shinra-bansho
Member
nintendo also has golf in borh wii sports and wii sports resort
That games sold 80million and 34 million respectively
Can't possibly be serious.
nintendo also has golf in borh wii sports and wii sports resort
That games sold 80million and 34 million respectively
Mysims and grandslam neber sold 10million plus. They are insignificant titles. Sure having EA support would be better for the platform than not but its not a precondition for success. Nintendo platforms are not as dependant on EA as other platforms.
nintendo also has golf in borh wii sports and wii sports resort
That games sold 80million and 34 million respectively
Can't possibly be serious.
No but seriously. No answer?
well people are claiming a dreamcast level failure because TW is not comming. Its not such a big franchise.
TW will not be the only title from EA (and third parties) not coming on the Wii U. The Dreamcast was cited to underline the sabotage EA did on that platform (starting from the "Sport" label) that was entirely skipped by the company, and that seriously risk to be repeated with the Wii U.
TW will not be the only title from EA (and third parties) not coming on the Wii U. The Dreamcast was cited to underline the sabotage EA did on that platform (starting from the "Sport" label) that was entirely skipped by the company, and that seriously risk to be repeated with the Wii U.
Megaton!
Well, sort of...
EA had little contribution to Wiis success and Nintendo has much stronger franchises
Seems to me EA wants to forcibly push new console buyers to the next xbox or playstation. Wii U might be getting the Dreamcast treatment. Now I really want to know what went wrong behind the scenes with Nintendo and EA.
Perhaps "confirmation" is a better conceptMegaton!
Well, sort of...
Wii =/= Wii U
The Wii U is much less successful and will need to use a more traditional model to succeed. That means full third party support like PS3/360.
When it's about not putting games on Nintendo consoles?At what point do stockholders sue EA for leaving money on the table?
It's up to members to read the fucking FAQ. It takes long enough to get approved, not reading the FAQ is idiotic, and everyone should know that Chartz is banned. Ignorance is no defence.
You mean "Very interesting Wii U-related news", I think.
When it's about not putting games on Nintendo consoles?
never
edit: also, I'm amazed that people (recognisable posters who should know better) are still earnestly replying to farnham. He's the new gahigiddy.
Wii =/= Wii U
The Wii U is much less successful and will need to use a more traditional model to succeed. That means full third party support like PS3/360.
First, I don't really think there was a 180 degree switch. EA always gave support to Nintendo, but never significant or overwhelming support. I'm not sure why everyone is so focused on the "standing on stage with Iwata" thing. That's PR. Just like lists of developers or lists of franchises releasing on a new platform are just PR. Something is only real if there's real evidence for it.
We know that EA Sports franchises excluding Tiger tanked on the Wii. Is that EA's fault for not pushing them more? Is it Nintendo's fault for the controller, the limited online support, or the lack of horsepower? Who cares? So that's the status quo going into this generation. EA can have the humility to admit that they missed out on something with the Wii without a clear idea of how to make a business case on the Wii U.
Second, I think Nintendo was probably a little on the slow end getting dev kits to publishers, and we also know that DLC/in-game purchases weren't supported until after the console was released (so right off the bat, EA's basic business plan for most of their titles isn't supported). It's not clear when online support was made available in the dev kits yet. That contributes towards explaining the thin launch support.
Now, in terms of post-launch announcements or ports for this year, EA is going to have a little bit of data on how ME3 and other titles performed on Wii U, and the hardware trajectory. If they feel the trajectory is poor, the install base will be poor, software performance was poor, and their own software was poor, that's definitely going to play a factor in terms of whether they're going to rev up the port teams or not.
How do you think ME3 did on Wii U in the US, November+December NPD? Yes, yes, ME Trilogy came out on the other consoles, yes yes EA sux, etc etc but how many copies do you think it sold? How many copies do you think they were expecting? How many copies do you think would have been a reasonable expectation? Give me a ballpark, and I'll let you know how your guess was.
Wii =/= Wii U
The Wii U is much less successful and will need to use a more traditional model to succeed. That means full third party support like PS3/360.
How do you think ME3 did on Wii U in the US, November+December NPD? Yes, yes, ME Trilogy came out on the other consoles, yes yes EA sux, etc etc but how many copies do you think it sold? How many copies do you think they were expecting? How many copies do you think would have been a reasonable expectation? Give me a ballpark, and I'll let you know how your guess was.
Yay, someone understand, finally
But let's dream about the Wii U huge success based on Game&Wario all together!
I have a real bad case of deja vu right now. It's the catch-22 of the Wii all over again.It deserved to fail. Late port, $60, no dlc, and the trilogy pack on other platforms for the same price.
EA hasn't really put their best effort forward. Madden is a gimped port, and Need For Speed Most Wanted will be another way late $60 port they cry about selling bad.
If anything it is going to be wii fit u, wii party u and mario kart u. The wario ware series is not sich a significant seller.
If anything it is going to be wii fit u, wii party u and mario kart u. The wario ware series is not sich a significant seller.
Actually, Tiger 12 completely tanked on the Wii. They didn't even make Tiger 13 for it. The series had been selling worse and worse each year on Wii so they finally abandoned it. It's all in EA's forums.
You don't think AC:Liberation and CODeclassified were greenlit after some months of sales for Vita, after all. Support takes a long time to materialize, so decisions on support have to be made long before results are seen for a system. Therefore, we can see that a lot of the industry was already writing off Wii U well before launch. In fact, we know that EA specifically was cancelling a Wii U port of a next-gen project despite the engine being able to run on Wii U months before launch.
those game without the remote/motion control/balance board fever of the Wii will sell WAAAAAAAAAY less.
that's the reason why, if Nintendo would like to do similar wii results, should look for better third party support.
it's not a matter of TW only: TW is just one example of the lack of third parties, but especially (as I was saying) of EA's total refuse of the console.
While the wiiu has not been as succesful we dont know its final sales number yet. Nintendo has done a bad job no doubt, but we have not seen sales numbers for wiifit u , wii party u, mario kart and the likes which will come out within this year.
Thats your assumption. We have no idea if they will be succesful or not. If they fail wiiu will be in a very hard spot. But dont forget that there are over 20 million balance boards in households and significantly more wiimotes
no assumption: we are already seeing that Wii U is not as hot as the Wii was.
so, if you miss something, you have to gain something else to par the weaknesses.
instead, they are losing also the few third party suppor they saw on the Wii.
Wii Fit U is going to tank because the fitness game fad is over and Wii Party U is a bunch of shovelware mini games. Mario Kart is the only one of those that will be successful, but it won't be out for a long time.
The Wii rode Wii Sports to early success and it had a solid Zelda entry at launch to get the hardcore in. The Wii U has neither of these to appeal to casuals or the hardcore.
The Wii U as a console is a tough nut to crack, it needs better marketing, a physical appearance change, a name change (Wii 2), a price cut and games that take advantage of the tablet, so far only ZombiU and Nintendo Land show off the tablet, not even NSMBU makes proper use of it.
edit: also, I'm amazed that people (recognisable posters who should know better) are still earnestly replying to farnham. He's the new gahigiddy.
Wii Fit U is going to tank because the fitness game fad is over and Wii Party U is a bunch of shovelware mini games. Mario Kart is the only one of those that will be successful, but it won't be out for a long time.
The Wii rode Wii Sports to early success and it had a solid Zelda entry at launch to get the hardcore in. The Wii U has neither of these to appeal to casuals or the hardcore.
The Wii U as a console is a tough nut to crack, it needs better marketing, a physical appearance change, a name change (Wii 2), a price cut and games that take advantage of the tablet, so far only ZombiU and Nintendo Land show off the tablet, not even NSMBU makes proper use of it.
Yes after less than a year and with two first party titles. As i said if wii party u and wii fit u bombs i will be on the wii u bombed train
Wii Fit U and Wii Party U will be succesful if they can get back the audience that existed on Wii but was not served ever since.
Your arguments are weak as Nintendo is trying to be a trendsetter not to be a follower. Your argument is that fitness games nowadays dont sell but those are mostly me too titles rather than the original. Also according to your logic wii fit should not have existed in the first place as fitness games usually bombed
You think people are really going to throw down $300 to do Wii Fit again?
Wii Fit U's biggest problem is going to be the fact that it looks nearly identical to Wii Fit.
That game has sales bomb written all over it.
Which big gaming franchise is not similar to the last iteration?
And after two games that sold 20 mio you are saying it will outright bomb, really?
Seriously, what's the point of that aproach? Never understood that really. Even more, the majority of homes don't possses that shiny, polished wood flooring. The Upad would get scratched to hell. XD
Shame
those game without the remote/motion control/balance board fever of the Wii will sell WAAAAAAAAAY less.
Yes, I am, because of the small user base of the Wii U.
People are still confused about the difference between Wii and Wii U. They haven't done anything to fix that. Many people this game is targeting will think it is still for the Wii with an add-on controller gamepad.
Why do you assume that those game are without remote/motion control/balance board? In fact a simple search for Wii Fit U shows different. Or you just assume that the balance board has no appeal ? What about those that have already a balance board and they could use it again, with the Wii U?
Well, I guess we will see it in some months.
I think it's much easier to sell iterative improvements and sequels to the "core" audience than it is to do the same for casuals.Which big gaming franchise is not similar to the last iteration?