For clarification: are these the 'free' games that we'll get when Nintendo start charging for their online services?
No, these are actually published by Hamster as part of their Arcade Archives series.For clarification: are these the 'free' games that we'll get when Nintendo start charging for their online services?
No, these are actually published by Hamster as part of their Arcade Archives series.
Alright, cool. So we can hope they'll be something different? I was under the impression Nintendo might just reduce the price of these in the store and make these the free titles for their online.
|OT| Hamster does what Nintendon't
Can't wait for Super Punchout
Remember, not Super Punchout From the SNES, but arcade Punch Out.
Also, cool flyer.
Bad game to launch it with imo. Not a fan of hamster as compared to M2.
Just not into this at all.
They should really have found a way to get original donkey Kong here.
ARCADE super punchout
$8... pass.
lol $8? Weren't NES games for Wii only $5? Seems a little steep for arcade titles.
Riiiiiiight...$8 for the original Mario Bros.??
Ah yes. Very good.
Which version will be the Arcade Archive release?
I live in Chicago so that might be why our expectations differ...Yeah, less than the cost of an average lunch in NYC.
These are also priced the same as Hamster's other ACA releases on the Switch. Unless they start suddenly charging more for NES games I don't see the problem here?
$8... pass.
Woah ahah, the Mario art from this era is always off model in the most fascinating ways. You'll never see a goomba or koopa that grotesque these days!
I'm really not interested in paying for any "classic" Nintendo arcade games. I really think Nintendo took off as a game developer after Super Mario Bros.
However, if they wanted to port their more recent arcade games like Mario Kart Arcade GP, F-Zero AX, Luigi's Mansion Arcade or Cruis'n Blast, I'm all over that!
I really want original Donkey Kong
DOesnt mean I cant like the price. VC titles are overpriced, this is overpriced. I would love to have it but Im not spending 8 dollars. I spent 8dollars and got a ton of games just the other day. The value proposition is not there for me.Yeah, less than the cost of an average lunch in NYC.
These are also priced the same as Hamster's other ACA releases on the Switch. Unless they start suddenly charging more for NES games I don't see the problem here?
I think Ill wait for this 1st.
Ikegami Tsushinki?Yeah, Mario Bros can be fun with two people, but yeah.. DK should have launched this. Nintendo should just buy out the company who has some of the DK rights or something.
Just do it Nintendo!
For Vs. Wrecking Crew, the 1984 Japanese arcade flyer had two nondescript heroes.
Then Nintendo decided to change the heroes To Mario & Luigi.
Why is this so expensive?
I'm happy regular ACA are finally Switch bound but I wish more than just Nintendo had been announced. I still want stuff like Bubble Bobble and Gradius.
Ikegami Tsushinki?
From a quick googling their market cap is around $100m USD and Toshiba is their largest shareholder with a 20% stake. They mainly develop, supply and service broadcast equipment though so not much crossover with Nintendo's businesses. Also there might still be bad blood on a corporate level.
DOesnt mean I cant like the price. VC titles are overpriced, this is overpriced. I would love to have it but Im not spending 8 dollars. I spent 8dollars and got a ton of games just the other day. The value proposition is not there for me.
$8 for Mario Bros?
I wish folks weren't willing to pay this ripoff price. Then maybe Nintendo would stop with this bullshit.
I think Ill wait for this 1st.
Regarding Donkey Kong
Nintendo has never rereleased it (outside of the inclusion in that one DK64 level) because they probably don't actually own the rights to it.
Many of Nintendo's earliest arcade games, Donkey Kong included, were programmed by an outside company named Ikegami Tsushinki when Nintendo themselves didn't really have many in-house programmers. When Nintendo reverse engineered the code to make Donkey Kong Jr. by themselves, Ikegami Tsushinki sued Nintendo and argued that they owned DK's programming. They settled out of court.