Death Metalist
Member
Mighty shoes to fill but all the best to him, seems like the best thing to do right now for the time being.
The ball got rolling under Yamauchi and by his directive. If you don't want to count that as his thing, then I don't think anything Kimishima does will matter, either.
Yeah, but there aren't a lot of options there. If you're going to debut something new and possibly strange, you want some degree of familiarity to do it.
I guess it depends on how involved Kimishima is in that type of thing, and I don't know how much he will be. Considering his background, I can't say what he could bring to those types of decisions. Iwata had his design background and Yamauchi had his odd intuition about hits. What exactly does this guy bring to the table? Will he oversee platform designs in a meaningful way? Does he have a vision of gaming all his own or is he more of a raw numbers guy?
I guess we'll find out in the time to come.
That was a great period of success for Nintendo on the hardware front.
No wait, that actually started in 2006...
The U.S. was the only region where GameCube performed decently.That was a great period of success for Nintendo on the hardware front.
No wait, that actually started in 2006...
I hope Kimishima does well, but man, it's just hitting me again how unique and irreplaceable Iwata is. There's just nobody like him in the industry.
I know I shouldn't judge by appearance, but this guy doesn't look that personable.
I don't know. Sony was quite successful with Cerny.
It would be more important to have a person who is 120% behind the console and developement instead of a decades old face just for the sake of it.
Got me there.I don't know, looks like he (laughs) sometimes to me.
I guess it depends on how involved Kimishima is in that type of thing, and I don't know how much he will be. Considering his background, I can't say what he could bring to those types of decisions. Iwata had his design background and Yamauchi had his odd intuition about hits. What exactly does this guy bring to the table? Will he oversee platform designs in a meaningful way? Does he have a vision of gaming all his own or is he more of a raw numbers guy?
I guess we'll find out in the time to come.
Can't wait for him to pop up in his debut direct in a stetson hat with an almighty yeehaw!
That's what my knowledge of America tells me.
Sensible choice. The foundations of Nintendo's creative vision have been laid for the mid-term, an Mr Kimishima sounds appropriate for executing them successfully and moving the company forward.
Incidentally, he doesn't seem to have also taken the role of CEO in either NCL or NoA. I imagine that if different people were to be set for the two roles, the one with the more business background would be set CEO, rather than President / Representative Director. With that in mind, I wouldn't be surprised if he also becomes CEO.
I can see how a lot of younger people really came of age during the Iwata era, and think it's natural that Nintendo would be run by a whimsical man like him, also a developer, etc...
...but I came of age during the Yamauchi era, and the Nintendo I know was ran by a person who didn't just not understand games, he actually kind of hated them!
And this was the superior era of Nintendo to me (no disrespect to the Wii/DS/Iwata era, it's just lesser than NES and SNES to me).
Lots of talk about keeping Nintendo creative and such. But let's remember that Super Mario Bros and Zelda actually emerged from the decree of an old man who didn't care about games and actually just wanted success in the market. Those games were less birthed in Miyamoto's magic workshop, and were more the result of a ruthless business man saying "make something that sells my console!"
We can get amazing games from Nintendo when there is a pure businessman at the top, don't worry about that.
Can't wait for him to pop up in his debut direct in a stetson hat with an almighty yeehaw!
That's what my knowledge of America tells me.
I don't know, looks like he (laughs) sometimes to me.
Cerny is a three decades old face, he's been considerably longer in the industry than Kimishima. And he was a gun for hire, whereas Kimishima has been with Nintendo for a long time.
Kimishima drinks confirmed.Kimishima laughs confirmed.
The U.S. was the only region where GameCube performed decently.
Do you really believe that Iwata did that kind of micromanagement? Videogame dev background doesn't mean a lot as president.
Do you really believe that Iwata did that kind of micromanagement? Videogame dev background doesn't mean a lot as president.
I can see how a lot of younger people really came of age during the Iwata era, and think it's natural that Nintendo would be run by a whimsical man like him, also a developer, etc...
...but I came of age during the Yamauchi era, and the Nintendo I know was ran by a person who didn't just not understand games, he actually kind of hated them!
And this was the superior era of Nintendo to me (no disrespect to the Wii/DS/Iwata era, it's just lesser than NES and SNES to me).
Lots of talk about keeping Nintendo creative and such. But let's remember that Super Mario Bros and Zelda actually emerged from the decree of an old man who didn't care about games and actually just wanted success in the market. Those games were less birthed in Miyamoto's magic workshop, and were more the result of a ruthless business man saying "make something that sells my console!"
We can get amazing games from Nintendo when there is a pure businessman at the top, don't worry about that.
I absolutely believe that Iwata was very involved in both game and hardware development. He has been widely credited for the original DS and Wii control/system layouts. More recently he went hands on in Q&A with Nintendoland and adjusted the physics for the balloon game to be more similar to the classic one.
He was a very hands-on president.
It can be both though.The C.E.O's job is more about making money for shareholders rather than being a media type personality.
I'd argue that a lot of what made Nintendo great during the NES/SNES days was a combination of the developers at Nintendo and the state of the industry. Keep in mind that, while many would consider NES/SNES Nintendo to be the best era of Nintendo, that's also the era of Nintendo that's responsible for draconian third-party policies that pissed off third-parties and made them develop for other consoles after the SNES era.
That would be a good way to add his own twist to future asks. Every time the interviewee says something great Kimi-kun takes another swig and slowly gets more and more drunk throughout the interview.Kimishima drinks confirmed.
That would be a good way to add his own twist to future asks. Every time the interviewee says something great Kimi-kun takes another swig and slowly gets more and more drunk throughout the interview.
It's good to remember though that a good developer doesn't always make a good president. We have no idea for example if Koizumi would be able to handle the financial side of things, host shareholder meetings, make business deals with global partners, etc.I was hoping that Yoshiaki Koizumi would be groomed to supersede Miyamoto and Iwata in the future.
I really like the guy and I thought that his mentorship and his youth would be something good for Nintendo.
Though he may not particularly want to head that role if asked.
It can be both though.
Iwata undoubtedly had a firm vision as CEO that was directly felt in a variety of ways, including the systems Nintendo produced.
In fact, I think it'd be absurd to hold that Nintendo's output wasn't largely shaped by Iwata during his era or Yamauchi during his.
Yeah, but there aren't a lot of options there. If you're going to debut something new and possibly strange, you want some degree of familiarity to do it.
It's good to remember though that a good developer doesn't always make a good CEO. We have no idea for example if Koizumi would be able to handle the financial side of things, host the shareholder meetings, etc.
It wasn't looks with Iwata. He changed Nintendo's face. Nintendo needed him.I really wish these multinational corporations would pick leaders based on how fun they look