No, that's what's not true. Evidence of enforcement of that policy was not dismissed. What was dismissed was the complaint that there was a reduction of output quality or quantity with the existence of Steam and that policy. If there was no evidence of such enforcement the judge would not suggest that allegations are sufficient to plausibly allege unlawful conduct and to file a new complaint. The new complaint is exactly about enforcing that policy if you read the Bloomberg report.This claim specifically was dismissed, however:
Like i said, thats the specific claim they want to investigate. There is no specific clause on steam terms demanding price parity.