• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What creator/writer ruined the lore of their property overtime the most?

I haven't read/seen Cursed Child, but outside of a certain casting decision I genuinely loved Fantastic Beasts and am excited for the future films (outside of again, that casting decision).

Spoilers:

She blatantly breaks her own established rules regarding time travel, makes it so Belatrix had a kid with Voldemort (despite there being no indication of it happening in the books and no reason for an immortal person to think they'll ever need someone to carry on their legacy), and she ruins Cedric Diggory's character by making him one humiliation away from becoming a Death Eater and killing Neville.

There's just no coming back from Cursed Child. It's not every day that a sequel is makes me feel stupid for ever liking a particular series, and if I didn't like Fantastic Beasts as much as I did I would have ignored the franchise for good.
 

Ogodei

Member
Kirby. Seriously.

This is a good one. The plots in Kirby become better every time.

Another opposite example would be Friendship is Magic. Episode quality over the seasons is debatable, but the lore just builds and builds and the world only gets better for it.
 

Enduin

No bald cap? Lies!
I think there are four major taboos that alone, and almost without fail in conjunction, will ruin any series if kept unchecked.

1) Trying to explain and demystify everything.
2) Trying to connect everything together/make everything important.
3) Trying to insert deeper meaning where there originally was not.
4) Trying to continually one-up your past highs and twists.

Most of these failed series are guilty of at least one if not several of these taboos.

Dexter was guilty of all 4 a ton. Dragon Ball was super guilty of #4 and occasionally #2. Star Wars has at times been very guilty of all of these; Star Killer base was the absolute worst example of #4. Mass Effect series was super guilty of #1 and #3 with how they handled the Reapers and ending to ME3. Ridley Scott is super guilty of all these as well, particularly #2 and #3.
 

TheXbox

Member
Brian Herbert & Kevin J Anderson.
If we're broadening the category beyond original creators, then this is the correct answer. They are so staggeringly out of their depth that I don't think they could match Frank Herbert if you gave them a million years. They have been so bad for so long that they might be the antithesis to the infinite monkey theorem. Dune is beyond their combined faculties.
 
I think there are four major taboos that alone, and almost without fail in conjunction, will ruin any series if kept unchecked.

1) Trying to explain and demystify everything.
2) Trying to connect everything together/make everything important.
3) Trying to insert deeper meaning where there originally was not.
4) Trying to continually one-up your past highs and twists.

Tolkien laughs at all of these.
 
This is a good one. The plots in Kirby become better every time.

Another opposite example would be Friendship is Magic. Episode quality over the seasons is debatable, but the lore just builds and builds and the world only gets better for it.
I'd argue the characters have gotten worse, but yeah, the world has only gotten bigger. Judging by the comic out this week, the movie will only add more. It's quite exciting.
 
Since I'm doing the Naruto reread.....Naruto.

The problem was that it was a very slow destruction, so you can't pinpoint the exact moment it became irrecoverable. In fact, I'd say it started as early with the different direction that the story took after the Mist arc.

I agree with this. Its not that the exam arc after that is awful, but it feels off pacing wise. They get one mission, a very good mission arc in the Mist village, and then it goes right into what is basically a tournament arc which then dovetails right into the Sasuke chase saga. The Mist arc was a promising start and i would have liked more fleshed out mission stories like that to really build up the trio as a team. What I like about the Mist village arc is the ability for them to build up these characters who would otherwise be relegated to filler fodder and make you kinda empathize with them. Were it later in the series, the Mist village would be a filler arc. The only characters worth fleshing out later in the series are the world changing ones with immense powers.
 
Ridley Scott. While I think a number of things about Covenant are being overblown (the blood slipping bit is nothing like how it's often described here), it along with Prometheus are undermining the entire franchise in a manner far more perverse than the AvP films. It's not even an issue of a different expectation, but rather direct contradictions to the very foundation.

JK Rowling isn't far behind after The Cursed Child. Have yet to have a proper watch of Fantastic Beasts to see what comes of that, though it sounds like the sequel will be the big test.

Edit: Throw probably every Marvel and DC superhero series. To the point where the rule is never issue by issue purchases.
 
I'm with those saying Akira Toriyama (and/or Toei).

DBZ never had a 'good' plot, but Super is downright insulting. Made me outright hate the characters and not interested in Dragonball Fighter Z.
 

Enduin

No bald cap? Lies!
Tolkien laughs at all of these.

True, I actually thought I should add the caveat at the end there that when it comes to creative works if you've got the talent there really aren't any taboos to hold you back. Some of the best writers purposefully break and subvert such taboos to great effect.

Tolkien was inhumanly meticulous and detailed with his work. His works are on a level few have reached since, and I'm sure many would say none have come close. He planned things out, developed things to the nth degree. My taboos are really there for series and creators who haven't done the leg work from the start but try and add that stuff in on the fly, especially when a series has peaked or is coming to the end.
 
Sorry folks. You all lose to Games Workshop and how they have handled Warhammer and Warhammer 40K these last few years. Holy fuck they are going out of their way to fuck things up and retcon all manner of shit.
Why couldn't they have just made the end times a set piece for awhile? End times doesn't have to mean overnight. Why are there space marines in my fantasy?

I checked out of 40k after I saw the small mechs. Knights I think? Oh and what they did to the necrons. Yikes.
 

Screaming_Gremlin

My QB is a Dick and my coach is a Nutt
I think most people have called out most of the obvious choices, but I will go with the Honor Harrington book series by David Weber. The first few books I think are genuinely good space opera, especially if you want some tense space battles. Then it quickly goes down hill. This is partially recycled from a post I made in a few months ago, but applies here.

Weber has no idea how to write any sort of believable flaws for Honor. She is literally the best at everything she does, from leading and inspiring her crew, to strategy, hand to hand fighting, firearms, space katana, etc. Supposedly her math is bad, which would make her a bad navigator, but of course she apparently just naturally knows how to plot the best courses, math be damned. She might as well be the literal definition of a Mary Sue. Also, the less said about her fucking physic space cat the better.

Also the books (well like the first 10) are just Horatio Hornblower in space, aka Space Britain versus Space France. That isn't necessary a bad thing, but Weber's politics can be cringe inducing. Space France is a shit hole, because their society has a basic income given to all people. Naturally, since everyone is on the dole, they are all lazy sacks of shit who don't bother working and their education system is the worst, since why bother going to school? Also, every time Rob S. Pierre's name was written out I had to resist rolling my eyes.

Sadly the space battles begin to take a back seat as the series goes along. It just becomes a few pages where both sides launch a bajillion fuck off missiles, the bad guys die, Honor feels sad about the loss of life for a paragraph, and then goes and drinks space hot coco. And even that starts to take a back seat so Weber can write more and more of his shitty libertarian politics. Seriously, don't read the later books.

But despite all of that, the first few books really aren't that bad!
 

Fuchsdh

Member
George Lucas and the prequels. The dude was so out of touch that you can actually trace his creative decision-making to the way other people absorbed the original films. Vader became a messiah because he was iconic. Obi Wan's desert robes became the Jedi uniform. The Clone Wars were waged by an army of literal clones. It's as if the prequels were made by an outsider misinterpreting Star Wars through the lens of fandom and iconography.

This has always been bullshit, given that Anakin and Yoda appeared wearing the same style clothing at the end of Jedi.

Also, given how consciously Lucas didn't "give the fans what they want" in terms of themes (making the Jedi antagonistic and partially responsible for the fall of the Republic, for instance) I don't think the issue was misinterpreting the series through fandom. It was that he had ideas he simply was not good enough to pull off through his directing or writing.

Lots of good ones.

My vote is for 'Community' tv series.
First season is literally the most charming and snappiest comedies I have ever seen.

Second season started pulling out the wacky factor in spades, has some lows that were not evident in tge first season and highs that almost exceed it. Characters start the journey of being falnderized.

Third Season onwards. Characters are flanderized. Jokes have a tendancy to be ham fisted. More cringe worthy moments than endearing. Not snappy.

Also throw in South Park and Final Fantasy 7 extended universe whatever please.

There's a lot of good Community even in the third through sixth seasons, but by the time they started bleeding cast members and had turned Chang into a guy who literally kidnapped the dean and took over the school, they really borked the believability. It's weird to rewatch the early episodes and how it clearly takes place at a community college, and by later seasons it might as well have been a random assortment of rooms where ostensibly classes were held sometimes. It stopped feeling like a place and instead just a madhouse of wacky sitcom characters.

Dan Harmon, like a lot of creators, has gotten turned into a messiah genius when he does crap work sometimes too.

Spoilers:

She blatantly breaks her own established rules regarding time travel, makes it so Belatrix had a kid with Voldemort (despite there being no indication of it happening in the books and no reason for an immortal person to think they'll ever need someone to carry on their legacy), and she ruins Cedric Diggory's character by making him one humiliation away from becoming a Death Eater and killing Neville.

There's just no coming back from Cursed Child. It's not every day that a sequel is makes me feel stupid for ever liking a particular series, and if I didn't like Fantastic Beasts as much as I did I would have ignored the franchise for good.

Luckily you can ignore it, especially as it was never released as a full-fledged prose book and it's not getting bundled with the original seven. Probably in decades if Harry Potter stands the test of time all the ancillary media will be this weird footnote people look at strangely and ignore.
 
Oh, I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that 95% of the examples in this thread aren't really "lore," but just plain ol' story. Not even backstory, at that. Just story.

But ehhhh
 
Nobody mentioned Tom Clancy's jack Ryan series. Got progressively into dumb politics from its roots as military tech/strats/espionage.
 
Claymore is a weird case because some of things that were explained made the setting make more sense but then you had shit like that
big ultra powerful awakened being the "fusion" of Luciela and Rafaela
and almost everything after that...

Claymore went along pretty well in comparison to some of these other series.

I'd say even The Destroyer made sense. It was basically a fusion of two Rank 1 Claymores, which made it a fused Abyssal One, so power wise, it checks out. Now, Clare breaking out of it all the way to the the Riful-Dauf Child is when shit got weird.
 

Lulubop

Member
Ohba and Obata - It's hard to compare because Death Note was like one of the biggest things ever in its time, but wasn't Bakuman also really successful? Of course CLAMP would probably count too (although that's a whole group). Rumiko Takahashi too? I think both Inuyasha and Ranma 1/2 were very popular.

Inoue, Urasawa, Nagai, Tezuka, Buronson
 
Akira Toriyama, 33 year champ, undefeated.
He keeps retconning his own rules, he's like that one asshole in a group of friends playing Monopoly, and he's the banker.

It's hard for me to pin down where I stand re: Toriyama because I kind of admire that he doesn't give a fuck and it's contributed greatly to my continued enjoyment of Dragon Ball
 

Spacejaws

Member
There's a lot of good Community even in the third through sixth seasons, but by the time they started bleeding cast members and had turned Chang into a guy who literally kidnapped the dean and took over the school, they really borked the believability. It's weird to rewatch the early episodes and how it clearly takes place at a community college, and by later seasons it might as well have been a random assortment of rooms where ostensibly classes were held sometimes. It stopped feeling like a place and instead just a madhouse of wacky sitcom characters.

Dan Harmon, like a lot of creators, has gotten turned into a messiah genius when he does crap work sometimes too.


Oh absolutely there is some great stuff throughtout Community and all the way to the end it still had some of that magic, even during the season withiut Harmon that people like to flat out shit over, but the potential it originally had with its premise and characters fells like it was just tossed in the air one day and some characters like Chang and Pierce got a really raw deal and pretty much squandered after season 2. It was almost like they couldn't understand their original appeal with relatable people and starting making the group wacky caricatures.

It was still one of my most rewatched series but the first and second season remain one of my favourite and faultless seasons in television. Everything else is an enjoyable filler episode.
 

Bakkus

Member
Miyamoto.

You mean to tell me the Koopalings aren't Bowser's biological kids? You mean to tell me that Bowser Jr. is the only one?

Fuckin' nonsense.

Not only this, he must also have an obvious hand in retconning DK and Diddy's relationship. They used to be uncle and nephew, now they're just monkey friends. The latter isn't even his creation.
 
Warcraft became really bad, but Starcraft gives it a run for its money. Wings of Liberty was so bad that there's absolutely no way the other two sequels (which I haven't played) salvaged that disaster.

Really, there just came a point where Blizzard seemed to stop caring about writing anything halfway decent.

They were always bad. In the book Stay Awhile and Listen: How Two Blizzards Unleashed Diablo and Forged a Video-Game Empire, one of the chapters mentions how with Warcraft 1, they made the game, and then they worked on the story (both with Warcraft & Diablo). And with Warcraft at least, there was a section where it said they just threw one of the employees into a recording booth and told him to make up the story on the spot, which would later be used for the cutscenes.

I think that was the biggest problem I had with the Warcraft movie. It really put in perspective how silly the story of Warcraft was when you were having to cringe through it at the movie theater.
 

EYEL1NER

Member
Sorry folks. You all lose to Games Workshop and how they have handled Warhammer and Warhammer 40K these last few years. Holy fuck they are going out of their way to fuck things up and retcon all manner of shit.
I don't have any problems with the current state of the 40K lore and narrative. I feel like they may have gone in a bit too hard on the Space Wolves when Magnus returned but overall I'm pleased with the 40K universe. I don't know much about WFB/AoS but yeah, I imagine I would be a bit irritated over the way that went down had I been a fan at the time.
 

jWILL253

Banned
Also, whoever writes Telltale Games' The Walking Dead.

The first season was a touching story of a troubled man & an orphaned little girl bonding with one another as they try to survive in the midst of an undead apocalypse, while also weathering the storm of the emotions of those around them. It had real, human emotions in it, brought about by real, believable events in the plot. No conflict felt contrived, and all the dialog felt real & believable. Plus, it gave us Clementine, one of the best female protagonists in video games today.

Season 2 is Telltale's version of Real World. A bunch of maladjusted adults toss all their problems onto a little girl, we have retread character archetypes, even more worthless characters that eventually get turned into either walker fodder, or become walkers - whether we want them alive or not. We also have fascist community leaders, bullshit romantic subplots, and...
Jane
.

Season 3...
a little girl gets murdered in front of her guardians & her sibling, all because of some half-eaten pudding cups.
Also, more fascist survivor communities, and we don't get to play as Clem anymore.

Sprinkle in a bullshit spinoff that no one gives a fuck about, and you got yourself some good ol fuckery.
 
Alien - It's been brought up before but Ridley Scott isn't really the writer of the first Alien, doesn't prevent it from having him ruin the mythology behind the creature of course.

-

Star Wars - ... eh, I feel like that details like the midichlorian thing are only minor annoyances, the overall problem were the prequels in their entirety, as in that they were horrible movies that didn't need to exist in the first place.

-

Halo - Not sure if "ruined" but there was a simple concept that was then artificially blown out of proportion.
Ancient humans fight alien flood, humans remove all sentient life from the galaxy, even themselves, to stopp the flood.
Humans rise again (planned or not by the ancient humans) they wage war with another group of aliens and rediscover the tech of the ancient humans and the flood is set free again.

Was a simple and understandable concept imo, now they've gone and split ancient humanity into two races and created a third race they then twisted into what the flood is supposed to be to tell a convoluted story... I'm not sure why this was done, maybe it was planned all along but it turned something simple and understandable into something convoluted and messy with many open questions and many logical faults that only can be explained by simply swiping many of these questions under the rug
 

Two Words

Member
Unfortunately Akira Toriyama and Dragon Ball. Though much of it due to editor/publisher pressure and his failing interest. But ultimately he should have shut shit down and not just kept dragging things out post Frieza. It's not always easy to know when to stop.
Should have just ended it with Dragon Ball. Or at least avoided the entire Saiyan nonsense. It completely ruins Dragon Ball and I just act like DBZ doesn't exist when I watch Dragon Ball.
 
The Wheel of Time books get bogged down hard with utter crap and nonsense by Jordan's need to write 15 of the motherfuckers (though he only finished 11).

I'll go into nerd mode and say Robert Jordan - The Wheel of Time.

Utterly fantastic world. Completely uninteresting, rambling story.

Knew you were good people.
 
Basically, super saiyan removed any sense of an actual 'cost-benefit' balance from the fights in favour of 'be the strongest, full stop'.

With the Frieza saga that works because it's the first time and explicitly framed as Frieza's comeuppance for being so damned evil. With Cell however, a large portion of the story is dedicated to deliberately pushing out a new transformation that can best the villains because the Z fighters know it's in there somewhere. Honestly, the Buu saga should at least get credit for figuring out a better way to deal with the villain, even if it meant going through four rounds of trying a new transformation first.

Though I think the worst of what's been done to the lore of the setting has mostly come from Super, because good god that show has no sense of scale or restraint. In particular, retconning it so that Future Trunks' entire storyline from Z was basically pointless because
everyone (sans Mai because oh god why) dies anyway, fuck his happy ending apparently
. It just... trivialises so much of the previous story it's legitimately frustrating.

I think Buu Saga actually handles this the best of all of the arcs, because not a single one of the new transformations is actually, well, good enough. SSJ3 is actually a detriment! I think that was a cool way to handle it.

The rest of the arc is a mess, but that aspect actually gets it kinda right.
 
If say Eureka Seven AO, but the main guy behind the original's story wasn't involved in it or the movie. It takes a big fat shit all over the original and its characters.

Part of me wants to say .hack//. Stuff got pretty dumb with LINK and all the revelations of everything being connected and a conspiracy being behind everything in the series. But the web novel and Quantum OVAs were really good, and the movie wasn't bad.
 
On a personal level, definitely Ridley Scott with Alien. Prometheus and Covenant are arguably even more damaging than Alien 3 and Resurrection because they retroactively make the original Alien worse.

If you were to care about that shit I mean. Luckily I don't so...
 

Famassu

Member
This probably isn't the worst but it's the closest to my heart- ASOIAF and game of thrones both.
How has GRRM ruined ASOIAF's lore? You might not have liked some of the storylines of some characters in the last couple of books but the lore/world-building is still unarguably excellent (note: I haven't seen the last 2 seasons of the tv show so I'm not sure if there have been some revelations there that also apply to the books that ruins aspects of them as well).
 

Timbuktu

Member
Luckily you can ignore it, especially as it was never released as a full-fledged prose book and it's not getting bundled with the original seven. Probably in decades if Harry Potter stands the test of time all the ancillary media will be this weird footnote people look at strangely and ignore.

As a play experienced in theatre it was properly great though, it would be a shame to not have that. It does stand apart from the rest for me and I am willing to overlook its problems for what it does accomplish.
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
Frank Miller The Dark Knight.

That's a good one.

Miller went from making one of the best Batman stories ever told, to one of the worst. Completely destroyed his Batman and Robin. III was also terrible.

From
HUKwjvZ.jpg

to
DB5zWL4.png


This probably isn't the worst but it's the closest to my heart- ASOIAF and game of thrones both.

I'm not sure how Game of Thrones destroyed their lore. One could argue that the quality went down, I would disagree since season 6 was the best so far, but the lore has not been ruined at all.
 

Monocle

Member
George Lucas made Darth Vader a dumb kid and a pouting teen after making him an ailing old man. And it turns out the tragic fall of Anakin Skywalker was more of a temper tantrum resulting from the awful communication skills of he and his colleagues.

Also: midichlorians. Nothing in the Alien universe is remotely as laughable or infuriating as midichlorians.

The list goes on. Honestly if you set out to purposely sabotage Star Wars, you couldn't do a much better job than Lucas managed with his prequels. If you can work the mental miracle of reconciling the wildly divergent tone and quality of the PT and the OT, and manage to view the two trilogies as a cohesive whole, the PT makes nearly every major character and event in the originals less appealing and dramatically effective.
 

CloudWolf

Member
I'm not sure how Game of Thrones destroyed their lore. One could argue that the quality went down, I would disagree since season 6 was the best so far, but the lore has not been ruined at all.

He's confusing 'destroying lore' with 'doing stuff I don't like'. I mean, I strongly disliked most Game of Thrones stuff post-season 4 (yes, including season 6, which I really don't understand the love for), but they haven't really screwed up the lore.

His claim for ASOIAF confuses me even more. GRRM never, ever changed or altered the lore. He's one of the most consistent world-builders around.
 

Kid Ying

Member
It's obviously the dark Knight. Not even a contest. And i don't even think 3 was that bad. It was Just ridiculous.

Lucas i feel that he had his heart in the right place. The prequels got a bad rep because they tried to introduce new things to shape the universe better and not because they were actively bad movies (even though the second one is unbelievably bad) as show by ep 7, which is godawful and everybody likes it.

He tried to do new stuff for a fanbase that wanted none of it. I appreciate that. I don't feel that New stuff destroyed the lore either.
 

Monocle

Member
It's obviously the dark Knight. Not even a contest. And i don't even think 3 was that bad. It was Just ridiculous.

Lucas i feel that he had his heart in the right place. The prequels got a bad rep because they tried to introduce new things to shape the universe better and not because they were actively bad movies (even though the second one is unbelievably bad) as show by ep 7, which is godawful and everybody likes it.

He tried to do new stuff for a fanbase that wanted none of it. I appreciate that. I don't feel that New stuff destroyed the lore either.
Whaaaaat. No, it's precisely because they're bad movies and a lot of their world building is lame that the Prequels are rightly despised.

TFA isn't "godawful" any way you slice it. Even if you're one of those ridiculous people who claim it's a remake of ANH in spite of the totally different characters, arcs, narrative, and dramatic beats, it's still a damn good movie. Well made, well acted, well written, well paced, well designed.
 

wetflame

Pizza Dog
That's a good one.

Miller went from making one of the best Batman stories ever told, to one of the worst. Completely destroyed his Batman and Robin. III was also terrible.

I don't know about you, but I find myself saying "Chucks! Buttfirst it!" all the time.
 
Top Bottom