Phoenician_Viking
Banned
SuperÑ;35741416 said:
Ahahahahahaha. I was waiting for gifs. GAF <3.
SuperÑ;35741416 said:
What is LucasArts thinking? It's like they don't care any more about quality games.
They don't even hide it, after all the promo video features only kids. And as a kid game, it doesn't seem worse than another.
"It doesn't seem worse than any other kids game."
Wow, what a ringing endorsement.
Even if you can justify this product's existence as a soul-less brand extension, wouldn't it make sense to extend the brand with a quality product that is distinct and clearly head-and-shoulders above the competition?
Even if you can justify this product's existence as a soul-less brand extension, wouldn't it make sense to extend the brand with a quality product that is distinct and clearly head-and-shoulders above the competition?...
Pffff. Dance Central and Child of Eden are a blast.Kinect is a great technology for a lot of possible applications. Gaming is not one of them.
As a matter of fact, kids games are not too bad these days, especially on kinect.
Pffff. Dance Central and Child of Eden are a blast.
They don't even hide it, after all the promo video features only kids. And as a kid game, it doesn't seem worse than another.
I think we had it better back in the day. When I was a kid, for my Star Wars gaming kicks I used to sit in one of these...
not do this...
and most certainly not this...
See, this argument is what I don't get. When I was 10 we played Super Star Wars on the SNES and somehow managed to beat it and loved it lol. Why do games for kids nowadays have be designed for brain dead vegetables? Don't underestimate the skills of 6-10 year olds, they deserve better than this.
You're the one calling it brain-dead... as a kid I would have been thrilled to have a game allowing me to use the Force with my hands, mimic lightsaber fights or go "pew pew" against Tie Fighters (actually I did all of this, only without a console nor a TV screen...).
I must admit I wasn't much into dancing though.
The dance game is a blast, very true (i have to be kinda tipsy to do it, but it's fun, agreed).
That's it though.
Fuck all of you. My kids are going to love this.
When I was a kid my parents bought me a bike. I played with the cardboard box more than the bike apparently.
I don't think parents should endeavour to get their kids cardboard boxes as presents is all I'm saying.
Fuck all of you. My kids are going to love this.
You're comparing a super casual game with a skill based arcade game. There are many kid demographics, it's not just "KIDS".
This is the correct response. The game is clearly aimed at kids and families. I watched the game play trailers. What I saw was a game that cleared delivered incredible experiences for the target audience, i.e. 3-12 year old kids.
If my son was a couple of years older, we would have an awesome time playing this together. All 4 gameplay modes look great for what they are.
For the uber star wars nerds, either have fun with it or wait until kinect 2.0 for your jedi knight simulation game.
For everyone else, quit applying the incorrect criteria to your judgements as the gameplay trailers looked great for the type of game that it is.
The problem with this game is the same as with every other kinect game: It could be cool, if MS would've allowed the implementation of accessories, like a navigation dongle (nunchuk) and an actual lightsaber in example.
I don't get this line of reasoning, would it not be better to have a genuinely good game and be a kids game rather than it only being good when viewed from the perspective of a child?
Why should it be The Lion King 2 when it could be The Lion King? i.e. Good for kids but also a great experience for adults?
Lowered expectations for children really irks me. They don't know better, but as the responsible adults we should be able to provide good experiences for them that they enjoy, not bad experiences they enjoy.
I don't get this line of reasoning, would it not be better to have a genuinely good game and be a kids game rather than it only being good when viewed from the perspective of a child?
Why should it be The Lion King 2 when it could be The Lion King? i.e. Good for kids but also a great experience for adults?
Lowered expectations for children really irks me. They don't know better, but as the responsible adults we should be able to provide good experiences for them that they enjoy, not bad experiences they enjoy.
See, this argument is what I don't get. When I was 10 we played Super Star Wars on the SNES and somehow managed to beat it and loved it lol. Why do games for kids nowadays have be designed for brain dead vegetables? Don't underestimate the skills of 6-10 year olds, they deserve better than this.
For the uber star wars nerds, either have fun with it or wait until third parties develop your jedi knight simulation game forWii!Move!Wii Motion Plus!Kinect!kinect 2.0?
I don't get this line of reasoning, would it not be better to have a genuinely good game and be a kids game rather than it only being good when viewed from the perspective of a child?
Why should it be The Lion King 2 when it could be The Lion King? i.e. Good for kids but also a great experience for adults?
Lowered expectations for children really irks me. They don't know better, but as the responsible adults we should be able to provide good experiences for them that they enjoy, not bad experiences they enjoy.
Add ME3 to the list as the best kinect game to date.
Sometimes I wish I had control over Star-Wars... The dancing to YMCA.. I felt a bit.. violated.
Princess Lia dancing, if you haven't seen it already:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=GlxfRprusUo#t=281s
That isn't the problem. Sesame Street: Once Upon a Monster, Disneyland Adventures and Kinectimals are wonderful kids games that don't beg for a controller at all. The problem with this game is that it doesn't look like a very good game.
I haven't played one of the games you just listed but aren't the controls/the overall gameplay kinda basic? Like lean left/right to move to this direction and do shapes with body to get through obstacle courses and waggle to catch/block stuff? Don't get me wrong I really liked what I saw of Sesame Street and Dance Central is totally fun, because well, dancing is fun. But don't you see that a trackable item (*wink*lightsaber*wink*) would probably give you a better Star Wars game and a analog stick in one of your hand would make navigation in 3D environments more enjoyable than leaning? So, yeah, I think that IS the problem.