• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New swimming park in France: forbidden to dogs and hijabies.

xrnzaaas

Member
It's in a park, people are going to go sit down or play football on the grass in their shorts and then bring all that shit in the water.
I also don't know about other countries but here I always see dudes putting their shorts on top of their boxers and just swimming like that, which doesn't seem super hygienic.
You can be unhygienic while wearing speedos as well. This entire board is silly. No smoking, no dogs and for the rest just rely that people will behave. :p
 

cwmartin

Member
This shorts thing is both new to me and fucking ridiculous.

I swim in board shorts, that's what they're for. I'm not wearing a fucking speedo, jesus christ. What a backwards-ass rule.



Why? I love bringing the dog to the beach.

Some of you need to chill the fuck out. Thank god I live in Canada.

I love my dog but she does not belong on a public beach. Despite your dog, or what you think about your dog, they do piss and shit in sand.
 

Switch Back 9

a lot of my threads involve me fucking up somehow. Perhaps I'm a moron?
I love my dog but she does not belong on a public beach. Despite your dog, or what you think about your dog, they do piss and shit in sand.

So pick it up? Like don't get me wrong, if there is a beach with a "no dog" rule that's totally cool and I'm obviously not going to bring the dog.

Otherwise? Hell yeah I'll bring the pup.

Cue 10+ pages of Americans being shocked that the whole world isn't as in love with swimming in shorts as they are.

Canada and Australia agree with America on this subject. You freaky weirdo Europeans can keep your gross banana hammocks.
 

Arkage

Banned
The anti-hijab/burqa argument is that the government is trying to mandate public areas as a safe space for liberal leaning Muslim women who don't want to wear traditional garb but are forced to by community or family pressures. Because the government bans it, the community anger is then directed toward the government instead of the individual Muslim women who then enjoy the freedom of not wearing it.

The pro-hijab/burqa argument is that if a community demands their women to wear traditional garb or face ostracization or punishment, and the government bans that garb from public places, the women will then simply be banned from going to those public places altogether. In which case the only end result is further antagonizing the Muslim community.

In the end I think the pro-hijab/burqa argument is most rational. Western nations need to maintain their liberal values of freedom of expression and religion, even if it can be argued there's a kind of stockholm syndrome going on with garb (particularly burqas) that was objectively created to desexualize and subjugate women.
 

xrnzaaas

Member
Why? I love bringing the dog to the beach.

Some of you need to chill the fuck out. Thank god I live in Canada.

Despite being a dog owner I approve banning dogs from public places. Most dog owners simply can't take care of them properly. Like on the beach they don't mind if the dog poops in the sand, because it's going to get covered anyway lol. Or don't they see a problem that some people might be afraid of dogs or that they may do something (especially the kids) that will trigger a hostile reaction from the dog.
 
Isn't this a 'no excess of fabric allowed' kind of rule that has existed for basically ever in French swimming pools?

People like to come in their swimming shorts so a specific mention of that clothing is needed. And now also hijabies because people also like to come in the pool wearing that?
 

Nista

Member
So wait, if I go to a pool in France, I couldn't wear a shorty wetsuit? I gotta let my boobs and ass hang out and get more skin cancer exposure? No thanks.

I wish I had any intention of visiting this backwards town so I could wear a Burkini to spite this dude.
 
I was actually approached by a woman in a hijab at a beach in Vancouver, while sitting on a park bench with my wife, and she told us not to hug/touch in public (we were holding hands).

moral of the story: everyone should be allowed on the beach, but also please don't talk to me.
 
Putting the hijibes ban in a simplified icon like you see in a map legend is some icing on the cake.

France is very good at offending people.
 
I think it's drawing attention that wearing a Hijab is on the same list as banging your dog to the pool.

But it also shows scuba gear and sports equipment is banned too. Requiring women to hide themselves is repressive as fuck, so I'm kinda split on the subject.

The anti-hijab/burqa argument is that the government is trying to mandate public areas as a safe space for liberal leaning Muslim women who don't want to wear traditional garb but are forced to by community or family pressures. Because the government bans it, the community anger is then directed toward the government instead of the individual Muslim women who then enjoy the freedom of not wearing it.

The pro-hijab/burqa argument is that if a community demands their women to wear traditional garb or face ostracization or punishment, and the government bans that garb from public places, the women will then simply be banned from going to those public places altogether. In which case the only end result is further antagonizing the Muslim community.

In the end I think the pro-hijab/burqa argument is most rational. Western nations need to maintain their liberal values of freedom of expression and religion, even if it can be argued there's a kind of stockholm syndrome going on with garb (particularly burqas) that was objectively created to desexualize and subjugate women.

I'm quoting this because it is a good post.
 
I was actually approached by a woman in a hijab at a beach in Vancouver, while sitting on a park bench with my wife, and she told us not to hug/touch in public (we were holding hands).

moral of the story: everyone should be allowed on the beach, but also please don't talk to me.


Did you tell her to fuck off? I would have.
 

SephiZack

Member
I remember seeing other similar news and they were also in France.
Unfortunately it looks like regulations like this will become a common recurrence there


image.php
 

IrishNinja

Member
People do ,why do you think france has regulation about it?

i don't know man, rest of the world seems fine - but there's also the hijab rule so clearly the door's open on adding more dumb policies

The chlorinated water is also a reason why swimming caps are (usually but not always) mandatory in French swimming pools. Chlorine isn't good for your hair.

i mean christ here's another one
 

Vagabundo

Member
So pick it up? Like don't get me wrong, if there is a beach with a "no dog" rule that's totally cool and I'm obviously not going to bring the dog.

Otherwise? Hell yeah I'll bring the pup.



Canada and Australia agree with America on this subject. You freaky weirdo Europeans can keep your gross banana hammocks.

Hey swimming shorts would be the norm in Ireland - probably the UK as well. European is pretty big and varied.

Not in finland they aren't.

Don't they force people to take naked showers while someone watches in swimming pools there? Or was that Sweden?

The anti-hijab/burqa argument is that the government is trying to mandate public areas as a safe space for liberal leaning Muslim women who don't want to wear traditional garb but are forced to by community or family pressures. Because the government bans it, the community anger is then directed toward the government instead of the individual Muslim women who then enjoy the freedom of not wearing it.

The pro-hijab/burqa argument is that if a community demands their women to wear traditional garb or face ostracization or punishment, and the government bans that garb from public places, the women will then simply be banned from going to those public places altogether. In which case the only end result is further antagonizing the Muslim community.

In the end I think the pro-hijab/burqa argument is most rational. Western nations need to maintain their liberal values of freedom of expression and religion, even if it can be argued there's a kind of stockholm syndrome going on with garb (particularly burqas) that was objectively created to desexualize and subjugate women.

Also you dont get the high aground about what women wear being policed by policing what women wear.
 

Kthulhu

Member
Not really, because men are told what they can't wear all the time too. Hiding yourself is reserved just for women. That's what makes it repressive.

You do realise that there are probably millions of muslim women that wear hijabs and other coverings of their own free will, right?
 

EGM1966

Member
Ah France swimming pools and parks.

Reminds me of the time I had a huge argument because I couldn't wear my usual shorts style trunks and had to buy a pair of speedos I didn't want before they'd let me in.

The French are really fussed about what's allowed in a swimming pool in my experience on holiday there - so much so last time I spent a week in summer I just found a nice lake and swam in that instead.

That said this sounds fucked if they're restricting the women just in the park itself vs the pool itself.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
If wonder why those people hate their country so much, that they are recruited to attack innocents, this is why. The root of all of this is segregation.
 

Laughing Banana

Weeping Pickle
They're already banning other attire so the title is a bit sensationalist, no? Still dumb.

Kinda feels like the other article of clothing are just there for camouflage to obscure the real intention of banning evil Muslims terrorists wannabe(tm) from joining on the pool.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
Not really, because men are told what they can't wear all the time too. Hiding yourself is reserved just for women. That's what makes it repressive.
My fiance wears a hijab, she wears it for herself, despite my protesting, and despite her parents protesting. Your idea of what makes a woman free is incredibly deeply myopic. It is no different than how men view women in the middle East. Why can't you let a woman decide what she wants to wear for herself? Why do we all feel the need to talk about what women should or shouldn't wear?
 

Alx

Member
Kinda feels like the other article of clothing are just there for camouflage to obscure the real intention of banning evil Muslims terrorists wannabe(tm) from joining on the pool.

Nah banning shorts is the standard rule in most swimming pools of the country (for hygiene reasons, as mentioned earlier). Technically the same rule should exclude de facto all sorts of non-specialized clothings like regular veils I guess (or hats, capes, scarves, ... whatever isn't swimwear) ; but making a specific icon against that is just trying to piss people off.
 
Top Bottom