Kenzodielocke
Banned
Ramsay is way more dangerous than Joffrey, because he's smart. As Tywin once said, a crown does not give you power.
Jofferey was a boy playing at being evil...Ramsay is just a fucking nutjob. Granted I might just think that because Ramsay is way more hands on. Unless the person was defenseless Jofferey would just put Sandor on the dude.
Ramsay is way more dangerous than Joffrey, because he's smart. As Tywin once said, a crown does not give you power.
He's become a 0815 sadistic evil antagonist, though. He's boring.
By now, everyone should know there is no just bad or good, there is always both in all of the characters, some have more good, some more bad. And of course it all depends on the view you have. You could argue that Joffrey and Ramsay are pure bad, but Jon Snow and Robb good. .
I would say Jon, Davos, perhaps Bran, and Sam in his own way are the closest thing the show has to pure heroes. For the most part they're consistently selfless, honest, and demonstrate an aversion to violence, which are the key heroic traits, to me. Robb was too violent and ultimately selfish for me to classify him as such.By now, everyone should know there is no just bad or good, there is always both in all of the characters, some have more good, some more bad. And of course it all depends on the view you have. You could argue that Joffrey and Ramsay are pure bad, but Jon Snow and Robb good.
Yeah, he was arrogant from the get go.
But think about how much we've gotten to know the true and natural nature of everyone in the westeros, by comparison for someone in a similar position of (limited) power, Theon isn't that horrible. He fucked up yeah, but in my opinion he still saved Bran and Rickon from death, or at the very least enslavement in their own home.
I fail to see any good in Cersei. She's done things to protect her bastard children but that doesn't equate to good for anybody other than herself. What has she done thats for the good of anybody? She was ready and willing to even screw over Tywin for fucks sake.By now, everyone should know there is no just bad or good, there is always both in all of the characters, some have more good, some more bad. And of course it all depends on the view you have. You could argue that Joffrey and Ramsay are pure bad, but Jon Snow and Robb good. .
I wish Roose would have more screen time. He's the most Tywin-like and he looks like Daniel Craig. But all the show cares about is Ramsay.
Yeah I've enjoyed him since he was just cutting pieces off of Theon. Seeing him whack Theon across the face with a bugle, the same bugle that he used to taunt him while he was at Winterfell was hilarious. He's like the opposite of Roose. Roose will ally with you until he has no use for you, then he'll fuck you over and stab you in the heart. Ramsay will just find out how to stab you in the heart without even playing at the ally game. Though Roose is creepier. You see that man smile...I still find enjoyment in that character. 'Feed her to the hounds' after his speech was pretty great.
Not random. He was useful governing in his stead until he wasn't. He had sworn allegiance to Robb and we know how that ended.But how does this work ? Isn't Ramsay officialy a Bolton now ? Would be kinda random if Roose just could take it back like it was nothing.
The dudes flag has a skinless man hanging off of it. How trustworthy would you expect him to be?But how does this work ? Isn't Ramsay officialy a Bolton now ? Would be kinda random if Roose just could take it back like it was nothing.
The dudes flag has a skinless man hanging off of it. How trustworthy would you expect him to be?
I don't see much difference between Robb and Jon. They both broke a vow to be with a woman they loved. Jon executed a man under his command for disobeying orders. Robb executed a man under his command for murdering two children.I would say Jon, Davos, perhaps Bran, and Sam in his own way are the closest thing the show has to pure heroes. For the most part they're consistently selfless, honest, and demonstrate an aversion to violence, which are the key heroic traits, to me. Robb was too violent and ultimately selfish for me to classify him as such.
I still find enjoyment in that character. 'Feed her to the hounds' after his speech was pretty great.
Ned? No, since the guy stuck by his word. Roose on the other hand. Yes, his word don't mean shit. He does everything out of connivence to himself. This is a guy that picked the fattest Frey daughter because he'd get rich from it...don't ask me how he has sex with her though.It's not about trust. I am just asking. If Ned had given Jon the Stark name, could Ned just take it again ? Just a political question.
I really hope Ramsay doesn't kill him. I want the writers to trick me. Ramsay tries to kill Walda or/and Roose but he is one step ahead of him.
I still find enjoyment in that character. 'Feed her to the hounds' after his speech was pretty great.
Any chance Sansa might already be pregnant?
Yes, although if she found out she was I'd assume it would be aborted immediately.
It would be funny if Ramsay was actually infertile. He had a lot of sex with Myranda and she never had any kids. Or maybe she did and fed them to the hounds...
Yes, although if she found out she was I'd assume it would be aborted immediately.
It would be funny if Ramsay was actually infertile. He had a lot of sex with Myranda and she never had any kids. Or maybe she did and fed them to the hounds...
ACTUALLY...
If Sansa is carrying Ramsay's baby, and say... Roose, Ramsay and the wife die...
Sansa becomes the Mother of the heir to the North.
Until Bran or Rickon shows up at least.ACTUALLY...
If Sansa is carrying Ramsay's baby, and say... Roose, Ramsay and the wife die...
Sansa becomes the Mother of the heir to the North.
ACTUALLY...
If Sansa is carrying Ramsay's baby, and say... Roose, Ramsay and the wife die...
Sansa becomes the Mother of the heir to the North.
True enough. Although, Jon's relationship didn't really jeopardize everything the same way. In fact, an argument could be made that it made what was essentially a deep cover op more effective and believable. Plus at the end he did stay true to the Watch, circumstances aside.I don't see much difference between Robb and Jon. They both broke a vow to be with a woman they loved. Jon executed a man under his command for disobeying orders. Robb executed a man under his command for murdering two children.
Until Bran or Rickon shows up at least.
I literally cannot remember a single thing Rickon does or even what he looks like.
:lol
The only reason I even remember his name is because Theonn Greyjoy once very weirdly said "Braaannn and Reeeekon Stark" in a very weird accent.I literally cannot remember a single thing Rickon does or even what he looks like.
:lol
Where did he go? Is he with Hodor?
Where did he go? Is he with Hodor?
Remember she said she would train him as well.The Wildling woman (forgot her name) refused to go North of the Wall since she had personally seen the White Walkers and was scared shitless of ever going near them. Bran and her agreed that it was a good idea for her to take Rickon with her to a safe location.
Don't know if they ever said the exact location but she's hiding him with somewhere South of the Wall.
So Arya will become a blind master assassin, Bran will control eagles with his mind and peck the eyes of his enemies, Rickon will master the techniques of the wildlings and fight with 2 axes, as the Old Gods intended, and Sansa will .... be rescued from some other situation she could've escaped or not gotten into.Remember she said she would train him as well.
There's a big difference in the magnitude of the two crimes, and Slynt was begging for his life, but I think I agree with you.True enough. Although, Jon's relationship didn't really jeopardize everything the same way. In fact, but an argument could be made that it made what was essentially a deep cover op more effective and believable. Plus at the end he did stay true to the Watch, circumstances aside.
Additionally, if you watch both of those executions again, you might notice their demeanors are pretty different.
Jon is clearly reluctant. Despite their personal issues, there's no pleasure. He's somber; he has no desire to kill a brother. But the law is the law for good reasons and in Westeros it's ruthless.
Robb is committed to it from the start and the act is vicious and angry. It's very personal. I don't know about you, but I see contempt in his eyes. I think he enjoyed it.
Maybe Robb was a hero, but I think after that scene no longer. It's a good one that illustrates his fall.
For Jon, well, I suppose he isn't really a hero. Is anybody? But this is war and in another universe where he has the power to spare his brother and keep his own head a little longer, I believe he would. The closest thing.
Found this leaked picture of Rickon.
Wasn't the plan to take him to the Umbers? She said they were great warriors and could train Rickon.The Wildling woman (forgot her name) refused to go North of the Wall since she had personally seen the White Walkers and was scared shitless of ever going near them. Bran and her agreed that it was a good idea for her to take Rickon with her to a safe location.
Don't know if they ever said the exact location but she's hiding him with somewhere South of the Wall.
Shouldn't the title be "no book spoilers (LOL)" - aren't we past the books at this point?
Goes well with the leaked pic of Gendry.
I've always hated how the discussion is split 50/50 on Gaf. I almost wish that if this show was based on books, which of course they aren't because what the fuck is a book, that it wasn't so everyone could freely post in one thread.
Half the fun of GoT being back on the air is the Gaf thread but it could be so much better if those filthy leopard posters could also post in here.