Right?If a film is 90 days from opening and is still in theaters, I'm probably going to spring for the the $5 matinee rather than cough up $30 to watch it on my flatscreen.
If a film loses all its screens in six weeks then it isn't worth the price of admission, let alone $30.
This is for rich lazy people with very nice home theater setups and nobody else.
If Hollywood studios get their wish, a new premium video-on-demand service could finally be introduced in the first two months of 2018. One likely scenario: Consumers would pay $30 to rent a movie only 30 to 45 days after the film has opened in theaters.
Apparently, all of GAF has home theatres, 7.1 surround sound and neighbors who are deaf.
Too long to wait for that high of a price.
Bullshit
And someone will pirate the videos and surge piracy if new movies get released in 30 days
30$ to rent a movie is insane? To purchase a digital copy, I'd consider it.
What if it were $35 and it included a digital code for keepsies.
my wife and I have a newborn, this might be worth it for a few movies we want to see sooner than the bluray release.
Day and date.....maybe after the first weekend or week. Anything longer than that and I'd just wait on DVD.