• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The number of PC digital storefronts/launchers is getting out of hand

Aeana

Member
I'm not sure how clicking an icon to open a program is all that more inconvenient than having to change discs or whatever. I'll be ok.
 
I use Steam and Battle.net almost exclusively. Steam launches with Windows but that's the only automated thing I have at startup because I use it the most. It's at the point where my Origin account got compromised and I can't even be bothered to contact EA to get it back--despite having BF3/BF4 Premium/BF1 and several other games I wouldn't mind playing on there. I should probably do that at some point though. BF1 is quite fun...
 

Neath

Neo Member
I just have every game added to Steam and launch from there.

By the way, Wargaming has their own launcher now for World of Tanks, World of Warships etc. :(
 

Paragon

Member
It's inconvenient, but I value having a choice - though these days, a lot of games are exclusive to their own platform. That isn’t choice. I mostly stick to Steam and GOG.
So long as I can launch the game directly from Steam, the Steam Overlay works, and it stays in the background when I quit the game, I'm not concerned about what service it's on.
If your launcher breaks the Steam Overlay, or injects its own overlay that causes other conflicts, then I care.

So what I'm saying is that I hate Uplay. Every time I try to launch a game I get three UAC prompts for my admin password so that it can update itself, it complains every time I launch a game with its overlay disabled, the Steam Overlay doesn't work - so I can't use my Steam Controller with those games, and when I quit a game it shows ads.
 

garath

Member
TIL choice is bad

Hey hey now. Never said choice was bad. I'm lamenting over the multitude of launchers and digital libraries that are becoming more and more common. Many storefronts are great and we should all love the choice.

There's a few good tips for managing them better that have popped up in this thread and I'll be trying to consolidate a bit more personally but the future is looking even more fractured as publishers continue to invest in their own platforms.
 

MUnited83

For you.
It's interesting people calling "competition" and "choice" to clients that literally lock down their own games and do nothing else. They're literally there just to lock down consumer choice and options and make you pay as much as possible. That's not competition. Stuff like GOG is competition.
It would be nice if some actual competition, in the actual meaning of the word, popped up.
 
It's hard to blame publishers for not wanting to take a 30% cut off of their product when they could probably still sell to most of the consumers willing to buy their game and not have to worry about Steam getting a cut of their sale.

What I don't understand is why some of the publishers don't team up against steam. Like ubisoft and EA. They still get the sales for their own games and now their launcher is twice as useful.
 
I don't buy games if they require a launcher outside Steam. There's too many game in my backlog to need to put up with that noise.

I don't care if that makes me part of a problem.
 

Renekton

Member
It's interesting people calling "competition" and "choice" to clients that literally lock down their own games and do nothing else. They're literally there just to lock down consumer choice and options and make you pay as much as possible. That's not competition. Stuff like GOG is competition.
It would be nice if some actual competition, in the actual meaning of the word, popped up.
What do you think of Battle.net?

Should Blizzard games be on Steam?
 

MUnited83

For you.
What do you think of Battle.net?

Should Blizzard games be on Steam?

If you want some actual competition, yes, that would be the way you'd have actual competition. As well as Battle.net opening the store to other games, let indies and others publish there, etc. That would be actual competition. As it stands, it's not competition.
 
I'm not sure how clicking an icon to open a program is all that more inconvenient than having to change discs or whatever. I'll be ok.

It's not, but multiple extraneous programs needing to keep themselves updated, occasionally forget my password even though I tell it to remember every single time, multiple friend lists, multiple overlays that use different shortcuts and multiple lists of games combine together to create an experience that is much less good than if they would all just kindly fuck off back into space. Oh yeah I can get steam overlay working over my origin games, I can add custom listings (that don't get the hours tracked anymore) to steam and shit but it's just extra layers of bullshit I don't want to deal with. It's something we tolerate but it's not something good.
 
I'd like to have the option to buy what I want where I want but at the same time all those clients are simple and unobtrusive enough to not really be a problem anymore.
 

supersaw

Member
Why aren't your games patched already?

Why aren't all your launchers just running in the background at startup if this is really a problem for you?

Because origin randomly logs itself out all the time or crashes. Have battle.net or whatever its called now log itself out on me quite often too.

Also since most of these things are electron based apps or some kinda thing running a fork of webkit underneath each of them wants to tax 100 meg of ram or more. I prefer not to have running processes using ram and cpu when I can avoid it.
 
Because origin randomly logs itself out all the time or crashes. Have battle.net or whatever its called now log itself out on me quite often too.

Also since most of these things are electron based apps or some kinda thing running a fork of webkit underneath each of them wants to tax 100 meg of ram or more. I prefer not to have running processes using ram and cpu when I can avoid it.
I will not tolerate the electron hate. Awesome ass tool for me since I'm studying to be a web developer and would love to make garage apps in my spare time.
 

NeonBlack

Member
I was wondering, how is Uplay? I've been trying to decide if I should get AC on PS4 or PC and the idea of having it for one game kinda put me off.
 

GLAMr

Member
How is it even competition?

Wanna play D3? Have to use Battle.net. Want to play Battlefield 4? Gotta launch Origin. Interested in DotA2? You must install steam. Hell, even for Ubisoft games you buy through Steam, you still have to launch heinous uPlay. I only ever use uPlay or Origin because they twist my arm, not because I like them.

If the various platforms could authenticate each other's games to allow us to really choose a storefront and stick with it, I'd be all for it. But a dozen fragmented, uncooperative interfaces is just annoying.
 

KHlover

Banned
I only buy on Steam. Origin gets installed whenever a SWBF or Battlefield beta rolls around, then immediately uninstalled.

Edit: Ah, I also have battle.net for Overwatch, but that barely behaves different than your average MMO launcher.
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
Personally, this is such an insignificant "problem" that it didn't even register with me. I don't have to be a paid member to any of the platforms, so I just click the icon and play the game. I could see this being an issue if it was similar to TV/Streaming platforms and such you have to pay to watch, but...

Sorry OP. =/
 

Gren

Member
I'm only able to tolerate all these storefronts (and their launchers, which are a byproduct of them wanting to keep as much of the revenue as possible) when they make their keys readily available through competing digital distributors like Gamesplanet & Green Man. Usually, at any given time, at least one of them will have the game on sale for a cheaper price.

Storefronts that only sell their games through their own platform & via Gamestop are essentially little better than console digital; you're more or less only getting a discount during a sales event or random flash sale.
 

mdubs

Banned
This is just like whining when there are competitors to Netflix.

Want to keep your prices down? Want to inspire competition? Want to have OPTIONS when purchasing games?

The answer to all of that should be yes.
This is a horrible comparison. Having more streaming services requires me to pay more to get a full selection of things if there exclusivity deals. Installing more clients costs me nothing.
 

gngf123

Member
I absolutely hate the "no Steam, no buy" mindset and find that it is toxic to the open PC platform.

The only problem I have with other launchers is that in the past, some of them have been pretty bad. UPlay in particular comes to mind. Other

I typically use Steam, GOG and separate DRM Free downloads from Itch/Humble
 

Pachael

Member
It's interesting people calling "competition" and "choice" to clients that literally lock down their own games and do nothing else. They're literally there just to lock down consumer choice and options and make you pay as much as possible. That's not competition. Stuff like GOG is competition.
It would be nice if some actual competition, in the actual meaning of the word, popped up.

I see this as publisher/developer decisions much like how some publishers aren't on certain console platforms for one reason or other.

Witcher 3 (GOG, Steam, Origin) and Cuphead (GOG, Steam, Windows store) come to mind. Itch.io has its fans and some Indies are publishing games there in addition to GOG and Steam.
 

Josman

Member
Uplay and the W10 store are the worst offenders, they are so terrible it's not even funny, and the competition they bring is horrible

Edit: And yeah, the concept of "competition" doesn't strictly apply here, if we get more publisher platforms it's only to block other storefronts, with no actual pricing war going on, see Origin, Battlenet and W10, Steam by itself is an open market that drives down prices to the point I own 70 games and I haven't played half of them.

I'm not trying to say that I'd rather have Valve control all the market but I'd be on board with installing a lot of clients if they were as open
 

pakkit

Banned
I absolutely hate the "no Steam, no buy" mindset and find that it is toxic to the open PC platform.

"How can I undermine the benefits of an open platform?"

Juggling all the titles can be a pain, and I do have a favorites folder in Steam that I try to curate but I can't complete because The Witcher and Grim Fandango and others are on other platforms. I'll try out playnite though, I bookmarked it when it showed up on /r/Games a few days ago.
 

Parfait

Member
Steam is the only one I keep open, unless i'm subbed to WoW at the time, in which case the Bnet app is open all the time too.

The rest? I don't even use em. Maybe uPlay if i get AssOrigins or reinstall Black Flag, but that's about it. I'm not getting battlefront 2 anymore so I don't need Origin.
 

everyer

Member
That is why I play console... It's simple.

8WrTT3h.jpg
 

Diancecht

Member
Can somone tell me what’s wrong with uPlay? I buy a game, I download a game and I play that said game. Haven’t had any problems with it since, I don’t know, 2013?
 
Top Bottom