• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Do Batman's parents need to be murdered?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PSqueak

Banned
Question is about his motivation, not his opponents.

But i mean, the motivation might nebulous, but if you call them inefficient, batman is the most inefficient because he aint doing jackshit but wasting his money in ineffectual crime fighting, in the very least, tony stark is less of a waste because more often than not, nobody has the resources to fight the shit he fights, he has to be ironman, while the world could do without batman.
 

Figboy79

Aftershock LA
I don't think his parents needed to be killed for him to become Batman. But he'd need some other kind of motivation to get him to do something that extreme. I think a lot of us would love to clean up our communities and better them if they're in a state of decay. I don't know if we'd dress up in a Bat costume and terrify criminals, though.

I think Bruce would have eventually gotten there as Batman, especially if he saw that the efforts of Wayne Enterprises weren't helping to improve Gotham City. I can see a storyline where a young Bruce is being groomed to take over Wayne Enterprises, and he learns that his father is beholden to corrupt executives and criminal strong-arming, and he decides to use his resources to attack that criminal element as a vigilante. I think either way you could craft a story where Bruce still becomes Batman with both of his parents being alive. I think the thirst for revenge in some way definitely drives Bruce, but I also think that he loves his city and wants to see it thrive.
 
I think the disconnect with batman is not that he's a vigilante, but that he is a billionaire, he could use his money to improve conditions in gotham and he could be more effective that way, but no, he dresses as a bat and punches criminals and mentally ill people.

There are Batman stories that show him also working the system as Bruce Wayne by day. Building hospitals, stumping for Harvey Dent, and such.
 
I wonder what it would take though for Batman not to have his strong "no kill" code of ethics. I mean, would it take an even more traumatic event, like the death of his hypothetical wife and kids (the Punisher route), or would it just require him to have no morally just guardian raising him after his parent's death (meaning no Alfred).

A movie deal.
 

Wiseblade

Member
It's super important. Otherwise, why doesn't he use his influence and resources more effectively to change Gotham over time? Invest in public services, build a youth centre, start an apprenticeship programme at Wayne Enterprises... All of these would have longer lasting and more significant benefits than running around at night punching people, but lack the immediacy.
Then what drives him?

Hey I am rich white guy using the least efficient way I have at my disposal to change shit.
Exactly. Without the death of his parents, the criticism that Bruce is just living out a power fantasy becomes too appropriate.
 

Iorv3th

Member
He's just going to be Tony Stark if his parents aren't murdered. He needs that drive in his life, it both empowers him to be the Dark Knight as well as crippling him in so many vital human areas. Its who he is and otherwise he just turns into another rich playboy and that isn't to say he might be a bad or good rich person but I doubt he turns into a superhero and if he did I'd expect something more along the lines of Iron Man than Batman to come about.

But starks parents were also murdered? If it happened when he was younger maybe he would have become batman instead of iron man?
 

ZdkDzk

Member
In many versions of his origin he isn't just fucking about and then becomes Batman. Many of them have him getting involved int raining across the world in various things to further his goal to fight crime in Gotham. Batman the Animated Series actually covers this pretty well. Batman did everything from studying escape artist and illusion from Zatanna's father to studying Akido and other martial Arts in Japan and so on. In many others he joins up with the Raz al Ghul and trains under him and so on.

IMO If he left home before he was an adult, and just did it independent of being Batman as he was out there, that's still putzing around, but it's fine. If he does it as a grown adult with the intended purpose of being Batman that's fine. If he's doing it early on in life with the intended purpose of being Batman, that just makes young Bruce Wayne look like an idiot. Not even crazy, just stupid and unsupervised.
 

Shanlei91

Sonic handles my blue balls
I mean, if we're being honest, Thomas Wayne becoming Batman makes more sense. In that regard, I think the Flashpoint story makes more sense. He's a guy who's tried all other avenues out in the open, loses his son, then goes vigilante.

Yup, his origin story makes more sense than Bruce Wayne losing his parents.
 
I don't like this idea that Bruce Wayne hasn't given back to the city and that he's just some scared little boy using billions of dollars to beat up lower class crooks. There are decades of comics with Bruce Wayne contributing money to socially concerned organizations, hospitals, clinics, hell he's put money into Arkham Asylum to try and make that better. Batman is a fictional cartoon character for children, he can buy equipment for the Gotham High Football team and also buy sweet ninja gear. He has infinite money. There is no opportunity cost here.

And maybe you havent noticed, but most of Batman's problems are Batman sized. Donating to building better libraries isn't gonna stop Poison Ivy's giant plants or Ra's Al Ghul giant James Bond badguy satellite or Professor Pyg from using his doll-a-trons to release deadly viruses through Gotham City. He's an pulpy adventure character, that what he does. If you can't accept that, like if you just straight up refuse to accept the fantastical premise of this character, then you're not even attempting to meet the material at its own terms.

A Batman comic where a dude in a suit writes checks for 20 pages aint too exciting.

He gave a black dude a jetpack and told him to protect ALL of Africa

Batman is a conservative's wet dream.
 
Funny you pointed out BVS because them ham-fisting that into their doesn't work mostly because Batman goes on to kill an insane amount of henchman throughout the movie, pretty much engaging in the type of violence that got his parents killed. If they would have removed that origin story it wouldn't quite seem as out of place when Batman begins killing people and using guns too.

But regarding other Batman universes beside Synder's, I think Batman's parents dying give him the motivation to continue on his parents dreams of making Gotham a better place to live. If he didn't have that event happen in his life or something similar he probaly just be that Billionaire playboy he always acts like when he's not batman but it would his life instead of batman.
 

Sojgat

Member
Yes, it's his entire driving motivation. He does what he does so the same thing doesn't happen to others.

Batman not processing death and loss in healthy ways is pretty much his defining character trait. Without that inciting traumatic experience he'd be doing something different with his life.

The problem with a lot of Batman stories is writers who constantly rehash the point and use it as a central thematic device. We get it, his parents are dead. Not every story needs to be about that.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
IMO If he left home before he was an adult, and just did it independent of being Batman as he was out there, that's still putzing around, but it's fine. If he does it as a grown adult with the intended purpose of being Batman that's fine. If he's doing it early on in life with the intended purpose of being Batman, that just makes young Bruce Wayne look like an idiot. Not even crazy, just stupid and unsupervised.

I mean he's a billionaire child with delusions of grandeur about fighting crime and righting the wrongs in Gotham City. He's an idiot by anyone standards trying to live a conventional life but that's kind of my point. He wasn't just back packing across Europe having flings and partying. Most of his stops are always to build a skill he know's he'll need in the future in many incarnations of his origin story. I'm not sure why him doing it as an adult is any different than when he's a child, if anything coming to this realization that he needs to train to be a superhero as a grown ass man seems even more foolish and childish than an actual child coming up with said scheme and being able to enact it because of his amount of money and clout.
 
Yeah. Tragic hero formula says yes. Think how many superheroes, hell, any characters from fiction have their backgrounds shaped by personal tragedy. Daredevil, Spider-Man, Harry Potter, Frodo Bagging.

What's odd is how usually this makes them better people and gives them some greater goal, when in reality it would probably give them immense emotional issues.
 

zeemumu

Member
Let's see what Marvel's Batman says

tumblr_m9gxjvwHzF1rvz7p6o2_1280.png

His parents don't need to die for him to care about crime in Gotham, but they need to die to make him Batman, unless you go with the old story in which case his dad was also batman.

Even then, he'd just be a vigilante hero, not Batman.
 

Pau

Member
Sometimes I wonder if people reading/watching Batman realize they're watching a superhero story whose whole conceit is entirely fictional because sometimes it sounds like y'all just want something completely different. Of course he dresses up in a stupid costume and fights crime physically. That's what superheroes do and what the majority of their storylines center on. Bruce has been shown to do what people here talk about (using his money and company to help people besides just fighting crime) but that's not the story DC is interested in telling issue in and issue out.
 

wetwired

Member
There's an older Batman story called "To Kill a Legend" where he gets a chance to save his parents in an alternative universe.

Spoiler: the Bruce Wayne whose parents live grows up to be Batman anyway.

Here's the relevant panel:

244590_original.jpg

Came to post this, it was the only Batman comic I ever had as a kid and that story left an impression on me.
 

Pau

Member
Yeah. Tragic hero formula says yes. Think how many superheroes, hell, any characters from fiction have their backgrounds shaped by personal tragedy. Daredevil, Spider-Man, Harry Potter, Frodo Bagging.

What's odd is how usually this makes them better people and gives them some greater goal, when in reality it would probably give them immense emotional issues.
They do have immense emotional issues. The point is that the trauma doesn't stop them from trying to do good. Those stories are supposed to be uplifting and inspirational.
 
They do have immense emotional issues. The point is that the trauma doesn't stop them from trying to do good. Those stories are supposed to be uplifting and inspirational.

No I'm not complaining, it's good, I just can't think of examples off the top of my head where it turned them the other way.
 
To make Batman as much of a fucked up character as he is absolutely.

However I really wish they played up his new family as having a healing effect, however the Batfamily stuff always gets thrown to the side anyway from one writer to the next.
 

ZdkDzk

Member
I mean he's a billionaire child with delusions of grandeur about fighting crime and righting the wrongs in Gotham City. He's an idiot by anyone standards trying to live a conventional life but that's kind of my point. He wasn't just back packing across Europe having flings and partying. Most of his stops are always to build a skill he know's he'll need in the future in many incarnations of his origin story. I'm not sure why him doing it as an adult is any different than when he's a child, if anything coming to this realization that he needs to train to be a superhero as a grown ass man seems even more foolish and childish than an actual child coming up with said scheme and being able to enact it because of his amount of money and clout.

The difference for me between all those options is the motivations and what that says about the character. If he was traveling the world from a young age and learned those skills independently of being Batman it's not only telling of who Bruce Wayne as a person is, but also of his determination and natural talent. If he decided to become Batman afterwards for whatever reason and used those talents, that is childish, but we still get to see him be the mature level headed Batman, so we know that no matter how absurd the decision to become Batman was, he was not only capable but justified. It's still a stupid decision, but one that I can see coming from a rich guy with confidence that he could actually succeed on some level.

If he was a kid who honestly thought he could travel the world learning how to be a crime fighter, then he's just and idiot who tripped into success before someone could stop him. When a billionaire adult does it, he's an immature idiot potentially throwing his life away, but he would (or at least should) be aware of that. Said kid wouldn't have that self-awareness. For that child to actually follow through on that all the way to adulthood and become Batman make Adult Bruce Wayne seem less immature, and more delusional. You can hand wave it away with the fact that he's mentally damaged and the trauma of his parents death, but he's not really shown to be a mentally damaged person struggling with his parents death, or at least not struggling with it in a way that explains Batman.

That's ultimately my problem with his origin. I'm not a hardcore comic fan, but Bruce Wayne is a really smart, really talented, and outwardly well adjusted person (aside from the superhero thing which I can easily buy into because he lives in a world where that's just a thing that exist), who happens to have traumatic experience involving his parents death. Does that experience inform his character and explain his behavior as Bruce Wayne/Batman? Yes. Does that experience justify him becoming Batman? No, because he's rarely ever shown to be the psycho viewers paint him as to explain why that would make any sense at all. Sure it would get a pass back when origins just needed to give a bluntly relevant how/why, but now it (to me) it just comes off as bad writing getting a looked over.
 

Dragun619

Member
If you're just tryna make Batman, then yea, I feel like you need that tragedy part in order for him to suit up as Bat and patrol the nights in Gotham.

But for just Bruce Wayne, even without the tragedy, whether he becomes a Lawyer, Doctor, Private Detective, Commissioner,

Dude is just destined to engage against evil in any DC timeline or universe, Gotham just got too much shit. lol
 
Does that experience justify him becoming Batman? No, because he's rarely ever shown to be the psycho viewers paint him as to explain why that would make any sense at all.

That's mostly because fans threw a fit when All-Star Batman and Robin actually went and depicted him as wot he is.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
The difference for me between all those options is the motivations and what that says about the character. If he was traveling the world from a young age and learned those skills independently of being Batman it's not only telling of who Bruce Wayne as a person is, but also of his determination and natural talent. If he decided to become Batman afterwards for whatever reason and used those talents, that is childish, but we still get to see him be the mature level headed Batman, so we know that no matter how absurd the decision to become Batman was, he was not only capable but justified. It's still a stupid decision, but one that I can see coming from a rich guy with confidence that he could actually succeed on some level.

If he was a kid who honestly thought he could travel the world learning how to be a crime fighter, then he's just and idiot who tripped into success before someone could stop him. When a billionaire adult does it, he's an immature idiot potentially throwing his life away, but he would (or at least should) be aware of that. Said kid wouldn't have that self-awareness. For that child to actually follow through on that all the way to adulthood and become Batman make Adult Bruce Wayne seem less immature, and more delusional. You can hand wave it away with the fact that he's mentally damaged and the trauma of his parents death, but he's not really shown to be a mentally damaged person struggling with his parents death, or at least not struggling with it in a way that explains Batman.

That's ultimately my problem with his origin. I'm not a hardcore comic fan, but Bruce Wayne is a really smart, really talented, and outwardly well adjusted person (aside from the superhero thing which I can easily buy into because he lives in a world where that's just a thing that exist), who happens to have traumatic experience involving his parents death. Does that experience inform his character and explain his behavior as Bruce Wayne/Batman? Yes. Does that experience justify him becoming Batman? No, because he's rarely ever shown to be the psycho viewers paint him as to explain why that would make any sense at all. Sure it would get a pass back when origins just needed to give a bluntly relevant how/why, but now it (to me) it just comes off as bad writing getting a looked over.

It is childish though and that's kind of the point. A child enacts this plan before he's probably even hit puberty and has no one to really tell him no except Alfred and he is often portrayed as looking after Bruce and trying to mold him into a good responsible person but he also enables him to do as he pleases. Even when he does put his foot down about something its not like Bruce just listens to him, especially concerning his burning desire for vengeance and to right the wrongs that led to his parents death.

You seem to be under the assumption that damage is only if he acts like a crazed monster or does violent things or what not. Bruce's damage isn't so surface level and superficial, his entire mindset was damaged and probably destroyed when his parents were murdered in front of him. Both because of how useless he felt after the fact that he could do nothing to stop them but that there was also such evil out their running a muck and robbing other kids of their futures.

His insanity isnt some frothing out the mouth talking to himself obvious madness, no its a deep seated conviction that almost no one will ever ever come close to achieving. Bruce goes beyond what any pro athlete or what not does. His "madness" is so deep, so pure that it basically breaks him as a person. Bruce isn't a terrible person but Bruce isn't a person anymore, he's Batman now. Batman is who he is on the inside and there are many moments in the different mediums on him where he says as such. Bruce is the mask he wears to the world and Batman is who he is at heart. In Batman Beyond he even says he calls himself Batman in his mind, not Bruce.

So yeah he isn't crazy or a psycho or anything so simple but to say he thinks at all like a sane level headed man is not accurate either, far from it. Bruce is deranged and crazy in an incredibly specific manner.
 
But i mean, the motivation might nebulous, but if you call them inefficient, batman is the most inefficient because he aint doing jackshit but wasting his money in ineffectual crime fighting, in the very least, tony stark is less of a waste because more often than not, nobody has the resources to fight the shit he fights, he has to be ironman, while the world could do without batman.
When did I say he's inefficient? Batman could be motivated by any number of things. The point was we have a perfectly apt non metahuman billionaire in stark whose power is being a smart, rich, human. Nobody asks why stark does it, and if they do its not central to his original story and mythology. Therefore, you could have a batman who is just a dude who believes he needs to fill dome niche in crime fighting society and his parents could be perfectly fine. It's not essential to crime fighters that their parents were murder victims.
 

JTripper

Member
Batman is born out of that specific tragedy. If his parents don't die, it would have to be some other very personal tragedy.
 

WolfeTone

Member
I always find it weird when people bring up the 'efficiency' of Batman's crime fighting. It's a comic book, the writers will always need to bring in more criminals for him to fight. Do you want the city to be full on saved and crime in Gotham to be wiped out?

Apply this same argument to any other superhero and you could reach the same conclusion. Spiderman is ineffective because his villains are still alive?

To the argument that Batman makes things worse by inspiring these psychos, this is a stronger point, but honestly Joker, Penguin and company aren't going to pack it in once Batman hangs up his cape.
 
I always find it weird when people bring up the 'efficiency' of Batman's crime fighting. It's a comic book, the writers will always need to bring in more criminals for him to fight. Do you want the city to be full on saved and crime in Gotham to be wiped out?

Apply this same argument to any other superhero and you could reach the same conclusion. Spiderman is ineffective because his villains are still alive?

The counter-argument there is usually that pretty much every other league member can take care of a city without turning it into a living hellscape.
 

WolfeTone

Member
The counter-argument there is usually that pretty much every other league member can take care of a city without turning it into a living hellscape.

Wasn't Gotham always like this though? It was always a shithole plagued by crime. And the city would still be a hellscape if Batman gave up.
 

Bleepey

Member
There's an older Batman story called "To Kill a Legend" where he gets a chance to save his parents in an alternative universe.

Spoiler: the Bruce Wayne whose parents live grows up to be Batman anyway.

Here's the relevant panel:

244590_original.jpg

I vaguely remember a comic where Batman saw something somehow where he saw his parents knew that their death would lead to him becoming Batman and they still took a walk down Crime Alley.
 
I vaguely remember a comic where Batman saw something somehow where he saw his parents knew that their death would lead to him becoming Batman and they still took a walk down Crime Alley.

General rule of thumb is "avoid any stories that deal with his parents like the plague".
 

Zombine

Banned
One can infer that the multiverse has a set of rules which define how the DCU works. Batman's parents don't have to die, but something traumatic does have to happen to that family at a particular point in time to shape the way that universe works.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
What if they died but were sent to the future and revived? We can have Batman and he can safely meet his parents after his career is ended.

Time travel!

Also, Bruce was the Flying Fox (in the Robin costume) before his parents died.
in one continuity
 
People say this, but honestly Batman doesn't "snap." Dude is (despite what the memes say) lawful good. A methodical genius bent on always doing what is right and following a strict code. To me, his behavior is actually at odds with his origin. He is NOT driven by vengeance. He is NOT driven by mental instability. He is a goody goody with a ninja suit.

Batman could be motivated by the same stuff that motivates Tony Stark and I think it'd play just fine. Or he could be a cop working around a corrupt system and leading a double life. Or he could be a guy who sold his soul to save his parents and now seeks to redeem himself. Or he could be the ghost of a dead hero. He could be anything. He is a cypher. It's not like he is a three dimensional character in most portrayals really.

Or is the idea that his parents' is death necessary to justify his grim/dark persona as a tortured loner?

Bruce doesn't "snap" per say but his mental state is significantly altered..just not in the psychotic way. He is pretty much magically obsessive with his obsession being attached to his feeling of helplessness and loss during their death.

This is why he adheres to a strict code and why he has the bat family. All of it is a coping mechanism and it's the basis of his justification of his feeling of superiority to every other hero (I.E. his contingency plans if they turn).

He's obsessed with his mission and code to the point that because no one else feels and operates exactly as he does, he doubts them.

It's definitely in line with his origin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom