Arthur-Hucksake
Neo Member
He accidentally killed her, then accidentally took a photo of her vagina, then accidentally posted it online.
That tickled me! LOL
He accidentally killed her, then accidentally took a photo of her vagina, then accidentally posted it online.
I think the most notable part of this is that Fiona Coyne by Skylar Spence is on the soundtrack. Instant GOTY contender now.
Rated R movies don't even show the female genitalia in such graphic detail. This is straight up pornographic.
Accuracy and realism? Fine with me.I think all you can accurately see are labia majora, actually.
Seriously though, this is ridiculous. I'm all for artistic integrity in games, and apparently they have penises in the game too, but exactly what purpose does it serve? Kids have plenty of wank bank material without needing vag in their games, which makes it seem like some dev slipped it in for the lulz.
Edit: ok slipping it in pun aside, if all these vids of nudists roaming around are watchdogs too, then the upskirt shot is meaningless. They are in your face with the nudity... Sony just doesnt want it on PS feeds apparently.
Oversight by ESRB maybe, unless this still falls within the M rating.
no, you can find nudists with fully rendered full frontal nudity in the game
again, VERY nsfw
this too. NSFW
I hear there is more pubic hair on the PS Pro
I'm so happy I get to keep seeing this title on the front page!
no, you can find nudists with fully rendered full frontal nudity in the game
again, VERY nsfw
this too. NSFW
Fur-K
Rated R movies don't even show the female genitalia in such graphic detail. This is straight up pornographic.
Does it use hairworks on pc?
Detail doesn't make something porn. Medical diagrams are extremely detailed, they're not porn. Pornography is intended to titillate, that has very little to do with detail.
Yes, it's to make the NPC more authentic. The NPC is supposed to be a hooked. It's only natural for her to try and be titillating.Why is the vagina fully textured? Why are the panties crotchless?
There is no reason for this to exist other than to titillate.
Yes, it's to make the NYC more authentic. The NPC is supposed to be a hooked. It's only natural for her to try and be titillating.
It's simple, OP. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you're allowed to.Were writing to inform you that your Sony Entertainment Network account has been temporarily suspended.
Weve made this decision based on your online activity in Live from PlayStation on 14-11-2016.
Content of an adult or sexual nature is against our Code of Conduct.
The suspension will last 1 week and will be lifted on 21-11-2016. You wont be able to access online multiplayer, PlayStation Store and other network features until the suspension is over.
We take the decision to suspend an account very seriously, and we only do so after one of our moderators has carefully analysed the situation. PlayStation Support therefore cannot overturn this moderation decision.
We ask all our players to act decently, respectfully and with consideration for us and other players while using PlayStation Network. To make sure you understand the behaviour we expect from our community, please review the Code of Conduct here before returning to PlayStation Network. Please be aware that any further breaches of the Code of Conduct may result in a longer suspension or even a permanent ban.
Yours sincerely,
SIEE Moderation
a NYC so authentic it's SF
Yes, it's to make the NYC more authentic. The NPC is supposed to be a hooked. It's only natural for her to try and be titillating.
It's simple, OP. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you're allowed to.
You're basically saying that no game should have "content of an adult or sexual nature".Don't put it in the game if it can get people suspended for sharing it. It's ridiculous.
Don't put it in the game if it can get people suspended for sharing it. It's ridiculous.
San Francisco
Don't put it in the game if it can get people suspended for sharing it. It's ridiculous.
Fixed. Damn auto-correct.a NYC so authentic it's SF
You are ridiculous. You're basically saying that no game should have "content of an adult or sexual nature".
That makes no sense.
You can walk round your own house with your cock hanging out, doesn't mean you can walk down the street with in hanging out too.
Except it's not in the street is it. It's all part of the same service.
It is "in the street",there is a question mark over how the share system works with mature content, and potentially anyone (even those with parentally restricted accounts) can see it , hence the issue.
Why is the vagina fully textured? Why are the panties crotchless?
There is no reason for this to exist other than to titillate.
We were not ready.
Then they should fix it and not punish consumers for sharing something that they're fine with being in the game.
P.S It's not in the street it's not a real tangible thing it's a service.
You agreed to abide by the TOS of the system, which includes not sharing (potentially) offensive material, if you don't, you get banned, it's that simple.
The game is rated 18, the share system isn't.
But what is offensive material?
If the TOS says you have to do ten jumping jacks before you turn on the system or connect to PSN, that doesn't make it sensible.You agreed to abide by the TOS of the system, which includes not sharing (potentially) offensive material, if you don't, you get banned, it's that simple.
The game is rated 18, the share system isn't.
Might as well change the name of the game to Watch Vagina
No, it's not. The game has an M rating, meaning mature. Its content is not for everyone. I'm glad that there are games with mature content. That doesn't mean I'd subject children to it.
Note that if you use your PlayStation camera to broadcast your penis, they'll ban you, too.
You agreed to abide by the TOS of the system, which includes not sharing (potentially) offensive material, if you don't, you get banned, it's that simple.
The game is rated 18, the share system isn't.
That's up to the platform holder to decide.
The problem is not the adults playing the game but the tons of kids that got it. Yep it's not UBI fault and parents should be awared about what their kids play.
If an adult thinks is weird/extrange/etc seeing that on a videogame just imagine how a kid would react.
I don't think that's good enough. It's anti-consumer, just because the system is flawed then that doesn't mean you can suspend people in place of a better way of dealing with screenshots from a rated game. Should we suspend someone who posts something violent from a game just because a child might see it?
I don't even understand what the repercussions for the wider world are for posting a hilarious polygonal vagina anyway. Who does it harm? Maybe the kids can stay off PSN and we as adults can continue sharing video game genitals and headshots.
To be blunt, it's tough, the TOS is pretty broad, so you could potentially get banned for a number of things.
As for what harm it does, nothing to me, but I guess that if the share system isn't age gated, and even mature content gets pushed to everyone, then there is an issue.
How Sony deal with that issue is up to them, like I said, we all agree to the TOS when we sign up, so even if you think it's not sensible, you still have to abide by it, or risk getting a ban.