the partner trailers with games like Destiny, COD, etc.
https://www.sie.com/en/corporate/release/2016/160614a.html



Kojima wanted it on PC, Sony agreed. The game has never been said to be PS exclusive.

Nobody has denied it is not coming to PC after Kojima said it.

Sony also published themselves Helldivers and Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on Steam, which are also games owned and produced by them.
Thanks for that this is a pretty good indicator PC version could still happen probably also after 1yr due to Sony's heavy investment in the project.
 

Dargor

Member
And they are not worried about that happening with DQ Heroes II... Why exactly?

I dunno, maybe they think PC sales won't hurt PS4 sales cuz of the genre? Musou games doesn't sound like the type of game that PC or console gamers would fight about lol. And by fight I mean clash in a negative way that would hurt each others sales.

PC gamers will buy them for PC and console gamers for consoles, unlike Nier, were you brought anecdotal evidence that some PC gamers just can't wait for it lol.

But I'm not claiming anything as facts though.
 
So I guess it's been established that the most Sony does is deliberately not mention other platforms, which it isn't their job to. Which is also in no way comparable to actually spreading misinformation about the titles exclusivity, like, say the ROTR situation.
Why are we somehow assuming that Sony is responsible for the communication and publication of the PC version of a Square Enix game... ?
It truly doesn't make any sense.
 

Moneal

Member
Because Square-Enix marketing decisions around Nier make no sense for their business and only benefits Sony.

unless they want to drive preorders for the ps4 version and then get people to double dip and get the pc version too.
 
There are undeniable double standards in this community when it comes to platform holders and their actions. This just one example.
 

MUnited83

For you.
Yes i do think they pull decisions about games out of a hat .
The made ROTR X1 exclusive for a year .
It's not like the PC version of Nier going to effect Japanese sales .
Where that is only place that Sony would even have a marketing deal for this type of game.
They made ROTR X1 exclusive for 6 months. In exchange of money. And even then with the delay they managed to sell over a million copies on Steam which is pretty impressive considering it was 6 months late.
And once again, I don't see why are you trying to bring that up. How in the fuck does them making a dumb financial decisions based on a deam supposed to disprove that they did another dumb financial decision based on a deal again?
Why are we somehow assuming that Sony is responsible for the communication and publication of the PC version of a Square Enix game... ?
Please learn to read and come back later.
 

jmga

Member
unless they want to drive preorders for the ps4 version and then get people to double dip and get the pc version too.

Ok, let's suppose S-E are that stupid.

What if the game releases the same date on PS4 an PC, as the last leaked trailer suggests?
 
https://www.sie.com/en/corporate/release/2016/160614a.html



Kojima wanted it on PC, Sony agreed. The game has never been said to be PS exclusive.

Nobody has denied it is not coming to PC after Kojima said it.

Sony also published themselves Helldivers and Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on Steam, which are also games owned and produced by them.

Good catch. Thanks for sharing.

It's likely a timed-exclusive, possibly 6-12 months.
 

Lothars

Member
There are undeniable double standards in this community when it comes to platform holders and their actions. This just one example.
yes Sony has been open about timed exclusives, Microsoft hasn't especially in the case of Tomb Raider. So they got raked over the coals.

The double standard is some people want Sony raked over the coals for no reason.
 
Wasn't it leaked that Sega wanted money hat from Ms and when declined they went for Sony which did moneyhat them?

Wow, sounds interesting. I'd like to read about it. Don't you have a source?
yeah i'd like to see a source for this too. i thought as far as I knew that Yakuza remained a playstation exclusive not exactly for brand loyalty but because Sega realized it would be most and pretty much only successful on playstation.

i don't think the wii u remasters was a moneyhat either, i think sega was just testing the waters of yakuza on nintendo
 

MUnited83

For you.
I dunno, maybe they think PC sales won't hurt PS4 sales cuz of the genre? Musou games doesn't sound like the type of game that PC or console gamers would fight about lol. And by fight I mean clash in a negative way that would hurt each others sales.

PC gamers will buy them for PC and console gamers for consoles, unlike Nier, were you brought anecdotal evidence that some PC gamers just can't wait for it lol.

But I'm not claiming anything as facts though.
Delaying it or not mentioning it absolutely hurts the sales of that version.
unless they want to drive preorders for the ps4 version and then get people to double dip and get the pc version too.
The game will probably be released at the same time, so no, that doesn't seem to be the reason.
 
In cases like this PR from trailer and such are far less likely to be the best indicators for exclusivity you only have to look at all the partner trailers with games like Destiny, COD, etc.

Yeah you're right. The more gamers that get to play good games, the better.


Is this a joke post?

Sony has lied on stage about exclusives.

https://youtu.be/nCuMLqEiiws?t=1h39m30s

https://youtu.be/LVyVelgMh2w?t=40m47s

It's not a lie. How do we know if NNK2 had PC port was planned back in 2015?

I don't think Sony has anything to gain from lying about Nier Automata, it was confirmed as a PS4 game on reveal. Square is still not talking about the PC port so why should Sony?
 

Moneal

Member
Ok, let's suppose S-E are that stupid.

What if the game releases the same date on PS4 an PC as the last leaked trailer suggests?

the leaked trailer had them 3 days apart. people preordering would get it on ps4 release date, then some would double dip for PC, just like I said.
 
Dear god are you people forced to be so disingenuous and smart assy? If they made a fucking deal they're not allowed to talk about it, in exchange Sony gave them whatever. Nobody is saying Square Enix was forced to do it.

So basically two publishers might have agreed and carried out the terms of a contract, hypothetically? Seems pretty tame.
 

Alrus

Member
So basically two publishers might have agreed and carried out the terms of a contract, hypothetically? Seems pretty tame.

Yes, that's probably what happened. But apparently it's impossible to accept for some people.

I'm asking for a proof which you have yet to provide. What argument?

I'm not going to find a written contract for a marketing deal no (because you'll probably never find those for any kind of marketing deal). You have given me no reason to believe a marketing deal didn't happen though.
 

MUnited83

For you.
the leaked trailer had them 3 days apart. people preordering would get it on ps4 release date, then some would double dip for PC, just like I said.
It has the same release date as the EU version.

Are you arguing that SE is so crazy that they are only specifically targeting the US market for double dipping?
 
They made ROTR X1 exclusive for 6 months. In exchange of money. And even then with the delay they managed to sell over a million copies on Steam which is pretty impressive considering it was 6 months late.
And once again, I don't see why are you trying to bring that up. How in the fuck does them making a dumb financial decisions based on a deam supposed to disprove that they did another dumb financial decision based on a deal again?.

Sony had done those type of deals with other companies and never stop them from talking about the PC version .
But somehow a niche game like Nier is the special case where they asking SE not to mention the PC version .
Which mind only going to effect sales in the west .
 
Yes, that's probably what happened. But apparently it's impossible to accept for some people.



I'm not going to find a written contract for a marketing deal no. You have given me no reason to believe a marketing deal didn't happen though.

The onus is on you to prove it since that's what you're claiming it happened.
 

Pooya

Member
Dear god are you people forced to be so disingenuous and smart assy? If they made a fucking deal they're not allowed to talk about it, in exchange Sony gave them whatever. Nobody is saying Square Enix was forced to do it.

Some are just purposefully obtuse in this topic, it's kinda hilarious with this many shit posts...
 

Lothars

Member
Because neither of them are exclusives?

Nier was even announced for PC before that.
They are console exclusives which is what was said. It that conference they are not going to talk about the PC version. So again how is it lies?
 
Top Bottom