Dynamic as low as 832x624, 51,792 pixels, versus 2,073,600 pixels.
That's a forty fold increase.
Check your math buddy no offense. It's 4x.
Dynamic as low as 832x624, 51,792 pixels, versus 2,073,600 pixels.
That's a forty fold increase.
Unless there's a miraculous day one patch for the Xbox one version I don't see how it's possible.
No, it's not. 50k x 4 is 200k, not 2m.Check your math buddy no offense. It's 4x.
Would it really surprise you if Phil Spencer and Albert Penello did actually know the resolution of the game?I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with wanting to know the truth, but flat saying they are deliberate liar is another matter entirely.
Check your math buddy no offense. It's 4x.
Truer words have never been spoken. It's a no win situation.
Dynamic as low as 832x624, 51,792 pixels, versus 2,073,600 pixels.
That's a forty fold increase.
According to Digital Foundry: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-face-off
Thank you sirs!864x720
360 is 880x720
No, it's not. 50k x 4 is 200k, not 2m.
Albert, just wanted to say that I think you're doing a good job.
You can't let nobody hold you down. You can't let nobody take your pride. Ya gotta keep on moving past these haters.
Forza and that basketball game so far.Not trying to troll or anything, am genuinely curious - does the Xbox One actually have any games that are 100% confirmed as running in 1080p?
Not trying to troll or anything, am genuinely curious - does the Xbox One actually have any games that are 100% confirmed as running in 1080p?
Not trying to troll or anything, am genuinely curious - does the Xbox One actually have any games that are 100% confirmed as running in 1080p?
As an individual then, do you believe personally that the fact those in that seperate organization are keeping mum for this long while Sony gleefully goes about saying "native 1080p" implies something negative?
As a gamer, completely dispassionately Albert, and without the dressing: do you as a person with an opinion believe that this indicates we shouldn't all be starting to draw some very real conclusions?
Better question, if you were Microsoft and you already knew your resolution was significantly lower than the competition, how would you handle it?
Dynamic as low as 832x624, 51,792 pixels, versus 2,073,600 pixels.
That's a forty fold increase.
He has a tough job. He's here to control the message and it is difficult to do when you are working with a product that has been designed and modified so much since its reveal.I just feel sorry for Albert whenever tech talk comes up. He's clearly not a technical guy, no offense meant, and it just makes it seem to some users like he's hiding something when he actually just plain doesn't know. The technical fellow situation just made things worse since the TF clearly didn't think that GAF would be able to dissect the claims as much as we did and Albert got shot as the messenger.
No, it's not. 50k x 4 is 200k, not 2m.
When you put it this way, I mostly agree.
However, this is the very first measurable confirmation of something we've suspected since early this year, that multiplatform games would perform better on PS4's hardware.
It's kind of a big deal.
Better question, if you were Microsoft and you already knew your resolution was significantly lower than the competition, how would you handle it?
Delay the game? Delay the console?
Admit it and claim you have more exclusives and dedicated servers (lol)
Or just keep silence and hope you get as many sales as possible till Digital Foundry roles around?
When did sony confirm it was running at 1080p on ps4??
Of course not. First, Call of Duty has nothing to fear from the sales of Killzone. Nothing at all. Second imo, even if it was 720p on PS4, the sales would not be that negatively impacted versus Killzone.
And finally, and most importantly, that's usually not how it works. Why didn't many last-gen games feel the need to compete with the native 720p games?
When did sony confirm it was running at 1080p on ps4??
Just not mention the word "native" in your promo materials, that's all.
When did sony confirm it was running at 1080p on ps4??
Forza and that basketball game so far.
Forza 5 and NBA 2K14. That's the only ones I can think of right now.
Forza 5. And 60fps!
Albert please ask your friend which looks better on the X1... COD Ghost or BF4?
Regardless of resolution gamers loyal to the Xbox brand who are moving on to X1 need to know what game to support this coming gen (evil smile)!
Oh shit, my bad yeah.The 832x624 bit.
No, it's not. 50k x 4 is 200k, not 2m.
no it's not
50,000 x4 = 200,000
not 2 million
I've gotta agree with Albert here. Not the coolest way to engage him or MS.
I'm not convinced he doesn't know, but I'll bet it's true that he can't say.
HOWEVER, if he couldn't say, he never should have chimed in.
OhToday. Brasil game show.
.Pretty much. It's amusing. It's ultimately silly. Some people just want to watch the world burn, and I can admit that sometimes I'm one of them.
I just feel sorry for Albert whenever tech talk comes up. He's clearly not a technical guy, no offense meant, and it just makes it seem to some users like he's hiding something when he actually just plain doesn't know. The technical fellow situation just made things worse since the TF clearly didn't think that GAF would be able to dissect the claims as much as we did and Albert got shot as the messenger.
No, it's not. 50k x 4 is 200k, not 2m.
I've actually seen them both running. So here you go and you won't like my answer: since both companies are partners with us, I'm not going to say. I do have an opinion, but I'll wait for the community to decide.
Today during the Brazil conference. Adam Boyes dropping elbows son!
Do you really think GAF would be satisfied with them just saying "it runs at 1080p"
You know damn well Amir0x would follow up with - "native?"
I've actually seen them both running. So here you go and you won't like my answer: since both companies are partners with us, I'm not going to say. I do have an opinion, but I'll wait for the community to decide.
Not trying to troll or anything, am genuinely curious - does the Xbox One actually have any games that are 100% confirmed as running in 1080p?
Not at all. You, as a student of the industry, should know that there are MANY factors at play here. Marketing deals, state of the code, competitive pressures. We show stuff at E3 first then gets announced later for PS, then they show something that gets announced later for us. There are a ton of examples of this.
Why did NBA show on PS4 then immediately disclose 1080p on Xbox One? Why isn’t Activision saying anything? Why are certain games showing first on ours, or first on theirs? Why go games get delayed? Quality? Tuning?
You should know by now that there is never one answer in all these cases. Sometimes it’s bad, sometimes it’s not.
I’ll be bummed if it’s true. But the fact nobody is saying anything doesn’t make me jump to conclusions.
I'll put this here for this interested
http://www.ign.com/videos/2013/10/24/call-of-duty-ghosts-squads-squad-vs-squad-gameplay
It's gameplay on Whiteout, it's still doesn't scream "next-gen" but it's much better looking than Octane.
I'm just wondering how a game with last gen graphics, is lower resolution than the last cod on the 360. Can someone explain how it makes any sense.
Fixed.Dynamic as low as 832x624, 519,792 pixels, versus 2,073,600 pixels.
That's a four fold increase.
I think you're confused.
What game is running at a lower game than the las COD on 360 ?