• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

VGLeaks: Durango GPU detailed

Darryl

Banned
Isn't this what most reasonable people always expected? Once that leaked PP came out, it clearly pointed toward this.

MS is positioning themselves as affordable with a reasonable amount of power. Plus, third-party games will almost assuredly look nearly identical to Orbis. It's not a bad place to be if they can undercut Sony's price.

it's certainly a great position for them to be in. this thing is a money printer just waiting to happen.
 

FordGTGuy

Banned
Sony is announcing their console in a couple of weeks and Durango probably a month or two after. These specs seem pretty locked. They will fluctuate a bit, but the general design is set in stone at this point.

"These specs" are not even confirmed to be fact so no they are not "pretty locked".

Of course we know the design is going to be AMD based that is a fact we have had confirmed, those fluctuating details can make all the difference...
 

Derrick01

Banned
*crickets*.

As of now Orbis seem to be more powerful, more game focused, and with Sony's first parties to back it up.
For what my priorities are, there is little doubt, as of now, which one would be the better one.

BUT, last gen i was initially verting towards the X360, and ps3 eventually ended up winning me over, i personally do not have any brand affiliation, so whoever delivers it's gonna have my money (probably both of them will :p).
I just hope Durango won't hold back multiplatform games, as i said earlier.

Yeah it seems like Orbis will be more gamer focused but obviously that may not work out for them in the long run if they can't match the non gaming features Durango will have. As much as that makes a lot of us cringe they pretty much have to do it now.

I think it's becoming a lot safer to say that Sony's 1st parties will be a step ahead yet again though. Specs don't lie.
 

iMax

Member
Also, remember power doesn't win a generation. Based on this generation, Durango is likely to be backed by a stronger ecosystem and community than Orbis. It'll probably have better media/DVR features too, and the prospects of Kinect 2.0, IllumiRoom, and Fortaleza later in the cycle.

Just had a flick through the leaked Durango document from a while back and noticed the following extracts:

Should NOT require glasses or cloud processing. Those will be layered in post 2013.

Cloud Rendering Platform for gaming, video and apps.

If Microsoft is working towards a cloud/local processing hybrid for later in the generation, these specs won't mean much at all.
 

liquidboy

Banned
As a developer I like very much what I am reading, and I understand they are all rumours still..

I can't wait to start developing for this gpu.... still waiting on details of the cpu thou, which I'm guessing by the gpu will also be very custom and a radical departure....

Nice work MS
 
Maybe Microsoft is aiming for 4 year console cycle this time around?

Shorter cycles equals lower up front costs, and doesn't run the risk of stagnating the market again.

If this is the case then you are not only seeing the battle of two different machines with different design decisions but you are looking at two different companies with completely different business plans. Pretty interesting to see who makes the right calls.
 
The fuck?

image.php
 

Reiko

Banned
The idea of Microsoft purposely gimping their GPU to give multiplat engines like UE4, Cryengine 3, and Frostbite 2.0 an edge on Orbis would be hilarious if true.
 

Takuya

Banned
Both consoles will look close to each other as far as third-party games are concerned. However the roles will be reversed with Orbis/PS4 leading the way in graphics and performance with the Durango having to settle for second place.

And first parties will really make these machines shine with (imo) Orbis having the best performing/looking exclusives.
 

Ichabod

Banned
Can someone place this thing in the spectrum of say, the nvidia gtx series, power-wise for those of us who don't see the world in 1's and 0's?
 

Qwerty710710

a child left behind
I'm not seeing a major power difference here it seems like sony fan boys are overreacting. They still haven't explained the move engines yet either so I would calm down before spouting random bullshit.
 

iMax

Member
The M.O. of VGLeaks has essentially been acquiring and copy-pastaing documentation.

It doesn't matter. Even if Ballmer Snapchatted the specs of Durango to VGLeaks, it doesn't mean anything until they announce it.

Both for Sony and Microsoft, this is all conjecture until it's been formally announced.

The reason Microsoft hasn't announced anything yet, and refuse to admit to Durango's existence, is precisely for this reason. So they can change things, delay things, alter things — that haven't been formally announced, meaning as far as their investors and customers go, they're not breaking promises or commitments.
 
I still don't see why Sony would react to developers by increasing the ram of their machine to combat durango if they knew these specs.

If those rumors are true than it definitely doesn't make sense.
 

PaulLFC

Member
it's certainly a great position for them to be in. this thing is a money printer just waiting to happen.
How can we possibly know that? The Wii U was affordable and look at that. Clearly Durango has a lot more power, but sales are far from guaranteed for any console.
 

FordGTGuy

Banned
The idea of Microsoft purposely gimping their GPU to give multiplat engines like UE4, Cryengine 3, and Frostbite 2.0 an edge on Orbis would be hilarious if true.

Why exactly would Microsoft purposely gimp their GPU to give Orbis a edge?

That wouldn't really be funny more sad than anything.
 
It was so much easier when we were talking in "bits".

"It's twice the bits of the last console? SIGN ME UP!"

The specs look comparable to ORBIS to me but there is an obvious difference according to the tech heads.
 

Boss Man

Member
I'm also a little worried about 3rd party games being held back, especially with the way we've heard a couple of devs talk. Obviously they'll be scaled back a tad bit (first parties are there to squeeze the most out of a platform), but I hope we at least see significant boosts to performance on Orbis. I mean, you sometimes get PC ports at 30FPS just for the sake of platform parity.

This is assuming that Orbis actually is as more powerful as it seems. Still having a hard time believing Microsoft would let that happen.
 

Takuya

Banned
I still don't see why Sony would react to developers by increasing the ram of their machine to combat durango if they knew these specs.

If those rumors are true than it definitely doesn't make sense.

Simple, so that consumers don't automatically think "Hey, Durango has 8GB, and PS4 has 4GB, Durango is better!" you know, because a lot of casuals/less informed consumers are easily fooled by marketing tactics.
 

Reiko

Banned
I still don't see why Sony would react to developers by increasing the ram of their machine to combat durango if they knew these specs.

If those rumors are true than it definitely doesn't make sense.

Yeah. Reading those specs... That comment doesn't make sense at all.
 
It doesn't matter. Even if Ballmer Snapchatted the specs of Durango to VGLeaks, it doesn't mean anything until they announce it.

Both for Sony and Microsoft, this is all conjecture until it's been formally announced.

The reason Microsoft hasn't announced anything yet, and refuse to admit to Durango's existence, is precisely for this reason. So they can change things, delay things, alter things — that haven't been formally announced, meaning as far as their investors and customers go, they're not breaking promises or commitments.
Lol. Yes, I'm sure they're re-engineering a several year billion dollar+ project and delaying launch plans as I type this sentence.
 

DieH@rd

Banned
Just when I thought FLOPS were the new bits, I read about ROPS? Wth are ROPS!

They are blocks that are placed at the very end of the rendering pipeline, responsible for compositing data from various buffers into final picture. They are crucial for filtering, depth compositing, blending and antialiasing. When shaders do their magic on the individual pixels, ROPs are responsible to place that pixel data "on the screen" [correct memory space].
 
Simple, so that consumers don't automatically think "Hey, Durango has 8GB, and PS4 has 4GB, Durango is better!" you know, because a lot of casuals/less informed consumers are easily fooled by marketing tactics.

I've never seen a console marketed to the majority consumer base by using technical specifications. I don't see Sony doing this either. The cost don't justify it.

(and by majority consumer base I mean not GAF and not people that watch E3)
 
Something's gotta give.

If these specs are true, MS is gonna deliver a cheaper system. They have to.

And no, Kinect 2.0 won't be built in and rise the price by 100$ alone. Sony also has dual cameras and the whole kitchen sink. Both will have multiple skus. But MS will have to deliver a cheaper baseline sku.
 
Can anyone please point me out to the source of the "secret sauce" rumors? I'm checking both this and the Kotaku rumor and so far it seem like there are no mention of such a thing.
 

iMax

Member
Lol. Yes, I'm sure they're re-engineering a several year billion dollar+ project and delaying launch plans as I type this sentence.

Well of course they are. Why wouldn't they be? At the very least, their marketing teams are going into overdrive to compensate for the negativity raised and I'm positive that their engineering teams have been tasked with addressing these shortcomings in any way possible in alignment with the budget and technology they've got. They're obviously not just sitting there and doing nothing.
 

Takuya

Banned
I've never seen a console marketed to the majority consumer base by using technical specifications. I don't see Sony doing this either. The cost don't justify it.

(and by majority consumer base I mean not GAF and not people that watch E3)

It doesn't have to be an extra 4GB of GDDR5, it can be cheap, slower DDR3 just to give a little big more headroom, the cost is almost negligible.

Also, it's about marketing. What you tell your reps to tell consumers, what you tell your reps to tell retailers to tell consumers. Every little edge you can get to market your product is an edge in sales. And the sales are what matter in the end.
 

Darryl

Banned
How can we possibly know that? The Wii U was affordable and look at that. Clearly Durango has a lot more power, but sales are far from guaranteed for any console.

i'm just speculating, lol. i think the Wii U could still be a money printer as well. they've both positioned themselves well from a consumer-value/price standpoint, assuming MS adds no extras and launches at about the same price as the U.
 

jaosobno

Member
AFAIK, Gaikai delivers fully cloud processed content. Microsoft is proposing some sort of hybrid here that could reduce overheads like latency, video artefacts, etc...

AFAIK we know nothing about Sony's plans for Gaikai. They could be planing the same thing.

And also, if you have a console that has Cloud co-processing you are basically saying "fuck you" to all those people whose consoles aren't connected to the Internet.
 

iMax

Member
I've never seen a console marketed to the majority consumer base by using technical specifications. I don't see Sony doing this either. The cost don't justify it.

(and by majority consumer base I mean not GAF and not people that watch E3)

Nintendo didn't do it with the Wii U. They didn't even say anything about the console when it was first announced. It was all about the controller and the games.
 

JimmyRustler

Gold Member
Well, that's it I guess. Assuming MS doesn't pull monster games at launch I'm buying Obris only for the start. Core gamers not important any more.
 
Top Bottom