• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Vigil in 2012: Wii U "has been on par with what we have with the current generation"

You don't seem to understand. Epic and Ubi quotes state it's more powerful, but they don't contradict the OP like you alluded to. The question about it being more powerful than current gen isn't what we're arguing about.


This
You're kind of just guessing what they mean in their quotes. Same thing ITT. I'm also accepting a lot of what's been stated in the Wii U thread as well (see summary post earlier in the thread), so yeah.

I don't have a horse in this race, so don't label me a fanboy.
 
Something can be more powerful and more advanced but still be on par. They don't' necessarily contradict each other. It's very possible WiiU will be more advanced than current gen hardware, but still far behind PS4 and Xbox720.

I think that the bolded is more than likely, but "beyond current gen" doesn't really tally with "on par".
 

Grymm

Banned
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for its new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not good.
 
What different game versions?
I'm talking about how some took "on part with current gen" as if it's the same or worse than 2005-Xbox 360 launch.

Any "big" difference in hardware, won't be known until a few years, when we compare games made for it and games fully made for it.

With 1st gen hardware and early dev kits, they've technically admitted to been able to port Darkiders 2 "as is" with extra controls. If in 2-3 years they're not able to do much more than that, that's another thing.

Why can't a developer who has access to the system's technical specifications know whether or not it is on par with current gen or significantly beyond? Why wait 2 years? Do we also have to wait 2-3 years to confirm the Vita is a lot stronger than the 3ds? I think if he knows the specs and is currently programming ps3/360 games for it, it would be pretty obvious where it stacks up.
 
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for it's new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not a good.
Who cares?

I mean I guess some people care. But it doesn't really matter.
 

AniHawk

Member
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for it's new console and it's going to look exactly the same. That's not good.

nintendo's biggest mistake was making darksiders 2 the centerpiece of their presentation, and after sony and microsoft did the same thing! oh nintendo, when will you learn.
 
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for its new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not good.

I hope Nintendo have some of their own games to show off. I'm sure they will but I mean something that justifies a day 1 purchase.
 
Why can't a developer who has access to the system's technical specifications know whether or not it is on par with current gen or significantly beyond? Why wait 2 years? Do we also have to wait 2-3 years to confirm the Vita is a lot stronger than the 3ds? I think if he knows the specs and is currently programming ps3/360 games for it, it would be pretty obvious where it stacks up.

The OP's quotes are taken from the Creative Director, I don't see why someone would think he would have a more worthwhile opinion than his Technical Director?
 
Hey guys, how many contradicting inane rumors or hearsays is this now? I swear, I could start coming up with stuff and submit it to kotaku and people would believe it.

I think the rule is, whatever the most recent rumor or vague statement that someone said is the one that is most true.

Can't wait till someone says that the Wii U is three times as powerful as this gen again.
 
You're kind of just guessing what they mean in their quotes. Same thing ITT. I'm also accepting a lot of what's been stated in the Wii U thread as well (see summary post earlier in the thread), so yeah.

I don't have a horse in this race, so don't label me a fanboy.
I didn't label you anything, I just replied to your post. And I'm not guessing, I'm going by what the quote states.

At what point in time does "on par" start becoming "more powerful"? The PSVITA is "on par" with the PS3 yet the PS3 is most definitely stronger than the PSVITA
On par as in the PS3 is on par with the 360 despite being "more powerful".

Yes, several sources are worth more than your opinion. That is correct.
There are not several sources. No sources contradict what the OP is saying.
 
I'm a little disappointed that Nintendo purposely goes behind the current tech with their systems now. I remember a time when they tried to be ahead of everyone else.

I can see why they're doing it though:

For me personally, I don't mind the Wii U being underpowered. I still think current gen systems look amazing and I can't wait to see my favorite Nintendo franchises with current gen graphics. Some of the recent games still blow me away, so I'm sure by the time the Wii U comes out, more developers will find ways to improve the visuals on it.
 
Why can't a developer who has access to the system's technical specifications know whether or not it is on par with current gen or significantly beyond? Why wait 2 years? Do we also have to wait 2-3 years to confirm the Vita is a lot stronger than the 3ds? I think if he knows the specs and is currently programming ps3/360 games for it, it would be pretty obvious where it stacks up.

Yeah pretty much
 

Coolwhip

Banned
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for its new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not good.

Angry birds looks the same on the new Ipad aswell. It's a very small group that obsesses so much about visuals (GAF plus a few more).
 

sp3000

Member
Yes, several sources are worth more than your opinion. That is correct.

Sources that you are pulling out of your ass apparently. You haven't named a single one.

You think the Darksiders 2 developer is wrong simply because it doesn't fit your fanboy assumptions for what the Wii U should be. No other reason.
 
The OP's quotes are taken from the Creative Director, I don't see why someone would think he would have a more worthwhile opinion than his Technical Director?

All the technical director said was that it's more powerful than current gen hardware, which we already knew, at least those of us with some common sense. That's not what we're discussing. It feels like this thread is on repeat.
 

axisofweevils

Holy crap! Today's real megaton is that more than two people can have the same first name.
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for its new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not good.

Did anyone expect any different? An Xbox 360 port on PS3 tends to look exactly like an Xbox 360 game. Why is the Wii U different? It is the exclusive titles where the Wii U will shine.
 
I still feel the Wii U will be right in-between the XB360/PS3 and next-gen consoles. We'll see what devs say about the v5 dev-kits, hopefully something will break soon, to put these Godawful rumors to rest, about Wii U only being on par with XB360/PS3.

I'm confident that Wii U will be the most powerful home console on its release, for at least 1 year before Microsoft launches XB3.
 

Grymm

Banned
Angry birds looks the same on the new Ipad aswell. It's a very small group that obsesses so much about visuals (GAF plus a few more).

It's a very small group that pays any attention to E3 too.

But to those that do... if the 360 Darksiders 2 is shown one day, and the PS3 Darksiders 2 is shown the next, and then Nintendo shows WiiU Darksiders 2 on what is supposed to be a next gen system and it looks exactly the same then that's just not a great way to make a first impression.

Like a poster above said hopefully for Nintendos sake they have something of their own that makes full use of the WiiU and does seem like a step ahead. I'm not talking about NSMBMii either, I mean something good.

Because as small as the audience is that pays attention to E3, the audience that cares about shader models and 1 gig more RAM etc. are just going to look at it and say it either looks like a new gen of games or it doesn't. Nintendo needs to make the impression that it is indeed a new gen, even if the hardware in the box doesn't exactly make it entirely so.
 

Pseudo_Sam

Survives without air, food, or water
MS typically has day 1 of e3, right?

So day 1 of e3 MS shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 2 Sony shows off Darksiders 2.

Day 3 Nintendo shows off Darksiders 2 for its new console and it's going to look exactly the same.

That's not good.

Who gives a shit? It's Darksiders 2. If your final judgement of a brand new system is based on a launch-window 3rd party port, you're doing it wrong. And if your final judgement of that launch-window 3rd party port is based solely on its graphical fidelity, and not on the unique use of the brand-new control scheme for which the new system is being touted, you're definitely doing it wrong.
 
gsye310kz3part13_1.gif


LOOK OUT 360 AND PS4!!!111 HERE CUMS SHADER MODELZ AND TESSELACTORS WITH TEH PIPELINES ON NINTENDO!!!!!11111

Can this fool stop with unrelated gifs?

Oh glad he's banned now. Hope the ban goes till E3.
 

JJConrad

Sucks at viral marketing
magash owned so hard.
This is what I hate most about GAF. The mod's deliberately making threads and posts to keep this forum divided and at eachother's throats. This interview was already been discussed and outcome of creating a new topic for it was certain. Now, context is lost and even mocked.


"We're still waiting on that final hardware and architecture, and help from Nintendo to figure that out.

"Right now, it looks like it's more than the 360 or PlayStation 3, but there's still a question mark about how much you can squeeze out of it
This quote comes from the interview where we first found out that they weren't adding anything visually to the WiiU version above the PS360 versions. It's key to understanding the company's context. It's been argued that the company has changed their tone because they found out that the system actual power. However, their tone changed since they've claimed the system was still more powerful. So the lack of improvements can't be blamed on the system's lack of extra power.

In the interview in the OP, Marvin Donald also states that he is in charge of the game's narrative and when asked about the difficulties of multiplatform development he starts, "Ummm... You know... honestly, it's not real transparent from my perceptive." He's not that involved on the technical side and the company line is that all the versions will look about the same, even the PC version. This simply isn't the guy to make definitive assessments about the system's power from one sentence.
 
All the technical director said was that it's more powerful than current gen hardware, which we already knew, at least those of us with some common sense. It feels like this thread is on repeat.


Well it's pretty hard to compare it to things that we don't officially have any information on (except there will be UE3 games on them).
 

fernoca

Member
Why can't a developer who has access to the system's technical specifications know whether or not it is on par with current gen or significantly beyond? Why wait 2 years? Do we also have to wait 2-3 years to confirm the Vita is a lot stronger than the 3ds? I think if he knows the specs and is currently programming ps3/360 games for it, it would be pretty obvious where it stacks up.
Because he's talking from a personal perspective, based on early dev kits (latest ones were recently sent and are not the final ones); of what the (separate) team at Vigil is doing with it. And since last year, they've said the same ..that their focus was on the controller first and if they had more resources, and time..then up the resolution and other things.


Is like back in 2005, when Itagaki said this about the Xbox 360:

In an interview published in the latest issue of Famitsu Xbox Magazine, Tecmo producer and Team Ninja head honcho Tomonobu Itagaki talked more about his impressions on the Xbox 360. When asked about the console's triple-core IBM PowerPC processor design, Itagaki called it a "buffed-up Sega Saturn," as the old console was also multi-processor, coming with two, 32-bit CPUs. He said that a single-CPU machine is easier for programming, but multi-core structures have become the recent trend.​

While making DOA4 with alpha kits (same alpha kits Microsoft used to demo stuff at E3 back then).

When developers "talk like that" they usually mean in other things, more than just actual power of said hardware. In that case, Itagaki mostly was talking about the multi-core CPUs, but that quote was taken out of context many times back then, under the assumption that the Xbox 360 was going to be "on par" with the Xbox. When multiple sources and developers (even the same Itagaki) said otherwise.

Then there were the usual comparisons about how the 360 was a buffed-up Xbox, how it wasn't going to exceed PC games...just like every gen.
In this case "on par" goes as far of what they've been able to do with their (up to that moment) dev kits; doesn't paint an absolute picture of it.
 
Sources that you are pulling out of your ass apparently. You haven't named a single one.

You think the Darksiders 2 developer is wrong simply because it doesn't fit your fanboy assumptions for what the Wii U should be. No other reason.

I think you are very capable of reading the many post in this topic and the speculation topic, so I shouldn't have to point them out when already have been pointed out several times.

No, unlike some people, I don't think the WiiU will be equal to the PS3/360, nor will it be equal to the PS4/Nextbox. But yes, I'm a fanboy for trusting many other sources besides on that has already stated what I believe. Right.
 

Coolwhip

Banned
It's a very small group that pays any attention to E3 too.

But to those that do... if the 360 Darksiders 2 is shown one day, and the PS3 Darksiders 2 is shown the next, and then Nintendo shows WiiU Darksiders 2 on what is supposed to be a next gen system and it looks exactly the same then that's just not a great way to make a first impression.

Like a poster above said hopefully for Nintendos sake they have something of their own that makes full use of the WiiU and does seem like a step ahead. I'm not talking about NSMBMii either, I mean something good.

Because as small as the audience is that pays attention to E3, the audience that cares about shader models and 1 gig more RAM etc. are just going to look at it and say it either looks like a new gen of games or it doesn't. Nintendo needs to make the impression that it is indeed a new gen, even if the hardware in the box doesn't exactly make it entirely so.

Nintendo is hanging up the Wii succesor entirely on the controller and the new fun games it brings though. (they still have to prove that of course). So if they show Darksiders 2 with a few cool touchcontrols they did their job. If of course they show some awesome Nintendo created Upad games too.

Personally I think Nintendo saying they want to get the 'core' gamers back is just BS. They would be fine with the casual crowd again. But this time they need to keep them interested longer.
 
I think you are very capable of reading the many post in this topic and the speculation topic, so I shouldn't have to point them out when already have been pointed out several times.

No, unlike some people, I don't think the WiiU will be equal to the PS3/360, nor will it be equal to the PS4/Nextbox. But yes, I'm a fanboy for trusting many other sources besides on that has already stated what I believe. Right.

These sources you're referring to either don't exist or don't state what you think they do. No source contradicts the OP.
 

Flatline

Banned
Leakers in Wii U thread as well as quotes from Ubi and Epic

We'll see what's right. I personally still expect it to be midway between this gen and PS4 or whatever


Are these leakers legit? And what have Epic and Ubi said? Honest questions, I'm interested to know.
 
Guys, I heard the Wii U will be an actual Transformer. A guy at Valve said so. You can go on awesome adventures and beat up bullies or something.
 

Instro

Member
With regards to them improving the game visually, iirc the PC version of Darksiders didn't have any graphical options other than resolution. Afaik it was a quick and dirty port, that people complained about considering it took 6 months to get it out. Assuming Darksiders 2 is another lazy PC port, then that would probably explain why the WiiU version looks the same as well.
 
These sources you're referring to either don't exist or don't state what you think they do. No source contradicts the OP.

They contradict many of the opinions on the definition of par being posted here. Not a single poster here has claimed the WiiU would be as powerful as PS4/Nextbx, yet because we believe it will be more powerful than the PS3/360 that means we do believe it will be x10 as powerful.
 

lednerg

Member
If gaming history has told me anything, it's that the more power a console has, the more successful it will be. Also, I have amnesia.
 
They contradict many of the opinions on the definition of par being posted here. Not a single poster here has claimed the WiiU would be as powerful as PS4/Nextbx, yet because we believe it will be more powerful than the PS3/360 that means we do believe it will be x10 as powerful.

Can you please post the sources.
 
With regards to them improving the game visually, iirc the PC version of Darksiders didn't have any graphical options other than resolution. Afaik it was a quick and dirty port, that people complained about considering it took 6 months to get it out. Assuming Darksiders 2 is another lazy PC port, then that would probably explain the WiiU version looks the same as well.

No, that obviously means PCs are on par with PS3/360. >_>
 

RagnarokX

Member
Even if WiiU is closer to PS360, it's disingenuous to say it's Wii all over again. For one thing, Wii was not a huge leap in power over it's predecessor like WiiU is over Wii. This is the first time Nintendo franchises will be in HD. Also, there won't be an SD/HD barrier between WiiU and the other consoles. They'll all be HD and the differences WAY less noticeable.
 
With regards to them improving the game visually, iirc the PC version of Darksiders didn't have any graphical options other than resolution. Afaik it was a quick and dirty port, that people complained about considering it took 6 months to get it out. Assuming Darksiders 2 is another lazy PC port, then that would probably explain why the WiiU version looks the same as well.

I agree, you won't really see potential until you go exclusive development. They are just simply porting darksiders 2 to wii u.

To think that Wii is only on par with current gen is riddiculus, unless they are aiming for a $149-199 dollar console. Though, I know some people want this price range but then you shouldn't expect it to go beyond current gen by much.
 
Are these leakers legit? And what have Epic and Ubi said? Honest questions, I'm interested to know.
TBH I don't frequent the thread too much, and I haven't been following the Wii U stuff closely at all. You'd have to ask in that thread. The Epic/Ubi stuff has been posted ITT, I don't have the quotes on hand.
 
Top Bottom