Dr.Palutena
Member
yea I went back and said most of what was said was still baseless and stupid.racemixing said:the whole of this was willful ignorance and an opportunity to express already held prejudice.
yea I went back and said most of what was said was still baseless and stupid.racemixing said:the whole of this was willful ignorance and an opportunity to express already held prejudice.
We should have a special new member group with its own tag to match: Smarmy Cockfighter. It'd have all the stigma of being a junior, but none of the restrictions, allowing people to make fools of themselves in new and exciting ways.jaxword said:Any issue that can be linked to gender issues, and more especially masculinity issues, will degrade into a smarmy cockfight. I know you have frustration with gender equality debates, I feel the exact same way with circumcision debates. You just can't reach some people when they think their views of masculine culture roles are even slightly challenged with new information.
It's basically a threat to their comfortable viewpoints, and is responded to almost instinctively.
Devolution said:It's really disturbing and frustrating how a place that's quite liberal and progressive in other avenues gets this way about gender issues.
racemixing said:the single but hugely significant upside of these routine imbecile rallies is the opportunity to cleanse the forum of large amounts of repulsive human beings.
so good.
*Comes back from TF2, checks the previous few pages from where I left off*GoutPatrol said:Don't get too upset. It seems like people with better informed opinions are telling the idiots what's what here. I'm arguing this exact same topic on another forum and its basically me against the rest there.
I can totally understand dissenting opinions. I'd never call for somebody to be banned over such a thing. There is a clear difference between that and what people have been presenting in this thread however.Rezbit said:Honestly, as you said, no you shouldn't. But you've gone and backseat modded anyway. Yes this is a very heated discussion, almost aggressive at times, but as this thread proves NeoGAF is a microcosm of society. What, should the mods ban everyone with a dissenting opinion? Whether people are perceived as right or wrong, there is a dialogue happening.
As for my two cents, I don't know enough about the issue or the science/biology behind it. I guess you take the potential side effects of the hormone blockers with the potential benefit of more time for the child and parents to decide the right course of action.
Which falls under the separate offense of being a dumb driveby poster. Less heinous, though, I agree. Hopefully most of those bans weren't too long.Thagomizer said:To be fair, I think a lot of this was more along the lines of people falling for a title that implies that this was forced on the kid and not reading the rest of the OP than actual bigotry.
Orayn said:We should have a special new member group with its own tag to match: Smarmy Cockfighter. It'd have all the stigma of being a junior, but none of the restrictions, allowing people to make fools of themselves in new and exciting ways.
Thagomizer said:To be fair, I think a lot of this was more along the lines of people falling for a title that implies that this was forced on the kid and not reading the rest of the OP than actual bigotry.
Acerac said:*Comes back from TF2, checks the previous few pages from where I left off*
There we are. I love the mods on this site. Sometimes they may take a bit of time to clean up the trash but they are quite good at what they do. <3
DoomXploder7 said:Personally I find the time delayed bans even funnier.
I support this notion.jaxword said:Neogaf REALLY needs a list of banned people and the reason they were banned. The community is big enough to warrant it, and other successful forums have implemented it.
It's a good idea because it serves as a warning to as to what the moderation team is watching for, which in turn leads to the community self-moderating, which makes it better for everyone.
It also keeps everyone honest and up front with their mistakes, including the moderating team, and makes for better communication up and down the hierarchy.
Why, Tulio, of course!jaxword said:I think we can all think of one person who already is infamous for being the smarmy cocktype...
Like, every member who has been banned carries a scarlet letter list of offenses committed on their profile? Well, actually I may be thinking too far on that onejaxword said:Neogaf REALLY needs a list of banned people and the reason they were banned. The community is big enough to warrant it, and other successful forums have implemented it.
TacticalFox88 said:So....they were banned...why?
thx broTrent Strong said:That's quite a post.
jaxword said:The mod clearly believed they did not read the actual article and just responded to the sensationalist title.
The article outlined how the child had gone to several specialists for hormonal treatment for his health.
The title implied THE LESBIANS were doing this arbitrarily, making it sort of a political statement.
Dead Man said:I'm not sure if I am pleased or disappointed that GAF made it 9 pages with no Ackbar.jpg. I think I am mostly pleased. Still sad my preconceptions were dashed though
Dead Man said:I'm not sure if I am pleased or disappointed that GAF made it 9 pages with no Ackbar.jpg. I think I am mostly pleased. Still sad my preconceptions were dashed though
Nah, the internet always feeds on itself and recycles the same shit.jaxword said:Perhaps we're growing up as a community that can make its own humor and not leech reddit/4chan memes.
I do believe it is.Thagomizer said:Isn't that a banned meme?
Dead Man said:Nah, the internet always feeds on itself and recycle.
True enough. If the glass were half full for me I would probably agree with youjaxword said:While that is GENERALLY true, I think a community of clever people who recognize how humor works can generate new jokes on its own. There has to be a "prime" who creates the joke in the first place for it to spread, even if it's just a variation on an older joke.
You just need people to stop taking themselves so seriously and realize when it's time to lighten up.
Agreed. This is the title that should have been here to begin with.Orayn said:Holy fuckawesome title change, Bat-Mods!
I do wish the thread creators were more accurate with their titles, but I suppose the people themselves are to blame for reading the headline but not the paper.Orayn said:Holy fuckawesome title change, Bat-Mods!
86 posts. No bannings. Boring.Krev said:Nice title change.
Interesting to consider how the thread would have turned out if that was the title from the start.
It's sad-funny how true this is.Dead Man said:86 posts. No bannings. Boring.
Dead Man said:True enough. If the glass were half full for me I would probably agree with you
Acerac said:I can totally understand dissenting opinions. I'd never call for somebody to be banned over such a thing. There is a clear difference between that and what people have been presenting in this thread however.
It's been quite a while since I've been as unnerved as I have by some opinions in this thread. Apologies for the backseat modding, it was unnecessary and altogether wrong of me. All I wanted was some consistency between how groups are treated, and it seems that given due time the moderation team was more than happy to make sure it happened, something that I am very thankful for. I should have had more faith in their abilities.
icarus-daedelus said:Another GAF tradition: first reply was best!
Yes.Koodo said:So is this thread the source of all the fresh banned corpses I've stumbled across in OT?
Unfortunately I think many people would still see it as some sort of lesbian conspiracy. I think those that would be able to question that belief probably would not hold it all that strongly in the first place.jim-jam bongs said:Well, a thread with this many bannings should make interesting reading for the evening. I wonder if stories like this one make people who think that gender identity is innate question that belief? Like, at all?
Dead Man said:Unfortunately I think many people would still see it as some sort of lesbian conspiracy. I think those that would be able to question that belief probably would not hold it all that strongly in the first place.
omg, Ctrl+Fing the first three pages for "banned" yields 44 results. :lolPlywood said:Yes.
?Steelrain said:Time for the circle jerk I guess.