• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Dev talks: What went wrong with Duke Nukem Forever [dishonesty, consoles, budget]

http://forums.gearboxsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=274852

Posted on April 26, 2013. By an anonymous developer, but what he says sounds legit and the webmaster of Duke4.net has verified its authenticity. You can either read the long quote or my summary that follows it.

Hi everyone I should have posted this long time ago when there was still interest about the game. The fact how the game ended is also a bit of my fault. This is something for me just to feel a bit better.

Most of the game faults came because no one openly spoke about what they think. We had serious problem issuing our concerns. There was very little feedback from both us and management. There were no board meetings like you could imagine, just George running from computer to computer to check our progress. Sometimes I knew I screwed up and George would just say he doesn't like it but that I should continue anyway instead of just whoop my ass. He had very hard time addressing what is wrong and what should be done instead. He always tried to be polite - and sometimes You just can't. There was this tense unpleasant atmosphere in the company covered by the mask of kindness. I believe it was also our fault. If your boss is this dove-like daddy figure instead of some power hungry jerk you know what I mean. Whenever there was a problem almost no one had the balls to talk to George. He was so deeply invested in this game personally that no one wanted to hurt him. This self censorship lead to a double standard that even when we were dissatisfied with the direction of the project anyone who got vocal about it was called a traitor - the quitters were cowards and so on. I wanted several times to come to his office and leave the project but when I saw how enthusiastic he is about some new stuff we made I didn't had the heart to do it. We were so personally attached to him that the growing problems were swooped under the rug until someone would finally trip over the pile.

This pile was simply money. We were working for the minimal average in the industry. We could get more after the game was released having percentage of the sales. The obvious fault of the system is that the longer the game takes the longer Your true paycheck is suspended. People were working for the same money for few years straight. With no signs of completing the game people quit - very valuable and key people. Another problem was that with very small team we had to work at least 80h a week (which is a standard now but then it was a little different) otherwise nothing could be done on any reasonable pace. Because we were working on a percentage from sales everyone was pretty reluctant to see new faces on the team as people feared they percentage would be negotiated if too many people would come. So we lacked manpower and at the same time - no one wanted for the team to grow. Project was taking too long and some people started having issues with their families, some people got kids and just couldn't afford working a basically two full-time jobs for less than quarter what they could get in other companies with their talent - regardless of the potential benefits and atmosphere at work. What I think the worst was that we felt exploited and exploiting. George exploited us with his fragility over money and we exploited his kindness over control. Everything slowly started to rot and fall apart. Everyone was seemingly doing their things but nothing of value was produced. George focused on small things but didn't had the big picture (or didn't want to see it) and we were frustrated over lack of clear goals.

Then George and Scott came and told us that consoles are the key citing Prey sales. I knew that game will ported onto consoles but for me that was one of the worst thing that could happen to the project. I had to delete all the pickups which took months of work to put in some sensible manner and ego mechanic which was another several months of work and replaced with regeneration. We threw the editor out from the release as no one would ever use it on the consoles. But this was no the worst part of it. The engine we were working with was almost impossible to get good performance on multi-core ps3. We had to rewrite some of the game code and cut some content we hadn’t finished yet in order to get it on time. We couldn't fit the game into X360 disc so we had to cut. There was not enough memory on the consoles to handle open levels we had in mind so we had to either streamline the level or cut completely. Suddenly almost half of the initially designed game was trashed and the other half had to be changed. Memory budget we had was limited to 1/4 - we either had to scale down levels, cut them into parts, corridor them or just replace textures with something less demanding. Surely You could build an awesome looking game on consoles with limited memory but You had to do it from start and using some dirty tricks - which our engine nor our game just wasn't fit for. I was all for the engine switch at that time - we could start the game with a new engine because we had to rewrite a lot of content anyway and without this hampering zombie we made from unreal engine. I believe at that time the only thing that stopped this was money. Licensing another engine was a costly issue so George had to make tough decision - game was going nowhere and he either had to sped up existing things or restart and meddle with another 3 years on the project.

He choose to finally finish the game - for the first time we had a project manager, a plan and clear direction. Team had to grow in order to finish the game on time so new people came in. From the start we the "old guard" were at least unfriendly towards the new ones. The new guys just basically thought that they will finish the game in just one year. They had to be fully paid because in no way they agreed to work on a percentage - they knew that they are needed and exploited this without mercy when negotiating their contract. Enough to say - we were in the company for years working our ass overtime and never had a raise. They came from the ass and from start got twice as we had. Some of the people working from the start this time called quits. New guys (now I think its funny) were outside our little cult - when something was wrong they didn't hesitate to call our manager or even George, "it can't be done", "this is stupid", "you are wrong", "I won't do it" was the stuff he never heard from us in years and now it was his breakfast, lunch and dinner. George was pretty miserable at that time - it seemed he lost control and heart for his project. He wasn't even there - I think he couldn't deal with constant criticism and in the end started hating his game. But the results were coming, game was going forward and finally it could see the release. But the company for me died. I was also expecting a child - and some new more profitable business opportunities came. I noticed that I didn't want to work here anymore. I didn't had time to quit. I was fired.

It was okay when 20 people worked 80 hours a week. But when 40 people started working 40 hours a week for the same wage as before developing costs quadrupled. George and Scott quickly ran out of money - they took some loans and asked publisher for support. They had a knife on their throats and either had to get the money or the new guys would leave 24h when they didn't get their pay. They made the deal with the devil. For this amount of loan they effectively seized control over its release. At that time George and Scott wouldn't know they would give up. If he did he would never do it. Probably just one day he summed things up and decided he is fed up. The costs of finishing it up were too big just for two people to handle and even with loans they would never sell as much as they wanted. I remember we were almost still a year from finishing the project - and no one had enough money for another year on full-time working team. It is now easy to judge them but they invested their own money - something that nowadays would sound ridiculous at least even on the average budget for projects like this. He is a married man and has more important things to do than spending money on making video games. I understand him fully - after I got fired I finally could spend some time with my wife and kids. Until then I didn't even knew how much I lost from life.

I don't know much what happened to the game after my departure. I knew the game was bought up by another company and scheduled for a release. I had my share of doubts if I really wanted to know how the game will be. Of course I bought it with the DLCs on steam sale and played it. My thoughts about the game? Seriously? It was a horrid experience. I could seriously see that almost nothing was done since I left. Nothing new was added, maybe few things were tweaked and finished plus all bad decisions made at that point were still there. The limitations went even further - blood decals were missing, texture quality went down and to cover this up a nice smudge of post processing and depth of field. Some of the levels went into DLC, some multiplayer maps should be in singleplayer and so on. The game wasn't good at least for me - nor did I remember it any better when working on it sadly. My worst fears that for all those years I was working on a project that in the end won't be that good were realized. It was a little heartbreaking to see the end result this below average after so much time spent on it. I had this feeling of guilt that I should did something during the development I should voiced my concerns when there was still time. It is too late now.

Was working on the game fun - yes it was. Was it worth it - no it wasn't. Nothing is worth so many years spent making a basically a elaborate toy for someone's amusement that is taking the toll from Your personal life. I regret it didn't come to me any sooner - the joy of female companionship, the smile of a child, look of a beautiful blue summer sky, walk in the park. All those simple things I missed when thinking only about work. Right now I am far away from the business and hope to keep it this way. I hope that people who are so obsessed with video games both making and playing them in general could just leave them for a moment and think. You are not winning anything and basically just wasting your time achieving nothing instead of doing some meaningful things in the real world. It is a pity I understood this so late in my life. Cheers and have a happy weekend!

Summary:

- Horrible communication, no actual feedback ever given. Broussard at worst would say he didn't like something but would never actually "whoop [the] ass" of those responsible. Likewise, the developers didn't want to break Broussard's heart, who legitimately had a passion to make the game, so they never had the balls to talk to him about the myriad of problems. Both sides were faking a kindness and they were being as much polite as they could, pretending everything was alright.

- To afford the development of the game they had to be paid the minimal wage, work 80h/week and never get a raise. Obviously there were people, key people, who got fed up and left.

- Broussard and Miller at some point cited Prey's sales data (note: which would be completely irrelevant by the time DNF was actually released.. 5 years after Prey) to prove to the team that the consoles are the key in making a successful game and DNF has to be adapted to first and foremost play great on them. And so the transormation began: Months of work of assigning pickups on the maps were deleted, health regeneration was added, the editor was scrapped, now deemed useless for console gamers. Content and levels were cut or streamlined significantly as they couldn't fit in the limited console memory or on the 360's DVD. Half of the game was thrown away and the other half was redesigned to adapt to the consoles' limitations. And even after all that, performance was still crap on consoles, since the game and engine weren't designed from the ground up to support them. A new engine would make sense, but that would mean the budget would grow even more so did their best with what they had. The developer believes the decision to adapt it to consoles was one of the worst things that happened to the game.

- Broussard chose to finish the game and new people were hired. The new people wouldn't possibly agree to get paid as little as the old people were getting paid, something that probably created a huge conflict between the old and new crews. Also the new people had no trouble to criticize the game to Broussard, who was now overwhelmed to hear about the game's problems, something the old crew out of "kindness" never had the balls to do. Broussard became miserable and just couldn't deal anymore. He started hating his own game.

- Costs quadrupled due to the new people. The company ran out of money. They took loans, and asked the publisher for support.. Major issues with finding more money. And as we know they had to shut down development and fire everyone.

- But as we also know work continued. The final game, finished by Triptych, ex-3DRealms developers with the help of Gearbox, didn't add anything significant to what 3DRealms had already made before their shut down. If there was a chance to improve the game.. they didn't take it. In fact the graphics got even worse, levels were cut to be released as DLC etc.

The developer considers the finished game as horrid as he remembers it when he worked on it. It wasn't worth the years of time he put in it. He no longer works in the industry and lives a much happier life. Good for him. :)
 

Nirolak

Mrgrgr
- But as we also know work continued. The final game, finished by Triptych, ex-3DRealms developers with the help of Gearbox, didn't add anything significant to what 3DRealms had already made before their shut down. If there was a chance to improve the game.. they didn't take it. In fact the graphics got even worse, levels were cut to be released as DLC etc.

I wonder what happened to Duke Begins.

I got the impression that was what Gearbox was doing while Triptych got this out the door, though maybe it got canned after DNF, given they said they have two new IPs going and obviously Borderlands will continue.
 

Mesoian

Member
They should write a book about this. I'd read it. Everything surrounding the creation of Duke except the final product is absolutely fascinating.
 

BPoole

Member
I guess we cab chalk this up as consoles destroying Duke Nukem. Would have been better off as a PC exclusive
 
I guess we cab chalk this up as consoles destroying Duke Nukem. Would have been better off as a PC exclusive

Yeah - based on what they were doing, I could see Steam sales at least being pretty damn good. Not every game is built for a console but it's tough to make management see that.
 
I guess we cab chalk this up as consoles destroying Duke Nukem. Would have been better off as a PC exclusive

Did you read the article?

George and the other people who wouldn't offer criticism destroyed the game. After they went through all those shenanigans, they needed money so went after the console route.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
DOOM3 was a huge success launching initially on PC, then later being ported to consoles.

They should've stuck to their guns.

Very sad story.
 

Milennia

Member
Whats the last game that was in develeopement hell between different company's and turned out ok?

Genuinely curious as i cant think of one..
I guess south park comes to mind as it looks pretty good, but that wasn't even in develeopement hell for very long compared to most.
 
Did you read the article?

George and the other people who wouldn't offer criticism destroyed the game. After they went through all those shenanigans, they needed money so went after the console route.

The author makes it sound like choosing consoles was the killing blow. However, the project had many problems both before and after this choice was made, so it's not fair to say that 'consoles destroyed the game'.
 

Silky

Banned
Whats the last game that was in develeopement hell between different company's and turned out ok?

Genuinely curious as i cant think of one..
I guess south park comes to mind as it looks pretty good, but that wasn't even in develeopement hell for very long compared to most.

Starcraft II and Diablo III? Both of these games took 10 or so years right
 
I guess we cab chalk this up as consoles destroying Duke Nukem. Would have been better off as a PC exclusive

By the time that happened the game was like half a decade past delivery date, I'm as quick to blame consoles for giving the gaming industry cancer of the arse as anyone but it doesn't really seem fair in this case. The real story of what killed Duke Nukem is two words: George Broussard.
 

shem935

Banned
Whats the last game that was in develeopement hell between different company's and turned out ok?

Genuinely curious as i cant think of one..
I guess south park comes to mind as it looks pretty good, but that wasn't even in develeopement hell for very long compared to most.

Sleeping dogs? Does that count if activision just dropped it?
 

akira28

Member
Whom shall I kill? No really, where do I send these deathbots of mine? The dreams of my happiness are left so far behind. Cold hard reality so easy to find. Whom. Shall I. Kill?
 

Jimrpg

Member
I didn't play DNF but sounds horrid from the OP.

I will say having worked in an engineering consultancy that shitty politics is one of the reasons I'm glad I won't be working in one again. We had people on different wages, and it wasn't always the people who deserved the highest wages that got them. We had loud pushy people that were able to talk their way into getting raises, and then to compensate, the people who couldn't got taken for every penny that they had. That's the way of the business world. Yes the loud people were often able to cite why they were so critical, but in the same way they made lots of mistakes and did the minimum they could whenever possible. In effect they knew how to work the system.
 

Milennia

Member
Starcraft II and Diablo III? Both of these games took 10 or so years right

But they weren't between company's, they took years because thats how long blizzard took to make the games, not because of financial issues/company's going under and having to sell off ips.
 
Sounds similar to what went wrong with Haze. The key people were far too close to the project to see the problems with it and got pretty angry at criticism, with the criticism actually contributing to the game getting worse coz they were so hardheaded and seemed to do things that were clearly hurting the game.
 

Ishida

Banned
Somewhat offtopic (But not really): I would love to read such a post-mortem of games like The Last Guardian and Final Fantasy XV after they get released. It would be interesting to know of the many hurdles faced by the developers.
 
- But as we also know work continued. The final game, finished by Triptych, ex-3DRealms developers with the help of Gearbox, didn't add anything significant to what 3DRealms had already made before their shut down. If there was a chance to improve the game.. they didn't take it. In fact the graphics got even worse, levels were cut to be released as DLC etc.
I seem to recall reading that what Triptych got was a bunch of assets and levels with no working enemy AI or a cohesive narrative to tie them together. So their focus was just doing a Frankenstein job on it, sewing a bunch of vaguely related parts together and turning it into a playable game.
 
I really hope one day all the unfinished builds, assets, etc make it out into the wild.

Also a comprehensive book/documentary would be nice.
 

shem935

Banned
That would yeah, but wasn't that a reimagining? As opposed to them trying to salvage the remains of a game?

Edit : double post -.-

Basically they removed any mention of True Crime Hong Kong as they bought the rights to the game and not the IP. So they were working off the same code and systems that were already made.

Edit: So yeah I guess it was just a re-imagining. Would Infinite count?
 

Takao

Banned
I wonder what happened to Duke Begins.

I got the impression that was what Gearbox was doing while Triptych got this out the door, though maybe it got canned after DNF, given they said they have two new IPs going and obviously Borderlands will continue.

Colonial Marines: Take 2 Edition?
 

BPoole

Member
By the time that happened the game was like half a decade past delivery date, I'm as quick to blame consoles for giving the gaming industry cancer of the arse as anyone but it doesn't really seem fair in this case. The real story of what killed Duke Nukem is two words: George Broussard.
Idk man, even the dev says adapting the games to consoles standards was the biggest issue. I know there are other factors at hand, but many of them seem to stem from that.
 

Milennia

Member
Basically they removed any mention of True Crime Hong Kong as they bought the rights to the game and not the IP. So they were working off the same code and systems that were already made.

Thats the same deal as duke nukem then yeah, except they kept the name of course.

The article is very interesting, i hope they do another on aliens.
 

vivftp

Member
I really hope we see a rebirth of Duke Nukem for the current generation. Something that actually lives up to the spirit of Duke Nukem 3D.

And someone make a Commander Keen game for Vita!
 
By the time that happened the game was like half a decade past delivery date, I'm as quick to blame consoles for giving the gaming industry cancer of the arse as anyone but it doesn't really seem fair in this case. The real story of what killed Duke Nukem is two words: George Broussard.

Although Broussard might have made the decision, it was consoles that killed the game, even if it would have been released in a timely manner: no pickups, health re-regen, smaller streamlined levels and many other cut corners. The 7th gen was the worst thing to happen to PC games, and all games for that matter, in terms of gameplay.
 

Nicktendo86

Member
I'm just wondering who the hell thought The Hive level was a good idea.

You know, that level.
Is that the one where loads of ships fly at you and you have to shoot them down or die? If so, that's where I stopped playing. Bought the game due to morbid curiosity but want to complete it one day...
 
Damn, the whole thing is pretty sad. There was so much passion for the project at the start, it's a shame things turned out the way they did.
 
By the time that happened the game was like half a decade past delivery date, I'm as quick to blame consoles for giving the gaming industry cancer of the arse as anyone but it doesn't really seem fair in this case. The real story of what killed Duke Nukem is two words: George Broussard.

Yes and no.

Before the decision the game had flaws and an uncertain future.
After the decision the game was bad with an uncertain future.

It is absolutely possible the game would still have sucked as a PC game, or even never get finished. Hell, it's the most likely scenario.

But the moment it got adapted to consoles in the middle of production (with horrific results) it became a bad game with no way to fix it.
 

Dead Man

Member
I guess we cab chalk this up as consoles destroying Duke Nukem. Would have been better off as a PC exclusive

That doesn't seem like it would have resulted in a much better game. Nor can a device be blamed for bad decisions people make.
 
Idk man, even the dev says adapting the games to consoles standards was the biggest issue. I know there are other factors at hand, but many of them seem to stem from that.

Although Broussard might have made the decision, it was consoles that killed the game, even if it would have been released in a timely manner: no pickups, health re-regen, smaller streamlined levels and many other cut corners. The 7th gen was the worst thing to happen to PC games, and all games for that matter, in terms of gameplay.

This is true, but my point is just that the game was most likely already a total piece of shit by that point. That wasn't the first time Broussard decided to glom on to the current flavour of the month and try to incorporate it into his bizarre patchwork quilt of a game, and having played it I can honestly say that devoid of those console changes it would still be a really terrible game.
 
Months of work of assigning pickups on the maps were deleted, health regeneration was added, the editor was scrapped, now deemed useless for console gamers. Content and levels were cut or streamlined significantly as they couldn't fit in the limited console memory or on the 360's DVD.

But when anyone says that consoles have dumbed down or at least heavily affected the design of shooters then it's called 'elitism'

popular fps devs going multiplat has killed off strafejumping, carrying 10 weapons, alt fire, pickups, fast movement, recoil, non hitscan weapons and affected the level design ...
 

finley83

Banned
This is an incredibly depressing story. Despite the ridiculous development and marketing costs inherent in today's industry, I doubt we'll ever see a catastrophe on this scale again.
 
I really hope we see a rebirth of Duke Nukem for the current generation. Something that actually lives up to the spirit of Duke Nukem 3D.

And someone make a Commander Keen game for Vita!

If the spirit is the crappy character with the crappy humour? Please no.

If the spirit is a FPS game that actually did something new gameplay wise, with varied weapons and pretty excellent distinct level design? Then yes please.

This is an incredibly depressing story. Despite the ridiculous development and marketing costs inherent in today's industry, I doubt we'll ever see a catastrophe on this scale again.

I think the MMO genre has some catastrophes on the same scale.
 
Yes and no.

Before the decision the game had flaws and an uncertain future.
After the decision the game was bad with an uncertain future.

It is absolutely possible the game would still have sucked as a PC game, or even never get finished. Hell, it's the most likely scenario.

But the moment it got adapted to consoles in the middle of production (with horrific results) it became a bad game with no way to fix it.

No argument here at all. I guess I'd just say that console changes were the final shot fired into the head of a bullet riddled badger who was already bleeding out.
 
Somewhat offtopic (But not really): I would love to read such a post-mortem of games like The Last Guardian and Final Fantasy XV after they get released. It would be interesting to know of the many hurdles faced by the developers.

last guardian is pretty easy i think.

-the scope may have been too big to technically achieve on ps3 (ie. maybe open world, they want to model each individual feather on the bird alone, etc...)
-dev team was way too small for such a ambitious project. seriously, like 40 or so people working on the game. and they weren't taking any outside help, from other studios or from outsourcing.
-restructuring of japan studio, people getting moved around. last guardian devs being made to focus on games like knack and rain and putting TLG on the backburner.
-game being possibly re-purposed for PS4.
 

vivftp

Member
If the spirit is the crappy character with the crappy humour? Please no.

If the spirit is a FPS game that actually did something new gameplay wise, with varied weapons and pretty excellent distinct level design? Then yes please.

Gotta try and keep the distinct Duke attitude and humor, but just do a better job of it than DNF did. Maybe hire some proper writers or something to create scenarios and dialogue to make it seem truly funny and cool.

Fully agree with the latter half of your post. A truly next gen Duke game could be an amazing thing.

I might invest in Duke Nuken 3D when it comes out on Vita to relive those moments... depending on the price of course.
 
But when anyone says that consoles have dumbed down or at least heavily affected the design of shooters then it's called 'elitism'

popular fps devs going multiplat has killed off strafejumping, carrying 10 weapons, alt fire, pickups, fast movement, recoil, non hitscan weapons and affected the level design ...

Well, didn't sound that the game was having a good direction before that.
 

Grayman

Member
I am glad to hear about there actually being loans. 3DR was paying for the game straight out of pocket and had a no advance print some boxes deal with GT interactive like id had with activision and Valve with Sierra. When they story did come out it always sounded like 2k games stole the ip without paying in to start with.

No argument here at all. I guess I'd just say that console changes were the final shot fired into the head of a bullet riddled badger who was already bleeding out.
Then the badger was hit with a shovel for a few more years of troubled development.
 
Top Bottom