iamshadowlark said:No it doesn't, not at all.
MS will do what wiiu will do. HD disk without the bluray logo. High capacity disk without the bluray playback. MS not will support blueray.
iamshadowlark said:No it doesn't, not at all.
There were rumours at before a few E3s that there would be a Bluray enabled Xbox 360 released. That never came to fruition but those rumours were legitimized by Steve Ballmer mentioning it a few times. They aren't adverse to using Bluray, nor should they be. Sony is 1 of 19 companies that are board members of the Bluray Disc Association. Not to mention that all MS adopting Bluray would do is take a checkbox away from Sony and not really give Sony any sort of major advantage. Movies will still be moving towards streaming regardless of what MS puts in their next Xbox.clashfan said:MS will do what wiiu will do. HD disk without the bluray logo. High capacity disk without the bluray playback. MS not will support blueray.
That could work for Nintendo but MS would be damn fools to not put the HD movie disc standard on their box. Not that this is hurting them with 360, but we are talking about the future. And if you are basing these strong accusations on the thought of MS won't support Blu-ray because of sony that wouldn't be the case.clashfan said:MS will do what wiiu will do. HD disk without the bluray logo. High capacity disk without the bluray playback. MS not will support blueray.
Bluray isn't the future.iamshadowlark said:That could work for Nintendo but MS would be damn fools to not put the HD movie disc standard on their box. Not that this is hurting them with 360, but we are talking about the future. And if you are basing these strong accusations on the thought of MS won't support Blu-ray because of sony that wouldn't be the case.
iamshadowlark said:That could work for Nintendo but MS would be damn fools to not put the HD movie disc standard on their box. Not that this is hurting them with 360, but we are talking about the future. And if you are basing these strong accusations on the thought of MS won't support Blu-ray because of sony that wouldn't be the case.
Alot of ps3 games high-quality/uncompressed audio with multiple language tracks. And I suspect Sony to be alot more generous with hard drive caching.infinityBCRT said:LA Noire only did facial capture, and pretty damn low quality at that (PC version shows how they barely are SD quality). Also, the audio was super compressed in LA Noire. Extrapolate that to full body capture @ higher fidelity and also better audio/uncompressed audio and thats easily more than 50GB if not 100GB.
Yeah, LA Noire is some sort of special case but I can think of others. RAGE for example. That game's source files are in the terabytes if I'm not mistaken. While in general the Mega texture stuff looks okay, with more room they could have had more stages of textures & higher res textures close up.
Yeah. People thinking that MS won't use BDs or some form of it is so off the mark. Sony doesn't own Bluray.
No, but I expect for the majority of the next-gen it will still be dominant. Streaming still doesn't even account for a quarter of the market yet.venne said:Bluray isn't the future.
See above.streaming>>>>physical movies.
thirty said:streaming>>>>physical movies.
there are many benefits for Microsoft.Dreamcast2 said:If Microsoft doesn't use BluRay they will use a proprietary high capacity format like Nintendo is doing with Wii U. No one is bringing HD-DVD back.
Sure... if you want 1-2MB/s video and compressed audio. I'll keep enjoying my Blu-rays with high bitrate video and audio.thirty said:streaming>>>>physical movies.
1)Im pretty sure whatever stake they had died alongside the formatpr0cs said:there are many benefits for Microsoft.
1) they're a primary stakeholder in HD-DVD
2) the format is DOA which means it's as close to a proprietary format as you can get
3) the process to create HD-DVD is similar to DVD so finding manufacturers should be straightfoward
4) hd-dvd drives with performance already exist, (ie: no first gen performance issues)
How can it still be dominant if it's not even dominant now?iamshadowlark said:No, but I expect for the majority of the next-gen it will still be dominant. Streaming still doesn't even account for a quarter of the market yet.
guek said:
not laughing at you since I think you realize how crazy unlikely that is
subversus said:Hex-core CPU, huh? This shit will make our PCs obsolete.
infinityBCRT said:I think 50GB discs are going to be a huge limiting factor though down the road with the next generation. Some games this gen on limited memory hardware are already barely fitting on 3 DVDs on the 360.
Every Xbox has offered movie playback. The next one will be no different.clashfan said:MS will do what wiiu will do. HD disk without the bluray logo. High capacity disk without the bluray playback. MS not will support blueray.
They would pocket the savings from licensing in that scenario, not hand it over to the customer. The hardware would still cost the same.REK said:The Original Xbox did not allow DVD playback out of the box. You had to purchase an infrared plug that came with a remote to activate DVD playback. It was a separate purchase. I don't see why they cannot do the same with Bluray except this time you download an app to activate playback for a price. I have no problem with that! This way they can use Bluray capacity and monetize the cost of the license to the consumer.
DVD/Bluray represent about 80% of the market. I should've been more clear.bigtroyjon said:How can it still be dominant if it's not even dominant now?
I'm looking at what the upper bound of games could be. Full body motion capture would take a shitload of data, but its probably the best way to make convincing human characters. And MotionScan isn't the only tech out there, AMD has been working for years on similar technology.dragonelite said:Your joking right if one thing i would be surprised if Next gen still uses prerendered Cutscenes
The hardware should be good enough that we dont need it. But then again how will devs hide those loadscreens without there fancy CGI.
Just look at Digital foundry Face off articles most games dont even fill up 2 dvds worth of Game Assets. KZ3 and other with around 40 gig data or using a crap load of CGI cutscene with duplicates for 3D cutscenes.
If one thing Skyrim should be a good indication what a game can be with almost all game Assets. People can still not believe its only 5 gig.
Dont know how much better compression tech can get but with more cpu/gpu resources you can use better compression and decompression algorithms which is what you want if you want to read as much info and as fast as possible. But dont think game size will shrink.
Atleast this a my newbie programmer point of view
Megatexture is a different beast entirely. It shouldn't be used as a focal point in this particular situation.infinityBCRT said:I'm looking at what the upper bound of games could be. Full body motion capture would take a shitload of data, but its probably the best way to make convincing human characters. And MotionScan isn't the only tech out there, AMD has been working for years on similar technology.
And RAGE is another example, a game where theres tons of unique textures. Sure Skyrim is only 3.8 GB, but if you look off in the distance you'll see tons of repeated ground textures for example. Using MegaTexture technology they could easily fill up a Bluray for the next Elder Scrolls game if they choose to do that.
If you want games to have unique textures and allow artists to be artists and not have to think about texture budgets, then yes, technologies like Megatexture will be very important going forward.iamshadowlark said:Megatexture is a different beast entirely. It shouldn't be used as a focal point in this particular situation.
95 out of 100 people won't care.infinityBCRT said:And RAGE is another example, a game where theres tons of unique textures. Sure Skyrim is only 3.8 GB, but if you look off in the distance you'll see tons of repeated ground textures for example. Using MegaTexture technology they could easily fill up a Bluray for the next Elder Scrolls game if they choose to do that.
Its implentation in RAGE is pretty disappointing, but that is a whole different conversation. Also on consoles, unique textures is way more of a ram/drive speed limitation than a purely storage space one. There is plenty of room for unique textures and they could be streamed if read speeds were fast enough.infinityBCRT said:If you want games to have unique textures and allow artists to be artists and not have to think about texture budgets, then yes, technologies like Megatexture will be very important going forward.
If RAM was fast enough, we'd only need 640k as well (according to Bill Gates).iamshadowlark said:Its implentation in RAGE is pretty disappointing, but that is a whole different conversation. Also on consoles, unique textures is way more of a ram/drive speed limitation than a purely storage space one. There is plenty of room for unique textures and they could be streamed if read speeds were fast enough.
venne said:95 out of 100 people won't care.
thirty said:streaming>>>>physical movies.
Convenience will always trump quality. Physical media's death is inevitable.Marty Chinn said:You mean the other way around right? Because there's no way what you said is remotely true.
Slayer-33 said:6 core CPU
Dual GPU
4 gigs of system ram
2 gigs of vram
Wifi
Bluetooth
1TB HDD / 2 TB option
Blueray
Super sleek settop box design
System form fit Kinect+ attachment
XBL for a year
HDMI cable
Controller
$499 price point
-
-
$350 tard pack
-no wifi
-8GB internal "HDD" memory
-no kinect
-3 months of XBL
I dunno. Renting for that one time pop of $5 is better than buying for $20 and watching it once. Yes it's lesser quality but it's good enough and more and more people are streaming. I could see them going the playback kit route or having some unlock download for bluray playback unless it's only 2 or 3$ to include licensed playback. I've seen bluray fall to the 9.99 section at best buy and I still won't bite. Last one I bought was wall e I think. They simply take up too much space. And for those who still watch, a device is more than likely already in the home. There's no explosive benefit to it these days.krypt0nian said:Not for some years yet.
Slayer-33 said:6 core CPU ... 3-4 cores with 2 or 4 Threads/clock will be sufficient I guess
Dual GPU ... What's the point?
4 gigs of system ram ... The half would be sufficient
2 gigs of vram ... Again
Wifi ... Sure
Bluetooth ... Sure
1TB HDD / 2 TB option ... Likely the former
Blueray ... BluRay
Super sleek settop box design ... I would adore a HiFi rack design more than a settop box design
System form fit Kinect+ attachment ... Likely
XBL for a year ... Likely
HDMI cable ... Sure
Controller ... Sure
$499 price point ... Too expensive, 400 max.
-
-
$350 tard pack ... Then this price would also make sense (these 4 points aren't worth 150$)
-no wifi
-8GB internal "HDD" memory
-no kinect
-3 months of XBL
disap.ed said:Fixed this for you
You are joking right? If all cutscenes were realtime there'd be long pauses between scenes that were set in different areas, as the game would have to load a totally new set of textures/scenery each time. Not going to happen.dragonelite said:Your joking right if one thing i would be surprised if Next gen still uses prerendered Cutscenes
The hardware should be good enough that we dont need it.
Why did HD DVD die? Couldn't it co-exist with Bluray and why can't it be brought back for Xbox 3?
Sure... if you want 1-2MB/s video and compressed audio. I'll keep enjoying my Blu-rays with high bitrate video and audio.
there are many benefits for Microsoft.
1) they're a primary stakeholder in HD-DVD
2) the format is DOA which means it's as close to a proprietary format as you can get
3) the process to create HD-DVD is similar to DVD so finding manufacturers should be straightfoward
4) hd-dvd drives with performance already exist, (ie: no first gen performance issues)
6 core CPU
Dual GPU
4 gigs of system ram
2 gigs of vram
Wifi
Bluetooth
1TB HDD / 2 TB option
Blueray
Super sleek settop box design
System form fit Kinect+ attachment
XBL for a year
HDMI cable
Controller
$499 price point
-
-
$350 tard pack
-no wifi
-8GB internal "HDD" memory
-no kinect
-3 months of XBL
Very Fuck you.streaming>>>>physical movies.
That could work for Nintendo but MS would be damn fools to not put the HD movie disc standard on their box. Not that this is hurting them with 360, but we are talking about the future. And if you are basing these strong accusations on the thought of MS won't support Blu-ray because of sony that wouldn't be the case.
Not all streaming comes without subtitle support. I've used plenty of streaming services which have it.Very Fuck you.
I hate streaming, It is totally discriminable.
No subtitle support, what about deaf people. So yeah FU for adore streaming.