itxaka said:Those are US laws. What do they have to do with a spanish site? They are just used to basically steal a domain for a page in another country that they don't like no matter how legal it is on that country.
Not that I give a fuck, they registered another domain with a non-us registrar, problem solved. They accomplished a lot with that domain hijack (mainly more publicity lol)
Just about every poster in every sports thread would be accountless if that was the case.BakedPigeon said:http://myp2p.eu/ has not been seized yet, use it. Dont know if I can get banned for posting that link but fuck it, dont really care.
WinoMcCougarstein said:I'd gladly pay the NFL $100-200 a season if they let me stream every game in nice high quality HD. Until then, I will find streams online.
santouras said:hopefully they won't be able to seize myp2p.eu
Roche178 said:So the US government seems to think they own the internet, fantastic.
CrazedArabMan said:Yup, only place I need when I can't get the hockey game on cable.
Kuro Madoushi said:
Why didn't you share this the rest of hockey GAF aka Leafs are the best team ever (manics tm)?
minus_273 said:they do. they made it and still control the DNS system. If you dont like it, ask why your country didnt spend billions on developing the tech and stop using it.
ruby_onix said:Maybe it's just me, but I would think that pissing off European soccer/football fans and then leaving a note saying "America was here, bitches" would make America less safe, not more.
Yes as we have seen in the past, once you get a piracy website shutdown it discourages everyone on the Internet from ever trying it again.bengraven said:The only way to stop pirating.
And probably the only way to help the US build back it's economy.
trollface.gif
Well I think Europe may want its WWW back then.minus_273 said:they do. they made it and still control the DNS system. If you dont like it, ask why your country didnt spend billions on developing the tech and stop using it.
ElectricBlue187 said:Yes as we have seen in the past, once you get a piracy website shutdown it discourages everyone on the Internet from ever trying it again.
Dead Man said:Well I think Europe may want its WWW back then.
My point was that the current incarnation of the internet is not a US invention, it is a combination of technologies invented in a few places. To say that becuase the US has the most economic power it de facto owns the internet is pathetic, as is the claim that it owns the internet becuase it invented it. But hey, you carry on with your national pride!minus_273 said:the DNS root name servers are mostly in the US and they are under the control of ICANN which is controlled by the commerce department of the federal government of the US. So if you are using the DNS you are likely using something provided and run by the federal government.
What part of the HTTP protocol is a service controlled by "Europe government"
to rephrase my post, if you are going to use a federal highway, you follow the rules. if you dont like the rules make your own highway.
minus_273 said:the DNS root name servers are mostly in the US and they are under the control of ICANN which is controlled by the commerce department of the federal government of the US. So if you are using the DNS you are likely using something provided and run by the federal government.
What part of the HTTP protocol is a service controlled by "Europe government"
to rephrase my post, if you are going to use a federal highway, you follow the rules. if you dont like the rules make your own highway.
Xavien said:Up until recently the US hasn't actually done anything like this to warrant development of another system, I'm sure after a while the EU will setup a similar system to the US to avoid dependence, just like the GPS system.
US should leave DNS's and registrars alone, otherwise they may find they have very little power over the Internet further down the road.
minus_273 said:they do. they made it and still control the DNS system. If you dont like it, ask why your country didnt spend billions on developing the tech and stop using it.
Older servers had their own name before the policy of using similar names was established.
The choice of 13 nameservers was made because of limitations in the original DNS specification, which specifies a maximum packet size of 512 bytes when using the User Datagram Protocol (UDP).[10] The addition of IPv6 addresses for the root nameservers requires more than 512 bytes, which is facilitated by the EDNS0 extension to the DNS standard.[11] While only 13 names are used for the root nameservers, there are many more physical servers; A, C, F, I, J, K, L and M servers now exist in multiple locations on different continents, using anycast address announcements to provide decentralized service. As a result most of the physical root servers are now outside the United States, allowing for high performance worldwide.
DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee is an ICANN committee. However, the root zone is controlled by the United States Department of Commerce who must approve all changes to the root zone file requested by ICANN. ICANN's bylaws[12] assign authority over the operation of the root nameservers of the Domain Name System to the DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee.
Lambtron said:Well I am glad that The Department of Homeland Security is diligently keeping the homeland safe today. I, for one, will be able to sleep soundly knowing that people will not be watching illegal streams of sporting events.
Plaguefox said:Awesome, this is what I pay homeland security for!
jamesinclair said:Fuck you Obama. We're paying homeland security how much so that people in france cannot watch a spanish soccer game?
WinoMcCougarstein said:I'd gladly pay the NFL $100-200 a season if they let me stream every game in nice high quality HD. Until then, I will find streams online.