Hero_of_the_Day
Member
Pretty sure there is an episode of myth busters that could have saved his life.
What book was it?
They're both over 18...Like, I refuse to believe there wasn't some shady shit going on.
They can't be this stupid.
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
WTF?
edit:
my god
They're up to ~300 now.They had ~150 subscribers to their channel.
i dont get it. even if you accept that youre only going to do 1 take, wouldnt you atleast test out the concept out to know that your 1 take will be successful
. Natural selection as far as I'm concerned.
That's some Darwin ass shit right here.
Throw the book at her.
I know plenty of dumbasses, people who surprise me by being capable of spelling their own nameTo everyone stating nobody can be this stupid:
They absolutely fucking can be. Get out of your bubble and meet people, they exist. These people are everywhere, you probably know some.
Assuming the police have evidence of the vlog (showing him playing along and acknowledging the gun, maybe even showing some resistance to the whole thing) and the time of the tweet doesn't conflict with the shooting, I don't think she should be held responsible. Sounds like she was coerced to do something she thought was stupid and the guilt of killing the father of her child is more than enough punishment.
this is why you shouldn't react to news and posters
even if you never shoot guns or never care for them like me.. to even think this is for a handgun is beyond reasoning. even FPS games and movies teach you this pretty easily
Just cause someone "sounds" like they know what they are talking about, more times than not they do not. Disregard everything he says and don't use books for any gun.
"Vlogging for Dummies"
What book was it?
Assuming the police have evidence of the vlog (showing him playing along and acknowledging the gun, maybe even showing some resistance to the whole thing) and the time of the tweet doesn't conflict with the shooting, I don't think she should be held responsible. Sounds like she was coerced to do something she thought was stupid and the guilt of killing the father of her child is more than enough punishment.
Ok, listen: no matter the country, the key to the law is
Ignorantia juris non excusat
If you can't tell you're gonna kill a person by firing a handcannon through a book at point blank range, it's your problem, you're a killer. This isn't like "let's throw a pair of scissors in the air whoops it stuck through the eye and it killed him", it's a goddamn cannon.
you mean all those movies where a cigarette case in the breast pocket saves someone's life lied to me?
why do i even carry a cigarette case then?
i don't even smoke.
If your wondering the fucking power of DE...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YRkgO02Uy5U
This is what it does to fucking watermelons...
In her defense, he allegedly showed her a book from another attempt where it had stopped the bullet. She seems to only be guilty of believing her boyfriend.