Betta Lines
Member
I thought the whole point of Rockstar getting on board was to get hold of the facial capture tech?
The question is: is it worth it? If the facial tech is a costly thing, then I doubt they would even consider it.Gamebaron said:Wouldn't or couldn't Rockstar buy the tech, since they own the IP?
DaBuddaDa said:There was a big thread a little while ago with David Cage of Heavy Rain infamy said that the face tech in LA Noire was a dead end, unsustainable and not the direction the industry should be headed in. Many jumped at his throat and it turned into a David Cage/Heavy Rain shitfest.
Lookie what we have here...
FixedStuBurns said:Anyone would think spending nearly a decade to make nearly anything was bad.
Aren't they also owned and fully funded by Sony?AgentChris said:Team ICO is like 40 people tops.
Gamebaron said:Wouldn't or couldn't Rockstar buy the tech, since they own the IP?
The game sold crazy amounts, and are you really trying to make this a PC vs console thing or am I misunderstanding your post?Utako said:They made a blockbuster for this generation of consoles thar didn't involve shooting EVERYTHING, and promptly go out of business.
Sounds about right.
Fantastical said:The game sold crazy amounts, and are you really trying to make this a PC vs console thing or am I misunderstanding your post?
TheLegendOfMart said:Karmas a bitch aint it.
Fantastical said:The game sold crazy amounts, and are you really trying to make this a PC vs console thing or am I misunderstanding your post?
I hardly see how the two are related... I mean I don't understand how the game not being a shooter has to do with the studio shutting down. They made way worse decisions than not making this game a shooter.Square Triangle said:He is referring to the fact that a studio was successful saleswise in a game that wasn't a bro-shooter and then this happens. What is so confusing about that?
Fantastical said:I hardly see how the two are related... I mean I don't understand how the game not being a shooter has to do with the studio shutting down. They made way worse decisions than not making this game a shooter.
I'm legitimately confused, not trying to be an asshole.Square Triangle said:Jesusfuckingchrist. I'm walking away.
I think this has way more to do with management than it has to do with their tech.DaBuddaDa said:There was a big thread a little while ago with David Cage of Heavy Rain infamy said that the face tech in LA Noire was a dead end, unsustainable and not the direction the industry should be headed in. Many jumped at his throat and it turned into a David Cage/Heavy Rain shitfest.
Lookie what we have here...
keywords are 'blockbuster' and 'out of business'Fantastical said:I hardly see how the two are related... I mean I don't understand how the game not being a shooter has to do with the studio shutting down. They made way worse decisions than not making this game a shooter.
Yeah. The only people that deserve to be jobless are the management. More specifically McNamara.SpaceDrake said:The management may have been shit, but the employees don't deserve to be jobless in this market. I can only hope some of them find gainful employment at the new company.
infinityBCRT said:I think this has way more to do with management than it has to do with their tech.
JJD said:What does this have to do with the topic at hand? With all respect David Cage's still insufferable and LA Noire is 10 times the game Heavy Rain wished to be regardless of McNamara douchiness and Team Bondi's handling of their employes.
spindoctor said:I don't get it. Where did all the money they had to have made from L.A. Noire go?
xbhaskarx said:So one game in seven years, one million plus sales = bankruptcy.... how is Silicon Knights still around after Too Human bombed?
xbhaskarx said:So one game in seven years, one million plus sales = bankruptcy.... how is Silicon Knights still around after Too Human bombed?
Which points to problems in management and the super long dev cycle this game had... right? Not the type of game they made? I mean I thought the original post was pointing out that the type of game they made was the problem but maybe I'm wrong.L00P said:keywords are 'blockbuster' and 'out of business'
daegan said:This makes apparent that Brendan McNamara is among the industry's worst managers.
Wow that's pretty telling. Also that man has a lot of arm hair.homing said:nice body language at the start when McNamara asked about Rockstar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3z_-gFc6W4
True, this sucks :/RandomVince said:This generation is littered with the corpses of way too many studios.
XDFantastical said:Which points to problems in management and the super long dev cycle this game had... right? Not the type of game they made? I mean I thought the original post was pointing out that the type of game they made was the problem but maybe I'm wrong.
Alright, I was overthinking it then.L00P said:XD
He's mocking the fact that the developer made a million-selling game that is completely unique(i.e. not a shooter), yet they still went under. That's it lol
Square Triangle said:So in the end Sony gtfo before it was too late then huh.