• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Polygon posts ad/re-worded press release as 'News' & deletes user comments [Removed]

AkuMifune

Banned
CNN runs ads
NTimes has ads

Serious journalism has ads.
Hell, most papers have ads that are designed to look like part of the newspaper.

I really don't get this argument. Or how it is only relevant to games journalism...

AND they weren't even paid for this one (outside of page views?). It was just a heads up about an armor code that happened to mention pizza.

Ads are usually run in commercials in-between the news bits. Those are the funny things that take place when Anderson Coopers sexy face isn't on the screen. They are not disguised as news during the main portion of the show.
 

Dennis

Banned
CNN runs ads
NTimes has ads

Serious journalism has ads.
Hell, most papers have ads that are designed to look like part of the newspaper.

I really don't get this argument. Or how it is only relevant to games journalism...

AND they weren't even paid for this one (outside of page views?). It was just a heads up about an armor code that happened to mention pizza.

Nothing to see here. Business as usual. No need to be upset.

I am sure the New York Times runs corporate press releases, unedited, under the 'News' header.
 

PaulLFC

Member
- There is a huge issue within gaming happening right now, covered in the thread this one is split from.

- Polygon remarked that they wouldn't be commenting on this issue.

- They do do however believe that rehashing press releases while adding no comment, opinion or journalistic flair if their own is newsworthy.

- When questioned on this in the comments, they began actively censoring comments and said that, effectively, criticism wasn't allowed.

That is the issue.
 
iLGgJhPJyuoNf.png
 

ghst

thanks for the laugh
it's crazy how distinguishable the veterans of the rab florence/wainwright thread are from those comparatively new to the issue.

they got them war shakes.
 
Running ads, prompting ethics questions, and doing it all without actually being paid for it? This really is a brave new world of games journalism.
 
I'm just curios why they run UK specific news that the UK sites themselves don't seem to cover. Not Edge Online, not CVG, not Eurogamer..

Polygon is normally so US centric that their games overview section doesn't even bother to list a currency next to the game's price.
 

DjangoReinhardt

Thinks he should have been the one to kill Batman's parents.
Conspiracy theories are, like, the manliest thing.

If they're not being paid, then how are readers supposed to trust a news site running free advertisements for an entity about which they are supposed to provide critical coverage? And running those ads as news?
 
Right now I can't find a UK site which has run it, despite it being the only relevant country for this new piece of important junk food/Halo crossover news. Perhaps that will change tomorrow.

That's actually a fair point, considering that the Polygon article went up at 4pm GMT. Although I suppose that's still a full hour before clocking off time. Maybe the whole Florencecourt thing has been noticed, by UK games journalists at least. Hell, not even IGN UK touched this.
 

JeffGrubb

Member
This would be a total nonissue if:

A) The person writing the post just injected it with something resembling even the slightest bit of original thought.

B) They didn't lock the comments thread!!!

Censorship is always an admission of guilt. If you are confident that you did the right thing, who cares what everyone else thinks.

I agree with this. I have to write about press releases because that's how I get a lot of my information, but when I do, I try to have a few jokes or something slightly surprising or delightful. Sometimes I fail at that though, but it's not cause I'm suckling from the PR teat, it's because I'm doing a lot of work on my own each day.

I spend most of my day infuriated or annoyed by PR. I try to circumvent them, but when I do, someone at the developer usually gets in trouble and the PR team tightens the reigns.

I don't stop trying though.
 
If you went to NBC News's site and took over the comments section on an article by criticizing NBC News, I'm sure it'd get deleted too. Would that be controversial?

I wouldn't consider it "controversial" - I'd consider it "censorship". If, say, I made a comment on some nuclear reactor-promoting article, or one that downplays the effects of Fukushima, in which I point out (in a polite and cultured way, supported by facts) NBC's connection to GE and GE's connection to nukes, and it got deleted, well, it'd be censorship, regardless of whether they're legally allowed to do it or not. It's of course something that's a million times as important as this tempest in a teapot - although this one is much, much funnier, since the people involved are so petty, narrow minded and unprofessional and the effects are not exactly earth-shaking. This is how shit goes. I mean, it'd be pretty much impossible to maintain this level of intentional ignorance otherwise.


Nothing to see here. Business as usual. No need to be upset.

I am sure the New York Times runs corporate press releases, unedited, under the 'News' header.

While they may not run unedited corporate press releases, they sure are proud to send some important articles for government approval. The NYT is worse than the entirety of the gaming press, which no sane person could confuse with journalism.
 
I'd say Pizza Hut and Microsoft can tell people about this important "information" on their own.

The worst part is that they got more advertising out of this fucking ridiculousness than if Polygon hadn't run the story at all. Polygon probably did them a huge favor with this, in all honestly.
 

Zeliard

Member
It really didn't. This is still newsworthy to some. It's the writer's job to inform the reader, and some readers will want to know about this.

Press releases are news.

If you want to call them lazy for just regurgitating it, then yes. It's lazy, but I would argue that there isn't much to investigate in a story like this.

If press releases are going to be posted as information for readers, they should be precisely labeled as such and shouldn't simply be regurgitated and vaguely re-worded in an effort to post them as some form of content written by the site's editors.

Gamasutra sticks completely unedited press releases into their own section of the site and labels them appropriately, and that is the way press releases should be posted if they are going to be at all. Gamasutra also discloses openly that they put out press releases in conjunction with a PR firm. Transparency goes a long way.

Florence's article revolved around the notion of the perception of impropriety in the midst of close relationships between games media and marketing. The reason something like this can be viewed as problematic in light of that is because of how it comes across. In Gamasutra's case there is full disclosure that they are putting up a press release and nothing more, because they do not re-word a bit of it in a way that could seem like they are somehow endorsing it.

Deleting critical comments, again, only adds to that sense of impropriety and leads people to believe that there is something to hide. It's exactly what got Lauren Wainwright in even more trouble. She went on a deleting spree and also hid her Twitter account instead of confronting the issue head-on, which only added to the sense that she knew she was in the wrong.
 

Corto

Member
OK. Are you suggesting that this information shouldn't be covered then?

Publish it verbatim, clearly informing that it's a press release or have a writer give it a spin as Giant Bomb did. Publishing it ipsis verbis like the press release with authorial attribution to a staff writer is dishonest. And considering all the lately developments about PR and news relations and polemic it's stupid. Naively stupid.
 

Famassu

Member
Ads are usually run in commercials in-between the news bits. Those are the funny things that take place when Anderson Coopers sexy face isn't on the screen. They are not disguised as news during the main portion of the show.
Yes, they actually are.
 
I agree with this. I have to write about press releases because that's how I get a lot of my information, but when I do, I try to have a few jokes or something slightly surprising or delightful. Sometimes I fail at that though, but it's not cause I'm suckling from the PR teat, it's because I'm doing a lot of work on my own each day.

I spend most of my day infuriated or annoyed by PR. I try to circumvent them, but when I do, someone at the developer usually gets in trouble and the PR team tightens the reigns.

I don't stop trying though.


So then you're not part of the problem.
 
CNN runs ads
NTimes has ads

Serious journalism has ads.
Hell, most papers have ads that are designed to look like part of the newspaper.

I really don't get this argument. Or how it is only relevant to games journalism...

AND they weren't even paid for this one (outside of page views?). It was just a heads up about an armor code that happened to mention pizza.
You won't see the NYTimes with an article like this:

Breaking News
Launch of Doritos Clam Chowder causes mayhem

NEW YORK, NJ - Doritos, a Frito Lay company, a filial of Unilever international, of the family of Pepsico, released the numbers of people arrested during the launch of the newly delicious Doritos Clam Chowder (really delicious). The new flavor, set to cause commotion across the nation, is available NOW at a 7 eleven near you.
 

JeffGrubb

Member
Publish it verbatim, clearly informing that it's a press release or have a writer give it a spin as Giant Bomb did. Publishing it ipsis verbis like the press release with authorial attribution to a staff writer is dishonest. And considering all the lately developments about PR and news relations and polemic it's stupid. Naively stupid.

If that's the issue, then I agree.
 
CNN runs ads
NTimes has ads

Serious journalism has ads.
Hell, most papers have ads that are designed to look like part of the newspaper.

I really don't get this argument. Or how it is only relevant to games journalism...

AND they weren't even paid for this one (outside of page views?). It was just a heads up about an armor code that happened to mention pizza.

Do you see ads plastered as BREAKING NEWS on CNN?
 

Kifimbo

Member
I don't see an ethical problem here, I think it's a news. But the article is certaintly lazy for a professional website. It also tells us a lot about Polygon that they'd rather cover this type of news than the Eurogamer/MCV/Wainwright stuff. And deleting negative comments isn't smart at all.
 
Guys, there's no controversy here. We decided to run a post, via EGM, that Pizza Hut was offering a prize to UK customers. Readers like to know when they can win free stuff, so we ran a post. There is no advertorial here since we weren't paid to put the piece up. Perhaps you didn't think the piece was newsworthy – well, that's fine. I encourage you to let us know at feedback@polygon.com and we'll use that feedback to influence our editorial direction.

What we won't allow is to have a bunch of people invade the comments and accuse us of wrongdoing. It's off-topic, and it's not helpful. If you want to believe there's a controversy behind everything, that's fine. We have a public ethics statement and we stick by it. If that's not enough for you to believe, then I'm sorry.

In short, we welcome your feedback, but in an appropriate venue. The comments thread of an article isn't that venue.


I am simply just not going to read your site. I appreciate manning up and coming in here to defend your decisions, but closing the comments and deleting everything is pretty ridiculous in my opinion.

It would have been over by now and everyone would have moved on, but your handling of it has just blown this whole stupid article up into a whole new issue. Good Luck in the future with your site, you are going to be busy I am sure!
 
Gotta love how Polyon and The Verge let the most raucous fanboy flame wars erupt in the comments sections of their articles, but as soon as it's someone crititicising them, it's Press Reset.
 

LuchaShaq

Banned
i don't understand people who don't understand Justin's sarcasm

This. I don't enjoy his writing but it has nothing to do with him being silly and dancing with a game he was excited about just for the laughs. People act like it was secret spy cam footage of him jerking off on the disc.
 
I don't see the big deal. Some people might have wanted to know that. Who cares if it as a press release and they are just regurgitating the information?

It seems that since the Wainwright Gaming Scandal of 2012, everybody is on a witch hunt.
 
I think the saddest part about these enthusiast sites posting these thinly veiled advertisements is...they do all of this for free.
 
I don't see an ethical problem here, I think it's a news. But the article is certaintly lazy for a professional website. It also tells us a lot about Polygon that they'd rather cover this type of news than the Eurogamer/MCV/Wainwright stuff. And deleting negative comments isn't smart at all.

Eh, I don't think that Halo 4's promotional tie-in with Pizza hut should be deemed newsworthy. Pizza Hut and Microsoft should be putting the word out themselves through Ads and not "news stories".
 
This. I don't enjoy his writing but it has nothing to do with him being silly and dancing with a game he was excited about just for the laughs. People act like it was secret spy cam footage of him jerking off on the disc.

there are these things called circumstances, and behaviors that are appropriate in them, come here, let me tell you more, as you've obviously never heard of them...
 

alr1ght

bish gets all the credit :)
Top Bottom