Support NeoGAF

[PeteBull]

Whats was your point exactly in regards to my post?

I was proving that biased offline renderers are still far from real life compared to unbiased renderers.....and games are a million miles away from biased renderers.

So on scale from 1 to 100, we are closer to 1 than we are to 10 let alone 100 with current real time graphics.

If some cgi can be already photorealistic, like that left pic, it means realtime gameplay should be there in 20-25years, thats my point

 

[Shubh_C63]

I dont want it to be that much more close to be honest.

I may have a problem but photorealistic graphics are less immersive.
Shitty graphics without any nostalgia feels so immersive, but shitty to look at. Like Dark Souls.

 

[CGNoire]

About 10%. The base is still 4TF ...We need 40TF+ to get there.

 

[BootsLoader]

I think we are somewhere from 40 to 45%. We got a lot of work to achieve realism.

 

[buenoblue]

Depends what you mean by reality. Games look great no doubt but actual reality is never really chased. Movies and tv shows don't look like reality either.

 

[ChuckeRearmed]

Some tech demos were quite impressive. I remember that VR FPS game (or it wasn't VR) that looked very realistic. A lot of it boils down to lighting.

 

[L*][*N*K]

Photo realism is pretty boring in my opinion

 

[Dr.D00p]

Dont know but I'm wiiling to bet that the finest 16bit 2D Pixel art will be revered for all time, in a way 3D Graphics never will, no matter how realistic they get.

 

[64bitmodels]

Dont know but I'm wiiling to bet that the finest 16bit 2D Pixel art will be revered for all time, in a way 3D Graphics never will, no matter how realistic they get.

what about 3D environments and 2D characters like in Doom?