Interfectum
Member
Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
It also launched with better games, sans Zelda.
Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
Is that the worst launch line up ever? No, seriously ... that's really dismal.
Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
Why does timing matter when it still has 4x more games and major franchises?Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
Why are people bringing up the PS4 launch? That console launched more than three years ago, not in the middle of a gen.
Look, it's not amazing, but there are some genuinely good games that launched on PS4. Yes, some were ports of old games, but there was at least a lot of them. Here are some good games.Like what? Ryse? Knack? Yearly sports games?
People were memeing PS4 HAS NO GAMES for months. Saying they had good launch games is revisionist bullshit.
Bomberman is $60? Lmao.
It's funny because diehard Wii-U fans would never stop comparing the current Wii-U offerings to the launch PS4/XB1 offerings...Right they should really compare it to the current libraries, but let's be real, that's not going to happen.
Another thing, what is with all of these ridiculously high priced games that should be $20 digital titles?
Super Bomberman R is $60
Minecraft is $60
1, 2, Switch is $50
Ultra Street Fighter 2 is $40
Puyo Puyo Tetris is $40
You can't be serious, right? Almost every launch since the Wii has not even had a killer app. Yeah this isn't great but it has Zelda and that's far more than any launch has had in a very long time.
PS4 had jack shit to buy with launch. Resogun was basically the best game on it for months. Xbox One had Dead Rising 3 and Ryse. Hardly anything to get excited about.
Speaking of bad PlayStation launches, what about the PS3 one? It only had Resistance which was supposedly disappointing, and then multiplats that were better on 360. And the thing was SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS. Worse than Switch IMO
Look, it's not amazing, but there are some genuinely good games that launched on PS4. Yes, some were ports of old games, but there was at least a lot of them. Here are some good games.
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag
Battlefield 4
Flower
Injustice: Gods Among Us - Ultimate Edition
Killzone Shadow Fall (I maintain that this is excellent)
Need for Speed Rivals
Resogun
Sound Shapes
Trine 2: Complete Story
Warframe
Yeah, certainly not amazing, but a really good Assassin's Creed? BF4? A great NFS game? Resogun?! Those are solid titles.
It's a mediocre launch but the only shining star for Switch is Zelda. That's a heck of a launch title and probably better than any of those PS4 titles but...the rest is pretty awful.
These prices are absurd. Has Nintendo lost their minds? They're sending this thing out to die.
Which context?You get me wrong, I'm saying that context matters. Just pointing at the PS4 launch and going "See? That one did not launch with anything great" is pointless. Totally different context.
Didnt it also had brand new 2 resident evil game for it one at launch one at few months later?Not bad. Zelda, Mario Kart, and Splatoon within the 1st few months. Miles ahead of 3DS which only had Nintendogs, Street fighter 4, and Pilotwings Resort for the first 5 months. Should be an interesting E3.
keep smoking that pipe.
This looks far better than the Wii U first year. Zelda BOTW, Splatoon 2, Arms, Mario, and Xenoblade 2 already make it much better in comparison.
I'm also expecting some smaller titles will still be announced for the second half of the year at e3.
Bringing up the PS4's launch lineup doesn't make the Switch launch not shit. The thing is a glorified Zelda box for it's first two months and then a re-release of Mario Kart comes out.
It's funny because diehard Wii-U fans would never stop comparing the current Wii-U offerings to the launch PS4/XB1 offerings...
It's a Neo-Geo comp. Too bad, I was hoping it would have some of the other stuff available on PS4. Nothing against Neo-Geo of course, just that I probably have most of those games in other compilations or VC. Hopefully it's got some cool new features!
AND the annual sports games that people buy in droves
Is that the worst launch line up ever? No, seriously ... that's really dismal.
:lol people actually defending the launch. If you have wii u theres no reason to get switch. Hopefully they have a shit load of virtual console games ready for launch.
PLEASE help me understand something. You have virtual console games from numerous platforms and can use for an advantage. Why not use that as an initiative to get people on board. Launch the console with some free virtual console games. At the very least there is SOME incentive to buying at launch.
Come on this is simple
N64's North American launch was worse or at least comparably bad. If I remember correctly, it was just Super Mario 64 and Pilotwings. Not a great lineup, but I'm looking forward to Zelda and Super Bomberman R.
I was just going to mention this, the only saving grace could be having a decent virtual console lineup but I have heard nothing.:lol people actually defending the launch. If you have wii u theres no reason to get switch. Hopefully they have a shit load of virtual console games ready for launch.
This is insane. How can you blame 3rd parties? Their goal is to make money and maximize profit. Why would you take the risk of bothering with the Switch before it's proven? What would 3rd parties have to gain? Those resources would probably provide greater return and less risk on any other platform.
It's Nintendo's job to convince people to get on their platform, they haven't done it, and they're not going to.
You just described two online-only games and an online-mostly game, two of which have their primary business model through IAP microtransaction gambling, something that it's not even clear if the Switch supports. Your pitch for these games is that they might sell a million extra copies (that would be about a 1.5% increase in overall sales for GTA5 and a maybe 3-4% increase for Overwatch) for people who want to play them on the go (something that's not technically possible because it doesn't support 4G data, unless by on the go you mean around your house, in which case, like, ...?)
Another thing, what is with all of these ridiculously high priced games that should be $20 digital titles?
Super Bomberman R is $60
Minecraft is $60
1, 2, Switch is $50
Ultra Street Fighter 2 is $40
Puyo Puyo Tetris is $40
Another thing, what is with all of these ridiculously high priced games that should be $20 digital titles?
Super Bomberman R is $60
Minecraft is $60
1, 2, Switch is $50
Ultra Street Fighter 2 is $40
Puyo Puyo Tetris is $40
GameStop Page said:Product Details:
A fast paced 1 to 8 player party action game that fully utilizes the new and unique Nintendo Switch!
Pricing not confirmed by Publisher
Bomberman, the iconic party-battle game, is returning as "SUPER BOMBERMAN R" on the Nintendo Switch and will be released alongside the launch of the new system for home and on-the-go fun!
N64's North American launch was worse or at least comparably bad. If I remember correctly, it was just Super Mario 64 and Pilotwings. Not a great lineup, but I'm looking forward to Zelda and Super Bomberman R.
Didn't dev kits go out to third party devs very late/only to a small handful of devs? The reason Sony and Microsoft get such strong 3rd party support is because they literally design their consoles with input from their devs. They bend over backwards to appease the devs for the promise of their support. Nintendo has a looooong history of not giving a damn about 3rd party devs (or actively screwing them over). This has squat to do with devs not liking image. Nintendo never courts devs. Sony and Microsoft do.It really isn't insane and Nintendo don't need to convince anybody. Sony and MS didn't convince anybody and they got the third party support. 3rd parties took risk supporting PS4 early on knowing that PS3 had a rough start and Vita was basically dead on arrival. Nothing is guaranteed. Plus I believe Nintendo are trying their best to convince people to support their system, but they always get rejected.
Nintendo always get rejected because of their image. Third parties see Nintendo as a toymaker instead of a videogame company and Nintendo have been trying to prove otherwise for years, by funding Bayonetta 2, Fatal Frame, Devil's Turd. But that image is stuck on them and there is no way getting rid of it. If you ask a western third party that why their game is not on Switch, they'd all reply same: "We don't think audience is there". They think Nintendo fans are aged between 6 and 9. They are completely wrong, that audience had migrated to smart devices years ago and Nintendo had been catering to nostalgia crowd since then.
There is only one thing Nintendo can do to have third parties attention: Having Switch sell more than Xbox One and become the number two console in short notice. Is it possible? It certainly is. But they need to dish out serious amount of money for moneyhatted projects, plus they have to put out quality first party software more often.
Ok, bad example. But there are lots of others. How about Deus Ex? Or Hitman? Or Witcher 3?
It really isn't insane and Nintendo don't need to convince anybody. Sony and MS didn't convince anybody and they got the third party support. 3rd parties took risk supporting PS4 early on knowing that PS3 had a rough start and Vita was basically dead on arrival. Nothing is guaranteed. Plus I believe Nintendo are trying their best to convince people to support their system, but they always get rejected.
Nintendo always get rejected because of their image. Third parties see Nintendo as a toymaker instead of a videogame company and Nintendo have been trying to prove otherwise for years, by funding Bayonetta 2, Fatal Frame, Devil's Turd. But that image is stuck on them and there is no way getting rid of it. If you ask a western third party that why their game is not on Switch, they'd all reply same: "We don't think audience is there". They think Nintendo fans are aged between 6 and 9. They are completely wrong, that audience had migrated to smart devices years ago and Nintendo had been catering to nostalgia crowd since then.
There is only one thing Nintendo can do to have third parties attention: Having Switch sell more than Xbox One and become the number two console in short notice. Is it possible? It certainly is. But they need to dish out serious amount of money for moneyhatted projects, plus they have to put out quality first party software more often.
Ok, bad example. But there are lots of others. How about Deus Ex? Or Hitman? Or Witcher 3?