I don't think that's why people are disappointed, Kotaku...
Different people can be disappointed for different reasons and, get this, a single person can even be disappointed for multiple reasons at the same time. I know, mindblowing.
I don't think that's why people are disappointed, Kotaku...
They really should have stuck with the playersexual approach from DA2. Harder to disappoint people that way.
My Shepard was celibate until they added gay male romances, if these half fleshed out ones are the only options in Andromeda, I guess my Ryder will have to go the same route, this is really disappointing after Dragon Age Inquisition, hell they even brought up the concept of homophobia in that game, I thought Bioware had moved past this...
Unfortunately, the people who make Dragon Age aren't the same ones who make Mass Effect. The Dragon Age team seems to generally be a whole lot better at inclusiveness and LGBT+ content.
Focus on better romance subplots with better characters instead of this open world approach to banging ("You see that person in the distance? You can bang them.")
Unfortunately, the people who make Dragon Age aren't the same ones who make Mass Effect. The Dragon Age team seems to generally be a whole lot better at inclusiveness and LGBT+ content.
God no, that was the worst.
And hopefully this spate of bad press and fan umbrage prompts them to integrate more gay romances in patches and DLC, to balance the scales. They'd generate a tremendous amount of good will (at a time when they need it badly) if they did that.
Patrick Weekes, who took over Gaider's role as the lead writer on Dragon Age, recently came out as pansexual.Unfortunately David Gaider no longer works there, but they still have aware and receptive writers as far as I know.
There are pros and cons to it, for me. The con is that you can't specifically have character arcs like Dorian. The pro is that you could romance a plot relevant character, where they were male or female, regardless of sexuality. If you want a plot relevant romance for some drama in DA2, Anders and Isabela had overarching plot relevant roles, as opposed to Fenris and Merrill who weren't directly plot related. Bioware is also kind of a bit dodge in that the leading plot characters out of your companions are always straight, and the LGB characters are the same archetypes over and over. Liara, Dorian and kinda Kaidan are the first ones to break the mould, though Kaidan might not even be in your game depending on your ME1 choices. Morrigan/Miranda/Cassandra/Cora and Alistair/Cullen/DA:I's spoiler character/Liam/(possibly Jaal?) are all more relevant to the main plot, and are all straight romances. In comparison, the supporting rogue-ish types, Leliana/Zevran/Sera/Josie/Iron Bull are more diverse in their sexualities, and in what I think has been an entirely accidental unfortunate implication, they all stray towards the criminal side of things with their pasts. Cortez and Traynor break this mould, but they are barely in ME3. Until Bioware stops making the more plot relevant characters automatically straight, whilst also reusing the same archetypes over and over again, I'd prefer a DA2 approach.
Different people can be disappointed for different reasons and, get this, a single person can even be disappointed for multiple reasons at the same time. I know, mindblowing.
How about being disappointed that the entire game is shit. lol
How about being disappointed that the entire game is shit. lol
I'm still looking for that alien romance that leaves you in the med bay shaking uncontrollably. You know like the sand pit monster from Star Wars comes out of the pants and latches on. Something terrifying and transformative.
Edit: Or they eat you like a scorpion and it's game over, be creative.
I mean you're literally saying they put less effort in gay male representation, is that not unfair enough for you ?honestly, most of the romance encounters in these games have been kind of underwhelming tbqh. The people who want male on male romance are, im guessing, a very small minority of the player base so its not at all surprising if they put even less effort than usual. Unless this is somehow unfair? id like to know why its not fair if thats the case.
honestly, most of the romance encounters in these games have been kind of underwhelming tbqh. The people who want male on male romance are, im guessing, a very small minority of the player base so its not at all surprising if they put even less effort than usual. Unless this is somehow unfair? id like to know why its not fair if thats the case.
I mean you're literally saying they put less effort in gay male representation, is that not unfair enough for you ?
Right, I'll give you an example.
Jimmy is a straight guy. Jimmy likes Mass Effect so he buys Mass Effect: Andromeda for 60$. Throughout the game, he can choose one of three female LIs - all of whom are squadmates, all of whom have unique faces, extensive romance content, loyalty missions and two of whom get fully animated sex scenes - and two female flings specifically made for straight guys. And if Jimmy ever wants to play as a female Ryder (I know, who would want that? Silly me.), there'll be three lesbian romances for him to pick from, most of which have been designed for straight guys like him.
John is a gay guy. John likes Mass Effect so he buys Mass Effect: Andromeda for 60$. Throughout the game, he can choose one of one male LIs - who isn't a squadmate, has a generic character creator face, shoddily thrown together, unpolished romance content, no loyalty missions and no proper sex scene - and one male fling whose entire romance content was sloppily copy-pasted from its straight counterpart.
Does that sound fair to you?
(And let's not forget that they profit from having a reputation for being inclusive and LGBT-friendly. They can't, on the one hand, claim that and profit from it and, on the other hand, treat gay male players like an afterthought.)
It really is a shame that Liam and JaalRight, I'll give you an example.
Jimmy is a straight guy. Jimmy likes Mass Effect so he buys Mass Effect: Andromeda for 60$. Throughout the game, he can choose one of three female LIs - all of whom are squadmates, all of whom have unique faces, extensive romance content, loyalty missions and two of whom get fully animated sex scenes - and two female flings specifically made for straight guys. And if Jimmy ever wants to play as a female Ryder (I know, who would want that? Silly me.), there'll be three lesbian romances for him to pick from, most of which have been designed for straight guys like him.
John is a gay guy. John likes Mass Effect so he buys Mass Effect: Andromeda for 60$. Throughout the game, he can choose one of one male LIs - who isn't a squadmate, has a generic character creator face, shoddily thrown together, unpolished romance content, no loyalty missions and no proper sex scene - and one male fling whose entire romance content was sloppily copy-pasted from its straight counterpart.
Does that sound fair to you?
You're actively avoiding them but you know them to be universally terrible?Nobody's missing much. The relationships in the game are universally terrible. Bioware hasn't had good romance options since before Dragon Age 2. I've been actively avoiding every single Andromeda relationship; it's a mess.
After Drack's loyalty mission,It really is a shame that Liam and Jaalaren't on the table for male Ryders. Why won't they give us what we all wantand Drack?and make a romanceable Krogan
After Drack's loyalty mission,Scott(maybe Sara too, not sure) has a flirt option with Drack. It's just a joke though, sadly.
You really don't see why fans are disappointed when they have only 2 romances available and they're not even fleshed out (no squadmates, no custom face, barely any development, etc) ? Just look at the picture in the OP lol. I don't see how catering to straight males means you can't also make an effort to please your LGBT fans, which Bioware has plenty of. Dragon Age Inquisition handled it much better 3 years ago.unfair based on which expectations? unless its worse than their usual (havent checked it out for the new game). Unfortunately if you want that romance, bioware will always cater to the largest demographic which, im just guessing here, is disproportionately straight male.
You really don't see why fans are disappointed when they have only 2 romances available and they're not even fleshed out (no squadmates, no custom face, barely any development, etc) ? Just look at the picture in the OP lol. I don't see how catering to straight males means you can't also make an effort to please your LGBT fans, which Bioware has plenty of. Dragon Age Inquisition handled it much better 3 years ago.
I can't really understand how this happened to begin with. Sure having not everyone be pansexual and having actual character is great. But this is a game filled with aliens.
Why aren't at least the aliens bi fi they didn't want to create a fleshed out male gay character? It is not too much to think that if aliens can overcome being an entire different species they can overcome the sex of the main character. Combine that with the gay romances going to black and I doubt it was just an oversight.
Especially since the Lesbian options are pretty great.
I never play as male so according to much of the internet this should not really bother me but the only joy I got out of DA:I was shamelessly flirting with Dorian.
He really added depth to a game I hated.
I mean, just to shoot down that little bit of logic, if you can overcome the difference in species to be attracted to an alien, surely you can at least overcome the difference in gender, right? Even if you're gay, why would Vetra's gender matter if her species isn't a deal breaker?
Not that I disagree that there should be more gay romances. I totally do. This little bit just struck me as funny.
Bioware gay romance options have always been scraps to me anyway. Dragon Age had Zevran (!?) but no Anders. Mass Effect 3 had no Johnny Vega (or whatever his name was). DA:I had Dorian which was a better attempt I guess but still not to my tastes. So, it's pretty sad that things have actually regressed but it was never anything worth writing home about in the first place. Still, better than nothing I guess.