• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Edge #250 - The World's 50 Greatest Developers

Shinta

Banned
Never seen anyone defend RE6 without posting mercenaries footage. Like ever. I guess I definitely shouldn't bother getting the pc version considering I don't care about mercenaries mode anymore, got my share in RE4 playing that a couple of hundreds of hours.

Well it's just the easiest way to show off the combat to skeptics with a short window of attention, without spoiling anything. The campaign is the exact same gameplay, minus a few poorly implemented vehicle sections - and there's 4 campaigns. Not like there isn't anything to show. There's a lot. It's more fun with a co-op partner.
 
Honestly I don't care for any of the devs outside of EAD, Platinum, FROM, Wayforward, and Relic so that list means jack shit to me. But, I don't see how anyone could rank Mojang as the second best developer.
 
I can see why Valve is number 1. But Rockstar should be in the top 3.

And Sumo Digital deserves a spot on that list. Those guys keep the true spirit of SEGA alive. They are great.
 

SimonA

Neo Member
Great to see Platinum Games in the top 5 in front of more commercially acclaimed studios like Rockstar and Naughty Dog.
 
The fact that anyone actually thinks Valve is a better developer than Nintendo EAD is just the epitome of fanboy insanity. Pretty much all FPS games except for Portal, which is still first person with a gun thing. This is really the pinnacle of all game design? What a joke. It's getting to the point where Valve is possibly the most overrated developer in the business right now.

So I'm insane? Good to know. :)

The only way I would put Nintendo EAD over Valve was if we decided that quantity is the most important factor.
 

szaromir

Banned
Valve winning is only natural. (...)
Releasing maybe the two best games rver made surely isnt enough right?
Can't stop laughing.

But if you compare those few games with Nintendo, they get outnumbered in quality, quantity, importance, variation, culture impact and sales. DOTA2 is not even official released.
My problem with that is that EAD is more like a publishing wing, a studio comprising 500 people working on 10 games simultaneously, many of which are derivative and dull, some of them are brilliant of course. Not really comparable to eg. Relic who has incredible game designers but focuses (usually) on one thing at a time.

I think Edge shouldn't be putting those studios in order of some fictional greatness, just alphabetically to avoid controversy. Even omission of great studios such as Obsidian or Paradox would be glaring.
 

Auto_aim1

MeisaMcCaffrey
There's no doubt that Capcom makes some creative games, but they're so inconsistent. Going after the mass market and creating a poor game in the process should nullify all the good games they've churned out.
 

dan2026

Member
Surprised Rocksteady Studios isn't on there.

Didn't Batman Arkham Asylum win Game of the Year across a ton of major publications.
 

Oxx

Member
Strange list.

Cover is nice, though. First time in years I have thought 'Oooooohhhhh' while unwrapping an issue.
 

ElRenoRaven

Member
Factually incorrect.

I know it's late to reply to but I just felt it was a good jumping off point for me so...

Well it's opinion and not fact but yea I wouldn't rate them in the top 50 greatest developers at all. No offense to them I love Minecraft but 1 hit game doesn't make you one of the greatest developers in the world. Also I do agree Valve may be starting to get a bit overrated. I love Valve too but if you look at entire history of the developer then you have to give it to Nintendo as the #1 developer. They've created more hit franchises then just about anyone. They have such rich and great IPs that it isn't funny. You name the Genre they have something in it or have had something in it. I think the one thing they're really missing is a good FPS franchise.
 

legacyzero

Banned
In all honesty, what does Treyarch contribute beyond following IW's lead? Zombies?

Pretty much. Although I think Treyarch are better with handling the community and feedback that IW ever was.

I only posted that because of some of the ridiculous entries on the list, I'm surprised either of them weren't included in it :p
 

zoukka

Member
The fact that anyone actually thinks Valve is a better developer than Nintendo EAD is just the epitome of fanboy insanity. Pretty much all FPS games except for Portal, which is still first person with a gun thing. This is really the pinnacle of all game design? What a joke. It's getting to the point where Valve is possibly the most overrated developer in the business right now.

The rest of this list is just offensive. The fact that Mojang is even in the top 50 is offensive. And regardless of what you guys thought of FFXIII, no one in this thread actually believes that SQEX is not one of the top 50 developers.

No Capcom in the year they put out Dragon's Dogma which bests Skyrim in 100 ways (not to mention dozens and dozens and dozens of other games) but they put Ninja Theory on this list?

Red Lynx is on here, the makers of Trials Evolution ... are you fucking serious? I could just go on and on, but I don't want to be here all day.

VLAMBEER is on here? On what planet is this rational? Super Crate Box suddenly puts you on par with the best developers on the planet. That is pure organic bananas.

Don't get me started on TellTale. The studio that surprised everyone in 2012 by actually putting out a "game" with a story that didn't suck horribly like Jurassic Park. At least they got that part down though, even though it was a liscensed world they didn't create. At least they got that, since there is literally no gameplay beyond basic QTEs. How anyone can put them on this list anywhere but in 50th place, I don't know.

For all the constant requests to ban Kotaku, honestly I would much rather ban this publication. This is literally the worst list ever made.

Jesus this post just screams of weeaboo and "I never play western/arcade/pc games". Trials was the best arcade game in many awards, Minecraft is a revolutionary game and Valve puts such care in their game design and innovation that even the most avid hater must acknowledge that.

The fact that SE wasn't on the list is awesome. They are just a shadow of their former self and knee deep in shit titles atm.
 

Ridley327

Member
With Infinity Ward, I'm not even surprised that they are not on this. I mean, it appears to me that they have basically been in a coma since West and Zampella left in 2010.

It definitely made sense for them to be on a list like this as late as 2010. Nowadays? Not so much, especially with MW3 spinning the wheels compared to their other entries in the franchise.
 

Shinta

Banned
Jesus this post just screams of weeaboo and "I never play western/arcade/pc games". Trials was the best arcade game in many awards, Minecraft is a revolutionary game and Valve puts such care in their game design and innovation that even the most avid hater must acknowledge that.

The fact that SE wasn't on the list is awesome. They are just a shadow of their former self and knee deep in shit titles atm.

Right off the bat starting with a weak ass personal insult instead of sticking to the arguments. This shows that the rest of your post is weak as well.

If I don't think Trials, basically Excitebike HD with zany track designs, is among the best games of all time, I'm a cultural reject? Excitebike was made in 1984, almost 30 years ago. Why is Trials supposed to put Redlynx in the top 50 developers? Because they can create a few roller coaster levels and toss it into a 30 year old game design?
 

tonitoni

Member
Pretty solid list if you look at it from a "How interested would you be if a new project was coming out from X" perspective.
 

szaromir

Banned
Well it's opinion and not fact but yea I wouldn't rate them in the top 50 greatest developers at all. No offense to them I love Minecraft but 1 hit game doesn't make you one of the greatest developers in the world.
Why not? In my opinion a novelist who wrote one outstanding novel is greater than another who wrote ten decent ones. Similarly here quantity shouldn't determine greatness.

I never really got into Minecraft though, so I'm not to judge that specific choice.
 
I don't understand why Valve is on the list at all. I love TF2 but Valve in 2013 is barely even a game developer. They just take other people's work and try and figure out how to best profit off it.

I mean I imagine in Edge's mind they're counting Steam, but that just seems backwards.
 

meta4

Junior Member
343 should not be on this list and Mojang is too high in the list.

Quantic Dream and NT higher than SSM? Lol
 

Sentenza

Member
Everything about this list is wrong.

Remember when Edge was good?
Honestly? No.

I don't understand why Valve is on the list at all.

Well, here's the thing: they are scarily consistent in the quality of their output (regardless of subjective tastes), they are extremely profitable, they are a leading model in terms of post-release support for their titles, they released dozens of FREE updates and DLCs over the years and they single-handedly developed and dominated the digital distribution model.
Plus, they are one of the most community-driven (and community-friendly) big companies around.

On a personal note, I also have the feeling that there's constantly interesting things happening around them and what they are doing.

So... Serious question: *who* do you think would be a better leading model for the industry and on what bases?
 
Honestly? No.

I'm totally down with Steam. I love Steam. I like all the things Valve has done with it.

But as a game developer? I don't even count Dota 2 given how derivative of DotA it is, so it's hard for me to be excited about them since Portal 2. If you're going to widen the criterion to be "this video game company is most influential in the industry", then sure. Valve's great. But game developer? Umm
 

Whompa

Member
I don't understand why Valve is on the list at all. I love TF2 but Valve in 2013 is barely even a game developer. They just take other people's work and try and figure out how to best profit off it.

I mean I imagine in Edge's mind they're counting Steam, but that just seems backwards.

Valve has been developing for games for a long time and they give you a complete product when they do release something. They don't feed you piece meal unfinished products. They also support the product years after, with product updates and additions.

The "take other people's work and try and figure out how to best profit off it." can also be looked at two different ways. I think you're looking at it very blase and negative approach, while others can see that as taking a concept, and bringing them into a family of developers and creating a finished product from it.

You don't see too many negative stories coming out of the Valve offices...because they treat their employes well and don't "profit off others ideas" in the same light that some other studios might. Zynga, Gameloft, and EA for example, have a bad rep for that...

Valve deserves to be on the list. Number 1? I dunno, maybe? Whatever it is, they definitely deserve to be there.
 
criteria for list: "we're interested in technical and creative ability, and in studios that realise the most involving and stimulating game worlds, whether that's through visual, audio or game design." Imagination to bring new influences and themes to games, experiment with new ways of interacting, ingenuity in creating enthralling experiences, understand and engage with their audiences and have the vision to know where games are going next.

Can someone tell me how Valve fits this criteria, especially fit it enough to be #1 overall? Assuming this is only for their games and not Steam.

Edit- Seems this point is being discussed a lot already, nevermind.
 

Ridley327

Member
But DKCR was awesome :(

I'm not saying it isn't, but making a good DKC game isn't exactly inspiring in the same way that blowing everyone away with making Metroid work in 3D and as a FPS did. If they can get their next project to have that same kind of impact, then we're sure to see that level of adoration return.
 

kswiston

Member
Why Obsidian isn't on an Edge list:

Fallout New Vegas - 6
Dungeon Siege 3 - 7

They didn't bother reviewing Alpha Protocol from what I can find.


As for CDProjekt Red

The Witcher 2 - 6
 
Valve has been developing for games for a long time and they give you a complete product when they do release something. They don't feed you piece meal unfinished products. They also support the product years after, with product updates and additions.

The "take other people's work and try and figure out how to best profit off it." can also be looked at two different ways. I think you're looking at it very blase and negative approach, while others can see that as taking a concept, and bringing them into a family of developers and creating a finished product from it.

You don't see too many negative stories coming out of the Valve offices...because they treat their employes well and don't "profit off others ideas" in the same light that some other studios might. Zynga, Gameloft, and EA for example, have a bad rep for that...

Valve deserves to be on the list. Number 1? I dunno, maybe? Whatever it is, they definitely deserve to be there.

I'm not saying they're not a great company. If this was "top 50 game companies" I'd have them number one. Game developers? In 2007 they were number one for sure, nowadays I see them as a distribution company first, developer second.
 

tonitoni

Member
I don't understand why Valve is on the list at all. I love TF2 but Valve in 2013 is barely even a game developer.
ygM2t.jpg


Halo 4 is amazing game visually (don´t know about the gameplay, since i don´t have the 360), but 343I released only one game. How can one call a developer one of the greatest if the developer released only one game?
Graphics is the only notable thing about halo4, especially since the campaign is so bad and the feature set so narrow compared to the previous games. Multiplayer design is just another call of duty clone.
 
Even though I'm not a fan of their games, I think From might have deserved the top spot for being simultaneously able to push video games forward (with a return to difficulty and their online stuff) and have polished games that a ton of people enjoy.

Arkane seems really really high after just one game.
 

Shrennin

Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment
Valve? Mojang? I disagree.

Mojang is surprising but I think Valve is a valid contender in anyone's top dev list.

But seriously, Mojang shouldn't even be in the top 10.

I think Edge might also be getting at the creativity of Valve to allow others to more easily develop games/game items via Steam workshop as well. Although when Valve makes a game themselves, they really make a great game.
 
Even though I'm not a fan of their games, I think From might have deserved the top spot for being simultaneously able to push video games forward (with a return to difficulty and their online stuff) and have polished games that a ton of people enjoy.

Arkane seems really really high after just one game.

"Polish" and "From" don't go together in my head. There are entire areas in their console games with framerates in the teens, a neogaf poster had to fix their PC DS port, and they aren't even balanced... playing as a pyro, I practically broke Dark Souls' difficulty level without even trying. And I'd argue Dark Souls goes to shit in later areas like Lost Izalith, but that's getting too subjective.

I like their games, but they're pretty jank.
 
Top Bottom