Oh boy, it's The Last of Us/Bioshock Infinite/GTA IV all over again. Review scores are more ridiculous than ever. I want critical reviews, not glorified ads.
Or, you know, they might just really like the game.
Oh boy, it's The Last of Us/Bioshock Infinite/GTA IV all over again. Review scores are more ridiculous than ever. I want critical reviews, not glorified ads.
hows melee combat in this? Haven't seen it in any reviews, so I guess its not much different from IV?
Good ol' szaromir. Just remember to breathe buddy. Don't want that blood pressure getting too high.You mean the sites that Rockstar didn't bother to moneyhat.
Oh boy, it's The Last of Us/Bioshock Infinite/GTA IV all over again. Review scores are more ridiculous than ever. I want critical reviews, not glorified ads.
Yes, that's exactly why that quote is laughable.
The Lost and the Damned was an example, the story was so dreary and the characters so irredeemable that I didn’t see the point of it.I think Escapist has a very valid point. Not everyone can partake in, let alone enjoy, the levels of excess that Rockstar puts in their game. That's not a bad thing, though some members are jumping on Escapist as if it is, seeking to invalidate a very valid stance and opinion.
Honestly I am trying to keep a level head. Red Dead was incredible but GTA 4 was all sorts of terrible.
As we stand on the brink of a new generation, GTAV sends an intimidating message to the rest of the industry. Beat that.
Well, Last of Us was certainly worthy (despite its framerate troubles). Infinite was also of very high quality. It's not as if they didn't deserve a lot of the praise. There were issues one could raise about what they were or were not but the end result was still great.Seeing Sessler review Bioshock Infite, Last of Us and now GTA5 made me grow tired with him. Everything is so... superlative, every game he describes sounds like the best game ever. By doing this, he is cheapening the meaning behind something really superlative. The end result goes against him, because his character now appears to exist just to use his charisma to indulge hype in consumers.
It's sad, because I like the guy.
lol games journalism. We so badly want our medium validated. I like the Sess a lot, but stuff like this makes me laugh.
Well Bioshock Infinite and Last of Us are both without a doubt utterly superlative works so I dont see the problem.Seeing Sessler review Bioshock Infite, Last of Us and now GTA5 made me grow tired with him. Everything is so... superlative, every game he describes sounds like the best game ever. By doing this, he is cheapening the meaning behind something really superlative. The end result goes against him, because his character now appears to exist just to use his charisma to indulge hype in consumers.
It's sad, because I like the guy.
Again I understand completely what he was doing, I was really good in english/lit classes too, but it doesn't change how dumb it was to say it.
Can't Waittttt
GAF is not a single person, dude,
Oh boy, it's The Last of Us/Bioshock Infinite/GTA IV all over again. Review scores are more ridiculous than ever. I want critical reviews, not glorified ads.
The Escapist blurb sounds like it's describing my feelings on GTA IV. Consequently I'm in no huge hurry to check out 5
"Unfortunately, you can only hear a character say "&^%@ you, Mother&*^%er" so many times before it starts to grate on you. You can only embody a vicious psychopath a short time before it becomes boring, at best, and soul-crushing, at worst. Forcing players to murder people, not in a gamey "I killed you to complete a goal" way that defines this medium, but in a terrorizing and demeaning way, is not what will make videogames great. Rockstar had a chance to elevate, and they wasted it on portraying characters you don't want to spend five minutes with, let alone the hours it would take to play through the game's story."
The fucking exact same problem as IV (and most other 'oscar winning' Rockstar stories). Reads like some serious moneyhatting / afraid to get fanboy ire for EG to still give it a 9 after that. A 9 for a game that can't even remain interesting for the first playthrough and sustain its own narrative. Boggles my mind.These are serious and intense moments, but Trevor is too shallow and unconvincing to justify them, and instead his antics derail the narrative. He's such a distraction to Michael that his family become a footnote rather than a subplot, while Franklin is almost completely forgotten until a bit of last-minute catch-up near the end of the game. The outcome ties up loose ends, but I'd lost interest by then.
last of us deserved it. GTA IV deserved it at the time. Bioshock Infinite could not have deserved it less, reviewers were paid off there.
I think this ones definately a case of deserving all praise
Honestly I am trying to keep a level head. Red Dead was incredible but GTA 4 was all sorts of terrible.
Where is the Game trailers review?
It's about to hit Half a Million viewers... make the damn thread.
Or upgrade me from Junior so I dont have to spam mods.
Yeah great 10/10 who didnt see that shit coming.
Where is the Game trailers review?
It really isn't a dumb thing to say. We live in a very short term "relevancy bubble", if I stepped out today wearing 90's attire and adopting it's slang people would think I was either nuts or being funny. Time is constantly eroding the prior generations relevance into a new normal, my nieces will never believe computers didn't have touch screens (they will learn it I am sure, it just won't be important to their reality) And that's what he is getting at, the game is like a juiced up infomercial of how we live now. We see the satire because that is our reality now, people in future generations will lack the insight we have and take it as is. This isn't an English lit argument, it's about how generations view the world as time passes. And for the record I don't think it was a dumb thing to say. Maybe for someone who only lives in the "now".
People need to stop using this logic 'cause it does not apply to every developer. Rockstar is the valedictorian of the gaming industry and this generation, and scores like this definitely don't look well on their transcript. A 3.5 out of 5 might be good for C average developers, but not Rockstar.
Anyone see how the Gamespot review went off in a few areas on how they treat women? In a game where you kill, crash, maim and so on for pleasure and fun, treating women in a poor light is crossing the line... what?
last of us deserved it. GTA IV deserved it at the time. Bioshock Infinite could not have deserved it less, reviewers were paid off there.
I think this ones definately a case of deserving all praise
This is an interesting example. The first season has a 74 MC score, the second 85 and the consecutive seasons ramp up even higher. I wonder if the increasing popularity of the show influenced the reviewers or it genuinely gets better. Or the ones that reviewed the show lowly didn't bother watching the following seasons. I stopped watching midway through the second season as the show was getting more and more boring, so I have no idea how to explain this.Breaking Bad Season 4
Breaking Bad Season 5
It happens.
Granted I don't know if I'd say GTAV is as impressive a game as BB is a TV show, but I don't think it's hard to see why it's being praised so highly.
Not really. I just have a hard time imagining any game being universally loved by every single person on the planet, particularly one as highly flawed as GTA games have historically been. That's why I would like to see examples in cinema/books, and one has been actually delivered.I stand by my point. "Universal" is just your excuse to discount any examples people do bring up.
That Sessler quote is the Citizen Kane of sentences in a review.
See I would say The Last of Us is grossly overrated.
Same here. Also the Eurogamer excerpts
The fucking exact same problem as IV (and most other 'oscar winning' Rockstar stories). Reads like some serious moneyhatting / afraid to get fanboy ire for EG to still give it a 9 after that. Boggles my mind.
I understand why Sessler rubs some people the wrong way, his style isn't exactly the most subtle around, but I don't think it's as bad as what you describe. I mean you mentioned three games. That's three out of probably hundreds that have come out this year. It's okay if a few of them are great :lolSeeing Sessler review Bioshock Infite, Last of Us and now GTA5 made me grow tired with him. Everything is so... superlative, every game he describes sounds like the best game ever. By doing this, he is cheapening the meaning behind something really superlative. The end result goes against him, because his character now appears to exist just to use his charisma to indulge hype in consumers.
It's sad, because I like the guy.
I don't understand some of you sometimes. Every given day it's always "fuck metacritic man, fuck reviews, reviews are awful, etc", but when a game comes out you guys get all giddy about the review thread, spend every second arguing on why someone's opinion is wrong and stupid, constantly are updating metacritic every moment so we know that a game goes from a 99 to *gulp* a 98. And then years from now people will constantly spout "man GTAV got the reviews from hype and paid journalists, reviews are a fucking joke", only for the same process to repeat its self for GTAVI or whatever the next big high profile game is.
Personal attacks from Fjordson without any arguments whatsoever. That's a new oneGood ol' szaromir. Just remember to breathe buddy. Don't want that blood pressure getting too high.
He said that?!how can you not roll your eyes when someone tells you Bioshock Infinite's plotline should be compared with Chinatown and Waiting for Godot?
I don't know how many more times I have to say it but I understood what he was saying.
I don't know about the combat as a whole but I saw one gif in the spoiler thread where a punch was thrown and I actually cringed and said "holy shit". It looked that painful....and good.
That Sessler quote is the Citizen Kane of sentences in a review.
Why should the story have that much impact in a game where you can spend 50 + hours doing whatever you want. You story focused people are ridiculous, WE PLAY VIDEO GAMES, we don't watch them.
I am getting really sick of every review being about story first and gameplay second, everything is backwards. I honestly dont give three craps what the reviewer thinks about the story.