Mr. Blonde
Member
He has also destabilized the world
Yeah OK.
He has also destabilized the world
Yeah OK.
He withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/us/politics/tpp-trump-trade-nafta.html
I don't have total faith that he won't reverse himself on this, but it is a major accomplishment for good. Probably the only one.
overhaul of H-1B visa system?
What overhaul? That EO didn't actually do anything like so many of the previous ones.
It was the nuclear option for non-SCOTUS appointments. It is called the nuclear option based on the procedure used to change the filibuster. By your logic, the GOP simply further carved out part of the filibuster (it still exists) for SCOTUS appointments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
2) Effectively ending the Clean Power Plan.
lol it's like Obama didn't inherit every Bush problem including a gigantic housing and economic crash LMAO
the drug treatment thing is good, i guess?
lol it's like Obama didn't inherit every Bush problem including a gigantic housing and economic crash LMAO
This hasn't actually happened. Just a 'review' like most of his EOs. Ending it is complicated unless the EPA can come up with a replacement (which they don't want to do since they don't believe in global warming)
you can add to the list several shitty actions by the FCC though
Well that's handy.this should be helpful; there are several more websites tracking the same.
https://trumptracker.github.io
He demonstrated that as an American President, when things are not going your way....Bomb a foreign Country.
Your critics in the media will all of a sudden see you as more presidential by the sight of beautiful weapons on their way to wreak destruction.
When you say "no, they did not use the nuclear option to seat 3 judges", I was taking you literally. The nuclear option is a complicated parliamentary procedure that is called a nuclear option because you can't reinstate the rule through the same procedure.you completely missed the point of my post, which had nothing to do with the semantics of calling it the nuclear option. call it whatever you want. it wasn't done to appoint 3 judges and its not related to the GOP's choice or ability to force Gorsuch through. Something they were going to do it either way, just as they demonstrated they would under Bush before the gang of 14 sham
and yes, I would say it is accurate to say the GOP simply further eroded the filibuster, which still exists
The only thing Trump has accomplished is dividing the country so strongly against itself, we'll probably never fully recover.
the drug treatment thing is good, i guess?
It's also not Trump's. Obama allocated that money and Trump is trying to steal credit for it:that hasn't actually happened either. it's just part of his budget wish-list
lol it's like Obama didn't inherit every Bush problem including a gigantic housing and economic crash LMAO
When you say "no, they did not use the nuclear option to seat 3 judges", I was taking you literally. The nuclear option is a complicated parliamentary procedure that is called a nuclear option because you can't reinstate the rule through the same procedure.
100 days is not enough time to judge anything, especially if we consider how long it takes to sway the economy.