Support NeoGAF

[ISee]

Started Steam and noticed that my 3D Mark started to update. They included a new dx12 benchmark. Come in and post your results.

Total Scores

Computerbase has an article up:

Nothing really surprising in the placement of these GPUs.

Only Graphic Scores:

Anandtech benchmarks - http://www.anandtech.com/show/10486/futuremark-releases-3dmark-time-spy-directx12-benchmark

Pcper benchmarks - http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...Looking-DX12-Asynchronous-Compute-Performance

 

[R3TRODYCE]

I was wondering why it updated but this explains it.

My score was a 7,081 with a GTX 1080/5820k

Graphics Score 7,189
CPU Score 6,527

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/7342

 

[LelouchZero]

Awesome! I'm going to run this when the download finishes!

I looked at the update notes a couple of minutes ago because I saw a 1.8GB update but I didn't see a mention of DX12, I'm going to have fun benchmarking with this!

Edit: Just realized the update note on Steam was actually from Tuesday, of course there was no mention of it lol.

 

[ashbash159]

My score with a 6700K and GTX 1080:

6,456

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/6990

 

[Durante]

Computerbase has an article up:

Nothing really surprising in the placement of these GPUs.

 

[Hesemonni]

In for RX480 benches!

 

[Teknopathetic]

Shattered Horizon ;_;.


2700 even with a 2500k and 780. Fits about right on that Computerbase.de graph.

 

[ISee]

i7 6700k @ 4.5 ghz
GTX 980 @ 1490mhz Core Clock
@ 7700mhz Vram Clock


Link to results

 

[Durante]

I got 7411 with my 1080 / 5820k (both relatively mildly OC'ed on air).

7554 GPU score and 6698 CPU score.

The premise of the demo actually looks quite interesting, someone should make a game from that

 

[tuxfool]

The premise of the demo actually looks quite interesting, someone should make a game from that

They need to work on their LODing, that demo was an aliasingfest.

Spoiler

(of course that would work against the purpose of throwing draw calls at your system).

-----

Got 4214 on a 290/5820k (3936 gpu and 7027 cpu)

 

[Beautiful Ninja]

GTX 1070 @ ~2050 core and 8600 memory
Core i7 6700k @ 4.7
16 GB DDR4-3000

6276 graphics score
5932 CPU score
6221 total score

 

[LelouchZero]

i7 4790K at 4.8GHz and GTX 970 at 1550MHz Core and 7603MHz memory.

12GB of 1333MHz DDR3 (I should really get a 2400MHz kit, this slow ram is holding my CPU back).

Total Score: 3996
Graphics Score: 3975
CPU Score: 4126

Results

2nd Run
Total Score: 4048
Graphics Score: 3979
CPU Score: 4491

Results

 

[nubbe]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/7272
SCORE
6 744 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080(1x) and Intel Core i7-3930K Processor

 

[Qassim]

I got 5671 on my 980Ti & 4770K (4.5Ghz).

 

[Beautiful Ninja]

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3095...geforce-in-this-major-new-dx12-benchmark.html

They break down Async vs No Async over here. You see the expected boosts you see from AMD on Async thanks to hardware shaders, 11% on the RX 480 as an example. You see basically jack shit on Maxwell based Nvidia since Async is really not a thing there. On Pascal, there is a modest jump in performance with Async, 6%. So the changes Pascal has for Async compute does seem to exist and work somewhat, good news for GTX 1070/1080 owners at least.

 

[HooYaH]

Got 6656 on evga 1080FTW/3770K @ 4.6.

 

[Kayant]

Anandtech benchmarks - http://www.anandtech.com/show/10486/futuremark-releases-3dmark-time-spy-directx12-benchmark

Pcper benchmarks - http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...Looking-DX12-Asynchronous-Compute-Performance

 

[Xyber]

1080 and i7 4770K@4.4GHz. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13191615?

Async disabled:

 

[Deaf Spacker]

5409 with a 980 TI and a 5820K at 4.4GHz.

 

[pelican]

4690K @ 4.5
1070 @ 2050/4500

total - 5703
graphics - 6310
cpu - 3692

 

[Lonely1]

GPU has a slight overclock on air. CPU is hybrid cooled.

What is that Time measurement data not available thing!?

 

[Xyber]

What is that Time measurement data not available thing!?

Something glitched out for some reason and it isn't qualified for hall of fame scores, but it doesn't really matter for normal benchmark runs IIRC.

 

[Lonely1]

Looks like, while the difference between a 980Ti and the 1070 is small on Dx11, is significant on Dx12. So jealous. :O

 

[TheRed]

Looks like, while the difference between a 980Ti and the 1070 is small on Dx11, is significant on Dx12. So jealous. :O

Is it? Doesn't look that big to me.
Nvm I looked again I guess it is a nice boost over 980ti

 

[cyen]

My result with a 1080FE

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13192999?

 

[BurgerDicks]

 

[rrs]

online score thing
3386 overall
3560 graphics (970 @ 1235 Mhz, 10.18.13.6822 drivers)
2653 CPU (2500K @ 4.1 Ghz)

 

[mephixto]

GPU has a slight overclock on air. CPU is hybrid cooled.

What is that Time measurement data not available thing!?

Means you are cheating!!

Spoiler

/jk

 

[Tiduz]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13193410?

no idea if its good, didnt get a stable 30 fps tho so guess my pc aint ready for the future lol

 

[KainXVIII]

SCORE
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13193478?
3 404 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970(1x) and Intel Core i5-3570

Demo itself is not super impressive though.. Where is eye-candy effects or very detailed models (just some human with helmet lol)? 3D Mark 2001 was so much cooler.

 

[Lonely1]

Is it? Doesn't look that big to me.
Nvm I looked again I guess it is a nice boost over 980ti

My OC 980Ti can match a stock 1080 on Dx11, but is nowhere close over Dx12 .

Can someone explain why?

At least looks like I'm winning the CPU front so far!

 

[ISee]

My OC 980Ti can match a stock 1080 on Dx11, but is nowhere close over Dx12 .

Can someone explain why?

At least looks like I'm winning the CPU front so far!

Maybe async compute?

 

[Trigg]

1896 on my 7870, Time to upgrade eh...

GPU has a slight overclock on air. CPU is hybrid cooled.

What is that Time measurement data not available thing!?

That means your overclock isn't stable.

 

[dr_rus]

My OC 980Ti can match a stock 1080 on Dx11, but is nowhere close over Dx12 .

Can someone explain why?

At least looks like I'm winning the CPU front so far!

Even an OCed 980Ti is nowhere near a stock 1080 in pure math throughput.

 

[rrs]

1896 on my 7870, Time to upgrade eh...

I'd still have a 6870 if the card decided to not die. Time to see who's going to get the ~$250 crown now, I suppose

 

[Kayant]

CPU - i5 4690K @ 4.6Ghz
GPU - GTX 970 @ 1540Mhz/8000Mhz
Ram - 2400Mhz


3DMark Score - 4008
Graphics Score - 4029
CPU Score - 3897
Graphics Test - 126.25 fps
Graphics Test - 223.11 fps
CPU Test - 13.09 fps

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13193497?

 

[Lonely1]

That means your overclock isn't stable.

Eh, works good enough for me in-game though.

 

[Trigg]

Eh, works good enough for me in-game though.

Its just what I found when I googled it, had it happen to me when everything worked fine.

 

[mario_O]

980Ti and old sandy 2700K.

 

[rrs]

Its just what I found when I googled it, had it happen to me when everything worked fine.

I find GTAV's benchmark a good test to see just how far a card will go

 

[red731]

CPU OC@4.4
Newest GPU Driver version16.200.1035.1001
Win 10/ 16GB RAM@1600/ 3D mark on SSD

"Smooth ~13fps"

Will try again when drivers are approved.

 

[capitalCORN]

i7 3770k @4.4 and 980ti at 1500/8000

 

[Trigg]

1903. 7870 at 1230/1450, 2500k 4.8Ghz. 1866 mhz ddr3.


http://www.3dmark.com/spy/10075

980Ti and old sandy 2700K.

Your CPU score seems low, my 2500k is on its heels and its only an i5. Surely those extra threads are worth more than ~290 points.

 

[wagamer]

Well...

R9 280 @ 1070/1350

Graphics score 2084.

Was not able to get CPU score because 3DMark crashed

 

[Dreams-Visions]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13196584?

As I mentioned in the other thread, I really like how the museum is a collection of scenes from all of their old benchmarks. Having been using their tool for more than a decade, I caught a few feels.

 

[Gemüsepizza]

Very impressive results for the 1080. Are those CB results without OC? The Titan/1080Ti results will be insane... just a few months left.

Here my current results:

i7 4790K @ 4.6GHz
980Ti @ 1220MHz core / 7810MHz memory
32 GB RAM @ 2400MHz

 

[low-G]

I have a somewhat higher than average speed for having a 970.

The demo itself looks pretty nice, but not really *that* impressive. Not as nice looking as some fully designed games...

Miss the olde days when Mad Onion put out the real shit. 3DMark01 was probably the peak, but everything through 05 was pretty choice and showed me shit far above anything I saw in a game at the time.

 

[low-G]

The premise of the demo actually looks quite interesting, someone should make a game from that

My fiancee hoped it was actually a preview for a hidden object game (like you see on iOS). I can see that.

 

[Durante]

It feels strange to be on top of the GAF heap for even one page of a new benchmark, time for Smokey to show up.

 

[blastprocessor]

The demo itself looks pretty nice, but not really *that* impressive. Not as nice looking as some fully designed games...

Miss the olde days when Mad Onion put out the real shit.

True they should look to the demo scene for ideas.