But Eurogamer said those two things ran on actual PS4 hardware. If that is false then Eurogamer needs to be called out for falling for it, as they should know better and Sony and Ubisoft for deceiving their potential customers.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
New Planetside 2 Screens on [PC]
- Thread starter TheRealTalker
- Start date
TheRealTalker
Banned
With a logo like this, you know you can trust them!
I mean, the dragon is winking at you, how could you not believe everything it says it?
Ugh I've been duped... I guess we should close this thread then
I'll tell my future children to never trust dragons again
smh..wow
Horse Armour
Member
Wow, looks amazing. You can really tell that they're pushing the PS4 in those shots, they're clearly making good use of the jump to 8GB GDDR5 RAM which isn't that surprising considering that they're a first party studio.
Goddammit Horse Armour, lol.
Goldrusher
Member
The majority of the screens in your post aren't even on that blog.
Things that are deceptions come out eventually - when you're playing the game. Just learn not to believe everything you see instead. You don't have to look far into the past with either (or any) company. For example, watch dogs has been downgraded in a whole bunch of ways since its initial high end PC reveal. And the frame rate on the new consoles is still not maintaining 30.
Battlefield 4 "on Xbox one" at e3 was running on the highest end amd 8 core CPU, 16gb of memory, and 2 crossfired 6gb 7990s. I haven't seen anyone in the press call anyone out for it.
diffusionx
Gold Member
It looks as good as the PC game on my machine, and I play it at max/near max settings.
I really think people are going to be happy with this gen.'
edit: oh...
I really think people are going to be happy with this gen.'
edit: oh...
Freedom = $1.05
Banned
The real question is what could they have done if they had 9 gigs of GDDR5 RAM. Man, they really blew it with the ram situation next gen...
KINGofCRA5H
Member
Welp, I think MrBig here would know.
They would have obviously done 4K resolution with 8XMSAA.
I think a downgrade over the life of a game's development is accepted (not liked) and expected. See BioShock: Infinite or Far Cry 3.
There is a difference when you claim that a game is running on a console and it isn't true. That's why I think it would be good if people that know about the foul play that took place are revealing this.
You added screenshots that weren't even on that site. So either you knew it was a fake or were deliberately trying to cover yourself up.
TheRealTalker
Banned
I got these screens from a forum that later linked it to this website... So Yes It is completely my fault for jumping the gun and I will take all responsibilities for my actions... I'm really sorry GAF my hype for this game made me delusional therefore making me not check my sources if they where creditable... I've flew to close to the sun and got burnt... Awaiting punishment ;(
I shall also never post a thread again and will accept a ban in posting if presented
TheRealTalker
Banned
http://gamrconnect.********.com/thread.php?id=156117&page=467
Place also had the new Infamous Screens, researched for source and came across this website
http://blog.gamingdragons.com/2013/0...side-2-on-ps4/
Yet again I take all responsibility for not finding a creditable source I just assumed they could be true
Playsation_
Banned
Ploid 3.0
Member
OMG hahhhahahaha
We need to have a laugh every now and then. We're not laughing at you, but at the site. Join us.
We need to have a laugh every now and then. We're not laughing at you, but at the site. Join us.
TheRealTalker
Banned
Thanks... it was just a slow news day and I happened to stumble upon it... becoming too hyped I posted this thread without thinking T_T
TheRealTalker
Banned
After really looking into it... no there is none... keeping a lid on it till SOE live
BadAss2961
Member
Obvious tag moment.
Ok so hopefully in 10 days.
TheRealTalker
Banned
SneakyStephan
Banned
the gaf screenshot is funny, instantly recognised it from the screenshot thread
Game junnalism...
Sure it will , with the render distance set to 500 maybe.
If it takes a 4.5 ghz quad core i5 to play the game at 60 fps (which is several times more powerful) , then a 1.6ghz jaguar is going to just shit itself.
Game junnalism...
Sure it will , with the render distance set to 500 maybe.
If it takes a 4.5 ghz quad core i5 to play the game at 60 fps (which is several times more powerful) , then a 1.6ghz jaguar is going to just shit itself.
schwabdizzle
Banned
Preinstall that shit on my PS4 Sony.
Imagine if they gave it the infinite power the Xbox One has. Infinite player battles! 2000? Meh.
Yes this will certainly look inferior to the version that's on more powerful hardware like the ps4.
MMO Shooter set in a giant world is the answer.
RibbedHero
Member
I believe it was set texture quality value to 0. But they've added "ultra" textures a while back in the in-game settings, so it's pointless now.
i thought they had a shit ton of optimization to due for multicore processors still...not saying its gonna be ultra on ps4 but upper mid at a locked 30fps with a serious draw distance is probably doable.
Even if its mid to mid low, the scale of the game justifies it...it will be a unique offering on consoles for sure.
Now Im gonna load it up on my wheezing laptop and see if there are any updates..
No, but it would be awesome to see it look like that at 60fps.
I wonder what framerate they're targeting.
Pops Maellard
Member
Thirty seems pretty likely, even on a high end rig the game is pretty difficult to run at a solid 60/ultra/1080p. I'd guess medium/30fps.
The above are PC Beta screenshots at lowest settings
lol
I'd be shocked if they were targeting 60 since they said they were aiming for Ultra settings visuals. I just hope it's a steady 30 without tearing.