• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

VGLeaks Durango specs: x64 8-core CPU @1.6GHz, 8GB DDR3 + 32MB ESRAM, 50GB 6x BD...

wwm0nkey

Member
So apparently Polygon is going to have a story on Destiny on the 24th, the same day as the MS event.....hmmmm

(will probably end up being nothing)
 
Maybe it depends where you were having conversations.
Cell was always treated pretty questionably. Any time fanboys are shouting a random word they don't understand and never explaining what or why is a signal really.

I've no doubt Sony fans were saying stuff like that but overall am pretty sure everyone expected it to be pretty damn close.

Nah, I was definitely not a Sony fan (nor the Xbox fan at that point), and even I thought PS3 would wipe the floor with the 360. Pretty much everyone did. It was only after the developers started sharing more of their experiences with the two systems that it became clear they were closer in terms of performance than it was initially thought.
 

saunderez

Member
Nah, I was definitely not a Sony fan (nor the Xbox fan at that point), and even I thought PS3 would wipe the floor with the 360. Pretty much everyone did. It was only after the developers started sharing more of their experiences with the two systems that it became clear they were closer in terms of performance than it was initially thought.

This lines up with my experience too, it's partly why I even bought a PS3 in the first place.
 

Satchel

Banned
I love that the 360 and PS3 could achieve what they could off a total of 512MB RAM, but suddenly the 8GB DDR of the new Xbox is looked down upon already.

Christ. Has it really become that bad here?

Both these consoles will be fuck awesome.
 

Ding-Ding

Member
So apparently Polygon is going to have a story on Destiny on the 24th, the same day as the MS event.....hmmmm

(will probably end up being nothing)

I remember some rumour doing the rounds that Destiny was going to be a timed exclusive. So maybe...

(However, is it just me that is starting to get the impression that Polygon is turning into an extension of MS's PR department?)
 

EvB

Member
I remember some rumour doing the rounds that Destiny was going to be a timed exclusive. So maybe...

(However, is it just me that is starting to get the impression that Polygon is turning into an extension of MS's PR department?)

Well it only makes sense that MS hand them a few exclusives from time to time.
 
Are you saying his calculations are wrong, the rumors about RAM amounts and speeds are wrong or the amount the OS occupies is wrong?

Yes, they're wrong because they don't take eSRAM and data movers into account at all. In fact, until we know how the data movers operate, it's hard to tell anything, even if rumors turn out to be true. One thing to keep in mind, though - just because three eights of the RAM capacity might be reserved for non-gaming applications, that doesn't necessarily mean that three eights of the bandwidth will also be unavailable to games. The reserved bandwidth will most likely be much lower, if not entirely dynamically allocated.
 
I love that the 360 and PS3 could achieve what they could off a total of 512MB RAM, but suddenly the 8GB DDR of the new Xbox is looked down upon already.

Christ. Has it really become that bad here?

Both these consoles will be fuck awesome.

No one is looking down on on the 6-6.5 of ram that the NextBox will dedicate to games! Some (including myself) think that the 3.5 on faster ram will be better put to use by the PS4.

Both machines are looking very good at the moment.
 

wwm0nkey

Member
Very interesting. Thanks for the leak. One of the main games I am interested in.

A lot of people are, Bungie's been working on this thing for a LONG time and its hitting a lot of platforms, current and next gen.

Just wonder if the 24th will be the day Microsoft comments on the new system.
 

Donnie

Member
Anyway, seems to back up everything we've heard before from reliable sources. I wonder if its also true that 5GB and 6 CPU cores will be usable by games?, even so it would be plenty. This isn't like the crazy expensive machines we saw last gen, but its still easily enough to produce great looking games for the next few years (and good looking games for the next several years).

Again though I find myself wondering why on earth they're using SRAM for the 32MB pool of memory on the GPU. Why would you need such low latency there? Surely 64MB of eDRAM would have been better for a GPU's purposes, and also cheaper.
 

Melchiah

Member
  • I think MS is actually in the best position of the 3, they have learnt from their hardware mistakes (which by the way they handled brilliantly).
    They have the software expertise so their devkits should be even better for developers to work with.
  • Kinect is a hit in certain circles and they seem to be adding this tech into their box as the key piece that separates them from the other 2 consoles.
  • The xbox brand has a very reliable user base.
  • I think if they expand on what they have been doing while gaining some exclusive titles they will be just fine.
  • Key thing is they built their DNA in just 2 product cycles and it is working for them, now it's time to reap the profits.

Sony on the other hand as much as I love their products and first party software, they still don't seem to know what they are about. They want to think that people are still willing to pay a premium for quality and this will be enough to bank profits but keep failing in this regard.

And the same on Sony's side.

  • You could say the same about Sony; no more exotic hardware that's hard to work with, and they've provided better help for devs than in the past. And I wouldn't say Microsoft handled the RROD fiasco brilliantly, as it was caused solely by their rush to launch; corporate gain over customer satisfaction.
  • I think the motion control trend has already passed.
  • The PlayStation brand has a very reliable userbase as well, as evidenced by the sales (especially in Europe) catching up with those of the 360 even after all the mistakes, the price difference, the lack of major titles during the first years, and 1-1½ year later launch in different regions.
  • Sony has more 1st party studios than ever before working on next gen content. They're probably going to expand the PS+ service, and continue releasing a wide variety of titles that cater every genre (excluding RPG), whereas Microsoft's exclusives have been mostly catering the action hungry younger male players.
  • Three generations of building the brand and fanbase has shown what can be achieved even against all the odds.

Microsoft has three major exclusive franchises (Halo, Forza, Gears), of which one isn't even made by a 1st party studio. Their efforts have so far been mainly focused on buying 3rd party (timed) exclusives. It's up in the air at the moment will that change in the future. They have acquired some new studios, which are making new games for X3, but it's uncertain whether any of those will be a success on the scale of the three or not.

They want to think that people are still willing to pay a premium for playing online, and accessing services like Netflix, without getting anything concrete (like free games) in return. Will that change? Will they make online play free, and if not, will people still be willing to pay for it, or will they copy PS+ and offer some free games in return?
 

Donnie

Member
On the GPU side it looks good for the Wii U, but on the memory and CPU side porting will likely cause problems.

Yep there were always going to be problems, the only question was how many and would they be insurmountable. For memory and CPU it really depends if its true or not that 5GB and 6 cores are available for games and also if Nintendo do decide to release some more of that OS RAM. Porting down from 5GB to 1.5GB isn't easy, but porting down from say 7GB to 1GB would probably be almost impossible at times.
 

CLEEK

Member
(However, is it just me that is starting to get the impression that Polygon is turning into an extension of MS's PR department?)

Polygon is to fair and balanced gaming news, as Fox is for current affairs. Both are just mouth pieces for their respective overloads (MS and GOP).
 
Can somebody explain how Polygon looks like it's run by MS PR?

I'm looking at the main page right now...I don't even see a single MS focused article here. We got news from all over the place.

From whatever little I know, the people who work there seem pretty level headed too.

So unless people have examples of how Polygon looks like an extension of MS PR, I would suggest them drop that childish bullshit.

Destiny is an Activision game folks, wake up.
 

saunderez

Member
Can somebody explain how Polygon looks like it's run by MS PR?

I don't like that they got all that money from MS to make the documentary but to be fair the site itself doesn't seem biased towards MS itself. They gave a pretty terrible score to Forza Horizon in my eyes.
 

wwm0nkey

Member
Can somebody explain how Polygon looks like it's run by MS PR?

I'm looking at the main page right now...I don't even see a single MS focused article here. We got news from all over the place.

From whatever little I know, the people who work there seem pretty level headed too.

So unless people have examples of how Polygon looks like an extension of MS PR, I would suggest them drop that childish bullshit.

Destiny is an Activision game folks, wake up.

Polygon is pretty nice but it does seem like MS hands them exclusives which isn't really a bad thing at all.

Also Destiny is a time MS exclusive according to the court documents.
 
One more thing that bothers me about the proposed design is single thread performance is still vital, crap single thread performance means crap multithread performance, means crap performance. Hence I dont get the reason MS would have gone with a CPU of only 1.6 Ghz.

well.. the CPU on the ps360 is an in order cpu. jaguar is obviously capable of out of order execution. also, it's more than likely that the single thread performance is greater than the single thread performance you can get on the 360's CPU. it's not like the single thread performance on the current consoles are great cuz they're not.

M$ and Sony know what they're doing. Even if jaguar is the replacement, it's obviously an acceptable replacement to them.

1.6ghz in one architecture is not comparible to 3.2ghz on a complete different architecture.

speed means nothing in today's world.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
These OS RAM allocation rumors make no sense. This gen, MS started out with a third the RAM usage of Sony.
Next gen, they're using six times as much? 18X flip-flop? lolwut
 
Think about it little more. If OS is taking 3GB, that will lower effective gaming bandwidth to mere 42 GB/s (six 4gbit DDR3 chips less). That's 1.4GB of data per one frame in 30fps game, or 700MB per one frame in 60fps game. PS4 will always have access to 3.2GB of data per one frame in 60fps game. That is a big difference THAT WILL MATTER.

The doesn't even make sense how that will work. The OS isn't drawing the bandwidth unless its being used and even then the bandwidth will be tiny in comparison to the gaming bandwidth. And I love the 3.2GB of data per frame. Thats definitely how it works.(not at all)
 
Polygon is pretty nice but it does seem like MS hands them exclusives which isn't really a bad thing at all.

Also Destiny is a time MS exclusive according to the court documents.

Actually people are saying it isn't anymore. I don't know if it is or isn't, maybe it's on PS3 but not PS4 who knows.

Either way, it's an Activision game. And Polygon is owned by Vox Media.

I don't like that they got all that money from MS to make the documentary but to be fair the site itself doesn't seem biased towards MS itself. They gave a pretty terrible score to Forza Horizon in my eyes.



They spent the 750.000$ on the documentary? Those 13 episodes? Impossible.
 
I don't like that they got all that money from MS to make the documentary but to be fair the site itself doesn't seem biased towards MS itself. They gave a pretty terrible score to Forza Horizon in my eyes.

Even MSNBC.com wasn't biased towards MS, I don't know why an independent website would be, documentary from their pocket or not.
 
Can somebody explain how Polygon looks like it's run by MS PR?

I'm looking at the main page right now...I don't even see a single MS focused article here. We got news from all over the place.

From whatever little I know, the people who work there seem pretty level headed too.

So unless people have examples of how Polygon looks like an extension of MS PR, I would suggest them drop that childish bullshit.

Destiny is an Activision game folks, wake up.

Here you go:

Press Reset: The Story of Polygon - financed by Microsoft for $750,000

If you don't see reasons why people might think that, I have a bridge to sell you.
 

NBtoaster

Member
Think about it little more. If OS is taking 3GB, that will lower effective gaming bandwidth to mere 42 GB/s (six 4gbit DDR3 chips less). That's 1.4GB of data per one frame in 30fps game, or 700MB per one frame in 60fps game. PS4 will always have access to 3.2GB of data per one frame in 60fps game. That is a big difference THAT WILL MATTER.

Disc seek times will limit you way before RAM if you need 700mb or more per frame.
 
Link within your link is bust?

I did not know Polygon was funded by Microsoft.

Nah, It's a GAF exclusive so it's part of the contents of the thread.

Actually people are saying it isn't anymore. I don't know if it is or isn't, maybe it's on PS3 but not PS4 who knows.

Either way, it's an Activision game. And Polygon is owned by Vox Media.





They spent the 750.000$ on the documentary? Those 13 episodes? Impossible.

They didn't, the rest was bribe money, like an investment in good will for PR. Pocket change for MSFT.
 
Top Bottom