While Nintendo are feeling rather generous to the "core" whiners, how about picking up the following;
Shenmue 3
Jet Set Radio 3
A er, more palatable sequel to Valkyria Chronicles...
Panzer Dragoon Saga 2
NiGHTS
Start as you mean to go on, Iwata, old boy.
Stop this wildly exciting talk right now!
I'm sure Sega will collapse in the near future anyway so they can go and pick up whatever they want.
Nintendo could step in and secure a console PSO2 before they go totally tits up though, the Western release seems dangerously far away and I'd really like a full console one. Be a nice fit on Wii U with the controller as well.
Quite possibly the largest pile of sodium on NeoGAF since Final Fantasy 13 on 360 announcement.
Okay, but if you agree there is an inherent breaking point in this concept, and that if they continue to do this, we will eventually reach it, you must also anticipate a change in strategy before that happens right? Sooner or later, they either have to get a lot more people playing games, or they need to stop increasing the costs of making them. A new generation just seems like a natural place to switch things up to me.In other words, my series of posts have not been intended to suggest what publishers should do, or what I think they will do, or to suggest what is a good idea or what isn't. I'm simply explaining what is happening and why. That is all.
Phones are bad analogy I think, because although you can have multiple phones, it's not really very practical. I want an iPhone, because I think iOS is much better than Android, and I want the Galaxy S3, because I think the handset is much better than an iPhone. I can't help but be frustrated at that situation, it's not like gaming consoles at all, because there's no reason not to own the three, if you want them of course.Replace toothbrushes with, let's say, Android phones then. Do people get upset that lots of options exist? To the contrary, almost everyone agrees that this is one of the strengths of Android. If you want a super cheap phone or an expensive one, a big phone or a small one, an international phone or a local only one, you have your pick.
Now let's expand it, instead, to iPhone vs. Android -- then, yes, people get upset. People don't mind competition within a single brand (Android), but they do mind it when you talk about multiple brands. I think this shows that it isn't really about "options," but about loyalty to specific brands.
And rabid brand loyalty isn't something we're likely to endorse here on GAF. Thou shalt not engage in idolatry.
I honestly think its more that people bought an app on the iPhone and then saw the sequel released exclusively on android.Replace toothbrushes with, let's say, Android phones then. Do people get upset that lots of options exist? To the contrary, almost everyone agrees that this is one of the strengths of Android. If you want a super cheap phone or an expensive one, a big phone or a small one, an international phone or a local only one, you have your pick.
Now let's expand it, instead, to iPhone vs. Android -- then, yes, people get upset. People don't mind competition within a single brand (Android), but they do mind it when you talk about multiple brands. I think this shows that it isn't really about "options," but about loyalty to specific brands.
Do you buy every console every gen?Apt analogy.
"I-it's not like I want the system or anything! Baka! (I have to keep up appearances.)"
Gonna look at those threads XDDQ X was worse.
And of course Epic Mickey as well.
I don't think the sentiment is unreasonable, but I'd argue that the reaction is in any way commensurate or reflective of what you're describing.
Let's take this away from gaming, for a second. Let's imagine, instead, that two toothbrushes made by two different companies have features that are distinct, but both good. One cleans your tongue a little better, the other gets your gums or something, I don't know, who cares. Let's also say you're only looking to buy one of these.
Would your reaction to having two different but good choices, as a consumer, be frustration? Anger? Would you lash out at the gum-cleaning-toothbrush company for making a good product that makes you consider which one you want to buy? Generally speaking, I like it when I find two good things instead of only one good thing.
Similarly, we can be pretty confident that the PS4/720 will get good third party support, and now maybe the Wii U will get some decent support as well. We now have several good products to choose from, instead of just one. I don't think most rational people respond to greater consumer choices with frustration and anger.
Moving goalposts, this is a megaton, either cause it's exclusive or cause Bayonetta is back, take one.Nah this is not a megaton. A real Megaton would have been COD or GTA timed exclusives.
....
I guess people buying Wii U just for Bayonetta 2 will drive down Wii U's software tie ratio?Would you be willing to pay $300 for a console + $60 for a game if said game was the only thing that interested you on said console? I know some GAFfers bought PS3s for like $800 just for FF XIII or whatever, but people who buy a console for one single game are in the minority.
Wouldn't it just?
Oh, and while we're at it... more Vanquish would not go amiss, either!
MY BODY IS REGGIE!
Quite possibly the largest pile of sodium on NeoGAF since Final Fantasy 13 on 360 announcement.
Okay, but if you agree there is an inherent breaking point in this concept, and that if they continue to do this, we will eventually reach it, you must also anticipate a change in strategy before that happens right? Sooner or later, they either have to get a lot more people playing games, or they need to stop increasing the costs of making them. A new generation just seems like a natural place to switch things up to me.
Well, it took long enough. Now... what's next? Gears of War on PlayStation 4? The hype train is departing.
Do you buy every console every gen?
If not, why not? Don't pretend there aren't two games that interest you.
Except here it's more of a situation of the first movie being on DVD and then the second one on Blu-ray, yet some people want it on HD-DVD and not Blu-ray, even though they know shit about HD-DVD or what it will offer while they have this great sequel on Blu-ray.I don't understand why people bother to whinge about it at length but I totally understand why it pisses people off. Imagine watching two films of a trilogy on blu-ray and then the third is released exclusively on hd-dvd.
.
I don't think I understand your answer. Do you, or not?Usually, I find it more productive to invest the money I would use buying other consoles and accompanying accessories and games into just buying more games for the consoles I already have.
What do you mean they know shit? Are you familiar with exclusive franchises?Except here it's more of a situation of the first movie being on DVD and then the second one on Blu-ray, yet some people want it on HD-DVD and not Blu-ray, even though they know shit about HD-DVD or what it will offer while they have this great sequel on Blu-ray.
Quite possibly the largest pile of sodium on NeoGAF since Final Fantasy 13 on 360 announcement.
I don't think I understand your answer. Do you, or not?
It sounds like you're still buying NES games if I'm reading your answer correctly.
Nintendo should try to get Final Fantasy Versus XIII exclusive just to see more meltdown.
Then I find myself surprised that you can't empathise with people that don't want to buy every console.Well obviously, upgrading to a new generation isn't hard to justify since the releases for the old one dry up.
Really, I should own more consoles than I do, but I feel guilty buying new consoles with a backlog. It took until two weeks ago for me to buy a 3DS even though I had wanted one since launch (that turned out to be a smart move.)
That's just it, you don't know that PS4 will offer all that you assume it will.I haven't said anywhere that PS4 and 720 will necessarily be 'better' (unless we're talking hardware specs, where I'm fairly certain PS4 and 720 will be relatively similar, and both will have better specs than Wii U). But the PS4 will give me Sony's exclusive games, so it makes more sense for me to get a console that offers me first-party franchises I want to play (God of War, Gran Turismo, Uncharted and maybe inFamous 3) + multiplat games than to get a Wii U just for Bayonetta and whatever potential third party exclusives that may appear in the future (since I don't really care all that much about Nintendo's first-party games in general). Obviously, I could just get a Wii U + a PS4, but I barely have the time to play my PS3 as it is (with the PSP, PS2 and PC left to gather dust), so it would most likely just be a waste of money for me to buy two consoles when I could just get a PS4 and get my fill from that.
I'm sorry, but I just find your kind of attitude kinda sad. You're so set in your ways that you're not willing to at least give a chance to new experiences. I guess it's just hard to comprehend for a person like me who likes everything from Mario to Silent Hill to Bayonetta to Borderlands to Final Fantasy to Planescape Torment to Ouendan to BlazBlue to Uncharted etc. (except generic FPS games like CoD & such), how some people can have such closed off preferences in games that they don't even want to at least try to change so that they could enjoy more good games.Never heard about The Wonderful 101 tbh, will check it out. That said, I'm generally not a fan of developers or designers, but of IPs.
Edit: Checked the trailer for Wonderful 101. Didn't look very appealing to me personally tbh.
Then I find myself surprised that you can't empathise with people that don't want to buy every console.
I usually do buy them all and inevitably end up with buyers remorse. I've promised myself I won't do that this time, but we shall see. New toys are fun, after all.
Difference is, you could still play the game on PS3. Now, everyone that bought the first game for a MS or Sony console is now forced to buy Nintendo's new console to see how the sequel unfolds. Same thing with Devil May Cry, went to 360 but was still on PS3. Could you imagine if Gears of War 4 all the sudden was published by Sony on the PS4? Rage of 1000 suns.
Man this thread is so delicious lol lol lol
That's just it, you don't know that PS4 will offer all that you assume it will.
I'm sorry, but I just find your kind of attitude kinda sad. You're so set in your ways that you're not willing to at least give a chance to new experiences. I guess it's just hard to comprehend for a person like me who likes everything from Mario to Silent Hill to Bayonetta to Borderlands to Final Fantasy to Planescape Torment to Ouendan to BlazBlue to Uncharted etc. (except generic FPS games like CoD & such), how some people can have such closed off preferences in games that they don't even want to at least try to change so that they could enjoy more good games.
Sorry if this is redundant but it was basically confirmed that Bayonetta 2 was dead right? Multiple sources have reported it? Debating with someone who thinks SEGA would have funded the game if Nintendo didn't.
Oh absolutely. This project was publicly announced as dead in the water. Any real ire ought to be directed at Sony or MS for not doing what Nintendo did: saving it.There's nothing wrong with this mentality it's the feeling obligated it should be ported that seems wrong should turn out (likely) the game was dead and Nintendo saved it. Then your being angry for no real reason. The words tough cookies and that's life should be said and the person quickly moves on. It's one of those occasions where there really isn't publisher/developer obligation to consumer.
Will they play Gran Turismo 6 next year? 2014? 2019? I mean, I guess it's ok if they are fine with the waiting game, but Bayonetta 2 will quite likely be released within a year from now (if they didn't stop working on it for too long after SEGA abandoned it, should've been in development for at least 2-2,5 years now).What do you mean they know shit? Are you familiar with exclusive franchises?
Should a Gran Turismo fan wait and see which system it ends up on next-gen?
This.The difference also is that those games were going to be made without exclusivity.
Bayonetta 2 does not exist without Nintendo.
That is the big difference between those games and this.
Do people not understand this part of it?
All signs point to Sega never ever funding the game and Nintendo saving it.Sorry if this is redundant but it was basically confirmed that Bayonetta 2 was dead right? Multiple sources have reported it? Debating with someone who thinks SEGA would have funded the game if Nintendo didn't (lol).
The difference also is that those games were going to be made without exclusivity.
Bayonetta 2 does not exist without Nintendo.
That is the big difference between those games and this.
Do people not understand this part of it?
So nintendo might as well own platinum games?