RichyDevil
Member
This is certainly one way to say goodbye to a former employer.
Buried in the middle of the third paragraph of a seemingly run-of-the-mill review of a run-of-the-mill game sits this little tidbit:
A few paragraphs later:
And the coup de grace here:
Read the entire review here while you still can: http://www.brashgames.co.uk/2017/04/08/pac-man-256-review/
I'm sure it will be gone at some point. But it's still there, right at the top of the Brash Games site.
Trash me in the third paragraph if old.
Buried in the middle of the third paragraph of a seemingly run-of-the-mill review of a run-of-the-mill game sits this little tidbit:
"Namco Bandai haven't changed too much of the winning formula, and why should they? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Everything that we grew to love in the original iterations is still present; the classic sound effects, the musical stings, and even ghosts. Speaking of ghosts, did you know that Brash Games deliberately ghosted themselves from Metacritic, GameRankings, and OpenCritic (marking themselves as ”out of business on Meta and GR, which is an outrageous and egregious lie – it's here right now) to avoid having any sort of public record of reviews available which would have attributed work to the proper authors? It's true! In fact, when reviewers leave, work gets automatically attributed to ”Brash Games", which is solely operated by Paul Ryan, thus making it seem like he did all the work. OpenCritic are doing an investigation into the behaviour of the site and everything. But what truly deserves investigation is the new alterations added to the game in order to freshen up the format; this is very much a case of teaching an old dog new tricks."
A few paragraphs later:
"Complementing the brilliant reimagined gameplay is a fantastic soundtrack. Namco Bandai shy away from the sound of silence, which is, at the time of writing, exactly what I received when I announced my resignation to the editor Paul Ryan and clarified I would leave Brash as soon as possible. No email, no apology, no ”I wish you the best in your future endeavours", nothing. Pure radio silence; the only acknowledgement I received was that my name was pulled from the contributors list quietly. Some might call that cowardly – I'll leave it to your interpretation. Rather, the game exploits low-key techno beats to gracefully update the beloved musical stings and background tracks. And (I promise this is the last time I utilise this painful segue) speaking of exploitation, Brash Games took advantage of naïve young writers, offering them no money, but exposure, which is useless when you essentially pretend your writers did not exist later on down the line."
And the coup de grace here:
I thought this game was great, but I'm going to – on behalf of Brash Games – award it a 1 out of 10. I do this safe in the knowledge that the editor will change it later without me knowing to fit the score HE would prefer. This is not an exaggeration: review scores selected by authors were changed by the editor without warning, explanation, or consideration, and several alumni of Brash Games corroborate this. As such, I would not want to begrudge my former editor another opportunity to do this.
Read the entire review here while you still can: http://www.brashgames.co.uk/2017/04/08/pac-man-256-review/
I'm sure it will be gone at some point. But it's still there, right at the top of the Brash Games site.
Trash me in the third paragraph if old.