• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Directs vs. E3 Blowout: Which style do you prefer?

demidar

Member
I love the weirdness ND employs. I mean Iwata contemplating while looking at a banana? Would never happen at E3. It's the perfect icebreaker, Iwata's actions compel you to tune in and find out more.
 

Rehynn

Member
Nintendo Directs. Just when you sorta forget about them, BAM, new Nintendo Direct: Tomorrow.

I find the long hype road to E3 sorta sickening in a way, because it makes under-performances feel extra disastrous. ND never feel that way to me.

Oh, but when an E3 conference delivers, it's incomparable.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Nintendo Directs. I think that during E3 only several games get the right attention and sometime the show might be stolen by some game that is not even going to be released in the near future. I prefer more information constantly during the year.
 
I love the weirdness ND employs. I mean Iwata contemplating while looking at a banana? Would never happen at E3. It's the perfect icebreaker, Iwata's actions compel you to tune in and find out more.

It also gives a platform for Nintendo to announce small things (like HarmoKnight) to a large audience that would get completely overlooked at E3 because everyone's so wrapped up in the hysteria.
 

Penguin

Member
I like the Nintendo Directs for smaller announcements. We've seen enough e3es to know that some games either don't stand out from the pack or get lost in the shuffle.

This allows you to focus people's attention on select announcements and continuously give out news and updates.

Would love to see Sony/MS embrace a similar idea for their content.
 
Nintendo Direct for me.

Nintendo at E3 at this point is just a live 60 minute Nintendo Direct that also allows people to play the games that have featured in a convention hall.

I like how they give very little notice to when a Nintendo Direct is about to be shown. It's more of a surprise than E3 where we know it's always at roughly the beginning of June every single year
 

Anth0ny

Member
well do you prefer the secretive, outdated style of saving everything for one show a year

or revealing things frequently, which makes business sense, like almost every other games company on earth




too bad nintendo tends to reveal fuck all at nintendo directs
 
Neither, Nintendo haven't announced anything to excite me in at least a couple of years. :(

More seriously, I honestly don't like the way Nintendo do E3 these days or their Directs. They're awkward and frankly dull. Far too corporate considering they're essentially the "purest" video game console manufacturer out there.
 

Mpl90

Two copies sold? That's not a bomb guys, stop trolling!!!
Nintendo Direct are a great step for Nintendo about comunicating what they have to fans and not just them. A way to release news / infos costantly without waiting just for E3 or other events. It's true that some of them have been a bit subpar, with only infos about well-known titles, but most of them have been good and also entertaining: Iwata's fruit obsession / Lego Iwata / What's wrong with you etc.etc...many good things came out of them.

Still, I hope they'll announce at E3 too. I'm still bitter at last conference's ending. I was thinking it would have ended with a bang. The problem is that it ended with a bang...FIREWORKS! They took it too literally ._.
 

mj1108

Member
Nintendo Directs by far. It's exciting to have them all throughout the year and announced suddenly just a day or two in advance.
 
Nintendo Directs don't replace E3 blowouts, they replace the random game announcements throughout a year. They usually announce games in Nintendo Direct that come out within a few months, and that they wouldn't announce at E3.

Here's an example of what happened before Nintendo Direct. ExciteBots for Wii just "showed up" on a Nintendo release list a month before release. A couple weeks later, the first media was shown, and a couple weeks later, it was released. Games like that are what Nintendo Direct is for.

Before Nintendo Direct, I don't think Nintendo made a big deal about WiiWare/DSiWare shops, either. The Directs are an outlet to show those off, too.
 
Nintendo Direct.

Regular Nintendo Directs are every second month, so next month we should get the regular stream. ;)


I wouldn't even need E3, but E3 has the big game announcements, that's why I still like it.
 

Meelow

Banned
For E3 I like to hear the people's reactions when a game gets announced, with Nintendo Direct I love that's it's every two months (soon even sooner) so it will calm our year with hype waiting for E3.

So I think my answer is I will always want both,
 

antonz

Member
Directs are one of the smarter things Nintendo has done in recent years. In many way sit makes E3 semi pointless in the announcement category but the hands on impressions etc. are still vital.

Nintendo just needs to loosen up a bit and not be afraid to talk about things even if a ways out so they can keep the hype train moving forward always
 

ozfunghi

Member
I'm still baffled they didn't put a Nintendo Direct Channel on the WiiU dashboard and have much in the same way as when a friend is online, show a message that there is a message for you waiting by the president of Nintendo. I mean, how many kids and parents have never even heard of these directs? I know they can be seen from the e-shop, but it's not the same thing.
 
I like Nintendo Directs because they don't make you sit through boring graphs and other shit you don't care about most of the time.
 
Oh, but when an E3 conference delivers, it's incomparable.

I think it's great to leave some of the major big guns for E3, stuff like smash bros, zelda etc.

But I think most of the "noise" should be ND. People mostly just pay attention to the 2-3 biggest E3 titles anyway.

This will make less awesome titles probably stand out more too when they're a ND title rather than part of an E3 trailer reel.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
I'd like to see a mix. Most of the time I would prefer something like Nintendo Direct but for console reveals and really big games, the pageantry, showboating, and crowd freakouts at E3 are fucking amazing.
 
Considering how disappointing nintendo's past few E3 conferences have been, would you rather they held off for one big shindig in early summer that previews products that are a ways away or do you prefer their current strategy of underplaying E3 and stringing out their announcements closer to launch dates throughout the year?
No "big one" BS. A steady stream of news throught the year. I think Nintendo should downright abandon E3 and just do the direct shows. And a return to Spaceworld would be awesome for the public.

I grew to dislike E3 from years ago, expensive and so saturated with news that good stuff tends to get lost in the avalanche.
 

Thraktor

Member
I prefer a constant stream of information to an annual showing. Nintendo Directs are one of the best things Nintendo has done in a long time, as far as I'm concerned.

I agree with this statement. The fact that I was sitting in a cafe today and just happened to notice a thread on GAF about a Nintendo Direct showing off new Wii U games in less than 24 hours time is great. It also keeps the hype down (although reading the ND thread you wouldn't think so), as you don't have the gradual ramping of hype for months on end as you get before E3.
 

spats

Member
I expect this year's E3 to be a return to form.

I'm not press and I'm probably never gonna go to E3, but there's nothing like E3 day for me. Staying up all night with/without friends and eating all sorts of shit and watching streams for cool announcements. I love it.
 

SykoTech

Member
Don't care, as long as I get the good announcements. The earlier the better honestly, as long as there's something substantial is shown (unlike the SSB4 announcement).

People, on these boards in particular, always seemed to complain whenever Sony would make announcements at any time other than E3, and I never understood that. Who gives a shit about "winning" E3, isn't a good announcement good regardless of when it's shown?

But now that Nintendo's going down the same road, people seem to finally be warming up to it.
 

Burai

shitonmychest57
Nintendo Direct is much better. It means that GAFers can overhype themselves into a frenzy and have huge meltdowns from the disappointment once or twice a month rather than once a year.
 

AzaK

Member
I like Nintendo Directs for small things but I want big shit at E3. It's a spectacle and I think new, big games deserve a spectacle. ND's make even the best of games seem pretty soft.

Iwata's English is not good enough to wow, and the ND's are pretty low budget so don't generate the sort of buzz I want. If they did a Nintendo Direct on a stage or somewhere like a bit of a show that'd be fine.

Will never happen either way. E3 is mainstream, ND's are for marketting to enthusiasts at low cost.
 
Nintendo directs are like mini-E3s.

Think about it, there's always hype built around them and they always end in either disappointment or with fantastic surprises.
 

guek

Banned
Something tells me that had I posted this after tomorrow's ND (likely) disappoints, a lot of these answers would be drastically different :3
 
Top Bottom