ViewtifulJC
Banned
It hurts my soul to live in a world without TimeSplitters 4
God.........damnit
God.........damnit
Many games from e3 11 that've been announced for wii u have not been talked about again in detail since their initial announcements. There are other games in the past few months that have announced wii u support with logos in press releases, web pages (project cars), etc. that have been subsequently taken down. Lastly there have been a couple of developers, Ono, vigil, etc. that have even directly said or hinted that nintendo has been laying down heavy NDAs for the system and it's upcoming games.
Pretty much.
Exhibit A: Project CARS promo material has a WiiU logo one day, and the next day it's gone.
Exhibit B: Previously announced titles, such as Darksiders II, have ZERO WiiU-related media.
Exhibit C: What, you thought absolutely NO GAME ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR A YEAR was normal?!
Well, you could just choose to believe Satterfield.
But yeah, as I've said before, Nintendo should have little trouble convincing third parties to greenlight Wii U versions of any and every multiplatform HD title shipping in Q4 of this year or later. If, in reality, more than a few such titles end up slipping through the cracks, it'll bode quite poorly for the system's future. (Not that multiplatform titles are enough in themselves, but that's another matter.)
Epic Mickey 2 denial is particularly bizarre, since all other indications are that Spector's/JP's relations with Nintendo are quite warm, and the excuse Spector gave makes no sense (he claimed that the game was "so far" into development by the time Wii U was "announced," yet EM2 couldn't possibly have been much more than 5-6 months into development by the time dev kits were made available early last year).
Maybe Crytek's problem lies with Nintendo's online strategy... /doom
It almost broke 18k in Japan!
In truth, it garnered a ton of interesting awards and/or press mentions of notability, and this sort of attention can increase mindshare for a sequel. The question is: Did Nintendo wait too long to capitalize on this?
Probably.
Thanks. I guess there is no worldwide numbers for it?Like shit, but times have changed. Eternal Darkness was an M-rated title on a platform with an image problem and a tiny install base.
I think Eternal Darkness in 2012 is an entirely different proposition. And considering Silicon Knights situation, I'm sure Nintendo got to dictate terms to SK with little blow back.
I'd rather say "everyone" instead That comment in the article is just one guy's opinion."I still don't see how first-person shooters will be any fun on that hulking controller."
say wut?
Nintendo can't please anyone
Who cares about Crysis 3 when the Wii U is getting Time Splitters 4 as an exclusive.
One of the teaser for the upcoming Call of Duty game
It shows a drone controlled by a tablet, with a bird eye view.
It's really smelling Wii U padlet when we're viewing this.
yes which we know absolutely nothing about, good job
One of the teaser for the upcoming Call of Duty game
It shows a drone controlled by a tablet, with a bird eye view.
It's really smelling Wii U padlet when we're viewing this.
guys I have a theory every time ideaman post a news clip and points at wiiu possibilities he is giving insider hints :3
hmm
usually when someone says "fat chance" it's sarcastic, as in "not going to happen". this guy however said "not a fat chance". can we take that as the double negative to mean "it's not NOT going to happen"?
i think crysis 3 is gonna come to wii u. just watch.
Third parties sales are going to suffer on Xbox360 and PS3 this holiday season with the WiiU out.
in other words, he's never allowed to post again unless he's giving a hint. lol
I warned against assuming that every unannounced third party game was a lock for WiiU. Though the game doesn't look that great one still has to wonder about the third party support nintendo has been able to muster.
Who cares about Crysis 3 when the Wii U is getting Time Splitters 4 as an exclusive.
ShadenfreudeSomebody just had to fucking do it.
What? Do you have a link? I'd be shocked if it wasn't multiplatform.
RG: Now that you talk about Marvel Pinball… You’ve made some tables based on other licenses. Would you like to create a Nintendo based table?
Neil: Yes, definitely. We’d love to make Mario, Zelda or Pokémon pinball tables. Nintendo is obviously very protective of their Intellectual Properties, so we hoping that once our games become established on their platforms they’ll see us as a good potential partner and they’ll want to work with us.
RG: One last question: Have you thought about using the Wii U controller for a pinball game? With its triggers and its accelerometers it looks like a good fit.
Neil: Well, the new Wii U controller is… very good for pinball, actually. I can’t talk you much more than that right now but yeah, I agree that it would be pretty cool for pinball *laughs*.
It's nonsense, actually. More third party games were sold on Nintendo platforms this generation than on either of their competitors' platforms. These include ~200 million sellers so it's not like it's only a few huge games that do well either.
The mistake people make when looking at Nintendo's dominance of the top seller lists and concluding from that that third parties can't catch a break is the failure to realize that those Nintendo games would dominate the top seller lists of any system. For example, 20 million copies would be enough to claim #1 on both 360 and PS3 while on Wii it won't even get you into the top 5.
The whole thing is CG... like, cheap monster movie sequels cheap CG.
But yeah, this thing uses a goddamn tablet. Perfect for the Wii U, HEH, ACTIVISION!?
Wonderful.
I like this. Something to combat the relentless attitude found in most large outlets.
I really wish Nintendo had the guts to say to these sites:
"Fuck you - no more review copies, no more interviews, and you're disinvited from our conference. Have a great E3. You won't miss us, right? We're too goddamn kiddy and behind the times and technologically obsolete to bother covering anyway, right, hmm? We'll just invite these smaller fan-driven community sites instead. Buh-bye!"
I like this. Something to combat the relentless attitude found in most large outlets.
I really wish Nintendo had the guts to say to these sites:
"Fuck you - no more review copies, no more interviews, and you're disinvited from our conference. Have a great E3. You won't miss us, right? We're too goddamn kiddy and behind the times and technologically obsolete to bother covering anyway, right, hmm? We'll just invite these smaller fan-driven community sites instead. Buh-bye!"
guys I have a theory every time ideaman post a news clip and points at wiiu possibilities he is giving insider hints :3
Yup. It's the same excuse essentially compared to the ones that Crystal Dynamics and Hideo Kojima used.For those that read the article but didn't watch the video, the video interview is much more balanced and he expands on the statement "Not a fat chance". He goes on to say that the launch platforms are PC and consoles and he doesn't think "it's in the cards to do a Wii U version of it".
Absolutely ! HEH ACTIVISION!?
Does anybody give a shit about this random third party support? No disrespect to you IdeaMan but if that's what nintendo has to show after a year's worth of silence that would be laughable.
"Wii U is kind of a special case," said the Crysis 3 creator. "The way the player interacts with the device is very different than any other device out there. So if I were to make a game for the Wii U, it would have to be a unique game."
Even then, the Crysis engine is still compatible with the Wii U, says the developer. The issue isn't with the game's engine, but rather what seems to be the developer's desire to create a unique title centered on the Wii U's capabilities. That's good to know, because the last thing we need is a wacky Wii U port of what could be a great game on other consoles. If the developers want to tinker around with the upcoming Nintendo console's hardware to deliver an intriguing and unique game, that's a much better idea than a port.
Sorry. Had to do it.
I dont quite understand. ~200 million sellers? I assume that this is a typo for ~20 million, but which 3rd party game sold that much on the Wii? I only see 1st party games that sold 20 million+.
The only 3rd part devs I give a shit about, not including the ones that will OBVIOUSLY support with the WiiU are Kojima, Square-Enix, FromSoftware.
Everyone else can do what they want.
Hmm, gonna have to mull this one over for a couple weeks.Let's say Bioware, when they'll finally be able to port their next sci-fi western RPG to a Nintendo console, stop their the development of their upcoming projects, and try an entry in the omelette & baked alaska market, with Shepard shaped scrambled-eggs, would you REALLY don't give a shit about that ?
I dont quite understand. ~200 million sellers? I assume that this is a typo for ~20 million, but which 3rd party game sold that much on the Wii? I only see 1st party games that sold 20 million+.
Hah. I was going to post something similar.Aaaaaand, it turned to shit.
3 pages.
Woooooooo...
Thanks. Then i understand. Does anyone have this list by the way?He means there are 200 games that are million sellers.
I dont quite understand. ~200 million sellers? I assume that this is a type for ~20 million, but which 3rd party game sold that much on the Wii? I only see 1st party games that sold 20 million+.