Could be.
When the dust settles, which will have had a better launch, the Xbox One or GTA Online?
Maybe, but he doesn't work for Microsoft and has no reason to lie. It could also be we're just pointing a narrative for ourselves and sticking to it instead of being more open. I'm sure there are issues, the evidence suggests it. I just don't think it's as bad it's made out to be. Certainly not worth the "Xbox is doomed" posts that I've actually seen a couple of lol.
Just trying to get a sense of scale.So, which pile of shit smells slightly less repulsive?
Well, people lost a lot of progress, money, etc. People couldn't connect, couldn't get past the first few minutes, crashed back to single player, stalled, the works.GTA Online of course. Even if the technical issues may be worse, people aren't spending $500 for GTA online. It will always leave a smaller mark as time goes by.
Another day, more FUD I see.
His visaion, hs faul. tD
dontget ttro rrun fof awitjhou t fallout
this isuzses e comes from fascts. ifu wont wantt2 hera what present, cnyt help yu.
f0cus your irea t the people waho made these dcsion w regarrdi!1n harwdawar. whe nmesentger is rigeght uo get mad, but I warn becau zei don't like wht ive sen over last 20 mons.
PLAN nevr not 4 gamers. xbo or ps or wiu. al of us . when direc+ve are aps fest rfisrst, pwoetr s2nond, ths not 34 gamers. whdn questins buot drm/online poicliy are flaote intenraly and disregard 3d
bcuz monetiztn is job one 4e xcs, ths not for game34rs. when u are lid to direct l yy buot featusre, tha n7t for gaemrs. eprderi00d.
today, snap is brkne. Ffac.t. M@aby e (an dpbrobly )() fix fo alaunch
today live conetx andpaty is borknaen. Fac and m..aby e fix bgoror launch.
today
esrm is prbl and tols wil help dwon road. hw wil always be gipm in compsaarson. this w can nev changewtiout new hw. Faact. get mad at whoa ywou shdoul beg etin mad at.
no forusm
no poster$
not pelfoe who kno se what srong and want to haplep gamrs
CU afte !launh.
really appreciate latest cboat post. any clarification on the current problems with the xbox one is really helpful.
I still don't know whether I'm going to cancel my pre-order or not. :/
Well if you want to ignore all the other insiders yeah.MS want to make some TV shows and Kinect as well as spend billions on huge exclusive new games for their platform. Oh no!
So it turns out there might not be much of a problem with the OS/XBL even now, after all? I think that's good news because I've got XBone on pre-order.
These threads do more to make me hate the PS4 than they do the X1.
Another day, more FUD I see.
I can't believe I'm saying this right now after the DRM 180s thing from E3, but this has got to be the worst 2 days of PR Microsoft has had for this console.
Maybe, but he doesn't work for Microsoft and has no reason to lie. It could also be we're just pointing a narrative for ourselves and sticking to it instead of being more open. I'm sure there are issues, the evidence suggests it. I just don't think it's as bad it's made out to be. Certainly not worth the "Xbox is doomed" posts that I've actually seen a couple of lol.
Another day, more FUD I see.
Oh I definitely think MS would have been in a better situation if they could delay this until next year. Their problem was that they didn't want to be the last console to launch by a significant amount of time i.e. whole fiscal quarter. I think that a large part of what's happening is because they 180'd on the 24 hour policy. I bet they had all of their ducks in row for launching with that system in mind but when everyone got all mad (rightfully so), they had to basically go back to the drawing board and essentially rebuild all or most of the XB1's software and online systems. With Mattrick gone and Ballmer pretty much waiting to be forced out, the lower tier Xbox execs have been scrambling to put the pieces together. If this is true, then some applause should be given to the people who are in charge now because they've basically been screwed over by their bosses and have been left to pick up the pieces. Whether or not they can successfully put all or most of the pieces together in time to make a good impression on the Xbox faithful and gaming community in general come Nov. 22 remains to be seen. All I'll say is that I am still very much excited for this console. I'm looking forward to hearing early adopter impressions, seeing how Xbox One games (multiplat and exclusives) run, and getting a chance to actually use the darn thing myself since a few friends of mine are still getting it at launch.
Another day, more FUD I see.
No, FUD was when MS warriors assured us that Sony's DRM would be just as bad.
Thread: WHAT IF: Sony announces used games DRM, always online console, what do you do?
I will smile.
These threads do more to make me hate the PS4 than they do the X1.
The tools to access it may become more developed, but the size of the eSRAM isn't going to magically increase due to the tools. Devs are saying that 32MB isn't enough
Hmm...
You need to understand what's going on before making that claim. Seriously. No no... Seriously.Another day, more FUD I see.
Without any solid confirmation, there's no story to tell. This is all a job for the "peripheral" media (forums, blogs, twitter) at the moment.Wha?? No. Mainstream media isn't even picking this story up.
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Hmm...
Well, people lost a lot of progress, money, etc. People couldn't connect, couldn't get past the first few minutes, crashed back to single player, stalled, the works.
If XBox Live is similar to that on day one than all of these warnings will have been understated imho.
But if not, it just seems like any other major launch: Expect turbulence.
Just trying to get a sense of scale.
But then again I am expecting both consoles to have problem launches. Expecting the Xbox to have issues at launch just seems like common sense at this point with all the leaks and subtle head shakes and the daily toxic drippings. But Sony also has a lot to prove here, and it looks like their launch audience is going to be pretty sizable, along with their game downloads. They're both going to get hammered, certainly, and issues will arise.
Not that the two will be equally screwed. I just think for my own sake, its best to expect bad mojo for the first week or two.
Well, people lost a lot of progress, money, etc. People couldn't connect, couldn't get past the first few minutes, crashed back to single player, stalled, the works.
If XBox Live is similar to that on day one than all of these warnings will have been understated imho.
But if not, it just seems like any other major launch: Expect turbulence.
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Good job, Kazuma KiryuHmm...
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
Oh you're still here. Saying the same things. Again.
Keeping employees in check through fear of getting fired will get you results short term, but degrade your working environment and discourage creativity long term. I also dislike this type of stack ranking. Which is why I refer to it as "monstrous".
Of course it a bottleneck. You have to use esram or you get terrible performance. the most limiting thing is the very small size. It is the same size as the wiiu..Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Anything else think We should start a church dedicated to CBOAT And worship / pray to him on Sunday ? And offer him sacrifices ?
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Of course it a bottleneck. You have to use esram or you get terrible performance. the most limiting thing is the very small size. It is the same size as the wiiu..
It not hard to see how this would be a nightmare to program for.....
miDnIghtEr20C said:Another day, more FUD I see.
Kazuma Kiryu said:WHAT IF: Sony announces used games DRM, always online console, what do you do?miDnIghtEr20C said:I will smile.
Why is a tweet like this thread worthy when another tweet saying the PS4 OS is just as, if not more problematic not thread worthy?
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.
The fact is I've heard that the bottleneck is at least 3 different things, which means nobody actually knows what the bottleneck in the system is.
Could have been easily spun. The fact is nobody has used , in any depth, either UI, simply because they aren't ready yet for either system.
Seriously, explain how an additional resource is a bottleneck? Tell me how a dev who chooses not to use the additional memory will still be bottlenecked by it?
Factually, objectively, spectacularly wrong.
Second, the esRAM IS NOT A BOTTLENECK and conceptually CANT BE A BOTTLENECK. It is an ADDITIONAL resource available to devs, it is not required which means it will absolutely NEVER be a bottleneck to the system which makes the second tweet utter bullshit.